UK Psychology PhD researchers’ knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of open science

References

• Allen, C., & Mehler, D. M. A. (2019). Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond. PLoS Biology, 17(5), e3000246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arza, V., & Fressoli, M. (2017). Systematizing benefits of open science practices. Information Services & Use, 37(4), 463–13. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170861
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, F., Liu, M., Pennington, C. R., Pownall, M., Evans, T. R., Parsons, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2022). Towards a culture of open scholarship: The role of pedagogical communities. BMC Research Notes, 15(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05944-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, S. M., & Wickham, H. (2022). magrittr: A Forward-pipe operator for R. R. package version 2.0.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=magrittr
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J., & Eaves, J. (2019). Getting to grips with open science. In H. Walton (Ed.), Guide for psychology postgraduates: Surviving postgraduate study (2nd ed., pp. 85–89). British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Bosnjak, M., Fiebach, C. J., Mellor, D., Mueller, S., O’Connor, D. B., Oswald, F. L., & Sokol, R. I. (2022). A template for preregistration of quantitative research in psychology: Report of the joint psychological societies preregistration task force. American Psychologist, 77(4), 602. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branney, P., Brooks, J., Kilby, L., Newman, K. L., Norris, E., Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Treharne, G. J., & Whitaker, C. (2023). Three steps to open science for qualitative research in psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(4), e12728. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. (2018). Registered reports. The Psychologist. https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/registered-reports
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. (2020). Position statement on open data. https://cms.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-06/Open%20data%20position%20statement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Callaway, E. (2011). Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities. Nature, 479(7371), 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/479015a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. A., Micheli-Campbell, M. A., & Udyawer, V. (2019). Early career researchers embrace data sharing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34(2), 95–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drisko, J. W., & Maschi, T. (2016). Content analysis. Pocket Guide to Social Work Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190215491.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Everett, J. A., & Earp, B. D. (2015). A tragedy of the (academic) commons: Interpreting the replication crisis in psychology as a social dilemma for early-career researchers. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnham, A., Kurz, C., Öztürk, M. A., Solbiati, M., Myllyntaus, O., Meekes, J., Pham, T. M., Paz, C., Langiewicz, M., Andrews, S., Kanninen, L., Agbemabiese, C., Guler, A. T., Durieux, J., Jasim, S., Viessmann, O., Frattini, S., Yembergenova, D. & Hettne, K. (2017). Early career researchers want open science. Genome Biology, 18(1), 221–224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1351-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, S. (2004). The effect of open access and downloads (‘hits’) on citation impact: A bibliography of studies. University of Southampton. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/354006
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, H. (2019). Registered reports are an ally to early career researchers. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(10), 1010. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0701-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, M. K., Pownall, M., & Govaart, G. H. (2023). Reflexivity in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner’s guide. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(4), e12735. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth-telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathawalla, U. K., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2021). Easing into open science: A guide for graduate students and their advisors. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.18684
   Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk, O. S., Lautarescu, A., Blok, E., Dall’aglio, L., & Westwood, S. J. (2022). What senior academics can do to support reproducible and open research: A short, three-step guide. BMC Research Notes, 15(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-05999-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, A., Peter, S. M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2018). Questionable research practices in student final theses–prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor’s perceived attitudes. PloS One, 13(8), e0203470. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvetnaya, T., Frank, M., Brachem, J., Hill, M., Schramm, L. F. F., & Eiberger, A. (2019). Questionable research practices and open science in undergraduate empirical projects: Results from a nationwide survey amongst German psychology students open practices in education (OPINE). Proceedings of the Open Practices in Education, Frankfurt, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• McKiernan, E. C. (2016). Point of view: How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, C., Richard, A., Wilson, K., Twomey, R., & Coroiu, A. (2023). I know it’s bad, but I have been pressured into it: Questionable research practices among psychology students in Canada. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 64(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., Grahe, J. E., McCarthy, R. J., Musser, E. D., Antfolk, J., Castille, C. M., Evans, T. R., Fiedler, S., Flake, J. K., Forero, D. A., Janssen, S. M. J., Keene, J. R., Protzko, J., Aczel, B. & Chartier, C. R. (2018). The Psychological science accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Du Sert, N. P., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E. J., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(1), 0021–0029. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562016-0021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, D., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Abrizah, A., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Xu, J., Świgoń, M. … Herman, E. (2019). Open science from the standpoint of the new wave of researchers: Views from the scholarly frontline. Information Services & Use, 39(4), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-190069
   Google Scholar
• Norris, E., & O’Connor, D. B. (2019). Science as behaviour: Using a behaviour change approach to increase uptake of open science. Psychology & Health, 34(12), 1397–1406. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1679373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., Buck, S., Chambers, C. D., Chin, G., Christensen, G., Contestabile, M., Dafoe, A., Eich, E., Freese, J., Glennerster, R., Goroff, D., Green, D. P., Hesse, B., Humphreys, M., & Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obels, P., Lakens, D., Coles, N. A., Gottfried, J., & Green, S. A. (2020). Analysis of open data and computational reproducibility in registered reports in psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920918872
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, D. B., Aggleton, J. P., Chakrabarti, B., Cooper, C. L., Creswell, C., Dunsmuir, S., Fiske, S. T., Gathercole, S., Gough, B., Ireland, J. L., Jones, M. V., Jowett, A., Kagan, C., Karanika‐Murray, M., Kaye, L. K., Kumari, V., Lewandowsky, S., Lightman, S., Malpass, D., & Wykes, T.… Armitage, C. J. (2020). Research priorities for the COVID‐19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science. British Journal of Psychology, 111(4), 603–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orben, A. (2019). A journal club to fix science. Nature, 573(7775), 465–465. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02842-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 528–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612465253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pownall, M., Talbot, C. V., Henschel, A., Lautarescu, A., Lloyd, K. E., Hartmann, H., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Navigating open science as early career feminist researchers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(4), 526–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211029255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Statistical Computing. URL. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Schöpfel, J., Prost, H., Jacquemin, B., & Kergosien, E. (2020). PhD training on open science in French universities. Cadernos BAD, 1, 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Stürmer, S., Oeberst, A., Trötschel, R., & Decker, O. (2017). Early-career researchers’ perceptions of the prevalence of questionable research practices, potential causes, and open science. Social Psychology, 48(6), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault, R. T., Bailey-Rodriguez, D., Bartlett, J. E., Blazey, P., Green, R. J., Pownall, M., & Munafo, M. (2023). A Delphi study to strengthen research methods training in undergraduate psychology programmes. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gp9aj
   Google Scholar
• Toribio-Flórez, D., Anneser, L., de Oliveira-Lopes, F. N., Pallandt, M., Tunn, I., & Windel, H. (2021). Where do early career researchers Stand on open science practices? A survey within the max Planck Society. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analysis, 5, 586992. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2020.586992
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitaker, T., & Guest, B. (2020). #bropenscience is broken science. The Psychologist, 33(2), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690055.2019.1577602
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., & Müller, K. (2022). Dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation. R package version 1.0.9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
   Google Scholar