Toward institutionalization of responsible research and innovation: insights from case studies of technological centers in Spain

References

• Adhikari, Dev Raj, and Prakash Shrestha. 2023. “Knowledge Management Initiatives for Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 4.7: Higher Education Institutions’ Stakeholder Perspectives.” Journal of Knowledge Management 27 (4): 1109–1139. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2022-0172/FULL/PDF.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrweiler, Petra, Nigel Gilbert, Benjamin Schrempf, Barbara Grimpe, and Marina Jirotka. 2019. “The Role of Civil Society Organisations in European Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 25–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1534508/SUPPL_FILE/TJRI_A_1534508_SM4173.PDF.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnaldi, S., and F. Neresini. 2019. “The Role of Intermediary Organizations in the Mainstreaming of Responsible Research and Innovation in the Italian Industrial Sector.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1608616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrizabalaga, Ion, Maite Solans-Domènech, Núria Radó-Trilla, and Paula Adam. 2018. How Can We Measure Stakeholders’ Engagement in Research? Barcelona: Agència de Qualitat i Avaluació Sanitàries de Catalunya (AQuAS)/Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia (AQuAS). Departament de Salut/Catalan Ministry of Health, Generalitat de Catalunya/Government of Catalonia.
   Google Scholar
• Balland, Pierre Alexandre, Cristian Jara-Figueroa, Sergio G. Petralia, Mathieu P. A. Steijn, David L. Rigby, and César A. Hidalgo. 2020. “Complex Economic Activities Concentrate in Large Cities.” Nature Human Behaviour 4 (3): 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0803-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, L. 2016. “Stakeholder Relationship Management: A Maturity Model for Organisational Implementation.”
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Teunis, and Vincent Blok. 2019. “Responsible Innovation in Business: A Critical Reflection on Deliberative Engagement as a Central Governance Mechanism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1575681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bührer, Susanne, and Angela Wroblewski. 2019. “The Practice and Perceptions of RRI—A Gender Perspective.” Evaluation and Program Planning 77: 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2019.101717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burget, Mirjam, Emanuele Bardone, and Margus Pedaste. 2017. “Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1): 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, Armando, Roberta Costa, Tamara Menichini, Francesco Rosati, and Gaetano Sanfelice. 2013. “Turning Corporate Social Responsibility-driven Opportunities in Competitive Advantages: A Two-dimensional Model.” Wiley Online Library 20 (1): 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1401.
   Google Scholar
• Čech, M., and M. Januška. 2020. “Evaluation of Risk Management Maturity in the Czech Automotive Industry: Model and Methodology.” Amfiteatru Economic 22 (55): 824–845. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2020/55/824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. 2021. “Standard CWA 17796:2021 – Responsibility-by-Design – Guidelines to Develop Long-Term Strategies (Roadmaps) to Innovate Responsibly.” European Committee for Standardization 13. https://store.uni.com/catalogo/cwa-17796-2021/#.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, David, and Katerina Ciampi Stancova. 2015. “Research and Technology Organisations and Smart Specialisation.” S3 Policy Brief Series, No. 15/2015. Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Charles Fang Chin, and Nicola Cantore. 2020. The Inclusive and Sustainable Development Index: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Chopyak, Jill, and Peter Levesque. 2002. “Public Participation in Science and Technology Decision Making: Trends for the Future.” Technology in Society 24 (1–2): 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00051-3.
   Google Scholar
• Claudia, Kettner, Angela Köppl, and Sigrid Stagl. 2014. Towards an Operational Measurement of Socio-Ecological Performance Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EARTO (European Association of Research and Technology Organisations). n.d. Research and Technology Organisations in the Evolving European Research Area.
   Google Scholar
• Eastwood, C., L. Klerkx, M. Ayre, and B. Dela Rue. 2019. “Managing Socio-Ethical Challenges in the Development of Smart Farming: From a Fragmented to a Comprehensive Approach for Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (5–6): 741–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10806-017-9704-5/TABLES/6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research Published by: Academy of Management Stable.” The Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., and Melissa E. Graebner. 2007. “Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (1): 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. She Figures 2018.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. She Figures 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Fitjar, Rune Dahl, Paul Benneworth, and Bjørn Terje Asheim. 2019. “Towards Regional Responsible Research and Innovation? Integrating RRI and RIS3 in European Innovation Policy.” Science and Public Policy 46 (5): 772–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Ellen Marie, and Nico Groenendijk. 2019. “RRI and Patenting: A Study of European Patent Governance.” NanoEthics 13 (2): 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11569-019-00341-8/METRICS.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Ellen Marie, and Christian Wittrock. 2022. “The Potential for Learning from Good RRI Practices and Implications for the Usefulness of RRI as an Umbrella Concept.” Learning Organization 30 (6): 687–671. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2021-0104/FULL/PDF.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraisl, Dilek, Jillian Campbell, Linda See, Uta Wehn, Jessica Wardlaw, Margaret Gold, Inian Moorthy, et al. 2020. “Mapping Citizen Science Contributions to the UN Sustainable Development Goals.” Sustainability Science 15 (6): 1735–1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-020-00833-7/FIGURES/4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, Peter, James Moultrie, and Mike Gregory. 2002. “The Use of Maturity Models/Grids as a Tool in Assessing Product Development Capability.” IEEE International Engineering Management Conference 1: 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.2002.1038431.
   Google Scholar
• García-Melón, Mónica, Tomás Gómez-Navarro, Hannia Gonzalez-Urango, and Carmen Corona-Sobrino. 2022. “Adapting RRI Public Engagement Indicators to the Spanish Scientific and Innovation Context. A Participatory Methodology Based on AHP and Content Analysis.” Central European Journal of Operations Research 30: 1483–1512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-022-00796-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, James R., Robert Rachlin, and Allen Sweeny. 1986. Handbook of Strategic Planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gökalp, Ebru, Bora Çalişkanbaş, and Altan Koçyiğit. 2023. “A Reference Model for Software Product Line Capability Assessment.” Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, https://doi.org/10.1002/SMR.2567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales-Gemio, Carla, Claudio Cruz-Cázares, and Mary Jane Parmentier. 2020. “Responsible Innovation in Smes: A Systematic Literature Review for a Conceptual Model.” Sustainability 12 (24): 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, Melody S., Nicole Ackermann, Deborah J. Bowen, and Vetta Sanders Thompson. 2020. “Reaching Consensus on Principles of Stakeholder Engagement in Research.” Progress in Community Health Partnerships : Research, Education, and Action 14 (1): 117. https://doi.org/10.1353/CPR.2020.0014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halkos, George, Jaime Moll de Alba, and Valentin Todorov. 2021. “Economies’ Inclusive and Green Industrial Performance: An Evidence Based Proposed Index.” Journal of Cleaner Production 279: 123516. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.123516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, Jens Ørding, Are Jensen, and Nhien Nguyen. 2020. “The Responsible Learning Organization: Can Senge (1990) Teach Organizations How to Become Responsible Innovators?” Learning Organization 27 (1): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-11-2019-0164/FULL/PDF.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecklau, Fabian, Florian Kidschun, Holger Kohl, and Sokol Tominaj. 2020. “Structured Analysis of Methodologies for the Assessment of the Technological Capability of RTOs: Using a Method Engineering Approach.” Proceedings of the European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 915–925, September 2020. https://doi.org/10.34190/EIE.20.029.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, Richard, Christopher Foster, and Yanuar Nugroho. 2014. “New Models of Inclusive Innovation for Development.” Innovation and Development 0 (2): 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2014.928982.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, Watts S. 1988. “Characterizing the Software Process: A Maturity Framework.” IEEE Software 5 (2): 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Stig Erik, Arnt Fløysand, and John Overton. 2019. “Expanding the Field of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)–from Responsible Research to Responsible Innovation.” European Planning Studies 27 (12): 2329–2343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1667617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, Irja Marije, Frank Kupper, and Jacqueline Broerse. 2016. “Inclusive Deliberation and Action in Emerging RRI Practices: The Case of Neuroimaging in Security Management.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (1): 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2015.1137752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaassen, Pim, Michelle Rijnen, Sara Vermeulen, Frank Kupper, and Jacqueline Broerse. 2018. “Technocracy versus Experimental Learning in RRI: On Making the Most of RRI’s Interpretative Flexibility.” In Responsible Research and Innovation: From Concepts to Practices, edited by R. Gianni, J. Pearson, and B. Reber, 77–98. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, B. J. 2015. “The Concepts, Approaches, and Applications of Responsible Innovations: An Introduction.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications, edited by B. J. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven, 1–15. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kwee, Zenlin, Emad Yaghmaei, and Steven Flipse. 2021. “Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice an Exploratory Assessment of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in a Nanomedicine Project.” Journal of Responsible Technology 5 (February): 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2021.100008.
   Google Scholar
• Legenvre, Hervé, and Jury Gualandris. 2018. “Innovation Sourcing Excellence: Three Purchasing Capabilities for Success.” Business Horizons 61 (1): 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2017.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehoux, P., H. P. Silva, R. R. Oliveira, and L. Rivard. 2020. “The Responsible Innovation in Health Tool and the Need to Reconcile Formative and Summative Ends in RRI Tools for Business.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 646–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1844974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lookman, Kyatmaja, Nyoman Pujawan, and Reny Nadlifatin. 2022. “Measuring Innovative Capability Maturity Model of Trucking Companies in Indonesia.” https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2094854.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, Vivien, and Mark Roberts. 2013. Why Institutions Matter: The New Institutionalism in Political Science. Political. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, Nicholas E., Laurence Stamford, and Philip Shapira. 2019. “Aligning Sustainability Assessment with Responsible Research and Innovation: Towards a Framework for Constructive Sustainability Assessment.” Sustainable Production and Consumption 20: 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, Paulo, L. José Eugênio, and Antônio Márcio Tavares Thomé. 2016. “A Maturity Model for Demand-Driven Supply Chains in the Consumer Product Goods Industry.” International Journal of Production Economics 179: 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2016.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modrego-Rico, Aurelia, Andrés Barge-Gil, and Ramón Núñez-Sánchez. 2005. “Research Evaluation August 2005 Service Supply Characteristics Developing Indicators to Measure Technology Institutes’ Performance.” Research Evaluation 14 (2): 177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, René Von Schomberg, and Phil Macnaghten. 2021. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, Mario, Richard Owen, Darian Meacham, Vivienne Kuh, and Mario Pansera. 2020. “Embedding Responsible Innovation within Synthetic Biology Research and Innovation: Insights from a UK Multi-Disciplinary Research Centre.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 384–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1785678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesch, Udo. 2014. “Sustainable Innovation, Learning and Responsibility.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B. -J. Koops, and H. Romijn, Vol. 1, 199–218. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Pimponi, Daniela, and Sesto Viticoli. 2020. Evaluation of the Efficacy, Efficiency and Impacts of Co-Creation, Based on the GoNano Project Activities and Impacts. Final External Evaluation Report: Assessment of the Co-Creation Process.
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, Ibo, Lotte Asveld, Steven Flipse, Pim Klaassen, Zenlin Kwee, Maria Maia, Elvio Mantovani, Christopher Nathan, Andrea Porcari, and Emad Yaghmaei. 2020. “Learning to Do Responsible Innovation in Industry: Six Lessons.” Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7 (3): 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1791506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesch, Hauke, and Clive Potter. 2014. “Citizen Science as Seen by Scientists: Methodological, Epistemological and Ethical Dimensions.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513497324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, Rene. 2012. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, edited by M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft, 39–61. Wiesbaden: Verlag..
   Google Scholar
• Senge, Peter M. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, Bernd Carsten, Michael Obach, Emad Yaghmaei, Veikko Ikonen, Kate Chatfield, and Alexander Brem. 2017. “The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice.” Sustainability 9 (6): 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, Marc, and Joram Nauta. 2020. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Societal Engagement: A Case Study in a Research and Technology Organization.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 598–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1813864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, Roger, Jack Spaapen, Martin W. Bauer, Ela Hogan, Gema Revuelta, Sigrid Stagl, Lino Paula, and Ângela Guimarães Pereira. 2015. Indicators for Promoting and Monitoring Responsible Research and Innovation Report from the Expert Group on Policy Indicators.
   Google Scholar
• Tabarés, Raúl, Anne Loeber, Mika Nieminen, Michael J. Bernstein, Erich Griessler, Vincent Blok, Joshua Cohen, Helmut Hönigmayer, Ulrike Wunderle, and Elisabeth Frankus. 2022. “Challenges in the Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation across Horizon 2020.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (3): 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2101211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulnicane, Inga. 2022. “Emerging Technology for Economic Competitiveness or Societal Challenges? Framing Purpose in Artificial Intelligence Policy.” Global Public Policy and Governance 2 (3): 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00049-8.
   Google Scholar
• Usak, Muhammet, Alfiya R. Masalimova, Elena I. Cherdymova, and Albina R. Shaidullina. 2020. “New Playmaker in Science Education: COVID-19.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 19 (2): 180–185. https://doi.org/10.33225/JBSE/20.19.180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiarda, Martijn, Geerten van de Kaa, Emad Yaghmaei, and Neelke Doorn. 2021. “A Comprehensive Appraisal of Responsible Research and Innovation: From Roots to Leaves.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172: 121053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittrock, Christian, Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Auke Pols, Philip Macnaghten, and David Ludwig. 2021. Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yaghmaei, Emad. 2018. “Responsible Research and Innovation Key Performance Indicators in Industry: A Case Study in the ICT Domain.” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 16 (2): 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-11-2017-0066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, Robert K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub, Laurens Landeweerd, and Arjan van Rooij. 2014. “Adapt or Perish? Assessing the Recent Shift in the European Research Funding Arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar