Epistemic inclusion: a key challenge for global RRI

References

• Bachelard, Gaston. 1938. La formation de l'esprit scientifique: contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance objective. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent. 2019. “From Participation to Interruption: Toward an Ethics of Stakeholder Engagement, Participation and Partnership in Corporate Social Responsibility and Responsible Innovation.” In International Handbook on Responsible Innovation: A Global Resource, edited by René Von Schomberg, and Jonathan Hankins Jonathan, 243–258. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent, and Edurne Inigo. 2020. Recommendations for the development of a competitive advantage based on RRI. RRING Deliverable D5.1.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, Vincent, Pieter Lemmens, et al. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons why it is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches and Applications, edited by Bert-Jaap Koops, 19–35. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry. 2014. Are we all Scientific Experts now? Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari. 2001. Participation: The new Tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Doezema, Tess, David Ludwig, Phil Macnaghten, Claire Shelley-Egan, and Ellen Marie Forsberg. 2019. “Translation, Transduction, and Transformation: Expanding Practices of Responsibility Across Borders.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1653155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Ellen Marie, Claire Shelley-Egan, Miltos Ladikas, and Richard Owen. 2018. Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation in Research Funding and Research Conducting Organisations—What Have We Learned so Far? Governance and Sustainability of Responsible Research and Innovation Processes. London: Springer Briefs in Research and Innovation Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. 1970. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Paulo. 1998. Pedagogy of Freedom: Ethics, Democracy, and Civic Courage. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice. Oxford: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Budd, and Rajesh Tandon. 2017. “Decolonization of Knowledge, Epistemicide, Participatory Research and Higher Education.” Research for All 1 (1): 6–19. DOI: 10.18546/RFA.01.1.02
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. 1998. Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms and Epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, Joseph, Steven Heine, and Ara Norenzayan. 2010. "The Weirdest People in the World?" Behavioral Brain Science 33 (2–3): 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFAD. 2016. Rural Development Report 2016: Spotlight 8.” https://www.ifad.org/documents/30600024/30604601/Spotlight_8.pdf/dc7b754d-667d-4da9-8f00-c9a5049640fe.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, Susanne. 2020. “Responsible Research, Inequality in Science and Epistemic Injustice: An Attempt to Open up Thinking About Inclusiveness in the Context of RI/RRI.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 672–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1780094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, Mairi, and Hub Zwart. 2009. “Bioethics: An Export Product? Reflections on Hands-On Involvement in Exploring the “External” Validity of International Bioethical Declarations.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6: 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-009-9168-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, David, and Phil Macnaghten. 2020. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Innovation Governance: A Framework for Responsible and Just Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1676686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., R. Owen, J. Stilgoe, B. Wynne, A. Azevedo, A. de Campos, J. Chilvers, et al. 2014. "Responsible Innovation Across Borders: Tensions, Paradoxes and Possibilities." Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (2): 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.922249.
   Google Scholar
• Novitzky, Peter, Michael Bernstein, Vincent Blok, Robert Braun, Tung Chan, Wout Lamers, Anne Loeber, Ingeborg Meijer, Ralf Lindner, and Erich Griessler. 2020. “Improve Alignment of Research Policy and Societal Values.” Science 369 (6499): 39–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlowski, Paul. 2019. “Freirean Conceptions of Participatory Action Research and Teaching for Social Justice – Same Struggle, Different Fronts.” The Canadian Journal of Action Research 20 (1): 30–51. https://doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v20i1.445.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Phil Macnaghten, and Jack Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, René von Schomberg, and Phil Macnaghten. 2021. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pain, Elisabeth. 2017. To be a responsible researcher, reach out and listen. Science.
   Google Scholar
• Posholi, Lerato. 2020. “Epistemic Decolonization as Overcoming the Hermeneutical Injustice of Eurocentrism.” Philosophical Papers 49 (2): 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2020.1779604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, Sidney. 1962. “Scientist:The Story of a Word.” Annals of Science 18 (2): 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033796200202722.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, Jathan. 2019. “Manufacturing Process Data Analysis Pipelines: A Requirements Analysis and Survey.” Journal of Big Data 6 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-018-0162-3.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Boaventure de Sousa. 2018. The end of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, René. 2011. "Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation." In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, edited by M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft, 39–61. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simis, M., and H. Madden. 2016. “The Lure of Rationality: Why Does the Deficit Model Persist in Science Communication?” Public Understanding of Science 25 (4): 400–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengers, Isabelle. 2013. Une Autre Science est Possible! Manifeste Pour un Ralentissement des Sciences. Paris: La découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengö, Maria, Eduardo Brondizio, Thomas Elmqvist, Pernilla Malmer, and Marja Spierenburg. 2014. “Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach.” AMBIO 43 (5): 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tercanli, Hacer, and Ben Jongbloed. 2022. “A Systematic Review of the Literature on Living Labs in Higher Education Institutions: Potentials and Constraints.” Sustainability 14: 12234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912234.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, Job, and Vincent Blok. 2021. "A Critical Hermeneutic Reflection on the Paradigm-Level Assumptions Underlying Responsible Innovation." Synthese 198 (19): 4635–4666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1839-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsosie, Krystal, and Katrina Claw. 2019. "Indigenizing Science and Reasserting Indigeneity in Research." Human Biology 91 (3): 137–140. https://doi.org/10.13110/humanbiology.91.3.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck, Eve, and Wayne Yang. 2014. “R-words: Refusing Research.” In In: Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities, edited by Django Paris, and Maisha Winn, 223–248. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, Govert, Annapurna Mamidipudi, Pandey Poonam, and Wiebe Bijker. 2020. “Responsible Innovation as Empowering Ways of Knowing.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1647087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Molen, Franke, David Ludwig, Luca Consoli, and Hub Zwart. 2019. “Global Challenges, Dutch Solutions? The Shape of Responsibility in Dutch Science and Technology Policies.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2019.1603569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vegter, Mira, Laurens Landeweerd, and Hub Zwart. 2022. “N = Many Me’s: Self-Surveillance for Precision Public Health.” Biosocieties 17: 78–98. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-020-00202-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakunuma, K., F. de Castro, T. Jiya, E. A. Inigo, V. Blok, and V. Bryce. 2021. "Reconceptualising Responsible Research and Innovation from a Global South Perspective." Journal of Responsible Innovation 8: 267–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, Mandy Li-Ming, and Krushil Watene. 2019. “The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Indigenous Peoples: Another Missed Opportunity?” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 20 (4): 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1574725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub. 1993. Ethische Consensus in een Pluralistische Samenleving. De Gezondheidsethiek als Casus. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub. 2001. “Consensus Formation as a Basic Strategy in Ethics.” In Bioethics in a European Perspective, edited by Henk Ten Have and Bert Gordijn, 281–288. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub. 2020a. “Emerging Viral Threats and the Simultaneity of the non-Simultaneous: Zooming out in Times of Corona.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23: 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-09970-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub. 2020b. “Science and Suspicion.” Maxim Gorky’s Children of the Sun as a Critical Mirror in Times of COVID-19.” Law, Culture and the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872120968053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub. 2022. Continental Philosophy of Technoscience. Series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub. 2023. “The Bioethics of Synthetic Cells.” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 25 (3): 157–158. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-023-00693-w.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub, J. Brenninkmeijer, et al. 2017a. “Reflection as a Deliberative and Distributed Practice: Assessing Neuro-Enhancement Technologies via Mutual Learning Exercises (MLEs).” Nanoethics 11 (2): 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0287-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub, Jonna Brenninkmeijer, Peter Eduard, Lotte Krabbenborg, Sheena Laursen, Gema Revuelta, and Winnie Toonders. 2017b. “Reflection as a Deliberative and Distributed Practice: Assessing Neuro-Enhancement Technologies via Mutual Learning Exercises (MLEs).” NanoEthics 11 (2): 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0287-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwart, Hub, and Laurens Landeweerd. 2014. “Adapt or Perish? Assessing the Recent Shift in the European Research Funding Arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (1): 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0011-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zwart, Hub, Xiaoyue Tan, Uduak Archibong, Cyril Eshareturi, Kingsley Utam, Chukwudi Paul Agu, Andrew Adams, Achim Rosemann, Kutoma Wakunuma, Aurelija Novelskaitė, Raminta Pucˇėtaitė, Eric Jensen, Lars Lorenz, Chris Foulds, Emmet Fox, Rihab Khalid, and Vincent Blok. (2021) "Report on RRI Best Practices and Learning Opportunities." https://rring.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/D4.1.pdf
   Google Scholar