Infrastructuring citizenry in Smart City Vienna: investigating participatory smartification between policy and practice

References

• Ahn, Byeongsun, and Elisabetta Mocca. 2022. “Unlocking the Door of the City Hall.” In Vienna. Still a Just City?, edited by Yuri Kazepov and Roland Verwiebe, 35–49. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, Kristin. 2015. “What is the Issue? The Transformative Capacity of Documents.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 16 (1): 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2015.1022194.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, Geoffrey C., Karen Baker, Florence Millerand, and David Ribes. 2010. “Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment.” In International Handbook of Internet Research, edited by Jeremy Hunsinger, Lisbeth Klastrup, and Matthew Allen, 97–117. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Kathrin, and Susanne Schultz. 2009. “‘ … a Certain Amount of Engineering Involved’: Constructing the Public in Participatory Governance Arrangements.” Public Understanding of Science 19 (4): 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509347814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardullo, Paolo, and Rob Kitchin. 2019. “Being a ‘Citizen’ in the Smart City: Up and Down the Scaffold of Smart Citizen Participation in Dublin, Ireland.” GeoJournal 84 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason, and Matthew Kearnes. 2019. “Remaking Participation in Science and Democracy.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (3): 347–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919850885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coletta, Claudio, Leighton Evans, Liam Heaphy, and Rob Kitchin. 2019. Creating Smart Cities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, Robert, Simon Joss, and Youri Dayot. 2018. “The Smart City and Its Publics: Insights from Across Six UK Cities.” Urban Research & Practice 11 (1): 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2017.1293150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, Ayona, and Nancy Odendaal. 2019. “Smart Cities and the Banality of Power.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (3): 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819841765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DAW2025. 2019. “DIGITAL AGENDA WIEN 2025 – Vienna to Become Capital of Digitalisation.” https://digitales.wien.gv.at/wp-content/uploads/sites/47/2020/04/PO19-00224-DigitaleAgendaWien_Ue-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• de la Bellacasa, Maria Puig. 2017. Matters of Care. Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Saille, Stevienna. 2015. “Dis-inviting the Unruly Public.” Science as Culture 24 (1): 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2014.986323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degelsegger, Alexander, and Helge Torgersen. 2011. “Participatory Paternalism: Citizens’ Conferences in Austrian Technology Governance.” Science and Public Policy 38 (5): 391–402. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X12924093660679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, Franziska, Alexander Wentland, and Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer. 2019. “Testing Future Societies? Developing a Framework for Test Beds and Living Labs as Instruments of Innovation Governance.” Research Policy 48 (9): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farías, Ignacio, and Claudia Mendes. 2018. “A Smart Equivocation. Co-Laboration and Subsidiarity in a Smart City Consortium.” In Inside Smart Cities: Place, Politics and Urban Innovation, edited by Andrew Karvonen, Federico Cugurullo, and Federico Caprotti, 182–196. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike. 2016. “The Temporal Choreographies of Participation: Thinking Innovation and Society from a Time-Sensitive Perspective.” In Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics, edited by Jason Chilvers and Matthew Kearnes, 178–198. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike. 2017. “‘Response-Able Practices’ or ‘New Bureaucracies of Virtue’: The Challenges of Making RRI Work in Academic Environments.” In Responsible Innovation 3: A European Agenda?, edited by Lotte Asveld, Rietje van Dam-Mieras, Tsjalling Swierstra, Saskia Lavrijssen, Kees Linse, and Jeroen van den Hoven, 49–68. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, Daniel Barben, Alan Irwin, Pierre-Benoît Joly, Arie Rip, Andy Stirling, and Tereza Stöckelová. 2013. Science in Society: Caring for our Futures in Turbulent Times, Policy Briefing 50. Strasbourg: ESF.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, and Maximilian Fochler. 2010. “Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and Describing Publics in Public Engagement.” Minerva 48 (3): 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9155-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, Maximilian Fochler, and Annina Müller. 2006. “Sozial robuste Wissenspolitik? Analyse partizipativ orientierter Interaktionen zwischen Wissenschaft, Politik und Öffentlichkeit im österreichischen Kontext.” In Technik- und Wissenschaftssoziologie in Österreich. Stand und Perspektiven, edited by Eva Buchinger, and Ulrike Felt, 103–130. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, Susanne Öchsner, Robin Rae, and Ekaterina Osipova. 2023. “Doing co-Creation: Power and Critique in the Development of a European Health Data Infrastructure.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2235931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaherty, Michael G. 2010. The Textures of Time. Agency and Temporal Experience. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, Jennifer, Helen Pritchard, and Benjamin Barratt. 2016. “Just Good Enough Data: Figuring Data Citizenships Through Air Pollution Sensing and Data Stories.” Big Data & Society 3 (2): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, Matthias. 2018. “Real-world Experiments as Generator of Sociotechnical Change.” In Energy as a Sociotechnical Problem. An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Control, Change, and Action in Energy Transitions, edited by Christian Büscher, Jens Schippl, and Patrick Sumpf, 125–138. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim, Michael. 2012. “Laboratizing and De-laboratizing the World: Changing Sociological Concepts for Places of Knowledge Production.” History of the Human Sciences 25 (1): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111422978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horst, Maja, and Alan Irwin. 2009. “Nations at Ease with Radical Knowledge: On Consensus, Consensusing and False Consensusness.” Social Studies of Science 40 (1): 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709341500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, Michael, and Simeon Hassemer. 2020. Formen und Praktiken der Partizipation im Kommunalen Wien. Wien: AK.
   Google Scholar
• Kelty, Christopher M. 2019. The Participant: A Century of Participation in Four Stories. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, Rob. 2019. “Reframing, Reimagining and Remaking Smart Cities.” In Creating Smart Cities, edited by Claudio Coletta, Leighton Evans, Liam Heaphy, and Rob Kitchin, 219–230. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klauser, Francisco, Till Paasche, and Ola Söderström. 2014. “Michel Foucault and the Smart City: Power Dynamics Inherent in Contemporary Governing Through Code.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32 (5): 869–885. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13041p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korn, Matthias, Wolfgang Reißmann, Tobias Röhl, and David Sittler. 2019. Infrastructuring Publics. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kornberger, Martin, Renate E. Meyer, Christof Brandtner, and Markus A. Höllerer. 2017. “When Bureaucracy Meets the Crowd: Studying ‘Open Government’ in the Vienna City Administration.” Organization Studies 38 (2): 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616655496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, John. 2011. “Collateral Realities.” In The Politics of Knowledge, edited by Fernando Dominguez Rubio and Patrick Baert, 156–178. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Caroline W., Michael McQuarrie, and Edward T. Walker. 2015. Democratizing Inequalities. Dilemmas of the New Public Participation. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemanski. 2019. Citizenship and Infrastructure. Practices and Identities of Citizens and the State. Charlotte. ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lerman, Jonas. 2013. “Big Data and Its Exclusions.” Stanford Law Review Online 66: 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Manual. 2012. “Praxisbuch Partizipation. Gemeinsam die Stadt entwickeln (Practice Manual Participation. Developing the City Together).” Magistrat der Stadt Wien, MA 18. https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/partizipation/praxisbuch.html.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje. 2007. “The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy.” Social Studies of Science 37 (5): 759–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706077367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje. 2015. “Why Map Issues? On Controversy Analysis as a Digital Method.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (5): 655–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915574602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin, Simon, Luque-Ayala Andrés, and McFarlane Calin. 2015. Smart Urbanism: Utopian Vision or False Dawn? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mora, Luca, Francesco Paolo Appio, Nicolai J. Foss, David Arellano-Gault, and Xiaoling Zhang. 2023. “Organizing for Smart City Development: Research at the Crossroads.” Introduction to the Special Issue. Organization Studies 44 (10): 1559–1575. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231197815.
   Google Scholar
• Mora, Luca, Mark Deakin, and Alasdair Reid. 2019. “Strategic Principles for Smart City Development: A Multiple Case Study Analysis of European Best Practices.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 142: 70–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov, Evgeny. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here. The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Persus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, René von Schomberg, and Phil Macnaghten. 2021. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, Mario, Alex Marsh, Richard Owen, Jesús Arturo Flores López, and Jessica Lillian De Alba Ulloa. 2023. “Exploring Citizen Participation in Smart City Development in Mexico City: An Institutional Logics Approach.” Organization Studies 44 (10): 1679–1701. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221094194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, Camaren, and Camille Meyer. 2023. “Organizing for the Smart African City: Leveraging the Urban Commons for Exerting the Right to the City.” Organization Studies 44 (10): 1725–1746. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221089609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCCW-FS. 2022. Smart Climate City Wien Framework Strategy. Vienna: Vienna Municipal Administration. https://smartcity.wien.gv.at/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2022/05/scwr_klima_2022_web-EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schuilenburg, Marc, and Brunilda Pali. 2021. “Smart City Imaginaries: Looking Beyond the Techno-Utopian Vision.” In The Algorithmic Society. Technology, Power, and Knowledge, edited by Marc Schuilenburg and Rik Peeters, 137–153. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• SCW-FS. 2014. Smart City Wien Framework Strategy. Vienna: Vienna City Administration. https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/studien/pdf/b008384a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• SCW-FS. 2019. Smart City Wien Framework Strategy 2019–2050. Vienna: Vienna’s Strategy for Sustainable Development. Vienna: Vienna City Administration. https://www.digital.wienbibliothek.at/urn/urn:nbn:at:AT-WBR-796682.
   Google Scholar
• Sepehr, Pouya, and Ulrike Felt. 2023. “Urban Imaginaries as Tacit Governing Devices: The Case of Smart City Vienna.” Science, Technology, & Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439231178597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar, Kalpana, David Hakken, and Carsten Østerlund. 2017. “Rethinking Documents.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 59–86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simone, AbdouMaliq. 2004. “People as Infrastructure: Intersecting Fragments in Johannesburg.” Public Culture 16 (3): 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-16-3-407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stage, Carsten, and Karen Ingerslev. 2015. “Participation as Assemblage.” Conjunctions 2 (2): 117–136. https://doi.org/10.7146/tjcp.v2i2.22923.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andy. 2008. “‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’. Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ST_D5.1.2. 2019. “Lighthouse Project Simmering NW – Glossy Summary Describing Main Activities and Achievements.” In SMARTER TOGETHER Deliverable D5.1.2, 1–44. Vienna: Magistrat der Stadt Wien.
   Google Scholar
• ST_D5.2.1. 2018. “Urban Living Lab – Activities in Vienna from 02/2016 Until 12/2018.” In SMARTER TOGETHER Deliverable D5.2.1, 1–192. Vienna: Magistrat der Stadt Wien.
   Google Scholar
• ST_Vienna. 2021. Urban Renewal with a Vision & Method – Vienna’s Final Report on its Share in the EU-Funded H2020 / SCC1 Project Smarter Together 2016-2021. City of Vienna. https://www.smartertogether.at/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/2021-11-12_Final-Report_Smarter-Together_Interaktiv.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, Jonas, and Timo von Wirth. 2021. “Experimentation or Projectification of Urban Change? A Critical Appraisal and Three Steps Forward.” Urban Transformations 3 (1): 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42854-021-00025-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Schomberg, René. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by Richard Owen, John Bessant, and Maggy Heintz, 51–74. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, Brian. 2007. “Public Participation in Science and Technology: Performing and Obscuring a Political–Conceptual Category Mistake.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 1: 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12280-007-9004-7.
   Google Scholar