A new metric for gain sharing assessment in collaborative distribution: the sustainability and flexibility rate

References

• Aloui, A., Hamani, N., Derrouiche, R., & Delahoche, L. (2021a). Assessing the benefits of horizontal collaboration using an integrated planning model for two-echelon energy efficiency-oriented logistics networks design. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23302674.2021.1887397
   Google Scholar
• Aloui, A., Hamani, N., Derrouiche, R., & Delahoche, L. (2021b). Systematic literature review on collaborative sustainable transportation: Overview, analysis and perspectives. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 9, 100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100291
   Google Scholar
• Aloui, A., Mrabti, N., Hamani, N., & Delahoche, L. (2021). Towards a collaborative and integrated optimization approach in sustainable freight transportation. IFAC INCOM 2021, 54(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.178
   Google Scholar
• Amer, L. E., & Eltawil, A. B. (2015). Analysis of quantitative models of horizontal collaboration in supply chain network design: Towards “Green collaborative” strategies. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEOM.2015.7093759
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., Allen, J., & Browne, M. (2005). Urban logistics - how can it meet policy makers’ sustainability objectives? Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Audy, J.-F., D’Amours, S., & Rousseau, L.-M. (2011). Cost allocation in the establishment of a collaborative transportation agreement—An application in the furniture industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(6), 960–970. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayadi, H., Hamani, N., Kermad, L., & Benaissa, M. (2021). Novel fuzzy composite indicators for locating a logistics platform under sustainability perspectives. Sustainability, 13(7), 3891. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bent, K., & Caplan, D. (2017). Lattice allocations: A better way to do cost allocations. Advances in Accounting, 38, 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2017.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruijssen, F., Cools, M., & Dullaert, W. (2007). Horizontal cooperation in logistics: Opportunities and impediments. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2005.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curiel, I. (1997). Cooperative games arising from combinatorial optimization problems. Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4871-0
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, J., Göthe-Lundgren, M., & Engevall, S. (2017). A note on the nonuniqueness of the Equal Profit method. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 308, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2017.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos, B., & Raa, B. (2018). Stability analysis of cost allocation methods for Inventory routing. 16th IFAC Symposium on Information Control Problems in Manufacturing INCOM 2018, 51(11), 1682–1688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.214
   Google Scholar
• Engevall, S., Göthe-Lundgren, M., & Värbrand, P. (1998). The traveling salesman game: An application ofcost allocation in a gas and oil company. Annals of Operations Research, 82, 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018935324969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisk, M., Göthe-Lundgren, M., Jörnsten, K., & Rönnqvist, M. (2010). Cost allocation in collaborative forest transportation. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(2), 448–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargouri, M.A., Hamani, N., Mrabti, N., & Kermad, L. (2021). Optimization of the Collaborative Hub Location Problem with Metaheuristics. Mathematics, 9(21), 2759. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9212759
   Google Scholar
• Guajardo, M., & Rönnqvist, M. (2016). A review on cost allocation methods in collaborative transportation. International Transactions in Operational Research, 23(3), 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12205
   Google Scholar
• Habibi, M. K. K., Allaoui, H., & Goncalves, G. (2018). Collaborative hub location problem under cost uncertainty. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 124, 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.07.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellner, F., & Otto, A. (2012). Allocating CO2 emissions to shipments in road freight transportation. Journal of Management Control, 22(4), 451–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-011-0143-6
   Google Scholar
• Khalifehzadeh, S., Seifbarghy, M., & Naderi, B. (2015). A four-echelon supply chain network design with shortage: Mathematical modeling and solution methods. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 35, 164–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2014.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajewska, M. A., Kopfer, H., Laporte, G., Ropke, S., & Zaccour, G. (2008). Horizontal cooperation among freight carriers: Request allocation and profit sharing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(11), 1483–1491. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, H., & Khatod, D. K. (2018). Loss allocation for distribution network using τ-value game theory approach. International Conference on Intelligent Circuits and Systems (ICICS), 401–405. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICS.2018.00088
   Google Scholar
• Lautso, K., Spiekermann, K., & Wegener, M. (2002). Modelling policies for urban sustainability. 42nd congress of the european regional science association: “From industry to advanced services - perspectives of european metropolitan regions”, August 27th–31st, 2002, Dortmund, Germany, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/115795.
   Google Scholar
• Leenders, B. P. J., Velázquez-Martínez, J. C., & Fransoo, J. C. (2017). Emissions allocation in transportation routes. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 57, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Wu, Y., & Xu, N. (2010). Allocating collaborative profit in less-than-Truckload carrier alliance. Journal of Service Science and Management, 03(01), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.4236/jssm.2010.31018
   Google Scholar
• Lozano, S., Moreno, P., Adenso-Díaz, B., & Algaba, E. (2013). Cooperative game theory approach to allocating benefits of horizontal cooperation. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(2), 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulin, H. (1988). Axioms of cooperative decision-making econometric society monographs. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521360552
   Google Scholar
• Mrabti, N., Hamani, N., & Delahoche, L. (2019). Vers un modèle de simulation de la mutualisation logistique 4.0. Logistique & Management, 28(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/12507970.2019.1684214
   Google Scholar
• Mrabti, N., Hamani, N., & Delahoche, L. (2020). The pooling of sustainable freight transport. Journal of the Operational Research Society 72(10), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1772022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrabti, N., Hamani, N., & Delahoche, L. (2022). A sustainable collaborative approach to the distribution network design problem with CO2 emissions allocation. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 14(1/2), 114–140. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2021.10037013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouhader, H., & El Kyal, M. (2020). Assessing the economic and environmental benefits of horizontal cooperation in delivery: Performance and scenario analysis. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 8(2), 303–320. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2019.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Pan, S., Trentesaux, D., Ballot, E., & Huang, G. Q. (2019). Horizontal collaborative transport: Survey of solutions and practical implementation issues. International Journal of Production Research, 57(15–16), 5340–5361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1574040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quak, H. (2008). Sustainability of urban freight transport: Retail distribution and local regulations in cities. PhD, Erasmus University. Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Rajak, S., Parthiban, P., & Dhanalakshmi, R. (2016). Sustainable transportation systems performance evaluation using fuzzy logic. Ecological Indicators, 71, 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeidler, D. (1969). The Nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 17(6), 1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.1137/0117107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n-person games. In: H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker (Eds.), Contributions to the Theory of Games II, Annals of Mathematics Studies, (Vol. 28, pp. 307–317). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simongáti, G. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making support tool for freight integrators: Selecting the most sustainable alternative. Transport, 25(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoussi, I., Hamani, N., Mrabti, N., & Kermad, L. (2021). A Robust Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Model for Sustainable Collaborative Distribution. Mathematics 2021, 9(18), 2318. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9182318
   Google Scholar
• Tijs, S. H. (1981). Bounds for the core of a game and the τ-value. Game theory and Mathematical economics. North-Holland Publishing Company. 123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Tijs, S. H., & Driessen, T. S. H. (1986). Game theory and cost allocation problems. Management Science, 32(8), 1015–1028. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.8.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanovermeire, C., & Sörensen, K. (2014). Measuring and rewarding flexibility in collaborative distribution, including two-partner coalitions. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(1), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.04.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonck, L., Beullens, P., Caris, A., Ramaekers, K., & Janssens, G. K. (2016). Analysis of collaborative savings and cost allocation techniques for the cooperative carrier facility location problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 67(6), 853–871. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2015.106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlinde, S. (2015). Promising but challenging urban freight transport solutions: freight flow consolidation and off-hour deliveries. Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Faculty of Economics, Social and Political Sciences and Solvay Business School; Ghent University. Faculty of Sciences, Brussels; Ghent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. 416/p.
   Google Scholar
• Wick, C., Klumpp, M., & Kandel, C. (2011). Shapley value simulation for allocating GHG emission saving due to logistics pooling within ECR cooperation. The 2011 European Simulation and Modelling Conference, Conference Proceedings October 24–26, at University of Mino, Guimaraes, Portugal, 2011, 240–244.
   Google Scholar