A new approach for business process reconfiguration under uncertainty using Dempster-Shafer Theory

References

• Abdi, A., Abdi, A., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., & Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. (2021). A set of calibrated metaheuristics to address a closed-loop supply chain network design problem under uncertainty. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 8(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2019.1610197
   Google Scholar
• Abdi, M. R., & Labib, A. (2004). Grouping and selecting products: The design key of reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs). International Journal of Production Research, 42(3), 521–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540310001613665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi, M. R., & Labib, A. W. (2003). A design strategy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs) using analytical hierarchical process (AHP): A case study. International Journal of Production Research, 41(10), 2273–2299. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754031000077266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alizadehsani, R., Roshanzamir, M., Hussain, S., Khosravi, A., Koohestani, A., Zangooei, M. H., Abdar, M., Beykikhoshk, A., Shoeibi, A., Zare, A., Panahiazar, M., Nahavandi, S., Srinivasan, D., Atiya, A.F., & Acharya, U.R. (2021). Handling of uncertainty in medical data using machine learning and probability theory techniques: A review of 30 years (1991–2020). Annals of Operations Research, 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04006-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, S. H., & Zhang, G. (2013). A three-stage model for closed-loop supply chain configuration under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 51(5), 1405–1425. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.693643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angkiriwang, R., Pujawan, I. N., & Santosa, B. (2014). Managing uncertainty through supply chain flexibility: Reactive vs. Proactive approaches. Production & Manufacturing Research, 2(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2014.882804
   Google Scholar
• Chan, F. T. S., Jiang, B., & Tang, N. K. H. (2000). The development of intelligent decision support tools to aid the design of flexible manufacturing systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 65(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00091-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, F. T. S., & Swarnkar, R. (2006). Ant colony optimization approach to a fuzzy goal programming model for a machine tool selection and operation allocation problem in an FMS. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, C., & Grabis, J. (2016). Supply Chain configuration: Concepts, solutions, and applications (2nd ed). Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, C., & Grabis, J. (2007). Supply chain configuration. Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Chibani, A., Dolgui, A., Delorme, X., & Pierreval, H. (2014). Approvisionnement d'une chaîne logistique agile: une approche d'optimisation dynamique. Conférence Internationale sur la Modélisation, l’Optimisation et la Simulation: de l'Économie Linéaire à l'Économie Circulaire (MOSIM 2014), Nancy, France.
   Google Scholar
• Dolgui, A., Ivanov, D., & Sokolov, B. (2020). Reconfigurable supply chain: The X-network. International Journal of Production Research, 58, 4138–4163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1774679
   Google Scholar
• Ennaceur, A., Elouedi, Z., & Lefevre, E. (2011). Handling partial preferences in the belief AHP method: Application to life cycle assessment. In Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (pp. 395–400). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fayezi, S., & Zomorrodi, M. (2015). The role of relationship integration in supply chain agility and flexibility development. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(8), 1126–1157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-11-2014-0123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francalanza, E., Borg, J. C., & Constantinescu, C. (2016). A fuzzy logic based approach to explore manufacturing system changeability level decisions. Procedia CIRP, 41, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.011
   Google Scholar
• Gharaei, A., Hoseini Shekarabi, S. A., & Karimi, M. (2019). Modelling and optimal lot-sizing of the replenishments in constrained, multi-product and bi-objective EPQ models with defective products: Generalised cross decomposition. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 7(3), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2019.1574364
   Google Scholar
• Giri, B. C., & Bardhan, S. (2014). Coordinating a supply chain with backup supplier through buyback contract under supply disruption and uncertain demand. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 1(4), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2014.951714
   Google Scholar
• Giri, B. C., & Masanta, M. (2018). Developing a closed-loop supply chain model with price and quality dependent demand and learning in production in a stochastic environment. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 7(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2018.1542042
   Google Scholar
• Han, S. H. (2008). Meta heuristic method for a supply chain network reconfiguration. Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae, 68(1), 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S. H., Wang, G. X., & Yan, Y. (2015). Decision-making method of reconfigurable manufacturing system’s reconfiguration timing based on catastrophe theory. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D. (2020a). Viable supply chain model: Integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives – lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Operations Research, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D. (2020b). Predicting the impact of epidemic outbreaks on the global supply chains: A simulation-based analysis on the example of coronavirus (COVID-19 / SARS-CoV-2) case. Transportation Research – Part E, 136, 101922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.101922
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904–2915. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahani, H., Abbasi, B., & Alavifard, F. (2017). Supply chain network reconfiguration in new products launching phase. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (pp. 95–99), IEEM 2020, Singapore, December 14–17, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Karim, R., & Nakade, K. (2020). Modelling a one retailer–one manufacturer supply chain system considering environmental sustainability and disruption. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 8(4), 297–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2020.1756006
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, C. W., Slaven, M. P., & Maltz, A. (2005). Improving supply-chain-reconfiguration decisions at IBM. Interfaces, 35(6), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.1050.0166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koren, Y., Heisel, U., Jovane, F., Moriwaki, T., Pritschow, G., Ulsoy, G., & Van Brussel, H. (1999). Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Annals, 48(2), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63232-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutzner, S. C., & Kiesmüller, G. P. (2014). The value of joint decision-making in an inventory–production system with random yield and imperfect information. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 1(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2014.942245
   Google Scholar
• Leeuw, D. (2000). Bedrijfskundig management. Uitgeverij Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Sun, S. X., Wang, H., & Zhao, J. (2011). A multi-agent based system for e-procurement exception management. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi, A., Razmi, J., Babazadeh, R., & Sabbaghnia, A. (2019). An integrated principal component analysis and multi-objective mathematical programming approach to agile supply chain network design under uncertainty. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 15(2), 855–879. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2018074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naughton, S., Golgeci, I., & Arslan, A. (2019). Supply chain agility as an acclimatisation process to environmental uncertainty and organisational vulnerabilities: Insights from British SMEs. Production Planning & Control, 31(14), 1164–1177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peidro, D., Mula, J., Poler, R., & Lario, F. C. (2009). Quantitative models for supply chain planning under uncertainty: A review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 43(3-4), 400–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1715-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbani, M., Foroozesh, N., Mousavi, S. M., & Farrokhi-Asl, H. (2017). Sustainable supplier selection by a new decision model based on interval-valued fuzzy sets and possibilistic statistical reference point systems under uncertainty. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 6(2), 162–178.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy process. M cGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saghaei, M., Ghaderi, H., & Soleimani, H. (2020). Design and optimization of biomass electricity supply chain with uncertainty in material quality, availability and market demand. Energy, 197, 117165.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, N. H. (2015). Three-layered integrated inventory model for deteriorating items with quadratic demand and two-level trade credit financing. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 4(2), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2015.1075078
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, N., Sahay, B. S., Shankar, R., & Sarma, P. R. S. (2017). Supply chain agility: Review, classification and synthesis. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(6), 532–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2017.1335296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simangunsong, E., Hendry, L. C., & Stevenson, M. (2012). Supply-chain uncertainty: A review and theoretical foundation for future research. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16), 4493–4523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.613864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., Kumar, R., Panchal, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on logistics systems and disruptions in food supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 59(7), 1993–2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supakar, P., & Mahato, S. K. (2020). An EPQ model with time proportion deterioration and ramp type demand under different payment schemes with fuzzy uncertainties. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2020.1826594
   Google Scholar
• Taha, Z., & Rostam, S. (2012). A hybrid fuzzy AHP-PROMETHEE decision support system for machine tool selection in flexible manufacturing cell. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23(6), 2137–2149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-011-0560-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana, M., Shaabani, A., Mansouri Mohammadabadi, S., & Varzgani, N. (2021). An integrated fuzzy AHP-fuzzy MULTIMOORA model for supply chain risk-benefit assessment and supplier selection. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 8(3), 238–261.
   Google Scholar
• Thorstenson, A., & Ramani, V. (2020). Coordination in a supply chain with two manufacturers, two substitute products, and one retailer. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 7(2), 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Tyagi, S. K. (2016). Making selection using multiple attribute decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 5(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2016.1244300
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vorst, J. G., & Beulens, A. J. (2002). Identifying sources of uncertainty to generate supply chain redesign strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(6), 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030210437951
   Google Scholar
• Wu, K.-J., Tseng, M.-L., Chiu, A. S. F., & Lim, M. K. (2017). Achieving competitive advantage through supply chain agility under uncertainty: A novel multi-criteria decision-making structure. International Journal of Production Economics, 190, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaowen, X., Wei, X., & Beirong, Z. (2009). Reconfigurability analysis of manufacturing system based on rough sets. IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H. Q., Besant, C. B., & Ristic, M. (2003). System for enhancing supply chain agility through exception handling. International Journal of Production Research, 41(6), 1099–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754021000049826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, S., Nishi, T., & Zhang, G. (2015). A game theoretic model for coordination of single manufacturer and multiple suppliers with quality variations under uncertain demands. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 3(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2015.1050079
   Google Scholar
• Zaeh, M. F., & Mueller, N. (2007). A modeling approach for evaluating capacity flexibilities in uncertain markets. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, 19(3), 151–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-007-9024-6
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & Tao, L. (2008). Multi-agent based supply chain management with dynamic reconfiguration capability. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Zidi, S., Hamani, N., & Kermad, L. (2019). Proposition d’une approche de reconfiguration des processus métiers de la chaîne logistique. Revue Génie Industriel et productique, ISTE, 2(1).
   Google Scholar
• Zidi, S., Hamani, N., & Kermad, L. (2021a). New metrics for measuring supply chain reconfigurability. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-021-01798-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zidi, S., Hamani, N., & Kermad, L. (2021b). Modularity metric in reconfigurable supply chain. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (pp. 455–464). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zidi, S., Hamani, N., & Kermad, L. (2022). Classification of reconfigurability characteristics of supply chain. In Towards sustainable customization: Bridging smart products and manufacturing systems (pp. 72–79). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zidi, S., Hamani, N., Samir, B., & Kermad, L. (2021). Use of fuzzy logic for reconfigurability assessment in supply chain. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-021-01187-7
   Google Scholar