Self-similarity and synthetic biology: a possible fractal anticipation

References

• Abbott, A. 1990. “Positivism and Interpretation in Sociology: Lessons for Sociologists from the History of Stress Research.” Sociological Forum 5 (3): 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, A. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abraham, R. H. 1993. “Human Fractals: The Arabesque in Our Mind.” Visual Anthropology Review 9 (1): 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1525/var.1993.9.1.52
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, A. S., and K. J. Bulpin. 2013. “Left to Their Own Devices: Post-ELSI, Ethical Equipment and the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) Competition.” BioSocieties 8 (3): 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2013.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, A., K. Bulpin, and S. Molyneux-Hodgson. 2016a. Synthetic Biology: A Sociology of Changing Practices. Basingstoke: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, A. S., J. Calvert, C. Marris, S. Molyneux-Hodgson, E. Frow, M. Kearnes, K. Bulpin, et al. 2015. “Taking Roles in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Reflections on Working in Post-ELSI Spaces in the UK Synthetic Biology Community.” Science & Technology Studies 28 (3): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, A. S., J. Calvert, C. Marris, S. Molyneux-Hodgson, E. Frow, M. Kearnes, K. Bulpin, et al. 2016b. “Five Rules of Thumb for Post-ELSI Interdisciplinary Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (1): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1177867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, A. S., and S. Molyneux-Hodgson. 2013. “Bacterial Cultures: Ontologies of Bacteria and Engineering Expertise at the Nexus of Synthetic Biology and Water Services.” Engineering Studies 5 (1): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2013.766198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barben, D, Fisher, E., Selin, C., and D. H. Guston. 2008. “Anticipatory Governance of Nano-Technology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, J. Wajcman, 3rd ed., 979-1000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, G. 2015. “The Moral Economy of Biotechnical Facility.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 128–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.1002169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betten, A. W., V. Rerimassie, J. E. W. Broerse, D. Stemerding, and F. Kupper. 2018. “Constructing Future Scenarios as a Tool to Foster Responsible Research and Innovation among Future Synthetic Biologists.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 14 (1): 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-018-0082-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brooks, S. M., and H. S. Alper. 2021. “Applications, Challenges, and Needs for Employing Synthetic Biology Beyond the Lab.” Nature Communications 12 (1): 1390. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21740-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1984. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” The Sociological Review 32 (1_suppl): 196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, J. 2008. “The Commodification of Emergence: Systems Biology, Synthetic Biology and Intellectual Property.” BioSocieties 3 (4): 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855208006303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, J. 2012. “Ownership and Sharing in Synthetic Biology: A ‘Diverse Ecology’ of the Open and the Proprietary?” BioSocieties 7 (2): 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2012.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, J. 2013. “Engineering Biology and Society: Reflections on Synthetic Biology.” Science, Technology and Society 18 (3): 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721813498501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, J., and P. Martin. 2009. “The Role of Social Scientists in Synthetic Biology.” EMBO Reports 10 (3): 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonell, P., A. J. Jervis, C. J. Robinson, C. Yan, M. Dunstan, N. Swainston, M. Vinaixa, et al. 2018. “An Automated Design-Build-Test-Learn Pipeline for Enhanced Microbial Production of Fine Chemicals.” Communications Biology 1 (1): 66. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0076-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casini, A., F.-Y. Chang, R. Eluere, Andrew M. King, Eric M. Young, Quentin M. Dudley, Ashty Karim, et al. 2018. “A Pressure Test to Make 10 Molecules in 90 Days: External Evaluation of Methods to Engineer Biology.” Journal of the American Chemical Society 140 (12): 4302–4316. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b13292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, A. 2016. “Assembling Desires: Synthetic Biology and the Wish to Act at a Distant Time.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (5): 914–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816637872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, A., and H. Åm. 2018. “Experiments in Interdisciplinarity: Responsible Research and Innovation and the Public Good.” PLOS Biology 16 (3): e2003921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, T. A., N. C. Curach, and I. S. Pretorius. 2020. “Bio-informational Futures.” EMBO Reports 21 (3): e50036. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202050036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeland, C., E.-M. Forsberg, and T. Maximova-Mentzoni. 2019. “RRI: Implementation as Learning.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1603570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehlers, N. 2023. “Racial Biofutures: COVID-19 and Black Futurity Otherwise.” Sociology 57 (2): 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221137551
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frow, E. 2020. “From ‘Experiments of Concern’ to ‘Groups of Concern’: Constructing and Containing Citizens in Synthetic Biology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (6): 1038–1064. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917735382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frow, E., and J. Calvert. 2013a. “‘Can Simple Biological Systems be Built from Standardized Interchangeable Parts?’ Negotiating Biology and Engineering in a Synthetic Biology Competition.” Engineering Studies 5 (1): 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2013.764881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frow, E., and J. Calvert. 2013b. “Opening up the Future(s) of Synthetic Biology.” Futures 48: 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frow, E. K. 2013. “Making Big Promises Come True? Articulating and Realizing Value in Synthetic Biology.” BioSocieties 8 (4): 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2013.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleick, J. 1988. Chaos: Making a New Science. London: Cardinal by Sphere Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim, M., and H. Nowotny. 2003. “Joy in Repetition Makes the Future Disappear.” In Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead, edited by B. Joerges and H. Nowotny, 229–258. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hammang, A. 2023. “Troubleshooting: The Automation of Synthetic Biology and the Labor of Technological Futures.” Science, Technology, & Human Values. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439221149524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, A. D., and de Lorenzo V. 2023. “Synthetic Biology─High Time to Deliver?” ACS Synthetic Biology 12 (6): 1579–1582. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.3c00238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S. 2015. “Capturing the Imaginary: Vanguards, Visions and the Synthetic Biology Revolution.” In Science and Democracy, edited by S. Hilgartner, C. Miller, and R. Hagendijk, 33-55. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillson, N., M. Caddick, Y. Cai, Nathan Hillson, Mark Caddick, Yizhi Cai, Jose A. Carrasco, et al. 2019. “Building a Global Alliance of Biofoundries.” Nature Communications 10 (1): 2040. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10079-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holowko, M. B., E. K. Frow, J. C. Reid, M. Rourke, and C. E. Vickers. 2021. “Building a Biofoundry.” Synthetic Biology 6 (1): 1. ysaa026. https://doi.org/10.1093/synbio/ysaa026
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B. 2007. “Infrastructural Fractals: Revisiting the Micro—Macro Distinction in Social Theory.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 25 (5): 832–850. https://doi.org/10.1068/d420t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judging Committee and iGEM headquarters. 2023. Judge Handbook 2023. https://static.igem.org/websites/competition/2023/2023-igem-judge-handbook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kallergi, A., Asin-Garcia, E., Martins dos Santos, V. A. P., and L. Landeweerd. 2021. “Context Matters.” EMBO Reports 22 (1): e51227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastenhofer, K. 2013. “Synthetic Biology as Understanding, Control, Construction, and Creation? Techno-Epistemic and Socio-Political Implications of Different Stances in Talking and Doing Technoscience.” Futures 48: 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitano, S., C. Lin, J. L. Foo, Shohei Kitano, Ciai Lin, Jee Loon Foo, Matthew Wook Chang, et al. 2023. “Synthetic Biology: Learning the Way Toward High-Precision Biological Design.” PLOS Biology 21 (4): e3002116. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, R. 2010. “Five Hard Truths for Synthetic Biology.” Nature 463 (7279): 288–290. https://doi.org/10.1038/463288a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Le Feuvre, R. A., and N. S. Scrutton. 2018. “A Living Foundry for Synthetic Biological Materials: A Synthetic Biology Roadmap to New Advanced Materials.” Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology 3 (2): 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2018.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L. 2023. “Next-generation Synthetic Biology Approaches for the Accelerated Discovery of Microbial Natural Products.” Engineering Microbiology 3 (1): 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engmic.2022.100060
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. 2013a. “The Economic Principles of Industrial Synthetic Biology: Cosmogony, Metabolism and Commodities.” Engineering Studies 5 (1): 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2013.764880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. 2013b. “From Validating to Verifying: Public Appeals in Synthetic Biology.” Science as Culture 22 (4): 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2013.764067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, A. 2013c. “Realizing the Promise of Biotechnology: Infrastructural-Icons in Synthetic Biology.” Futures 48: 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marris, C. 2015. “The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology.” Science as Culture 24 (1): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2014.986320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marris, C., and J. Calvert. 2020. “Science and Technology Studies in Policy: The UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (1): 34–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919828107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, C., S. de Saille, and B. Nerlich. 2018. “Risk in Synthetic Biology—Views from the Lab.” EMBO Reports 19 (7): e45958. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201845958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckin, R. 2016. “Making Research Translatable: Articulating and Shaping Synthetic Biology in the UK.” PhD. University of Sheffield, Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Meckin, R. 2020. “Changing Infrastructural Practices: Routine and Reproducibility in Automated Interdisciplinary Bioscience.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (6): 1220–1241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919893757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meckin, R., and A. Balmer. 2019. “Situating Anticipation in Everyday Life: Using Sensory Methods to Explore Public Expectations of Synthetic Biology.” Public Understanding of Science 28 (3): 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518808694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molyneux-Hodgson, S., and A. S. Balmer. 2014. “Synthetic Biology, Water Industry and the Performance of an Innovation Barrier.” Science and Public Policy 41 (4): 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the Art and Craft of Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882064
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley, M. A., A. Powell, J. F. Davies, M. A. O’Malley, A. Powell, J. F. Davies, J. Calvert, et al. 2008. “Knowledge-Making Distinctions in Synthetic Biology.” BioEssays 30 (1): 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.20664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opgenorth, P., Z. Costello, T. Okada, P. Opgenorth, Z. Costello, T. Okada, G. Goyal, et al. 2019. “Lessons from Two Design–Build–Test–Learn Cycles of Dodecanol Production in Escherichia coli Aided by Machine Learning.” ACS Synthetic Biology 8 (6): 1337–1351. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paddon, C. J., and J. D. Keasling. 2014. “Semi-Synthetic Artemisinin: A Model for the Use of Synthetic Biology in Pharmaceutical Development.” Nature Reviews Microbiology 12 (5): 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian, A. 2019. A Possible Anthropology: Methods for Uneasy Times. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., R. Owen, D. Meacham, M. Pansera, R. Owen, D. Meacham, V. Kuh, et al. 2020. “Embedding Responsible Innovation Within Synthetic Biology Research and Innovation: Insights from a UK Multi-Disciplinary Research Centre.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 384–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1785678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patwari, P., F. Pruckner, and M. Fabris. 2023. “Biosensors in Microalgae: A Roadmap for New Opportunities in Synthetic Biology and Biotechnology.” Biotechnology Advances 68: 108221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poddar, H., R. Breitling, and E. Takano. 2020. “Towards Engineering and Production of Artificial Spider Silk Using Tools of Synthetic Biology.” Engineering Biology 4 (1): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1049/enb.2019.0017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raimbault, B., J.-P. Cointet, and P.-B. Joly. 2016. “Mapping the Emergence of Synthetic Biology.” PLoS One 11 (9): e0161522. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raimbault, B., and P.-B. Joly. 2021. The Emergence of Technoscientific Fields and the New Political Sociology of Science. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, S. 2004. “The Novelty Trap: Why Does Institutional Learning About New Technologies Seem So Difficult?” Industry and Higher Education 18 (6): 349–355. https://doi.org/10.5367/0000000042683601
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, B., R. Meckin, A. Balmer, B. Ribeiro, R. Meckin, A. Balmer, P. Shapira, et al. 2023. “The Digitalisation Paradox of Everyday Scientific Labour: How Mundane Knowledge Work is Amplified and Diversified in the Biosciences.” Research Policy 52 (1): 104607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, B., and P. Shapira. 2019. “Anticipating Governance Challenges in Synthetic Biology: Insights from Biosynthetic Menthol.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 139: 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schyfter, P., and J. Calvert. 2015. “Intentions, Expectations and Institutions: Engineering the Future of Synthetic Biology in the USA and the UK.” Science as Culture 24 (4): 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2015.1037827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schyfter, P., E. Frow, and J. Calvert. 2013. “GUEST EDITORIAL: Synthetic Biology: Making Biology Into an Engineering Discipline.” Engineering Studies 5 (1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2013.763647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si, T., and H. Zhao. 2016. “A Brief Overview of Synthetic Biology Research Programs and Roadmap Studies in the United States.” Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology 1 (4): 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synbio.2016.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, P. A. 2009. “Making Biology Easier to Engineer.” BioSocieties 4 (2-3): 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1745855209990135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. D. J., Z. T. Kamwendo, A. Berndt, R. D. J. Smith, Z. T. Kamwendo, A. Berndt, J. Parkin, et al. 2021. “Taking Knowledge Production Seriously in Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1935584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemerding, D., W. Betten, V. Rerimassie, D. Stemerding, W. Betten, V. Rerimassie, Z. Robaey, et al. 2019. “Future Making and Responsible Governance of Innovation in Synthetic Biology.” Futures 109: 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J. 2018. “Machine Learning, Social Learning and the Governance of Self-Driving Cars.” Social Studies of Science 48 (1): 25–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717741687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. 2008. “‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 2004. Partial Connections, Updated Edition. Walnut Creek: Altamira Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 2011. “Binary Licence.” Common Knowledge 17 (1): 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-2010-040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 2012. “Innovation or Replication? Crossing and Criss-Crossing in Social Science.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 13 (1/2): 62–76.
   Google Scholar
• Synthetic Biology Roadmap Coordination Group. 2012. A Synthetic Biology Roadmap for the UK. Swindon: Technology Strategy Board. Accessed October 11, 2023. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130302042701/http://www.innovateuk.org/_assets/tsb_syntheticbiologyroadmap.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K., and S. Woods. 2020. “Reflections on the Practice of Responsible (Research and) Innovation in Synthetic Biology.” New Genetics and Society 39 (2): 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2019.1709431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiek, A., D. Guston, E. Frow, A. Wiek, D. Guston, E. Frow, J. Calvert, et al. 2012. “Sustainability and Anticipatory Governance in Synthetic Biology.” International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development 3 (2): 25–38. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2012040103
   Google Scholar
• Wright, O., G.-B. Stan, and T. Ellis. 2013. “Building-in Biosafety for Synthetic Biology.” Microbiology 159 (Pt_7): 1221–1235. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.066308-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang, J., Y. Chen, L. Fu, J. Zhang, Y. Chen, L. Fu, E. Guo, et al. 2021. “Accelerating Strain Engineering in Biofuel Research Via Build and Test Automation of Synthetic Biology.” Current Opinion in Biotechnology 67: 88–98. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2021.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar