On with critique! The necessity of critique in addressing the political deficits of responsible innovation

References

• Arendt, H. (1958) 1998. The Human Condition. Edited by M. Canovan. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, V. 2022. “The Ontology of Technology Beyond Anthropocentrism and Determinism: The Role of Technologies in the Constitution of the (post)Anthropocene World.” Foundations of Science 28: 987–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-022-09829-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., and L. Thévenot. 1999. “The Sociology of Critical Capacity.” European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3): 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/136843199002003010.
   Google Scholar
• Boulanin, V., K. Brockmann, and L. Richards. 2020. Responsible Artificial Intelligence Research and Innovation for International Peace and Security. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher, P., and C. Lafont. 2017. “Introduction.” In Critical Theory in Critical Times: Transforming the Global Political and Economic Order, edited by P. Deutscher and C. Lafont, xiii–xxxv. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (1991) 2002. Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revised. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 1999. “Escaping the Iron Cage, or, Subversive Rationalization and Democratic Theory.” In Democratising Technology: Theory and Practice of a Deliberative Technology Policy, edited by R. von Schomberg, 1–16. Hengelo: International Centre for Human and Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2006. “Replies to Critics.” In Democratizing Technology: Andrew Feenberg’s Critical Theory of Technology, edited by T. J. Veak, 175–210. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2010. Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2015. “Lukács's Theory of Reification and Contemporary Social Movements.” Rethinking Marxism 27 (4): 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2015.1076968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2017. Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (2020) 2022. “Critical Constructivism: An Exposition and Defence.” In The Necessity of Critique: Andrew Feenberg and the Philosophy of Technology, edited by D. Cressman, 15–38. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
   Google Scholar
• Frahm, N., T. Doezema, and S. Pfotenhauer. 2022. “Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 47 (1): 174–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243921999100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuss, R. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. 2015. Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation Over the Centuries. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2019. “The Inherently Democratic Nature of Technology Assessment.” Science and Public Policy 46 (5): 702–709. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A. 2018. “Is There an Emancipatory Interest? An Attempt to Answer Critical Theory’s Most Fundamental Question.” European Journal of Philosophy 25 (4): 908–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, H. (1979) 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Translated by H. Jonas and D. Herr. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lafont, C. 2019. “Democracy Without Shortcuts.” Constellations 26 (3): 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, D., V. Blok, M. Garnier, Phil Macnaghten, and A. Pols. 2022. “What’s Wrong with Global Challenges?” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (1): 6–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.2000130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. (1964) 1968. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., and M. Pansera. 2019. “Responsible Innovation: Process and Politics.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource, edited by R. von Schomberg and J. Hankins, 35–48. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., R. von Schomberg, and P. Macnaghten. 2021. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaughten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oudheusden, M. 2014. “Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882097.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 51–74. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2015. “Responsible Innovation.” In The New Paradigm for Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy Responsible Innovation: Neue Impulse fur die Technikfolgenabschatzung?, edited by A. Bogner, M. Decker, and M. Sotoudeh, 47–71. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, L., and V. Blok. 2019. “Technology in the Age of Innovation: Responsible Innovation as a New Subdomain Within the Philosophy of Technology.” Philosophy & Technology 34: 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-019-00386-3.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, L., and V. Blok. 2023. “It Takes two to Tango: Toward a Political Concept of Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 10: 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2023.2264616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldron, T. L., C. Navis, E. P. Karam, and G. D. Markman. (2019) 2022. “Toward a Theory of Activist-Driven Responsible Innovation: How Activists Pressure Firms to Adopt More Responsible Practices.” Journal of Management Studies 59 (1): 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar