Technology assessment and the governance of automated vehicles: a Collingridge-dilemma or a lack in normative orientation?

References

• Bijker, Wiebe E., and John Law. 1992. Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• BMVI. 2017. “BMDV – Automatisiertes Fahren im Straßenverkehr - Herausforderungen für die zukünftige Verkehrspolitik.” 2017. https://www.bmdv.bund.de/SharedDocs/DE/Anlage/G/wissenschaftlicher-beirat-gutachten-2017-1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Bösch, Patrick M., Felix Becker, Henrik Becker, and Kay W. Axhausen. 2018. “Cost-Based Analysis of Autonomous Mobility Services.” Transport Policy 64: 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canzler, Weert, and Andreas Knie. 2016. “Mobility in the Age of Digital Modernity: Why the Private Car is Losing Its Significance, Intermodal Transport Is Winning and Why Digitalisation Is the Key.” Applied Mobilities 1 (1): 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2016.1147781.
   Google Scholar
• Canzler, Weert, Andreas Knie, and Lisa Ruhrort. 2019. Autonome Flotten. Mehr Mobilität mit Weniger Fahrzeugen [Autonomous Fleets. More Mobility with Less Vehicles]. oekom verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Canzler, Weert, Andreas Knie, Lisa Ruhrort, and Christian Scherf. 2018. Erloschene Liebe? Das Auto in der Verkehrswende: Soziologische Deutungen. transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• CEC, Commission of the European Countries. 2020. “Expectations and Concerns from a Connected and Automated Mobility – April 2020 – Eurobarometer Survey.” 2020. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2231.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Maurie J. 2010. “Destination Unknown: Pursuing Sustainable Mobility in the Face of Rival Societal Aspirations.” Research Policy 39 (4): 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Tom, and Clémence Cavoli. 2019. “Automated Vehicles: Exploring Possible Consequences of Government (Non)Intervention for Congestion and Accessibility.” Transport Reviews 39 (1): 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1524401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Tom, Jack Stilgoe, Sally Stares, Nihan Akyelken, Clemence Cavoli, Jennie Day, Janet Dickinson, et al. 2020. “A Constructive Role for Social Science in the Development of Automated Vehicles.” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 6: 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100133.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, David. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, Kingsley, and John Urry. 2009. “After the Car – By Kingsley Dennis and John Urry.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33 (4): 1090–1091. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00934_7.x.
   Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag. 2021. “Straßenverkehrsgesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 5. März 2003 (BGBl. I S. 310, 919), das zuletzt durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 12. Juli 2021a (BGBl. I S. 3108) geändert worden ist.”.
   Google Scholar
• Drexler, Corinna E., Björn Verse, Andrea Hauslbauer, Julia Lopez, and Sajjad Haider. 2022. “Framing the Mobility Transition: Public Communication of Industry, Science, Media, and Politics in Germany.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 12 (1): 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00374-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duboz, Amandine, Andromachi Mourtzouchou, Monica Grosso, Viktoriya Kolarova, Rubén Cordera, Sophie Nägele, Maria Alonso Raposo, et al. 2022. “Exploring the Acceptance of Connected and Automated Vehicles: Focus Group Discussions with Experts and Non-Experts in Transport.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 89 (August): 200–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.013.
   Google Scholar
• Fraedrich, Eva, Sven Beiker, and Barbara Lenz. 2015. “Exploration of External Indicators of Social Change in Postmodern Communities.” European Journal of Futures Research 3 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-014-0061-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraedrich, Eva, Lars Kröger, Francisco J. Bahamonde-Birke, Ina Frenzel, Gernot Liedtke, Stefan Trommer, Barbara Lenz, and Dirk Heinrichs. 2017. “Automatisiertes Fahren im Personen- und Güterverkehr. Auswirkungen auf den Modal-Split, das Verkehrssystem und die Siedlungsstrukturen.” Berichtsreihe. e-Mobil BW GmbH. August 2017. https://elib.dlr.de/117868/.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Markus, Maximilian Hartl, and Christoph Magg. 2018. “Impacts of Vehicle Sharing with Driverless Cars on Urban Transport.” In Simulation Science, Communications in Computer and Information Science, edited by Marcus Baum, Gunther Brenner, Jens Grabowski, Thomas Hanschke, Stefan Hartmann, and Anita Schöbel, 24–38. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96271-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Fuenfschilling, Lea, and Bernhard Truffer. 2014. “The Structuration of Socio-Technical Regimes—Conceptual Foundations from Institutional Theory.” Research Policy 43 (4): 772–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galich, Anton, and Kerstin Stark. 2021. “How Will the Introduction of Automated Vehicles Impact Private Car Ownership?” Case Studies on Transport Policy 9 (2): 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank W. 2004. “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems.” Research Policy 33 (6): 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank W. 2011. “The Multi-Level Perspective on Sustainability Transitions: Responses to Seven Criticisms.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (June): 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank, Rene Kemp, Goeff Dudley, and Glenn Lyons. 2012. Automobility in Transition? : A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Genus, Audley, and Andy Stirling. 2018. “Collingridge and the Dilemma of Control: Towards Responsible and Accountable Innovation.” Research Policy 47 (1): 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givoni, Moshe. 2014. “Addressing Transport Policy Challenges Through Policy-Packaging.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 60: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkartzonikas, Christos, and Konstantina Gkritza. 2019. “What Have We Learned? A Review of Stated Preference and Choice Studies on Autonomous Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 98: 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gösele, Martin, and Philipp Sandner. 2019. “Analysis of Blockchain Technology in the Mobility Sector.” Forschung Im Ingenieurwesen 83 (4): 809–816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10010-019-00315-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gössling, Stefan. 2017. “The Psychology of the Car – 1st Edition.” 2017. https://www.elsevier.com/books/the-psychology-of-the-car/gossling/978-0-12-811008-9.
   Google Scholar
• Granstrand, Ove, and Marcus Holgersson. 2020. “Innovation Ecosystems: A Conceptual Review and a New Definition.” Technovation (February): 102098–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098.
   Google Scholar
• Groth, Sören, Henrike Hesping, Thomas Klinger, Rafael Eggebrecht, Eusebia Flamm, and Noa Groicher. 2023. Nachhaltige Mobilitätswende: Mobilität in den Medien.” Umweltbundesamt. Dessau-Roßlau.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2014. “The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (September): 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.968437.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2020. “The Objects of Technology Assessment. Hermeneutic Extension of Consequentialist Reasoning.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1647086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2022. Technikfolgenabschätzung: Einführung. Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin, and Jens Schippl. 2013. “Forschung für die Energiewende 2.0: Integrativ und Transformativ.” TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 22 (August): 56–62. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.22.2.56.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, Tobias. 2020. “Cracks in the Gearbox of Car Hegemony: Struggles Over the German Verkehrswende Between Stability and Change.” Mobilities 15 (6): 810–827. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2020.1817686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude. 2005. “Anforderungen an Eine Methodologie Transdisziplinärer Forschung.” TATuP – Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 14 (2): 44–49. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.14.2.44.
   Google Scholar
• Haugland, Bård, and Tomas Skjølsvold. 2020. “Promise of the Obsolete: Expectations for and Experiments with Self-Driving Vehicles in Norway.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 16 (June): 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1765677.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Andrew J. 2001. From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism. Expanded Edition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, Debbie, and Tim Schwanen. 2018. “Automated Mobility Transitions: Governing Processes in the UK.” Sustainability 10 (4): 956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, Burkhard. 2021. “Ein Neuer Rechtsrahmen für die Verkehrswende.” Forum Wohnen und Stadtentwicklung Heft 3: 120–124.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, Burkhard, Thomas Kiel, and Hilmar von Lojewski. 2018. Nachhaltige städtische Mobilität für alle. Agenda für eine Verkehrswende aus kommunaler Sicht. Positionspapier des Deutschen Städtetages. https://orlis.difu.de/handle/difu/249784.
   Google Scholar
• Karger, Erik, Marvin Jagals, and Frederik Ahlemann. 2021. “Blockchain for Smart Mobility—Literature Review and Future Research Agenda.” Sustainability 13 (November): 13268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313268.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, Franziska, and Martin Lanzendorf. 2020. “Support for Innovative On-Street Parking Policies: Empirical Evidence from an Urban Neighborhood.” Journal of Transport Geography 85 (May): 102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102726.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, Udo, Bernhard Bruch, Heike Oehler, Hinrich Helms, Jutta Deffner, and Georg Sunderer. 2023. Bausteine für Eine Multimodale und Klimaschonende Mobilität Was Akteure in der Region Rhein-Main-Neckar tun Können. Heidelberg.: ifeu, ISOE.
   Google Scholar
• Legêne, Martijn F., Willem L. Auping, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia, and Bart van Arem. 2020. “Spatial Impact of Automated Driving in Urban Areas.” Journal of Simulation 14 (4): 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2020.1806747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, Glenn. 2022. “The Driverless Cars Emulsion: Using Participatory Foresight and Constructive Conflict to Address Transport’s Wicked Problems.” Futures 136 (February): 102889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102889.
   Google Scholar
• Manderscheid, Katharina. 2020. “Antriebs-, Verkehrs- Oder Mobilitätswende?: Zur Elektrifizierung des Automobilitätsdispositivs.” In Antriebs-, Verkehrs- Oder Mobilitätswende?: Zur Elektrifizierung des Automobilitätsdispositivs, 37–68. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839451656-003
   Google Scholar
• Markard, Jochen, Rob Raven, and Bernhard Truffer. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects.” Research Policy 41 (6): 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Robert. 2021. “AV Futures or Futures with AVs? Bridging Sociotechnical Imaginaries and a Multi-Level Perspective of Autonomous Vehicle Visualisations in Praxis.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8 (March): 68. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00739-4.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Jonas, Henrik Becker, Patrick M. Bösch, and Kay W. Axhausen. 2017. “Autonomous Vehicles: The Next Jump in Accessibilities?” Research in Transportation Economics 62 (June): 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2017.03.005.
   Google Scholar
• Milakis, Dimitris, and Stephan Müller. 2021. “The Societal Dimension of the Automated Vehicles Transition: Towards a Research Agenda.” Cities 113 (June): 103144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103144.
   Google Scholar
• Milakis, Dimitris, Bart van Arem, and Bert van Wee. 2017. “Policy and Society Related Implications of Automated Driving: A Review of Literature and Directions for Future Research.” Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 21 (4): 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, Ian, and Michael Keenan. 2003. Practical Guide to Regional Foresight in the UK. Brussels: European Commission, DG Research.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Riel. 2007. “Futures Literacy: A Hybrid Strategic Scenario Method.” Futures 39 (4): 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladenović, Miloš N. 2019. “How Should We Drive Self-Driving Vehicles? Anticipation and Collective Imagination in Planning Mobility Futures.” In The Governance of Smart Transportation Systems, edited by M. Finger, and M. Audouin, 103–122. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mladenović, Milos, Dominic Stead, Dimitris Milakis, Kate Pangbourne, and Moshe Givoni. 2020. “Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Connected and Automated Vehicle Technology: Comparative Analysis of Governance Cultures in Finland, Germany, and the UK”.
   Google Scholar
• Mögele, Michael, and Henrike Rau. 2020. “Cultivating the “Car State”: A Culturally Sensitive Analysis of car-Centric Discourses and Mobility Cultures in Southern Germany.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 16 (1): 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2020.1756188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobis, Claudia, and Tobias Kuhnimhof. 2018. “Mobilität in Deutschland – MiD Ergebnisbericht [Mobility in Germany - MiD Report on Results]. Studie von Infas, DLR, IVT und Infas 360 im Auftrag des Bundesministers für Verkehr und Digitale Infrastruktur.” FE-Nr. 70.904/15. Bonn, Berlin. www.mobilitaet-in-deutschland.de.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, Peter. 2021. Autonorama. The Illusory Promise of High-Tech Driving. Washington: ISLANDPRESS.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. OECD-Wirtschaftsberichte: Deutschland 2018. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-deu-2018-de
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2023. OECD-Wirtschaftsberichte: Deutschland 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/80df9211-de.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie, and René Kemp. 1998. “Technological Change.” In Human Choice and Climate Change. Vol. II, Resources and Technology. https://research.utwente.nl/en/publications/technological-change
   Google Scholar
• Roache, Rebecca. 2008. “Ethics, Speculation, and Values.” NanoEthics 2 (December): 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-008-0050-y.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, Aron B., Simone Kimpeler, Elna Schirrmeister, and Philine Warnke. 2021. “Participatory Foresight and Reflexive Innovation: Setting Policy Goals and Developing Strategies in a Bottom-up, Mission-Oriented, Sustainable Way.” European Journal of Futures Research 9: 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-021-00171-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhrort, Lisa. 2023. “Can a Rapid Mobility Transition Appear Both Desirable and Achievable? Reflections on the Role of Competing Narratives for Socio-Technical Change and Suggestions for a Research Agenda.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 36 (1): 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2057935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryghaug, Marianne, Ivana Subotički, Emilia Smeds, Timo von Wirth, Aline Scherrer, Chris Foulds, Rosie Robison, et al. 2023. “A Social Sciences and Humanities Research Agenda for Transport and Mobility in Europe: Key Themes and 100 Research Questions.” Transport Reviews 43 (0): 755–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2023.2167887.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Fabio Luis Marques dos, Amandine Duboz, Monica Grosso, María Alonso Raposo, Jette Krause, Andromachi Mourtzouchou, Alexandra Balahur, and Biagio Ciuffo. 2022. “An Acceptance Divergence? Media, Citizens and Policy Perspectives on Autonomous Cars in the European Union.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 158 (April): 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.02.013.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schippl, Jens, and Annika Arnold. 2020. “Stakeholders’ Views on Multimodal Urban Mobility Futures: A Matter of Policy Interventions or Just the Logical Result of Digitalization?” Energies 13: 1788. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13071788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippl, Jens, and Bernhard Truffer. 2020. “Directionality of Transitions in Space: Diverging Trajectories of Electric Mobility and Autonomous Driving in Urban and Rural Settlement Structures.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 37 (December): 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.007.
   Google Scholar
• Schippl, Jens, Bernhard Truffer, and Torsten Fleischer. 2022. “Potential Impacts of Institutional Dynamics on the Development of Automated Vehicles: Towards Sustainable Mobility?” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 14 (June): 100587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100587.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, Johan, and Laur Kanger. 2018. “Deep Transitions: Emergence, Acceleration, Stabilization and Directionality.” Research Policy 47 (6): 1045–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöller-Schwedes, Oliver. 2010. “The Failure of Integrated Transport Policy in Germany: A Historical Perspective.” Journal of Transport Geography 18 (1): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. Richard. 2008. Institutions and Organizations : Ideas and Interests. Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, Mimi. 2012. “Sustainable Mobility and Mobility Justice: Towards a Twin Transition.” Mobilities: New Perspectives on Transport and Society (January): 289–304.
   Google Scholar
• Siebert, Jonathan. 2022. “Wie Kann Eine Konsequent Klimagerechte Verkehrsplanung Aussehen? Bedarfe Einer mit den Klimaschutzzielen des Übereinkommens von Paris im Einklang Stehenden Mobilitäts- und Verkehrsinfrastrukturplanung des Bundes.” Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation, Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation, https://ideas.repec.org//p/zbw/wzbdms/spiii2022602.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack. 2018. “Machine Learning, Social Learning and the Governance of Self-Driving Cars.” Social Studies of Science 48 (1): 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717741687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, and Milos Mladenović. 2022. “The Politics of Autonomous Vehicles.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9 (December), https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01463-3.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andy. 2008. ““Opening Up” and “Closing Down”.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andy. 2009. Direction, Distribution and Diversity! Pluralising Progress in Innovation, Sustainability and Development”.
   Google Scholar
• Thomopoulos, Nikolas, and Moshe Givoni. 2015. “The Autonomous Car—A Blessing or a Curse for the Future of Low Carbon Mobility? An Exploration of Likely vs. Desirable Outcomes.” European Journal of Futures Research 3 (November), https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-015-0071-z.
   Google Scholar
• Truffer, Bernhard, Jens Schippl, and Torsten Fleischer. 2017. “Decentering Technology in Technology Assessment: Prospects for Socio-Technical Transitions in Electric Mobility in Germany.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 122 (September): 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.020.
   Google Scholar
• UITP. 2017. “Autonomous Vehicles: A Potential Game Changer for Urban Mobility.” Policy Brief. Brussels. https://www.uitp.org/sites/default/files/cck-focus-papers-files/PolicyBrief_Autonomous_Vehicles_LQ_20160116.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, John. 2016. What is the Future? Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wynsberghe, Axelle, and Ângela Guimarães Pereira. 2022. “The Politics and Imaginary of ‘Autonomous Vehicles’: A Participatory Journey.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9 (August): 284. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01209-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weber, Matthias, and Harald Rohracher. 2012. “Legitimizing Research, Technology and Innovation Policies for Transformative Change.” Research Policy 41 (July): 1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Matthias, and K. Whitelegg. 2003. “Grundorientierungen Einer Wissenschafts-Und Forschungspolitik Für Nachhaltige Entwicklung.” In Den Globalen Wandel Gestalten - Forschung Und Politik Für Einen Nachhaltigen Globalen Wandel., 113–135. Berlin: Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• WEF and BCG. 2018. “Reshaping Urban Mobility with Autonomous Vehicles. Lessons from the City of Boston.” https://www.weforum.org/reports/reshaping-urban-mobility-with-autonomous-vehicles-lessons-from-the-city-of-boston/.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, Langdon. 1980. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus 109 (1): 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WBGU. 2011. World in Transition: A Social Contract for Sustainability; Summary for Policy-Makers. Copy Deadline: 17.03.2011. Berlin: WBGU.
   Google Scholar
• Yap, Xiao-Shan, and Bernhard Truffer. 2019. “Shaping Selection Environments for Industrial Catch-up and Sustainability Transitions: A Systemic Perspective on Endogenizing Windows of Opportunity.” Research Policy 48 (May): 1030–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Yen, Robert, Nadja Braun Binder, Constantin Pitzen, and Jens Schippl. 2024. Automatisierter ÖPNV: Hintergründe und Praktische Anleitung zur Umsetzung in Kleineren Städten und Ländlichen Regionen. Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar