Refusing participation: hesitations about designing responsible patient engagement with artificial intelligence in healthcare

References

• Abma, Tineke A. 2019. “Dialogue and Deliberation: New Approaches to Including Patients in Setting Health and Healthcare Research Agendas.” Action Research 17 (4): 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750318757850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Academy of Medical Sciences. 2019. Artificial Intelligence and Health. Summary Report of a Roundtable Held on 16 January 2019. London: Academy of Medical Sciences. https://acmedsci.ac.uk/file-download/77652269.
   Google Scholar
• Aggarwal, Ravi, Soma Farag, Guy Martin, Hutan Ashrafian, and Ara Darzi. 2021. “Patient Perceptions on Data Sharing and Applying Artificial Intelligence to Health Care Data: Cross-sectional Survey.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 23 (8): e26162. https://doi.org/10.2196/26162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “AI, Algorithmic and Automation Incidents and Controversies Repository.” 2022. AI, Algorithmic and Automation Incidents and Controversies. https://www.aiaaic.org/.
   Google Scholar
• AI Index Steering Committee, Maslej, Nestor, Loredana Fattorini, Erik Brynjolfsson, John Etchemendy, Katrina Ligett, Terah Lyons, et al. 2023. The AI Index 2023. Stanford: Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University. https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/HAI_AI-Index-Report_2023.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, Claudia, and Tobias Blanke. 2022. Algorithmic Reason: The New Government of Self and Other. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, Claudia, and Mercedes Bunz. 2022. “Dismantling the Apparatus of Domination?: Left Critiques of AI.” Radical Philosophy 212:10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ayobi, Amid, Jacob Hughes, Christopher J Duckworth, Jakub J Dylag, Sam James, Paul Marshall, Matthew Guy, et al. 2023. “Computational Notebooks as Co-design Tools: Engaging Young Adults Living with Diabetes, Family Carers, and Clinicians with Machine Learning Models.” In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ‘23, 1–20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581424.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, Rebecca, Hannah Bradwell, Katie Edwards, Sebastian Stevens, Samantha Prime, John Tredinnick-Rowe, Miles Sibley, and Arunangsu Chatterjee. 2022. “Meaningful Patient and Public Involvement in Digital Health Innovation, Implementation and Evaluation: A Systematic Review.” Health Expectations 25:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, Andrew S., Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, Emma Frow, Matthew Kearnes, Kate Bulpin, Pablo Schyfter, Adrian Mackenzie, and Paul Martin. 2016. “Five Rules of Thumb for Post-ELSI Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1177867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabas, Chelsea. 2022. Refusal in Data Ethics: Re-imagining the Code Beneath the Code of Computation in the Carceral State. SSRN Scholarly Paper. Rochester, NY. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094977.
   Google Scholar
• Beier, Katharina, Mark Schweda, and Silke Schicktanz. 2019. “Taking Patient Involvement Seriously: A Critical Ethical Analysis of Participatory Approaches in Data-Intensive Medical Research.” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 19 (1): 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0799-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Ruha. 2016. “Informed Refusal: Toward a Justice-Based Bioethics.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41 (6): 967–990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916656059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, Peter. 2019. “Public Participation in Health and Social Care: Exploring the Co-Production of Knowledge.” Frontiers in Sociology 3. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389fsoc.2018.00041.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, Wiebe. 2003. “The Need for Public Intellectuals: A Space for STS.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 28 (4): 443–450.
   Google Scholar
• Birhane, Abeba. 2021. “Algorithmic Injustice: A Relational Ethics Approach.” Patterns 2 (2): 100205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bogner, Alexander. 2012. “The Paradox of Participation Experiments.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 37 (5): 506–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243911430398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Lundy, Anna Wentz, Reuben Baker, Ellen Richardson, and Jennifer Tsai. 2021. “Racialized Algorithms for Kidney Function: Erasing Social Experience.” Social Science & Medicine 268 (January): 113548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113548.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castro, Eva Marie, Tine Van Regenmortel, Kris Vanhaecht, Walter Sermeus, and Ann Van Hecke. 2016. “Patient Empowerment, Patient Participation and Patient-centeredness in Hospital Care: A Concept Analysis Based on a Literature Review.” Patient Education and Counseling 99 (12): 1923–1939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason, and Matthew Kearnes. 2016. Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason, and Matthew Kearnes. 2020. “Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (3): 347–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919850885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cifor, M., P. Garcia, T. L. Cowan, J. Rault, T. Sutherland, A. Chan, J. Rode, A. L. Hoffmann, N. Salehi, and Lisa Nakamura. 2019. “Feminist Data Manifest-No.” https://www.manifestno.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Coad, Alex, Paul Nightingale, Jack Stilgoe, and Antonio Vezzani. 2021. “Editorial: The Dark Side of Innovation.” Industry and Innovation 28 (1): 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1818555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, Shannon N., and Emily York. 2020. “Public Engagement in Contested Political Contexts: Reflections on the Role of Recursive Reflexivity in Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (sup1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1848335.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, Hannah, Charlotte Kühlbrandt, and Hana Riazuddin. 2022. “Reordering the Machinery of Participation with Young People.” Sociology of Health & Illness 44 (S1): 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13426.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Del Savio, Lorenzo, Alena Buyx, and Barbara Prainsack. 2016. Opening the Black Box of Participation in Medicine and Healthcare. Vienna: Institute of Technology Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, Ana, Kamilla Lein Kjølberg, and Fern Wickson. 2011. “Public Engagement Coming of Age: From Theory to Practice in STS Encounters with Nanotechnology.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (6): 826–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510363054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, Catherine, and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dihal, Kanta, and Tania. Duarte. 2023. Better Images of AI: A Guide for Users and Creators. Cambridge and London: The Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence and We and AI.
   Google Scholar
• Donia, Joseph, and James A. Shaw. 2021. “Co-design and Ethical Artificial Intelligence for Health: An Agenda for Critical Research and Practice.” Big Data & Society 8 (2): 20539517211065250. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211065248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, Gary Lee, and Teun Zuiderent-Jerak. 2016. “Making and Doing: Engagement and Reflexive Learning in STS.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 223–251. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drogt, Jojanneke, Megan Milota, Shoko Vos, Annelien Bredenoord, and Karin. Jongsma. 2022. “Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Pathology: A Qualitative Interview Study of Users’ Experiences and Expectations.” Modern Pathology 35 (11): 1540–1550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-022-01123-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Steven. 2007. “Patient Groups and Health Movements.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 499–539. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, Virginia. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Patients Forum. 2020. “European Patients Forum’s Response & Accompanying Statement. Public Consultation on the White Paper on Artificial Intelligence.” https://www.eu-patient.eu/globalassets/documents/1.-ai-white-paper_consultation-response_epf_statement-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Patients Forum. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare from a Patient’s Perspective.” https://www.eu-patient.eu/globalassets/documents/1.-ai-white-paper_consultation-response_epf_statement-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, and Maximilian Fochler. 2008. “The Bottom-up Meanings of the Concept of Public Participation in Science and Technology.” Science and Public Policy 35 (7): 489–499. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X329086.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, Amelia, Barbara Prainsack, and Alena Buyx. 2019. “Meeting the Needs of Underserved Populations: Setting the Agenda for More Inclusive Citizen Science of Medicine.” Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (9): 617–622. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, Sebastian J., Andrea Blankenheim, Alina Wahl, Petra Hetfeld, Oliver Maassen, Saskia Deffge, Julian Kunze, et al. 2022. “Attitudes and Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Cross-sectional Survey among Patients.” Digital Health 8 (August): 20552076221116772. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221116772.
   Google Scholar
• Ganesh, Maya Indira, and Emanuel Moss. 2022. “Resistance and Refusal to Algorithmic Harms: Varieties of ‘Knowledge Projects’.” Media International Australia 183 (1): 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X221076288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, Patricia, Tonia Sutherland, Niloufar Salehi, Marika Cifor, and Anubha Singh. 2022. “No! Re-imagining Data Practices Through the Lens of Critical Refusal.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6 (CSCW2): 315:1–315:20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3557997.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, Colin. 2018. “Testing the 'Terminator Syndrome': Sentiment of AI News Coverage and Perceptions of AI Risk.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3310907.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• High-Level Expert Group on AI. 2019. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. European Commission. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeyer, Klaus, and Henriette Langstrup. 2021. “Datafying the Patient Voice: The Making of Pervasive Infrastructures as Processes of Promise, Ruination, and Repair.” In Healthcare Activism: Markets, Morals, and the Collective Good, edited by Susi Geiger. 0xford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198865223.003.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Anna Lauren. 2021. “Even When You Are a Solution You Are a Problem: An Uncomfortable Reflection on Feminist Data Ethics.” Global Perspectives 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.1525/gp.2021.21335.
   Google Scholar
• Hollin, Gregory, and Ros Williams. 2022. “Complicity: Methodologies of Power, Politics and the Ethics of Knowledge Production.” Sociology of Health & Illness 44 (S1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irwin, Alan, Torben Elgaard Jensen, and Kevin E Jones. 2013. “The Good, the Bad and the Perfect: Criticizing Engagement Practice.” Social Studies of Science 43 (1): 118–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712462461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, Christian, Donato Ricci, Noortje Marres, Michael Castelle, Jonathan Roberge, and Fenwick McKelvey. 2023. Shifting AI Controversies. Statement and Call for Contributions to the Final Conference of the International Project “Shaping AI”. https://shapingai.org.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenbach, Christian, and Jascha Bareis. 2022. “Talking AI into Being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and Their Performative Politics.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 47 (5): 855–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211030007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H. 2018. “Living with Data: Aligning Data Studies and Data Activism Through a Focus on Everyday Experiences of Datafication.” Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 2018 (1): 18–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, Carly. 2020. “The Term ‘Ethical AI’ is Finally Starting to Mean Something.” VentureBeat (blog), August 23, 2020. https://venturebeat.com/2020/08/23/the-term-ethical-ai-is-finally-starting-to-mean-something/.
   Google Scholar
• Klawiter, Maren. 2008. The Biopolitics of Breast Cancer: Changing Cultures of Disease and Activism. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Komporozos-Athanasiou, Aris, Nina Fudge, Mary Adams, and Christopher McKevitt. 2016. “Citizen Participation as Political Ritual: Towards a Sociological Theorizing of ‘Health Citizenship.’” Sociology, August. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516664683.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1996. Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtiniemi, Tuukka, and Minna Ruckenstein. 2019. “The Social Imaginaries of Data Activism.” Big Data & Society 6 (1): 2053951718821146. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718821146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macq, Hadrien, Céline Parotte, and Pierre Delvenne. 2021. “Exploring Frictions of Participatory Innovation between Sites and Scales.” Science as Culture 30 (2): 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2021.1910230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macq, Hadrien, Élise Tancoigne, and Bruno J. Strasser. 2020. “From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019).” Minerva 58 (4): 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09405-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden, Mary, and Ewen Speed. 2017. “Beware Zombies and Unicorns: Toward Critical Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research in a Neoliberal Context.” Frontiers in Sociology 2. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389fsoc.2017.00007.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, James, Laura Watts, and Britt Ross Winthereik. 2021. Energy Worlds. Manchester: Mattering Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marris, Claire, and Jane Calvert. 2020. “Science and Technology Studies in Policy: The UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (1): 34–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919828107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Paul A. 2022. “The Challenge of Institutionalised Complicity: Researching the Pharmaceutical Industry in the Era of Impact and Engagement.” Sociology of Health & Illness 44 (S1): 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13536.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCradden, Melissa D., Ami Baba, Ashirbani Saha, Sidra Ahmad, Kanwar Boparai, Pantea Fadaiefard, and Michael D. Cusimano. 2020. “Ethical Concerns around Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Research from the Perspective of Patients with Meningioma, Caregivers and Health Care Providers: A Qualitative Study.” Canadian Medical Association Open Access Journal 8 (1): E90–E95. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20190151.
   Google Scholar
• McCradden, Melissa D., Tasmie Sarker, and P. Alison Paprica. 2020. “Conditionally Positive: A Qualitative Study of Public Perceptions about Using Health Data for Artificial Intelligence Research.” MedRxiv (May): 2020.04.25.20079814. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.25.20079814.
   Google Scholar
• McGranahan, Carole. 2016. “Theorizing Refusal: An Introduction.” Cultural Anthropology 31 (3): 319–325. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.3.01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuillan, Dan. 2022. Resisting AI: An Anti-Fascist Approach to Artificial Intelligence. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Fiona Alice, Sarah J. Patton, Mark Dobrow, and Whitney Berta. 2018. “Public Involvement in Health Research Systems: A Governance Framework.” Health Research Policy and Systems 16 (1): 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0352-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen, Karen Dam, and Marianne Boenink. 2020. “Subtle Voices, Distant Futures: A Critical Look at Conditions for Patient Involvement in Alzheimer’s Biomarker Research and beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (2): 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1676687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Karen Dam, and Henriette Langstrup. 2018. “Tactics of Material Participation: How Patients Shape their Engagement through e-Health.” Social Studies of Science 48 (2): 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718769156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermeyer, Ziad, Brian Powers, Christine Vogeli, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019. “Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm Used to Manage the Health of Populations.” Science 366 (6464): 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Our Data Bodies.” 2018. Our Data Bodies. https://www.odbproject.org.
   Google Scholar
• Panofsky, Aaron. 2011. “Generating Sociability to Drive Science: Patient Advocacy Organizations and Genetics Research.” Social Studies of Science 41 (1): 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710385852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierre, Jennifer, Roderic Crooks, Morgan Currie, Britt Paris, and Irene Pasquetto. 2021. “Getting Ourselves Together: Data-centered Participatory Design Research & Epistemic Burden.” In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ‘21, 1–11. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445103.
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack, Barbara. 2017. Personalized Medicine: Empowered Patients in the 21st Century? 1st ed. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Jordan P., Cambray Smith, Susan Curtis, Sara Watson, Xuan Zhu, Barbara Barry, and Richard R. Sharp. 2021. “Patient Apprehensions about the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.” Npj Digital Medicine 4 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-00373-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, David G. 2022. Voices in the Code: A Story about People, Their Values, and the Algorithm They Made. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Jill, Nina Fudge, and Trish Greenhalgh. 2020. “The Impact of Public Involvement in Health Research: What are We Measuring? Why are We Measuring it? Should We Stop Measuring it?” Research Involvement and Engagement 6 (1): 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00239-w.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saba, Mariella, Tamika Lewis, Tawana Petty, Seeta Peña Gangadharan, and Virginia Eubanks. 2017. “From Paranoia to Power. Our Data Bodies Project 2016 Report.” Our Data Bodies. https://www.odbproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/ODB-Community-Report-7-24.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Seyyed-Kalantari, Laleh, Haoran Zhang, Matthew B. A. McDermott, Irene Y. Chen, and Marzyeh Ghassemi. 2021. “Underdiagnosis Bias of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Applied to Chest Radiographs in Under-served Patient Populations.” Nature Medicine 27 (12): 2176–2182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01595-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, James, and Sharifah Sekalala. 2023. “Health Data Justice: Building New Norms for Health Data Governance.” Npj Digital Medicine 6 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00734-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoop-Worrall, Stephanie J. W., Katherine Cresswell, Imogen Bolger, Beth Dillon, Kimme L. Hyrich, and Nophar Geifman. 2021. “Nothing about Us without Us: Involving Patient Collaborators for Machine Learning Applications in Rheumatology.” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 80 (12): 1505–1510. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siffels, Lotje E., Tamar Sharon, and Andrew S. Hoffman. 2021. “The Participatory Turn in Health and Medicine: The Rise of the Civic and the Need to ‘Give Back’ in Data-intensive Medical Research.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00684-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson, Audra. 2007. “On Ethnographic Refusal: Indigeneity, ‘Voice’ and Colonial Citizenship.” Junctures: The Journal for Thematic Dialogue 9. https://junctures.org/junctures/index.php/junctures/article/view/66.
   Google Scholar
• Stawarz, Katarzyna, Dmitri Katz, Amid Ayobi, Paul Marshall, Taku Yamagata, Raul Santos-Rodriguez, Aisling Peter Flach, and Aisling Ann O’Kane. 2023. “Co-designing Opportunities for Human-centred Machine Learning in Supporting Type 1 Diabetes Decision-making.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 173 (May): 103003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103003.
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, Eve, and K. Wayne Yang. 2014. “Unbecoming Claims: Pedagogies of Refusal in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6): 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Vertrouwen in de GGZ.” 2023. https://vertrouwenindeggz.nl/over-vertrouwen-in-de-ggz.
   Google Scholar
• Vezyridis, Paraskevas, and Stephen Timmons. 2019. “Resisting Big Data Exploitations in Public Healthcare: Free Riding or Distributive Justice?” Sociology of Health & Illness 41 (8): 1585–1599. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, Jan-Peter, and Nina Amelung. 2016. “Innovating Public Participation Methods. Technoscientization and Reflexive Engagement.” Social Studies of Science 46 (5): 749–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716641350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajcman, Judy. 2004. TechnoFeminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Wehling, Peter. 2011. “The ‘Technoscientization’ of Medicine and its Limits: Technoscientific Identities, Biosocialities, and Rare Disease Patient Organizations.” Poiesis & Praxis 8 (2–3): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-011-0100-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Welsh, Ian, and Brian Wynne. 2013. “Science, Scientism and Imaginaries of Publics in the UK: Passive Objects, Incipient Threats.” Science as Culture 22 (4): 540–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2013.764072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Christopher. 2022. “Public Engagement and AI: A Values Analysis of National Strategies.” Government Information Quarterly 39 (1): 101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, Peter, and Annamaria Carusi. 2022. “Professional Expectations and Patient Expectations Concerning the Development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for the Early Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension (PH).” Journal of Responsible Technology 12 (December): 100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100052.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, Steve, Else Vogel, David Moats, and Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, eds. 2021. The Imposter as Social Theory: Thinking with Gatecrashers, Cheats and Charlatans. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. 2021. Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health. WHO Guidance. Geneva: World Health Organisation. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240029200.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Chenxi, Huiqiong Xu, Dingxi Bai, Xinyu Chen, Jing Gao, and Xiaolian Jiang. 2023. “Public Perceptions on the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Qualitative Meta-synthesis.” BMJ Open 13 (1): e066322. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Albert T, Dominic Amara, Abhishek Bhattacharya, and Maria L Wei. 2021. “Patient and General Public Attitudes towards Clinical Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.” The Lancet Digital Health 3 (9): e599–e611. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00132-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun. 2015. Situated Intervention: Sociological Experiments in Health Care. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar