Fermatean fuzzy framework based on preference selection index and combined compromise solution methods for green supplier selection in textile industry

References

• Akcan, S., & Taş, M. A. (2019). Green supplier evaluation with SWARA-TOPSIS integrated method to reduce ecological risk factors. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, H., & Zhang, J. (2023). A fuzzy multi-objective decision-making model for global green supplier selection and order allocation under quantity discounts. Expert Systems with Applications, 225, 120119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri, M., Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M., Ghahremanloo, M., Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Banaitis, A. (2021). A new fuzzy BWM approach for evaluating and selecting a sustainable supplier in supply chain management. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(2), 125–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslankaya, S., & Çelik, M. T. (2021). Green supplier selection in steel door industry using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy Moora methods. Emerging Materials Research, 10(4), 357–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asgharnezhad, A., & Avakh Darestani, S. (2022). A green supplier selection framework in polyethylene industry. Management Research Review, 45(12), 1572–1591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attri, R., & Grover, S. (2015). Application of preference selection index method for decision making over the design stage of production system life cycle. Journal of King Saud University- Engineering Sciences, 27(2), 207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A., Govindan, K., & Gold, S. (2018). Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 106–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytekin, A., Görçün, ÖF, Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2022). Evaluation of the pharmaceutical distribution and warehousing companies through an integrated Fermatean fuzzy entropy-WASPAS approach. Kybernetes, (ahead-of-print).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baki, R. (2022). An integrated multi-criteria structural equation model for green supplier selection. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 9(4), 1063–1076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalık, A. (2021). A novel Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection in the Industry 4.0 era. Soft Computing, 25(3), 2253–2265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caruzzo, A., Blanco, C. M. R., & Joe, P. (2020). Developing a multi-attribute decision aid model for selection of a weather radar supplier. Environment Systems and Decisions, 40(3), 371–384.
   Google Scholar
• Celik, E., Yucesan, M., & Gul, M. (2021). Green supplier selection for textile industry: A case study using BWM-TODIM integration under interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 64793–64817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Zhu, J., Yang, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Assessing environmental impact of textile production with water alkalization footprint. Science of The Total Environment, 719, 137522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çifçi, G., & Büyüközkan, G. (2011). A fuzzy MCDM approach to evaluate green suppliers. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 4(5), 894–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalic, I., Stević, Ž, Karamasa, C., & Puška, A. (2020). A novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA–interval rough SAW model: Green supplier selection. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(1), 126–145.
   Google Scholar
• Daryanian, N., Kazemi, A., & Adibi, M. A. (2023). A fuzzy robust stochastic model for designing a pharmaceutical supply chain with sustainability and resiliency dimensions. Applied Soft Computing, 143, 110357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhiman, R., Kumar, V., & Rana, S. (2020). Why export competitiveness differs within Indian textile industry? Determinants and empirical evidence. Review of International Business and Strategy, 30(3), 375–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, C. Y., Liu, H. C., Zhang, L. J., & Shi, H. (2019). An extended alternative queuing method with linguistic Z-numbers and its application for green supplier selection and order allocation. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21, 2510–2523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecer, F. (2021). A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecer, F. (2022). Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: A case study of a home appliance manufacturer. Operational Research, 22(1), 199–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecer, F., Küçükönder, H., Kaya, S. K., & Görçün, ÖF. (2023). Sustainability performance analysis of micro-mobility solutions in urban transportation with a novel IVFNN-Delphi-LOPCOW-CoCoSo framework. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 172, 103667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., Zolfani, S. H., & Eshkalag, M. K. (2019). Sustainability assessment of OPEC countries: Application of a multiple attribute decision making tool. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecer, F., & Torkayesh, A. E. (2022). A stratified fuzzy decision-making approach for sustainable circular supplier selection. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 1130–1144.
   Google Scholar
• Görçün, O. F., Senthil, S., & Küçükönder, H. (2021). Evaluation of tanker vehicle selection using a novel hybrid fuzzy MCDM technique. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 140–162.
   Google Scholar
• Govindan, K., Kadziński, M., & Sivakumar, R. (2017). Application of a novel PROMETHEE-based method for construction of a group compromise ranking to prioritization of green suppliers in food supply chain. Omega, 71, 129–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisi, R. M., Guerra, L., & Naviglio, G. (2010). Supplier performance evaluation for green supply chain management. In Business performance measurement and management (pp. 149–163). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guarnieri, P., & Trojan, F. (2019). Decision making on supplier selection based on social, ethical, and environmental criteria: A study in the textile industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 347–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gül, S. (2021). Fermatean fuzzy set extensions of SAW, ARAS, and VIKOR with applications in COVID-19 testing laboratory selection problem. Expert Systems, 38(8), e12769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., Soni, U., & Kumar, G. (2019). Green supplier selection using multi-criterion decision making under fuzzy environment: A case study in automotive industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, 663–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustina, A., Ridwan, A. Y., & Akbar, M. D. (2019, July). Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection and evaluation of textile industry using fuzzy axiomatic design (FAD) method. In 2019 5th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST) (Vol. 1, pp. 1-6). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., Cenk, Z., Erdebilli, B., Özdemir, Y. S., & Gholian-Jouybari, F. (2023a). Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection in the food industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 224, 120036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M., Cenk, Z., Erdebilli, B., Özdemir, Y. S., & Gholian-Jouybari, F. (2023b). Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection in the food industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 224, 120036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi-Amiri, O., Ghorbani, F., & Ji, R. (2023). Integrated supplier selection, scheduling, and routing problem for perishable product supply chain: A distributionally robust approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 175, 108845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. W., Kuo, T. C., Chen, S. H., & Hu, A. H. (2013). Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 164–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javad, M. O. M., Darvishi, M., & Javad, A. O. M. (2020). Green supplier selection for the steel industry using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS: A case study of Khouzestan steel company. Sustainable Futures, 2, 100012.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. (2020). Struggle in the garment sector. Theory and Struggle, 121, 68–77.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, X., Qian, W., Tian, Z., Li, Y., & Wang, L. (2021). Quantification and evaluation of chemical footprint of woollen textiles. Industria Textila, 72(1), 68–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, D., Govindan, K., & Rajendran, S. (2015). Fuzzy axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: A case study from Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production, 96, 194–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan, D., Mina, H., Nosrati-Abarghooee, S., & Khosrojerdi, G. (2020). Sustainable circular supplier selection: A novel hybrid approach. Science of the Total Environment, 722, 137936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantari, L. A., Pujawan, I. N., Arvitrida, N. I., & Hilletofth, P. (2022). Mixing contract-based and on-demand sourcing of transportation services for improved supply chain performance under supply uncertainties. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 9(4), 472–488.
   Google Scholar
• Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M., Zavadskas, E. K., & Kaklauskas, A. (2020). A new decision-making approach based on Fermatean fuzzy sets and WASPAS for green construction supplier evaluation. Mathematics, 8(12), 2202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak, B. K., Naseem, A., Ullah, M., Imran, M., & El Ferik, S. (2022). Incorporating management opinion in green supplier selection model using quality function deployment and interactive fuzzy programming. PLoS One, 17(6), e0268552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodua, L. T., Xiao, Y., Adjei, N. O., Asante, D., Ofosu, B. O., & Amankona, D. (2022). Barriers to green human resources management (GHRM) implementation in developing countries. Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production, 340, 130671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korucuk, S., Aytekin, A., Ecer, F., Karamaşa, Ç, & Zavadskas, E. K. (2022). Assessing green approaches and digital marketing strategies for twin transition via Fermatean Fuzzy SWARA-COPRAS. Axioms, 11(12), 709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korucuk, S., Aytekin, A., Ecer, F., Pamucar, D. S. S., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2023). Assessment of ideal smart network strategies for logistics companies using an integrated picture fuzzy LBWA–CoCoSo framework. Management Decision, 61(5), 1434–1462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Saha, A., Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Dutta, D., & Baidya, J. (2023). A BCF–CRITIC–WASPAS method for green supplier selection with cross-entropy and Archimedean aggregation operators. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(9), 11909–11933.
   Google Scholar
• Lotfabadi, A. K., Hajinezhad, A., Kasaeian, A., & Moosavian, S. F. (2022). Energetic, economic, environmental and climatic analysis of a solar combisystem for different consumption usages with PSI method ranking. Renewable Energy, 197, 178–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Zhang, S., Wu, J., & Wei, Y. (2021). COPRAS method for multiple attribute group decision making under picture fuzzy environment and their application to green supplier selection. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(2), 369–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniya, K., & Bhatt, M. G. (2010). A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method. Materials & Design, 31(4), 1785–1789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memari, A., Dargi, A., Jokar, M. R. A., Ahmad, R., & Rahim, A. R. A. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 9–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mina, H., Kannan, D., Gholami-Zanjani, S. M., & Biuki, M. (2021). Transition towards circular supplier selection in petrochemical industry: A hybrid approach to achieve sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 125273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzaee, H., Samarghandi, H., & Willoughby, K. (2023). A robust optimization model for green supplier selection and order allocation in a closed-loop supply chain considering cap-and-trade mechanism. Expert Systems with Applications, 228, 120423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, S. S., Azar, A., Ghatari, A. R., & Alimohammadlou, M. (2022). A model for selecting green suppliers through interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy multi criteria decision making models. Journal of Management Analytics, 9(1), 60–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayeri, S., Khoei, M. A., Rouhani-Tazangi, M. R., GhanavatiNejad, M., Rahmani, M., & Tirkolaee, E. B. (2023). A data-driven model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection and order allocation problem in a responsive supply chain: A case study of healthcare system. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 124, 106511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazari-Shirkouhi, S., Tavakoli, M., Govindan, K., & Mousakhani, S. (2023). A hybrid approach using Z-number DEA model and artificial neural network for resilient supplier selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 222, 119746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk, M., & Paksoy, T. (2020). A combined DEMATEL-QFD-AT2 BAHP approach for green supplier selection. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 35(4), 2023–2044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, O., Gupta, A. K., & Garg, R. K. (2013). Supplier selection criteria and methods in supply chains: A review. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 7(10), 2667–2673.
   Google Scholar
• Puška, A., Božanić, D., Nedeljković, M., & Janošević, M. (2022). Green supplier selection in an uncertain environment in agriculture using a hybrid MCDM model: Z-Numbers–Fuzzy LMAW–Fuzzy CRADIS model. Axioms, 11(9), 427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbani, M., Foroozesh, N., Mousavi, S. M., & Farrokhi-Asl, H. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection by a new decision model based on interval-valued fuzzy sets and possibilistic statistical reference point systems under uncertainty. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 6(2), 162–178.
   Google Scholar
• Safra, I., & Ghachem, K. (2021). Enhancement of textile supply chain performance through optimal capacity planning. In Lean manufacturing. IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Sahu, A. K., Sharma, M., Raut, R. D., Sahu, A. K., Sahu, N. K., Antony, J., & Tortorella, G. L. (2023). Decision-making framework for supplier selection using an integrated MCDM approach in a lean-agile-resilient-green environment: Evidence from Indian automotive sector. The TQM Journal, 35(4), 964–1006.
   Google Scholar
• Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2019a). Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 112–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2019b). Some new operations over Fermatean fuzzy numbers and application of Fermatean fuzzy WPM in multiple criteria decision making. Informatica, 30(2), 391–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2020). Fermatean fuzzy sets. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(2), 663–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharafi, H., Soltanifar, M., & Lotfi, F. H. (2022). Selecting a green supplier utilizing the new fuzzy voting model and the fuzzy combinative distance-based assessment method. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 10, 100010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheh, C., Chan, P. S., & Sim, W. J. (2018). Ethical issues in the fast fashion industry. Journal of Business and Economics, 9(8), 660–665.
   Google Scholar
• Simic, V., Ivanović, I., Đorić, V., & Torkayesh, A. E. (2022). Adapting urban transport planning to the COVID-19 pandemic: An integrated fermatean fuzzy model. Sustainable Cities and Society, 79, 103669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, T., Pattnaik, P., Shekhawat, D., Ranakoti, L., & Lendvai, L. (2023). Waste marble dust-filled sustainable polymer composite selection using a multi-criteria decision-making technique. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 16(6), 104695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanković, M., Stević, Ž, Das, D. K., Subotić, M., & Pamučar, D. (2020). A new fuzzy MARCOS method for road traffic risk analysis. Mathematics, 8(3), 457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suryadi, A., & Rau, H. (2023). Considering region risks and mitigation strategies in the supplier selection process for improving supply chain resilience. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 181, 109288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana, M., Shaabani, A., Mansouri Mohammadabadi, S., & Varzgani, N. (2021). An integrated fuzzy AHP-fuzzy MULTIMOORA model for supply chain risk-benefit assessment and supplier selection. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 8(3), 238–261.
   Google Scholar
• Torkayesh, A. E., Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., & Karamaşa, Ç. (2021). Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model. Sustainable Cities and Society, 71, 102975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulutaş, A., Topal, A., Görçün, ÖF, & Ecer, F. (2024). Evaluation of third-party logistics service providers for car manufacturing firms using a novel integrated grey LOPCOW-PSI-MACONT model. Expert Systems with Applications, 241, 122680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, S. P., Zou, W. C., Zhong, L. G., & Dong, J. Y. (2020). Some new information measures for hesitant fuzzy PROMETHEE method and application to green supplier selection. Soft Computing, 24, 9179–9203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, D., Meng, D., Rong, Y., Liu, Y., Garg, H., & Pamucar, D. (2022). Fermatean Fuzzy Schweizer–Sklar operators and BWM-entropy-based combined compromise solution approach: An application to green supplier selection. Entropy, 24(6), 776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, S., Pathak, V. K., & Gangwar, S. (2019). A novel hybrid TOPSIS-PSI approach for material selection in marine applications. Sādhanā, 44, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, X., Bao, X., Zhao, R., & Li, F. (2022). Performance measurement for green supplier selection based on data envelopment analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(30), 45960–45970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Zolfani, S. H. (2017). Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3728–3740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision, 57(9), 2501–2519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar