741
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Health Psychology

Validation of the French Versions of the Flourish Index and the Secure Flourish Index

, PhDORCID Icon, , PhDORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , MSc, , MScORCID Icon & , MScORCID Icon
Article: 2173043 | Received 06 Mar 2022, Accepted 20 Jan 2023, Published online: 13 Feb 2023

References

  • Al Taher, R. (2015, February 12). The 5 founding fathers and a history of positive psychology. PositivePsychology.Com. https://positivepsychology.com/founding-fathers/
  • Antonovsky, A. (1987). The salutogenic perspective: Toward a new view of health and illness. Advances, 4(1), 47–15. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1988-20161-001
  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
  • Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2015). National accounts of subjective well-being. The American Psychologist, 70(3), 234‐42. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038899
  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
  • Dunkel, C. S., Mathes, E., & Harbke, C. (2011). Life history strategy, identity consolidation, and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.005
  • Fischer, P., Boughaba, Y., & Meffre, V. (2021). Conditions d’études et de vie dans les hautes écoles suisses. Office fédéral de la statistique (OFS).
  • Jiang, J. M., Seng, E. K., Zimmerman, M. E., Sliwinski, M., Kim, M., & Lipton, R. B. (2017). Evaluation of the reliability, validity, and predictive validity of the subscales of the perceived stress scale in older adults. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 59(3), 987–996. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170289
  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2005). Mental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(3), 539–548. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.539
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Fourth) ed.). The Guilford Press.
  • Lesage, F.-X., Berjot, S., & Deschamps, F. (2012). Psychometric properties of the French versions of the Perceived Stress Scale. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 25(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-012-0024-8
  • Mittelmark, M. B., & Bauer, G. F. (2017). The meanings of salutogenesis. In M. B. Mittelmark, S. Sagy, M. Eriksson, G. F. Bauer, J. M. Pelikan, B. Lindström, & G. A. Espenes (Eds.), The handbook of Salutogenesis (pp. 7–13). Springer.
  • Mittelmark, M. B., & Bauer, G. F. (2022). Salutogenesis as a theory, as an Orientation and as the Sense of Coherence. In M. B. Mittelmark, G. F. Bauer, L. Vaandrager, J. M. Pelikan, S. Sagy, M. Eriksson, B. Lindström, & C. Meier Magistretti (Eds.), The Handbook of Salutogenesis (pp. 11–17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79515-3_3.
  • Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831
  • Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/met0000045
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 52. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/mpr_Schermelleh.pdf
  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
  • Shankland, R. (2014). La Psychologie Positive. Paris: Dunod.
  • Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00
  • VanderWeele, T. J. (2017). On the promotion of human flourishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(31), 8148–8156. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702996114
  • VanderWeele, T. J., McNeely, E., & Koh, H. K. (2019). Reimagining health—Flourishing. JAMA, 321(17), 1667. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.3035
  • Wȩziak-Białowolska, D., McNeely, E., & VanderWeele, T. (2017). Flourish Index and Secure Flourish Index Development and Validation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6(1), 1598926. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3145336
  • Wȩziak-Białowolska, D., McNeely, E., & VanderWeele, T. J. (2019b). Human flourishing in cross cultural settings. Evidence from the United States, China, Sri Lanka, Cambodia, and Mexico. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1269. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01269
  • Wȩziak-Białowolska, D., McNeely, E., VanderWeele, T. J., & Topa, G. (2019a). Flourish Index and Secure Flourish Index – Validation in workplace settings. Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1598926. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1598926
  • Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., & Erikson, P. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in Health, 8(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
  • Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ωH: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7