Sensitivity analysis of the bullwhip effect in supply chains with time delay

References

• Amirteimoori, A., & Khoshandam, L. (2011). A data envelopment analysis approach to supply chain efficiency. Advances in Decision Sciences, 2011, 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1155/2011/608324
   Google Scholar
• Asif, F. M., Bianchi, C., Rashid, A., & Niclescu, C. M. (2012). Lifecycle scenario design for product end-of-life strategy. Journal Remanufacturing, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/2210-4690-2-1
   Google Scholar
• Aslani Khiavi, S., Khaloozadeh, H., & Soltanian, F. (2021). Regulating bullwhip effect in supply chain with hybrid recycling channels using linear quadratic Gaussian controller. IJIEPR, 32(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.22068/ijiepr.32.1.13
   Google Scholar
• Aslani Khiavi, S., & Skandari Dastghiri, S. (2021). The design of inverse network DEA model for measuring the bullwhip effect in supply chains with uncertain demands. Journal of Optimization in Industrial Engineering, 14(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.22094/JOIE.2020.1885077.1703
   Google Scholar
• Bisschop, J. (2012). AIMMS optimization modeling. Bellevue, WA: Paragon Decision Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Cannella, S., López-Campos, M., Dominguez, R., Ashayeri, J., & Miranda, P. A. (2015). A simulation model of a coordinated decentralized supply chain. International Transactions in Operational Research, 22(4), 735–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3-4), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800090303
   Google Scholar
• Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G., Shaban, A., & Tronci, M. (2015). The impact of information sharing on ordering policies to improve supply chain performances. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 82(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.01.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneshvar, S., Izbirak, G., & Javadi, A. (2014). Sensitivity analysis on modified variable returns to scale model in data envelopment analysis using facet analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 76(2), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejonckheere, J., Disney, S., Lambrecht, M., Towill, R., & R, D. (2003). Measuring and avoiding the bullwhip effect: A control theoretic approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(3), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00369-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejonckheere, J., Disney, S. M., Lambrecht, M. R., & Towill, D. R. (2004). The impact of information enrichment on the bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(3), 727–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00808-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disney, S. M., & Towill, D. R. (2003). On the bullwhip and the inventory variance produced by an ordering policy. Omega, 31(3), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(03)00028-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duc, T. T. H., Luong, H. T., & Kim, Y. D. (2008a). A measure of bullwhip effect in supply chains with a mixed autoregressive-moving average demand process. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(1), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duc, T. T. H., Luong, H. T., & Kim, Y. D. (2008b). A measure of the bullwhip effect in supply chains with stochastic lead time. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 38(11–12), 1201–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1170-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. (1958). Industrial dynamics, A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review, 30(1), 67–96.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, D., Ionescu, C., Aghezzaf, E. H., & De Keyser, R. (2015). Quantifying and mitigating the bullwhip effect in a benchmark supply chain system by an extended prediction self-adaptive control ordering policy. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 81(2), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.12.024
   Google Scholar
• Goodarzi, M., & Farzipoor, R. (2018). How to measure bullwhip effect by network data envelopment analysis? Accepted in Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.046.
   Google Scholar
• Jahanshahloo, G. R., Hosseinzadeh, F., Shoja, N., Sanei, M., & Tohidi, G. (2005). Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 169(2), 897–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.09.092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili, K., & Shahmir, Z. (2015). Uncertain network data envelopment analysis with undesirable outputs to evaluate the efficiency of electricity power production and distribution processes. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 88(1), 131–150. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.06.013
   Google Scholar
• Khiavi, S. A., Khaloozadeh, H., & Soltanian, F. (2019). Nonlinear modelling and performance analysis of a closed-loop supply chain in the presence of stochastic noise. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, 25(5), 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13873954.2019.1663876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khiavi, S. A., Khaloozadeh, H., & Soltanian, F. (2021). Suboptimal sliding manifold for nonlinear supply chain with time delay. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 42(1), 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-021-00733-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. G., Chatfield, D., Harrison, T. P., & Hayya, J. C. (2006). Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a supply chain with stochastic lead time. European Journal of Operational Research, 173(2), 617–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T., & Ma, J. (2014). Complexity analysis of the dual-channel supply chain model with delay decision. Nonlinear Dynamics, 78(4), 2617–2626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-014-1613-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Chen, Y., Liang, L., & Xie, J. (2012). DEA models for extended two stage network structures. Omega, 40(5), 611–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, L., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008). DEA models for two-stage processes: Game approach and efficiency decomposition. Naval Research Logistics, 55(7), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashud, A. H. M., Hasan, M. R., Daryanto, Y., & Wee, H. M. (2021a). A resilient hybrid payment supply chain inventory model for post covid-19 recovery. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 157(1), 107249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107249
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mashud, A. H. M., Pervin, M., Mishra, U., Daryanto, Y., Tseng, M. L., & Lim, M. K. (2021b). A sustainable inventory model with controllable carbon emissions in Green-warehouse farms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298(1), 126777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126777
   Google Scholar
• Mashud, A. H. M., Roy, D., Daryanto, Y., & Ali, M. H. (2020a). A sustainable inventory model with imperfect products, deterioration, and controllable emissions. Mathematics, 8(1), 2049. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8112049
   Google Scholar
• Mashud, A. H. M., Roy, M. D., Daryanto, Y., Chakrabortty, R. K., & Tseng, M. L. (2021c). A sustainable inventory model with controllable carbon emissions, deterioration and advance payments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 296(1), 126608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126608
   Google Scholar
• Mashud, A. H. M., Roy, M. D., Daryanto, Y., & Wee, H. M. (2021d). Joint pricing deteriorating inventory model considering product life cycle and advance payment with a discount facility, RAIRO-Oper. Res. 55, S1069–S1088.
   Google Scholar
• Mashud, A. H. M., Tseng, M. L., Wu, J. Z., & Mishra, U. (2021e). Optimizing a sustainable supply chain inventory model for controllable deterioration and emission rates in a greenhouse farm. Mathematics, 9(5), 495. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9050495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashud, A. H. M., Udin, M. S., & Sana, S. S. (2019). A two-level trade-credit approach to an integrated price-sensitive inventory model with shortages. International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics, 5(4), 121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40819-019-0703-2
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, P., & Lozano, S. (2014). A network DEA assessment of team efficiency in the NBA. Annals of Operations Research, 214(1), 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1074-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosrat, A., Saneie, M., Payan, A., & Rozbehi, G. (2017, September). Measuring efficiency and sensitivity analysis two stage systems. Ninth National DEA Conference, Islamic Azad university Birjand Branch, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Pin-Ho, L., Shan-Hill, D., & Shi-Shang, J. (2004). Controller design and reduction of bullwhip for a model supply chain system using z-transform analysis. Journal of Process Control, 14(5), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2003.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Disney, S. M. (2016). The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(3), 691–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, M., Qin, Z., & Kang, R. (2011). Sensitivity and stability analysis in fuzzy data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-010-9093-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar