The green supply chains’ ordering and pricing competition under carbon emissions regulations of the government

References

• Allevi, E., Gnudi, A., Konnov, I. V., & Oggioni, G. (2018). Evaluating the effects of environmental regulations on a closed-loop supply chain network: A variational. Annals of Operations Research, 261(1–2), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2613-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Q., Gong, Y. (Yale)., Jin, M., & Xu, X. (2019). Effects of carbon emission reduction on supply chain coordination with vendor-managed deteriorating product inventory. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjaafar, S., Li, Y., & Daskin, M. (2013). Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models. Automation Science and Engineering, {IEEE} Transactions on, 10(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2009.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, F., Chen, F., & Federgruen, A. (2006). Coordinating supply chains with simple pricing schemes: The role of vendor-managed inventories. Management Science, 52(10), 1483–1492. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, J., Guo, X., & Li, K. W. (2018). Decentralization or integration: Distribution channel selection under environmental taxation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 113, 170–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, J., Zhang, G., & Zhou, G. (2020). Manufacturer vs. Consumer subsidy with Green technology investment and environmental concern. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(3), 832–843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, J., & Zhao, X. (2020). Tax or subsidy? An analysis of environmental policies in supply chains with retail competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 283(3), 901–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.11.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas, I., & Avittathur, B. (2019). Channel coordination using options contract under simultaneous price and inventory competition. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 123, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddewyn, J. J. (2016). International business-government relations research 1945-2015: Concepts, typologies, theories and methodologies. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchery, Y., Ghaffari, A., Jemai, Z., & Tan, T. (2017). Impact of coordination on costs and carbon emissions for a two-echelon serial economic order quantity problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(2), 520–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, K., He, P., & Liu, Z. (2020). Production and pricing decisions in a dual-channel supply chain under remanufacturing subsidy policy and carbon tax policy. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(8), 1199–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1605471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai, Q., Xiao, Z., & Zhou, G. (2020). Competitive strategies for original equipment manufacturers considering carbon cap and trade. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 78, 102193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Benjaafar, S., & Elomri, A. (2019). On the effectiveness of emission penalties in decentralized supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 274(3), 1155–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daryanto, Y., Wee, H. M., & Astanti, R. D. (2019). Three-echelon supply chain model considering carbon emission and item deterioration. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 122, 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2018.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Y., Yu, Y., Shi, Y., & Liu, J. (2020). The effect of carbon tariffs on global emission control: A global supply chain model. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 133, 101818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J., Xiao, Z., Wei, H., & Zhou, G. (2018). Active or passive? Sustainable manufacturing in the direct-channel Green supply chain: A perspective of two types of green product designs. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 332–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri, B. C., Chakraborty, A., & Maiti, T. (2016). Trade credit competition between two manufacturers in a two-echelon supply chain under credit-linked retail price and market demand. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, 3(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2015.1056271
   Google Scholar
• Giri, R. N., Mondal, S. K., & Maiti, M. (2019). Government intervention on a competing supply chain with two green manufacturers and a retailer. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 128, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddadsisakht, A., & Ryan, S. M. (2018). Closed-loop supply chain network design with multiple transportation modes under stochastic demand and uncertain carbon tax. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 118–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi, T., Chaharsooghi, S. K., Sheikhmohammady, M., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2020). Pricing strategy for a green supply chain with hybrid production modes under government intervention. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 121945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafezalkotob, A. (2017). Competition, cooperation, and coopetition of Green supply chains under regulations on energy saving levels. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 97, 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafezalkotob, A. (2018). Modelling intervention policies of government in price-energy saving competition of green supply chains. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 119, 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafezalkotob, A., Makui, A., & Sadjadi, S. J. (2011). Strategic and tactical design of competing decentralized supply chain networks with risk-averse participants for markets with uncertain demand. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/325610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halat, K., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2019). Modeling carbon regulation policies in inventory decisions of a multistage green supply chain: A game theory approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 807–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, M. R., Roy, T. C., Daryanto, Y., & Wee, H. M. (2021). Optimizing inventory level and technology investment under a carbon tax, cap-and-trade and strict carbon limit regulations. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Z., Chu, C., Zhang, L. L., & Yu, Y. (2017). Optimizing an emission trading scheme for local governments: A Stackelberg game model and hybrid algorithm. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovelaque, V., & Bironneau, L. (2015). The carbon-constrained EOQ model with carbon emission dependent demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadi, T., Alizadeh-Basban, N., Asian, S., & Hafezalkotob, A. (2019). Pricing policies in a dual-channel supply chain considering flexible return and energy-saving regulations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Li, B., Qu, X., & Cheng, Y. (2016). A green vendor-managed inventory analysis in supply chains under carbon emissions trading mechanism. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 18(5), 1369–1380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-1048-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonrinaldi, J., & Zhang, D. Z. (2013). An integrated production and inventory model for a whole manufacturing supply chain involving reverse logistics with finite horizon period. Omega (United Kingdom), 41, 598–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Kadiyala, B., Özer, Ö, & Bensoussan, A. (2020). A mechanism design approach to vendor managed inventory. Management Science, 66(6), 2628–2652. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M., Jaber, M. Y., Zanoni, S., & Zavanella, L. (2016). Vendor managed inventory with consignment stock agreement for a supply chain with defective items. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(15–16), 7102–7114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.02.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiti, M. R., Ghosh, D., Basu, P., & Bisi, A. (2020). Do cap-and-trade policies drive environmental and social goals in supply chains: Strategic decisions, collaboration, and contract choices. International Journal of Production Economics, 223, 107537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, T. C., Hong, I. H., & Lin, S. C. (2016). Do carbon taxes work? Analysis of government policies and enterprise strategies in equilibrium. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamas, A., & Chevalier, P. (2018). Joint dynamic pricing and lot-sizing under competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 266(3), 864–876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., & Li, L. (2020). Environmental sustainability EOQ model for closed-loop supply chain under market uncertainty: A case study of printer remanufacturing. Computers and Industrial Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malleeswaran, B., & Uthayakumar, R. (2020). An integrated vendor–buyer supply chain model for backorder price discount and price-dependent demand using service level constraints and carbon emission cost. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2020.1833258
   Google Scholar
• Mateen, A., & Chatterjee, A. K. (2015). Vendor managed inventory for single-vendor multi-retailer supply chains. Decision Support Systems, 70, 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, W., & Snyder, C. (2012). Microeconomic theory basic principles and extensions (11th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, I., Majumder, S., Szwarc, E., & Saha, S. (2020). Impact of strategic cooperation under competition on Green product manufacturing. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi, Q., Wang, J., & Bai, Q. (2017). Pricing decision of a two-echelon supply chain with one supplier and two retailers under a carbon cap regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., Hafezalkotob, A., Asian, S., & Martínez, L. (2021). Environmental policy making in supply chains under ambiguity and competition: A fuzzy stackelberg game approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabzevar, N., Enns, S. T., Bergerson, J., & Kettunen, J. (2017). Modeling competitive firms’ performance under price-sensitive demand and cap-and-trade emissions constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, S., Nielsen, I., & Sana, S. S. (2021). Effect of optimal subsidy rate and Strategic behaviour of supply chain members under competition on Green product retailing. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6661103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepehri, A., & Gholamian, M. R. (2021). Joint pricing and lot-sizing for a production model under controllable deterioration and carbon emissions. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations and Logistics, https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2021.1896049
   Google Scholar
• Sherafati, M., Bashiri, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Pishvaee, M. S. (2019). Supply chain network design considering sustainable development paradigm: A case study in cable industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheu, J. B., & Chen, Y. J. (2012). Impact of government financial intervention on competition among green supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(1), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somanathan, E., Sterner, T., & Sugiyama, T. (2015). National and Sub-national policies and institutions, in: Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19860660603
   Google Scholar
• Stellingwerf, H. M., Laporte, G., Cruijssen, F. C. A. M., Kanellopoulos, A., & Bloemhof, J. M. (2018). Quantifying the environmental and economic benefits of cooperation: A case study in temperature-controlled food logistics. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 178–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterner, T., & Coria, J. (2012). Policy instruments for environmental and natural resource management (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.660_3.x
   Google Scholar
• Talbi, E. (2013). A Taxonomy of Metaheuristics for Bi-level, in: Metaheuristics for Bi-Level Optimization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37838-6
   Google Scholar
• Taleizadeh, A. A., Noori-daryan, M., & Govindan, K. (2016). Pricing and ordering decisions of two competing supply chains with different composite policies: A Stackelberg game-theoretic approach. International Journal of Production Research, 7543, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1154621
   Google Scholar
• Taleizadeh, A. A., Shokr, I., Konstantaras, I., & VafaeiNejad, M. (2020). Stock replenishment policies for a vendor-managed inventory in a retailing system. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, L., Zhang, Z., Li, P., & Gong, D. (2019). Integrated inventory-transportation problem in vendor-managed inventory system. IEEE Access, 7, 160324–160333. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. H. (2018). Carbon taxes and carbon right costs analysis for the tire industry. Energies, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Liu, K., Choi, T., & Yue, X. (2015). Effects of carbon emission taxes on transportation mode selections and social welfare. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 45(11), 1413–1423. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2015.2411577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Wang, J., Li, C., & Su, K. (2018). Optimal supply chain structural choice under horizontal chain-to-chain competition. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051330
   Google Scholar
• Xu, C., Wang, C., & Huang, R. (2020). Impacts of horizontal integration on social welfare under the interaction of carbon tax and green subsidies. International Journal of Production Economics, 222, 107506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Zhang, Q., & Ji, J. (2017). Pricing and carbon emission reduction decisions in supply chains with vertical and horizontal cooperation. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenipazarli, A. (2019). Incentives for environmental research and development: Consumer preferences, competitive pressure and emissions taxation. European Journal of Operational Research, 276(2), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.01.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, M., Cruz, J. M., & Li, D. M. (2018). The sustainable supply chain network competition with environmental tax policies. International Journal of Production Economics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., & Huang, G. Q. (2010). Nash game model for optimizing market strategies, configuration of platform products in a vendor managed inventory (VMI) supply chain for a product family. European Journal of Operational Research, 206(2), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Cheng, P., Sun, H., Shi, Y., Zhang, G., & Kadiane, A. (2021). Carbon reduction decisions under progressive carbon tax regulations: A new dual-channel supply chain network equilibrium model. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1077–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Hu, F., & Zhou, Z. (2018). Pricing decisions and social welfare in a supply chain with multiple competing retailers and carbon tax policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 752–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar