Fostering responsible innovation with critical design methods

Bibliography

• “AI Principles.”. n.d. Future of Life Institute. Accessed August 12, 2020. https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/.
   Google Scholar
• Ansari, Ahmed. 2019. “Global Methods, Local Designs.” The Social Design Reader 417: 417–430.
   Google Scholar
• Antle, Alissa N., Yumiko Murai, Alexandra Kitson, Yves Candau, Zoe Minh-Tam Dao-Kroeker, and Azadeh Adibi. 2022. “‘There Are a LOT of Moral Issues with Biowearables’ … Teaching Design Ethics through a Critical Making Biowearable Workshop.” In Interaction Design and Children, 327–40. IDC ’22. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3501712.3529717.
   Google Scholar
• Arao, Brian, and Kristi Clemens. 2013. “From Safe Spaces to Brave Spaces,” 16.
   Google Scholar
• Artefact. 2018. “The Power of Predicting Impact: Introducing The Tarot Cards of Tech.” Artefact Stories (blog). May 10, 2018. https://medium.com/artefact-stories/the-power-of-predicting-impact-introducing-the-tarot-cards-of-tech-382adfc0b3a3.
   Google Scholar
• Bardone, Emanuele, Mirjam Burget, and Margus Pedaste. 2023. “The RRI Map: Making Sense of Responsible Research and Innovation in Science Education.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 10 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2198183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignull, Harry. 2011. “Dark Patterns: Deception vs. Honesty in UI Design.” A List Apart. November 1, 2011. https://alistapart.com/article/dark-patterns-deception-vs-honesty-in-ui-design/.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, David. 2013. “Opinion | The Philosophy of Data.” The New York Times, February 5, 2013, sec. Opinion. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/05/opinion/brooks-the-philosophy-of-data.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cech, Erin A. 2014. “Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?” Science, Technology, & Human Values 39 (1): 42–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivukula, Sai Shruthi, Ziqing Li, Anne Pivonka, Jingning Chen, and Colin Gray. 2021. “Surveying the Landscape of Ethics-Focused Design Methods.” In Semantic Scholar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Surveying-the-Landscape-of-Ethics-Focused-Design-Chivukula-Li/0aeabb12e5d02f1caed45af4b849ad866d90d437.
   Google Scholar
• Communitech, Deloitte, and Rideau Hall Foundation. 2018. “True North Tech For Good Declaration: The Canadian Tech Industry’s Living Document.” 2018. https://www.truenorthwaterloo.com/festival/true-north-tech-for-good-declaration-the-canadian-tech-industrys-living-document.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, Shannon N., Brad Tabas, and Emily York. 2022. “Futures Labs: A Space for Pedagogies of Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 0 (0): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2129179.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, José A., and William J. Frey. 2003. “An Effective Strategy for Integrating Ethics across the Curriculum in Engineering: An ABET 2000 Challenge.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4): 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0049-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Urquhart, Lachlan, and Peter J. Craigon. 2021. “The Moral-IT Deck: A Tool for Ethics by Design.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (1): 94–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1880112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, Anthony, and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, Maximilian Fochler, and Lisa Sigl. 2018. “IMAGINE RRI. A Card-Based Method for Reflecting on Responsibility in Life Science Research.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (2): 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1457402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, Batya, and David Hendry. 2012. “The Envisioning Cards: A Toolkit for Catalyzing Humanistic and Technical Imaginations.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1145–1148. CHI ‘12. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, Lea, Linda Paxling, and Eugenia Perez Vico. 2022. “Norm-Critical Innovation as a Way Forward for Responsible Innovation? Evidence from a Swedish Innovation Policy Program.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (3): 371–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2112817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garst, Jilde, Vincent Blok, Léon Jansen, and Onno S. W. F. Omta. 2017. “Responsibility versus Profit: The Motives of Food Firms for Healthy Product Innovation.” Sustainability 9 (12): 2286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Ben. 2021. “The Contestation of Tech Ethics: A Sociotechnical Approach to Technology Ethics in Practice.” Journal of Social Computing 2 (3): 209–225. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSC.2021.0018.
   Google Scholar
• van Grunsven, Janna, Taylor Stone, and Lavinia Marin. 2023. “Fostering Responsible Anticipation in Engineering Ethics Education: How a Multi-Disciplinary Enrichment of the Responsible Innovation Framework Can Help.” European Journal of Engineering Education 0 (0): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2218275.
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, Garnet. 2015. Conversations in Critical Making. CTheory Books. https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/handle/1828/7070.
   Google Scholar
• Hipp, Christian. 2007. “An Integrative Approach To Teaching Engineering Ethics.” In, 12.223.1–12.223.7. https://peer.asee.org/an-integrative-approach-to-teaching-engineering-ethics.
   Google Scholar
• Hoven, Jeroen van den. 2019. “Ethics and the UN Sustainable Development Goals: The Case for Comprehensive Engineering.” Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (6): 1789–1797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9862-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICTC-CTIC. 2021. “Responsible Innovation in Canada and Beyond.” Information and Communication Technology Council | Conseil Des Technologies de l’information et Des Communications (blog). January 20, 2021. https://medium.com/informationandcommunicationstechnologycouncil/responsible-innovation-in-canada-and-beyond-fed1c4256680.
   Google Scholar
• “IEEE 7000-2021 for Systems Design Ethical Concerns.”. n.d. Accessed February 12, 2023. https://engagestandards.ieee.org/ieee-7000-2021-for-systems-design-ethical-concerns.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kalichman, Michael. 2014. “Rescuing Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Education.” Accountability in Research 21 (1): 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2013.822271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, Sumit. 2022. “Review of Geothermal Energy as an Alternate Energy Source for Bitcoin Mining.” Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research 23 (1): 1–101.
   Google Scholar
• Lajoie, Jason. 2019. “Cultivating Ethos in the Tech Sector: A Discussion Paper on the Tech for Good Declaration.” Deloitte.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Jessica, and Shengli Fu. 2012. “A Systematic Approach to Engineering Ethics Education.” Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (2): 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9249-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr, Steve. 2022. “Facial Recognition Is Accurate, If You’re a White Guy.” In Ethics of Data and Analytics edited by Kirsten Martin, 143–147. Boca Raton: Auerbach Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lubberink, Rob. 2018. “Responsible Innovation in Industry : Learning from Social Entrepreneurship.” Phd, Wageningen: Wageningen University. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/532854.
   Google Scholar
• Malpass, Matt. 2013. “Between Wit and Reason: Defining Associative, Speculative, and Critical Design in Practice.” Design and Culture 5 (3): 333–356. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470813X13705953612200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malpass, Matthew. 2017. Critical Design in Context: History, Theory, and Practices. London: Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, Caroline. 2020. “Aura: Maton: A Wearable Olfactory Display for Immersive Scentscapes.” In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, 677–682. TEI ‘20. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3375290.
   Google Scholar
• Mellis, David A., and Leah Buechley. 2014. “Do-It-Yourself Cellphones: An Investigation into the Possibilities and Limits of High-Tech Diy.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1723–1732. CHI ‘14. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• O’Gorman, Marcel. 2015. Necromedia. Posthumanities 33. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Gorman, Marcel. 2018. “The Techlash Is Coming.” The Globe and Mail, October 28, 2018. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-the-techlash-is-coming/.
   Google Scholar
• O’Gorman, Marcel. 2020. Making Media Theory: Thinking Critically with Technology. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Orchard, Alexi, and David Radke. 2023. “An Analysis of Engineering Students’ Responses to an AI Ethics Scenario.” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, and Mario Pansera. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, 26–48. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://china.elgaronline.com/edcollchap/edcoll/9781784715939/9781784715939.00010.xml.
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, Ibo, Lotte Asveld, Steven Flipse, Pim Klaassen, Zenlin Kwee, Maria Maia, Elvio Mantovani, Christopher Nathan, Andrea Porcari, and Emad Yaghmaei. 2020. “Learning to Do Responsible Innovation in Industry: Six Lessons.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1791506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratto, Matt. 2011. “Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life.” The Information Society 27 (4): 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Resistor Case.”. 2021. Marcel O’Gorman (blog). December 17, 2021. https://marcelogorman.net/resistor-case-2/.
   Google Scholar
• “Responsible AI Principles from Microsoft.”. n.d. Microsoft. Accessed April 26, 2022. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/responsible-ai.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, Jennifer, Annie E. Hale, and Leanna M. Archambault. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Education: Integrating Values and Technology in the Classroom.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1510713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal, Anandita, Matthew T. Ballew, Sander van der Linden, Abel Gustafson, Matthew H. Goldberg, Edward W. Maibach, John E. Kotcher, Janet K. Swim, Seth A. Rosenthal, and Anthony Leiserowitz. 2021. “The Greta Thunberg Effect: Familiarity with Greta Thunberg Predicts Intentions to Engage in Climate Activism in the United States.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 51 (4): 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarfaty, Galit. 2015. “Shining Light on Global Supply Chains.” Harvard International Law Journal 56 (June): 419–463.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, Bernd Carsten, Simisola Akintoye, Lise Bitsch, Berit Bringedal, Damian Eke, Michele Farisco, Karin Grasenick, et al. 2021. “From Responsible Research and Innovation to Responsibility by Design.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1955613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland, Mary E., Behnam Taebi, Cathryn Carson, and William Kastenberg. 2014. “Teaching Global Perspectives: Engineering Ethics across International and Academic Borders.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.922337.
   Google Scholar
• Tharp, Bruce M., and Stephanie M. Tharp. 2019. Discursive Design: Critical, Speculative, and Alternative Things (Design Thinking, Design Theory). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• “The Mozilla Manifesto.”. n.d. Mozilla. Accessed March 19, 2020. https://www.mozilla.org/en-CA/about/manifesto/.
   Google Scholar
• Torkildsby, Anne Britt, and Kristof Vaes. 2019. “Addressing the Issue of Stigma-Free Design Through Critical Design Workshops.” DS 95: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE 2019), University of Strathclyde, Glasgow. 12th -13th September 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Truax, Conor, Alexi Orchard, and Heather A. Love. 2021. “The Influence of Curriculum and Internship Culture on Developing Ethical Technologists: A Case Study of the University of Waterloo.” In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS52410.2021.9629124.
   Google Scholar
• Vaes, Kristof. 2014. Product Stigmaticity: Understanding, Measuring and Managing Product-Related Stigma. Delft: Delft University of Technology – Antwerp University.
   Google Scholar
• Vitak, Jessica, and Michael Zimmer. 2020. “More Than Just Privacy: Using Contextual Integrity to Evaluate the Long-Term Risks from COVID-19 Surveillance Technologies.” Social Media + Society 6 (3): 2056305120948250. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, Emily K., Melissa Tully, and Leticia Bode. 2020. “Empowering Users to Respond to Misinformation about Covid-19.” Media and Communication 8 (2): 475–479. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczak, Kelley, Cynthia Finelli, Matthew Holsapple, Janel Sutkus, Trevor Harding, and Donald Carpenter. 2010. “Institutional Obstacles To Integrating Ethics Into The Curriculum And Strategies For Overcoming Them.” In, 15.749.1-15.749.14. https://peer.asee.org/institutional-obstacles-to-integrating-ethics-into-the-curriculum-and-strategies-for-overcoming-them.
   Google Scholar
• Whitten-Woodring, Jenifer, Mona S. Kleinberg, Ardeth Thawnghmung, and Myat The Thitsar. 2020. “Poison If You Don’t Know How to Use It: Facebook, Democracy, and Human Rights in Myanmar.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 25 (3): 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220919666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Yingqin, and Geoff Walsham. 2021. “Inequality of What? An Intersectional Approach to Digital Inequality under Covid-19.” Information and Organization 31 (1): 100341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar