A hybrid returns to scale-DEA model for sustainable efficiency evaluation of urban transportation systems

References

• Afsharian, M., Ahn, H., & Alirezaee, M. (2015). Developing selective proportionality on the FDH models: New insight on the proportionality axiom. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 7(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDS.2015.068754
   Google Scholar
• Alirezaee, M., & Boloori, F. (2012). Proportional production trade-offs in dea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 29(06), Article 1250035. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217595912500352
   Google Scholar
• Azadi, M., Moghaddas, Z., Farzipoor Saen, R., & Hussain, F. K. (2021). Financing manufacturers for investing in industry 4.0 technologies: Internal financing vs. external financing. International Journal of Production Research, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1912431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Returns to scale in dea. In Handbook on data envelopment analysis (pp. 41–70).
   Google Scholar
• Batur, İ., & Koç, M. (2017). Travel demand management (tdm) case study for social behavioral change towards sustainable urban transportation in istanbul. Cities (London, England), 69, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazaraa, M. S., Jarvis, J. J., & Sherali, H. D. (2008). Linear programming and network flows. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioğlu, O., & Göçer, F. (2018). Selection of sustainable urban transportation alternatives using an integrated intuitionistic fuzzy choquet integral approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 58, 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Freight transport structure evaluation and optimization toward sustainable development: New evidence from the sbm-dea model with undesirable outputs. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03192-2
   Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2011). Multiple variable proportionality in data envelopment analysis. Operations Research, 59(4), 1024–1032. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1110.0937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa Melo, I., Nocera Alves Junior, P., Péra, T. G., D. Aparecida Do Nascimento Rebelatto, & Vicente Caixeta-Filho, J. (2022). Partially non-discretionary measures for green transportation corridors performance index: A dea approach. In New perspectives in operations research and management science (pp. 89–111). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Djordjević, B., & Krmac, E. (2019). Evaluation of energy-environment efficiency of european transport sectors: Non-radial dea and topsis approach. Energies, 12(15), 2907. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12152907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazi, A., Lotfi, F. H., & Sanei, M. (2020). Hybrid efficiency measurement and target setting based on identifying defining hyperplanes of the pps with negative data. Operational Research, 20(2), 1055–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0362-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkos, G., & Petrou, K. N. (2019). Treating undesirable outputs in dea: A critical review. Economic Analysis and Policy, 62, 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2019.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, C.-C., Feng, C.-M., Chou, P.-F., Wey, W.-M., & Khan, H. A. (2023). Mixed network dea models with shared resources for measuring and decomposing performance of public transportation systems. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 46, Article 100828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, L. E., & Juhola, S. (2021). Urban transportation sustainability assessments: A systematic review of literature. Transport Reviews, 41(5), 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1879309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoveyni, M., Eslami, R., & Yang, G.-l. (2017). Negative data in dea: Recognizing congestion and specifying the least and the most congested decision making units. Computers & Operations Research, 79, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen, T. (2005). Weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis with undesirable outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 87(4), 1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.v87.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Ma, X., & Song, Y. (2022). Green building efficiency and influencing factors of transportation infrastructure in china: Based on three-stage super-efficiency sbm–dea and tobit models. Buildings, 12(5), 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L.-L., Seo, Y.-J., & Ha, M.-H. (2021). The efficiency of major container terminals in china: Super-efficiency data envelopment analysis approach. Maritime Business Review, 6(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-08-2020-0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, S., Ma, S., & Jia, N. (2021). Sustainable urban transportation development in china: A behavioral perspective. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 9(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-021-0162-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Wu, N., Qiao, Y., & Li, Z. (2020). Performance evaluation of public bus transportation by using dea models and shannon's entropy: An example from a company in a large city of china. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 8(4), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.6570654
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi, R., Emrouznejad, A., Shetab-Boushehri, S.-N., & Hejazi, S. R. (2020). The origins, development and future directions of data envelopment analysis approach in transportation systems. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 69, Article 100672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddas, Z., Amirteimoori, A., & Kazemi Matin, R. (2022). Selective proportionality and integer-valued data in dea: An application to performance evaluation of high schools. Operational Research, 22(4), 3435–3459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-022-00692-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddas, Z., Tosarkani, B. M., & Yousefi, S. (2021). A developed data envelopment analysis model for efficient sustainable supply chain network design. Sustainability, 14(1), 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddas, Z., Tosarkani, B. M., & Yousefi, S. (2022). Resource reallocation for improving sustainable supply chain performance: An inverse data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 252, Article 108560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podinovski, V. V. (2004). Bridging the gap between the constant and variable returns-to-scale models: Selective proportionality in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podinovski, V. V. (2009). Production technologies based on combined proportionality assumptions. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 32(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-008-0113-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podinovski, V. V. (2021). Variable and constant returns-to-scale production technologies with component processes. Operations Research, 70(2), 1238–1258. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2021.2103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podinovski, V. V., Ismail, I., Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., & Zhang, W. (2014). Combining the assumptions of variable and constant returns to scale in the efficiency evaluation of secondary schools. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(2), 504–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaee, M. J., Izadbakhsh, H., & Yousefi, S. (2016). An improvement approach based on dea-game theory for comparison of operational and spatial efficiencies in urban transportation systems. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20(4), 1526–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0345-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sameni, M. K., Preston, J., & M. K. Sameni (2016). Evaluating efficiency of passenger railway stations: A dea approach. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 20, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, P., Jain, J. K., & Kalla, P. (2023). A study of efficiency measurement of Jaipur metro mass transit system using data envelopment analysis. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering, 19(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-022-00511-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., Bao, Q., & Hermans, E. (2020). Applying an alternative approach for assessing sustainable road transport: A benchmarking analysis on eu countries. Sustainability, 12(24), Article 10391. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, Y.-y., Li, J.-j., Wang, J.-l., Yang, G.-l., & Chen, Z. (2022). Eco-efficiency of chinese transportation industry: A dea approach with non-discretionary input. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 84, Article 101383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniec, A., Hosseini, K., Xie, J., & Li, Y. (2020). Sustainability assessment of inland transportation in china: A triple bottom line-based network dea approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 80, Article 102258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, C., & Lu, J. (2023). Data envelopment analysis of urban development efficiency from a traffic congestion perspective. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 149(2), Article 05023011. https://doi.org/10.1061/JUPDDM.UPENG-4274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavassoli, M., Fathi, A., & Saen, R. F. (2020). Developing a new super-efficiency dea model in the presence of both zero data and stochastic data: A case study in the iranian airline industry. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-01-2020-0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, N., Tang, S., Che, A., & Wu, P. (2020). Measuring regional transport sustainability using super-efficiency sbm-dea with weighting preference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van, H. T. K., Ha, T. V., Asada, T., & Arimura, M. (2022). Assessing transportation system efficiency in its relationship with urban housing: A data envelopment analysis. Asian Transport Studies, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eastsj.2022.100065
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C.-N., Le, T. Q., Yu, C.-H., Ling, H.-C., & Dang, T.-T. (2022). Strategic environmental assessment of land transportation: An application of dea with undesirable output approach. Sustainability, 14(2), 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wey, W.-M., Kang, C.-C., & Khan, H. A. (2020). Evaluating the effects of environmental factors and a transfer fare discount policy on the performance of an urban metro system. Transport Policy, 97, 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Zhu, Q., Chu, J., Liu, H., & Liang, L. (2016). Measuring energy and environmental efficiency of transportation systems in china based on a parallel dea approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 48, 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Juan, Z., Luo, Q., & Xiao, G. (2016). Performance evaluation of public transit systems using a combined evaluation method. Transport Policy, 45, 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., Zeng, L., Li, P., Lu, H., Hu, H., Li, C., Zheng, M., Li, H., Yu, Z., Yuan, D., Xie, J., Huang, Q., & Qi, Y. (2022). China's transportation sector carbon dioxide emissions efficiency and its influencing factors based on the ebm dea model with undesirable outputs and spatial Durbin model. Energy, 238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar