46
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A methodology for solving bimatrix games under 2-tuple linguistic environment

&
Article: 2199368 | Received 01 Jul 2022, Accepted 31 Mar 2023, Published online: 11 Apr 2023

References

  • Arfi, B. (2006). Linguistic fuzzy-logic game theory. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(1), 28–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002705284708
  • Arfi, B. (2006). Linguistic fuzzy-logic social game of cooperation. Rationality and Society, 18(4), 471–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463106068811
  • Aristidou, M., & Sarangi, S. (2006). Games in fuzzy environments. Southern Economic Journal, 72(3), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2006.tb00725.x.
  • Aubin, J. P. (1981). Cooperative fuzzy game. Mathematics of Operations Research, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1287/moor.6.1.1
  • Bai, S. X. (1996). A note on determining pure-strategy equilibrium points of bimatrix games. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 32(7), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(96)00153-8
  • Barron, E. N. (2011). Game theory: An introduction. John Wiley and Sons.
  • Bector, C. R., & Chandra, S. (2005). Fuzzy mathematical programming and fuzzy matrix games. Springer.
  • Bector, C. R., Chandra, S., & Vijay, V. (2004). Duality in linear programming with fuzzy parameters and matrix games with fuzzy payoff. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 146(2), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(03)00260-4
  • Bector, C. R., Chandra, S., & Vijay, V. (2004). Matrix games with fuzzy goals and fuzzy linear programming duality. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3(3), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODM.0000036866.18909.f1
  • Belhaiza, S., Audet, C., & Hansen, P. (2012). On proper refinement of Nash equilibria for bimatrix games. Automatica, 48(2), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2011.07.013
  • Bosse, H., Byrka, J., & Markakis, E. (2010). New algorithms for approximate Nash equilibria in bimatrix games. Theoretical Computer Science, 411(1), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2009.09.023
  • Butnariu, D. (1978). Fuzzy games : A description of the concept. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(3), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(78)90003-9
  • Campos, L. (1989). Fuzzy linear programming models to solve fuzzy matrix games. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 32(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(89)90260-1.
  • Campos, L., & Gonzalez, A. (1991). Fuzzy matrix games considering the criteria of the players. Kybernetes, 20(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb005872.
  • Chen, Y. W. (2002). An alternative approach to the bimatrix non-cooperative game with fuzzy multiple objectives. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 19(5), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10170660209509353
  • Delgado, M., Verdegay, J. L., & Vila, M. A. (1990). Playing matrix games defined by linguistic labels. Multiperson decision making models using fuzzy sets and possibility theory, theory and decision library (series B: mathematical and statistical methods), 18, pp. 298–310. Dordrecht, Springer.
  • Dengfeng, L. (1999). A fuzzy multi-objective programming approach to solve fuzzy matrix games. The Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics, 7(4), 907–912.
  • Firouzbakht, K., Noubir, G., & Salehi, M. (2016). Linearly constrained bimatrix games in wireless communications. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 64(1), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2015.2504085
  • Gani, A. N., & Kumar, C. A. (2013). A new method for solving bimatrix game using LCP under fuzzy environment. Journal of Mathematical and Computational Science, 3(1), 135–149.
  • Gao, J. (2013). Uncertain bimatrix games with applications. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 12(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10700-012-9145-6
  • Gao, L. (2021). An algorithm for finding approximate Nash equilibria in bimatrix games. Soft Computing, 25(2), 1181–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05213-y.
  • Garagic, D., & Cruz, J. B. (2003). An approach to fuzzy noncooperative Nash games. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 118(3), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTA.0000004867.66302.16
  • Han, C., Gao, Z., Yu, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., & Bai, H. (2009). Two-Person non Zero-Sum bimatrix game with fuzzy payoffs and its equilibrium strategy. Journal of Mathematics Research, 1(1), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.5539/jmr.v1n1p57
  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1967). Games with incomplete information played by ‘Bayesian’ players I–III. Management Science, 14(3), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.14.3.159
  • Herrera, F., & Martínez, L. (2000). A 2-Tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8(6), 746–752. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.890332.
  • Herrera, F., & Martínez, L. (2001). The 2-tuple linguistic computational model: Advantages of its linguistic description, accuracy and consistency. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge-Based System, 9(suppl 1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488501000971
  • Hladik, M. (2010). Interval valued bimatrix games. Kybernetika, 46(3), 435–446.
  • Krishnaveni, G., & Ganesan, K. (2018). A new approach for the solution of fuzzy games. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1000 (1), 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1000/1/012017
  • Larbani, M. (2009). Non cooperative fuzzy games in normal form: A survey. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160(22), 3184–3210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2009.02.026
  • Larbani, M. (2009). Solving bimatrix games with fuzzy payoffs by introducing nature as a third player. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160(5), 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2008.06.010
  • Lemke, C., & Howson, J. (1964). Equilibrium points of bimatrix games. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 12(2), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1137/0112033
  • Li, C. L. (2012). Characterization of the equilibrium strategy of fuzzy bimatrix games based on L-R fuzzy variables. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2012, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/824790
  • Maeda, T. (2000). Characterization of the equilibrium strategy of the bimatrix game with fuzzy payoff. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 251(2), 885–896. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.2000.7142
  • Malhotra, T., & Gupta, A. (2020). Group operations and isomorphic relation with the 2-tuple linguistic variables. Soft Computing, 24(24), 18287–18300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05367-9.
  • Malhotra, T., Gupta, A., & Singh, A. (2019). Methodology for interval-valued matrix games with 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic information. International Conference on Numerical Computations: Theory and Algorithms, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer (pp. 154–168).
  • Myerson, R. (1991). Game theory: Analysis of conflict. Harvard University Press. JSTOR.
  • Neumann, J. V., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.
  • Nishizaki, I., & Sakawa, M. (1995). Equilibrium solutions for multiobjective bimatrix games incorporating fuzzy goals. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 86(2), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02192089
  • Sahoo, L. (2015). Effect of defuzzification methods in solving fuzzy matrix games. Journal of New Theory, 8, 51–64.
  • Sahoo, L. (2015). An interval parametric technique for solving fuzzy matrix games. Elixir Applied Mathematics, 93, 39392–39397.
  • Sahoo, L. (2017). An approach for solving fuzzy matrix games using signed distance method. Journal of Information and Computing Science, 12(1), 073–080.
  • Sahoo, L. (2017). Solving matrix games with linguistic payoffs. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 10(4), 484–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-018-0714-0
  • Sakawa, M., & Nishizaki, I. (1994). Max-min solutions for fuzzy multiobjective matrix games. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 67(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(94)90208-9
  • Singh, A., & Gupta, A. (2018). Matrix games with Interval-Valued 2-Tuple linguistic information. Games, 9(3), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/g9030062
  • Singh, A., Gupta, A., & Mehra, A. (2018). Matrix games with 2-tuple linguistic information. Annals of Operation Research, 287, 895–910. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2810-6.
  • Xu, Z. (2005). Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Omega, 33(3), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.04.008
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, I–III. Information Sciences, 8(4), 301–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0255(75)90046-8
  • Zadeh, L. A. (1999). Fuzzy logic = computing with words. computing with words in information/intelligent systems 1. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, 33, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1873-4

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.