Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts: examples from Bolivia and the Netherlands

References

• Adams, V., M. Murphy, and A. E. Clarke. 2009. “Anticipation: Technoscience, Life, Affect, Temporality.” Subjectivity 28: 246–265.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, N., and A. Loconto. 2021. “Serving Magically Perfect Fruit Globally: Local Nesting in Translating Multiple Standards.” Organization Studies 42 (2): 327–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., M. Besharov, and B. Mitzinneck. 2017. “On Hybrids and Hybrid Organizing: A Review and Road Map for Future Research.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Chapter 5), edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, and R. E. Meyer, 128–162. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneuil, C., P. B. Joly, and C. Marris. 2008. “Disentrenching Experiment: The Construction of GM Crop Field Trials as a Social Problem.” Science Technology, and Human Values 33 (2): 201–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, L. 2011. Standards: Recipes for Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1991. “Techno-Economic Networks and Irreversibility.” In A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, edited by J. Law, 132–163. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 2010. “Performativity, Misfires and Politics.” Journal of Cultural Economy 3 (2): 163–169.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 2016. “Revisiting Marketization: From Interface-Markets to Market-Agencements.” Consumption, Markets and Culture 19 (1): 17–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., C. Méadel, and V. Rabeharisoa. 2002. “The Economy of Qualities.” Economy and Society 31: 194–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Y. Milllo, and F. Muniesa. 2007. Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., and V. Rabeharisoa. 2003. “Research ‘in the Wild’ and the Shaping of New Social Identities.” Technology in Society 25: 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M., and A. Rip. 1992. “Humains, Non-Humains: Morale D'une Coexistence.” In La Terre Outragée. Les Experts Sont Formels, edited by J. Theys, and B. Kalaora, 140–156. Paris: éditions Autrement.
   Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E., and D. F. J. Campbell. 2009. “’Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem.” International Journal of Technology Management 46 (3-4): 201–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dacin, M. T., and P. A. Dacin. 2008. “Traditions as Institutionalized Practice: Implications for Deinstitutionalization.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin, 327–351. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daimer, S., H. Berghauser, and R. Lindner. 2023. “The Institutionalisation of a New Paradigm at Policy Level.” In Putting Responsible Research and Innovation Into Practice: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach (Chapter 3), edited by V. Blok, 35–56. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D., and M. Suchman. 2008. “Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Chapter 1), edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin, 49–77. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Delemarle, A., and P. Larédo. 2014. “Governing Radical Change Through the Emergence of a Governance Arrangement.” In The Governance of Socio-Technical Systems, edited by S. Borrás, and J. Edler, 159–186. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Flink, T., and D. Kaldewey. 2018. “The New Production of Legitimacy: Sti policy Discourses Beyond the Contract Metaphor.” Research Policy 47: 14–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griessler, E., R. Braun, M. Wicher, and M. Yorulmaz. 2023. “The Drama of Responsible Research and Innovation: The Ups and Downs of a Policy Concept.” In Putting Responsible Research and Innovation Into Practice: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach (Chapter 2), edited by V. Blok, 11–34. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gurzawska, A., M. Mäkinen, and P. Brey. 2017. “Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Practices in Industry: Providing the Right Incentives.” Sustainability 9 (10): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 1997. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inigo, E. A., P. Ritala, and L. Albareda. 2020. “Networking for Sustainability: Alliance Capabilities and Sustainability-Oriented Innovation.” Industrial Marketing Management 89: 550–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., R. Lindner, and S. Randles. 2016. “Conclusions: Making Responsibility an Institutionalised Ambition.” In Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation: Approach, Process, and Results of Res-AGorA Project (Chapter 12), edited by R. Lindner, S. Kuhlmann, S. Randles, B. Bedsted, G. Gorgoni, E. Greissler, A. Loconto, and N. Mejlgaard, 161–179. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, B., R. Suddaby, and B. Leca2009. Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, R., S. Kuhlmann, S. Randles, B. Bedsted, G. Gorgoni, E. Greissler, A. Loconto, and N. Mejlgaard. 2016. Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation: Approach, Process, and Results of Res-AgorA Project. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer ISI. http://res-agora.eu/news/navigating-towards-shared-responsibility/.
   Google Scholar
• Loconto, A. 2020. “Labelling Agroecology: A Study of Valuation Processes in Developing Countries.” In Labelling the Economy, edited by B. Laurent, and A. Mallard, 59–90. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Loconto, A., and M. Hatanaka. 2018. “Participatory Guarantee Systems: Alternative Ways of Defining, Measuring, and Assessing ‘Sustainability’.” Sociologia Ruralis 58 (2): 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loconto, A., A. S. Poisot, and P. Santacoloma. 2016. Innovative Markets for Sustainable Agriculture: How Innovations in Market Institutions Encourage Sustainable Agriculture in Developing Countries. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Macq, H., E. Tancoigne, and B. J. Strasser. 2020. “From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019).” Minerva 58 (3): 489–512. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007s11024-020-09405-6.
   Google Scholar
• Niederle, P., A. Loconto, S. Lemeilleur, and C. Dorville. 2020. “Social Movements and Institutional Change in Organic Food Markets: Evidence from Participatory Guarantee Systems in Brazil and France.” Journal of Rural Studies 78: 282–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocasio, W., P. H. Thornton, and M. Lounsbury. 2017. “Advances in the Institutional Logics Perspective.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (Chapter 19), edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, and R. E. Meyer, 489–512. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., and M. Pansera. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy (Chapter 2), edited by D. Simon, S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm, and W. Canzler, 26–48. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., M. Pansera, P. Macnaghten, and S. Randles. 2021a. “Organisational Institutionalisation of Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 50 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., R. von Schomberg, and P. Macnaghton. 2021b. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 217–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Randles, S. 2017. “Deepening Deep Institutionalisation: Elaborating a Concept and Developing a Typology to Analyse and Contrast the Institutionalisation of De Facto Responsible Research and Innovation (rri) and H2020 RRI in Research and Technology Organisations.” Deliverable 1.2 of the EU JERRI project. https://www.jerri-project.eu/jerriwAssets/docs/deliverables/wp-1/JERRI_Deliverable_D1_2_Deepening-Deep-Institutionalisation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Randles, S., B. Dorbeck-Jung, R. Lindner, and A. Rip. 2014. “Report of the Roundtable at S.NET Boston 2013: Where to Next for Responsible Innovation?” In Innovation and Responsibility: Engaging with New and Emerging Technologies, edited by C. Coenen, A. Dijkstra, C. Fautz, J. Guivant, K. Konrad, C. Milburn, and H. van Lente, 19–35. Berlin: AKA Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Randles, S., J. Edler, S. Gee, and C. Gough. 2016b. “Res-AGorA Case Studies: Drawing Transversal Lessons.” In Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation: Approach, Process, and Results of Res-AGorA Project (Chapter 7), edited by R. Lindner, S. Kuhlmann, S. Randles, B. Bedsted, G. Gorgoni, E. Greissler, A. Loconto, and N. Mejlgaard, 65–72. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Randles, S., P. Laredo, A. Loconto, B. Walhout, and R. Lindner. 2016a. “Framings and Frameworks: Six Grand Narratives of De-Facto rri.” In Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation: Approach, Process, and Results of Res-AgorA Project (Chapter 3), edited by R. Lindner, S. Kuhlmann, S. Randles, B. Bedsted, G. Gorgoni, E. Greissler, A. Loconto, and N. Mejlgaard, 31–36. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Randles, S., E. Tancoigne, and P.-B. Joly. 2022. “Two Tribes or More? The Historical Emergence of Discourse Coalitions of Responsible Research and Innovation (rri) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI).” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (2): 248–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridder, H.-G. 2017. “The Theory Contribution of Case Study Research Designs.” Business Research 10 (2): 281–305.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A. 2018. “The Past and Future of RRI.” In Futures of Science and Technology in Society, 115–133. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21754-9_7
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., T. J. Misa, and J. Schot. 1995. “Constructive Technology Assessment: A new Paradigm for Managing Technology in Society.” In Managing Technology in Society, edited by A. Rip, T. J. Misa, and J. Schot, 1–12. London and New York: Pinter Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J. 2001. “Towards new Forms of Participatory Technology Development.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 13 (1): 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shanley, D. 2021. “Imagining the Future Through Revisiting the Past: The Value of History in Thinking About R(R)I’s Possible Future(s).” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 234–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanley, D. 2022. Making Responsibility Matter: The Emergence of Responsible Innovation as an Intellectual Movement. PhD diss., Maastricht University, Netherlands. https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/en/publications/making-responsibility-matter-the-emergence-of-responsible-innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Sjögren, E., and C.-F. Helgesson. 2007. “The Q(u)ALYfying Hand: Health Economics and Medicine in the Shaping of Swedish Markets for Subsidized Pharmaceuticals.” The Sociological Review 55 (2_suppl): 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00737.x.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C. 2018. “RRI in Industry: On the Translation of the RRI Discourse Into the Private Domain.” The ORBIT Journal 1 (3): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B. C., M. Obach, E. Yaghmaei, V. Ikonen, K. Chatfield, and A. Brem. 2017. “The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice.” Sustainability 9 (6): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. “This is not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origins of a Concept.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (5): 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoolology 1907–1939.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., and J. Nauta. 2020. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Societal Engagement: A Case Study in a Research and Technology Organization.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 598–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2019. “How Deep Is Incumbency? A ‘Configuring Fields’ Approach to Redistributing and Reorienting Power in Socio-Material Change.” Energy Research & Social Science 58: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tancoigne, E., S. Randles, and P. B. Joly. 2016. “Evolution of a Concept: A Scientometric Analysis of RRI.” In Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation: Approach, Process, and Results of Res-AGorA Project (Chapter 4), edited by R. Lindner, S. Kuhlmann, S. Randles, B. Bedsted, G. Gorgoni, E. Greissler, A. Loconto, and N. Mejlgaard, 39–44. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P., W. Ocasio, and M. Lounsbury. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Poel, I., L. Asveld, S. Flipse, P. Klaassen, Z. Kwee, M. Maia, E. Mantovani, C. Nathan, A. Porcari, and E. Yaghmaei. 2020. “Learning to do Responsible Innovation in Industry: Six Lessons.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 697–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Molen, F., D. Ludwig, L. Consoli, and H. Zwart. 2019. “Global Challenges: Dutch Solutions? The Shape of Responsibility in Dutch Science and Technology Policies.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 340–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., and W. Van Saarloos. 2017. The Dutch Polder Model in Science and Research. Amsterdam: KNAW.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 51–74. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Walhout, B. 2023 “Making a Difference? Nanotechnology and the Quest for Responsible Innovation.” Doctoral Thesis, University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Walhout, B., S. Kuhlmann, G. Ordonez-Matamoros, and J. Edler. 2016. “Res-AGorA Concepts and Approaches.” In Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation: Approach, Process, and Results of Res-AGorA Project (Chapter 5), edited by R. Lindner, S. Kuhlmann, S. Randles, B. Bedsted, G. Gorgoni, E. Greissler, A. Loconto, and N. Mejlgaard, 47–53. Karlsruhe, Germany: Fraunhofer ISI.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., J. H. Wesseling, K. Frenken, M. P. Hekkert, and K. M. Weber. 2020 “A Framework for Mission-oriented Policy: Alternative Pathways Through the Problem-Solution Space.” Science and Public Policy 47 (4): 474–489.
   Google Scholar
• Wittrock, C., E.-M. Forsberg, A. Pols, P. Macnaghton, and D. Ludwig. 2021. Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation: Organisational and National Conditions. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1984. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar