The need for more inclusive deliberation on ethics and governance in agricultural and food biotechnology

References

• Balmer, A., J. Calvert, C. Marris, S. Molyneux-Hodgson, E. Frow, M. Kearnes, K. Bulpin, P. Schyfter, A. Mackenzie, and P. Martin. 2016. “Five Rules of Thumb for Post-ELSI Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1177867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biden, J. 2022. “Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy.” White House Briefing (September 12, 2022). https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/09/12/executive-order-on-advancing-biotechnology-and-biomanufacturing-innovation-for-a-sustainable-safe-and-secure-american-bioeconomy/.
   Google Scholar
• Bioteknologirådet. 2018. A Forward-looking Regulatory Framework for GMO. Stortingsgata 10, 0161 Oslo, Norge. Accessed February 17, 2022. www.bion.no.
   Google Scholar
• Bronson, K. 2019. “Looking through a Responsible Innovation Lens at Uneven Engagements with Digital Farming.” NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 90: 100294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Food Safety. 2022. “Court Rules ‘QR’ Codes Alone Unlawful for GMO Food Labeling.” https://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/press-releases/6714/court-rules-qr-codes-alone-unlawful-for-gmo-food-labeling.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, C., and D. J. Peters. 2022. “Who Trusts in Gene-edited Foods? Analysis of a Representative Survey Study Predicting Willingness to Eat-and Purposeful Avoidance of Gene Edited Foods in the United States.” Frontiers in Food Science and Technology 2: 858277.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. 2021. “Lawsuit Challenges Trump-era Overhaul of USDA’s Biotech Regulation.” AgriPulse. Accessed January 1, 2022. https://www.agri-pulse.com/articles/16221-lawsuit-challenges-trump-rule-on-biotech-plants.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. 2017. “Study of Electronic or Digital Link Disclosure A Third-Party Evaluation of Challenges Impacting Access to Bioengineered Food Disclosure.” https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/USDADeloitteStudyofElectronicorDigitalDisclosure20170801.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D., G. Jaffe, M. Doane, A. Glaser, T. Gremillion, and M. Ho. 2021. “Responsible Governance of Gene Editing in Agriculture and the Environment.” Nature Biotechnology 39: 1055–1057. Accessed September 10, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-021-01023-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, F., R. Amasino, D. Brossard, C. Buell, R. Dixon, J. Falck-Zepeda, M. Gallo, et al. 2022. “Toward Product-based Regulation of Crops: Current Process-based Approaches to Regulation are no Longer Fit for Purpose.” Science 377 (6610): 1051–1053. Accessed September 1, 2022. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126science.abo3034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gugganig, M., K. Burch, J. Guthman, and K. Bronson. 2023. “Contested Agri-food Futures: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Agriculture and Human Values 40 (3): 787–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe, G., and J. Kuzma. 2021. “New Bioengineered (aka GM) Food Disclosure Law: Useful Information or Consumer Confusion?” Food and Drug Law Institute. Accessed December 3, 2021. https://www.fdli.org/2021/04/new-bioengineered-aka-gm-food-disclosure-law-useful-information-or-consumer-confusion/.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzma, J., and K. Greiger. 2020. “Community-led Governance for Gene-edited Crops.” Science 370 (6510): 916–918. Accessed October 2, 2021. https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126science.abd1512.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyson, T. 2004. Civic Agriculture: Reconnecting Farm, Food, and Community. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montenegro, M. 2020. “How a New Biotech Rule Will Foster Distrust with the Public and Impede Progress in Science.” The Conversation. Accessed November 20, 2021. https://theconversation.com/how-a-new-biotech-rule-will-foster-distrust-with-the-public-and-impede-progress-in-science-139547.
   Google Scholar
• National Academies News Release. 2022. “NAS and NAM Presidents, Other Experts Urge Biden Administration to Reinstate Presidential Bioethics Commission.” National Academies. Accessed April 5, 2022. https://www.nationalacademies.org/news/2022/03/nas-and-nam-presidents-other-experts-urge-biden-administration-to-reinstate-presidential-bioethics-commission.
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 1999. Genetically Modified Crops: Ethical and Social Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Accessed January 5, 2022. www.nuffieldbioethics.org.
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2016. Genome Editing: An Ethical Review. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Accessed January 5, 2022. www.nuffieldbioethics.org.
   Google Scholar
• Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2021. Genome Editing and Farmed Animal Breeding: Social and Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Accessed January 5, 2022. www.nuffieldbioethics.org.
   Google Scholar
• Pandya, R., Perumal Gandhi, S. Ji, D. Beauchamp, and L. Hom. 2016. “Compositions Comprising a Casein and Methods of Producing the Same.” Perfect Day, Inc. International Patent, #PCT/US2015/046428- WO 2016/029193. 21/08/2015 filed. 25/02/2016 published.
   Google Scholar
• Panel of Eminent Experts on Ethics and Food and Agriculture. 2007. “FAO Governing and Statutory Bodies Website.” Accessed October 12, 2023. https://www.fao.org/unfao/govbodies/gsb-subject-matter/statutory-bodies-details/en/c/432/?no_cache=1#:~:text=The%20Panel%20of%20Eminent%20Experts,environment%20of%20rapid%20global%20change.
   Google Scholar
• Smolka, M., and S. Böschen. 2023. “Responsible Innovation Ecosystem Governance: Socio-technical Integration Research for Systems-level Capacity Building.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 10: 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2207937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C. 2022. “Responsible Innovation Ecosystems: Ethical Implications of the Application of the Ecosystem Concept to Artificial Intelligence.” International Journal of Information Management 62: 102441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. 2023. “Ag-tech, Agroecology, and the Politics of Alternative Farming Futures: The Challenges of Bringing Together Diverse Agricultural Epistemologies.” Agriculture and Human Values 40: 913–928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tigard, D., M. Braun, S. Breuer, K. Ritt, A. Fiske, S. McLennan, and A. Buyx. 2023. “Toward Best Practices in Embedded Ethics: Suggestions for Interdisciplinary Technology Development.” Robotics and Autonomous Systems 167: 104467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2023.104467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA. 2021. “About the SECURE Rule.” Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Accessed August 14, 2021. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/biotech-rule-revision/secure-rule/secure-about/340_2017_perdue_biotechreg.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. National Bioethics Advisory Commission / President's Council on Bioethics / Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. United States. 1998. “Web Archive.” Accessed November 8, 2021. https://www.loc.gov/item/lcwaN0016880/ Bioethics Archive. https://bioethicsarchive.georgetown.edu/pcsbi/history.html.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R., and J. Hankins. 2019. International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S., R. Charo, A. Capron, R. Dresser, H. Gayle, C. Grady, M. Hourdequin, and I. Kohane. 2022. Recommending a New Presidential Bioethics Commission. White Paper. Co-Chairs of the Bioethics Commission Working Group. Convened by the National Academy of Sciences leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. 2020. “The Early Years of Agricultural Biotechnology at the United States Department of Agriculture, 1986–1996.” Austin Journal of Nutritional Metabolism 7 (5): 1092.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, H., L. Landeweerd, and A. van Rooij. 2014. “Adapt or Perish? Assessing the Recent Shift in the European Research Funding Arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’.” Life Sciences, Society & Policy 10: 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar