Preferred level of vehicle automation: How technology adoption, knowledge, and personality affect automation preference in Türkiye and Sweden

References

• Alessandrini, A., Campagna, A., Delle Site, P., Filippi, F., & Persia, L. (2015). Automated vehicles and the rethinking of mobility and cities. Transportation Research Procedia, 5, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Anania, E. C., Rice, S., Walters, N. W., Pierce, M., Winter, S. R., & Milner, M. N. (2018). The effects of positive and negative information on consumers’ willingness to ride in a driverless vehicle. Transport Policy, 72, 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014). Outlier removal, sum scores, and the inflation of the type I error rate in independent samples t tests: The power of alternatives and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 19(3), 409–427. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, P., Kockelman, K. M., & Singh, A. (2016). Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellem, H., Thiel, B., Schrauf, M., & Krems, J. F. (2018). Comfort in automated driving: An analysis of preferences for different automated driving styles and their dependence on personality traits. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliner, R. M., Hardman, S., & Tal, G. (2019). Uncovering early adopter’s perceptions and purchase intentions of automated vehicles: Insights from early adopters of electric vehicles in California. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 712–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethlehem, J. (2010). Selection bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00112.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C. Y. (2017). Advancements, prospects, and impacts of automated driving systems. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 6(3), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.07.008
   Google Scholar
• Charness, N., Yoon, J. S., Souders, D., Stothart, C., & Yehnert, C. (2018). Predictors of attitudes toward autonomous vehicles: The roles of age, gender, prior knowledge, and personality. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2589. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chikodili, N. B., Abdulmalik, M. D., Abisoye, O. A., & Bashir, S. A. (2020, November) Outlier detection in multivariate time series data using a fusion of K-medoid, standardized euclidean distance and Z-score. In S. Misra, & B. Muhammad-Bello (Eds.), International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and Applications (pp. 259–271). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrea, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 2. Personality measurement and testing (pp. 179–198). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, M. L., Regan, M. A., Horberry, T., Weeratunga, K., & Dixit, V. (2019). Public opinion about automated vehicles in Australia: Results from a large-scale national survey. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 129, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlen, E. R., Edwards, B. D., Tubré, T., Zyphur, M. J., & Warren, C. R. (2012). Taking a look behind the wheel: An investigation into the personality predictors of aggressive driving. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 45, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dettmann, A., Hartwich, F., Roßner, P., Beggiato, M., Felbel, K., Krems, J., & Bullinger, A. C. (2021). Comfort or not? Automated driving style and user characteristics causing human discomfort in automated driving. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(4), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1860518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicianno, B. E., Sivakanthan, S., Sundaram, S. A., Satpute, S., Kulich, H., Powers, E., Deepak, N., Russell, R., Cooper, R., & Cooper, R. A. (2021). Systematic review: Automated vehicles and services for people with disabilities. Neuroscience Letters, 761, 136103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, G., Nanchen, B., Ramseyer, R., & Evéquoz, F. (2017, September) Expectation and experience: Passenger acceptance of autonomous public transportation vehicles. In R. Bernhaupt et al. (Eds.), IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 360–363). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-68059-0
   Google Scholar
• European Transport Safety Council. (2020). 14th Annual road safety performance index (PIN) report. ETSC, https://etsc.eu/14th-annual-road-safety-performance-index-pin-report/.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, K., & van Lierop, D. (2020). How will older adults use automated vehicles? Assessing the role of AVs in overcoming perceived mobility barriers. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 133, 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gençöz, T., & Öcül, Ö. (2012). Examination of personality characteristics in a Turkish sample: Development of basic personality traits inventory. The Journal of General Psychology, 139(3), 194–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2012.686932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardman, S., Berliner, R., & Tal, G. (2019). Who will be the early adopters of automated vehicles? Insights from a survey of electric vehicle owners in the United States. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 71, 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwich, F., Witzlack, C., Beggiato, M., & Krems, J. F. (2019). The first impression counts–a combined driving simulator and test track study on the development of trust and acceptance of highly automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 522–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• König, M., & Neumayr, L. (2017). Users’ resistance towards radical innovations: The case of the self-driving car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 44, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körber, M., & Bengler, K. (2014, September). Potential individual differences regarding automation effects in automated driving [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, Puerto de la Cruz Tenerife Spain (pp. 1–7). 10.1145/2662253
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, J., Scholz, D., & Baumann, M. (2021). What’s driving me? Exploration and validation of a hierarchical personality model for trust in automated driving. Human Factors, 63(6), 1076–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820922653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, J., Scholz, D., Messner, E. M., Messner, M., & Baumann, M. (2020a). Scared to trust?–predicting trust in highly automated driving by depressiveness, negative self-evaluations and state anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2917. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & de Winter, J. C. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 32, 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Seppelt, B., Reimer, B., Mehler, B., & Coughlin, J. F. (2019, November). Acceptance of vehicle automation: Effects of demographic traits, technology experience and media exposure. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 2066–2070). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/107118131963142
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, E., Malin, F., Louw, T., Lee, Y. M., Itkonen, T., & Innamaa, S. (2022). Why would people want to travel more with automated cars? Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 89, 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, E., Wörle, J., Malin, F., Metz, B., & Innamaa, S. (2022). Travel experience matters: Expected personal mobility impacts after simulated L3/L4 automated driving. Transportation, 49(5), 1295–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-021-10211-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Yao, N., Shi, Y., Nie, W., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Liang, J., Chen, F., & Gao, Z. (2020). Personality openness predicts driver trust in automated driving. Automotive Innovation, 3(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42154-019-00086-w
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Yang, R., Wang, L., & Liu, P. (2019). Evaluating initial public acceptance of highly and fully autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(11), 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D. P.,Fairchild, A. J., &Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542 16968208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljamo, T., Liimatainen, H., & Pöllänen, M. (2018). Attitudes and concerns on automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 59, 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAE International. (2019). SAE standards news: J3016 automated-driving graphic update. https://www.sae.org/news/2019/01/sae-updates-j3016-automated-driving-graphic.
   Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T.Jr, (1995). Trait explanations in personality psychology. European Journal of Personality, 9(4), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410090402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriman, S. E., Plant, K. L., Revell, K. M., & Stanton, N. A. (2021). Challenges for automated vehicle driver training: A thematic analysis from manual and automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 76, 238–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhoff, S., Kyriakidis, M., Van Arem, B., & Happee, R. (2019). A multi-level model on automated vehicle acceptance (MAVA): A review-based study. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 20(6), 682–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2019.1621406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhoff, S., Louw, T., Madigan, R., Lee, Y. M., Innamaa, S., Lehtonen, E., Malin, F., Bjorvatn, A., Beuster, A., Happee, R., Kessel, T., & Merat, N. (2022). Profiling the enthusiastic, neutral, and sceptical users of conditionally automated cars in 17 Countries: A questionnaire study. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8053228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman, K. (2021). Public acceptance and perception of autonomous vehicles: a comprehensive review. AI and Ethics, 1(3), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00041-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Othman, K. (2023b). Public attitude towards autonomous vehicles before and after crashes: A detailed analysis based on the demographic characteristics. Cogent Engineering, 10(1), 2156063. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2156063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman, K. (2023a). Investigating the influence of self-driving cars accidents on the public attitude: Evidence from different countries in different continents [Paper presentation]. 2023 5th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT), Tirunelveli, India (pp. 1579–1584). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSIT55814.2023.10061032
   Google Scholar
• Özkan, T., & Lajunen, T. (2015). A general traffic (safety) culture system (G-TraSaCu-S). TraSaCu project, European Commission, RISE Programme. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.16515.20006
   Google Scholar
• Öztürk, İ. (2021). Preferred level of vehicle automation in Turkey and Sweden: In association with traffic climate, traffic locus of control and driving skills [Unpublished Doctoral thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Öztürk, İ., Wallén Warner, H., & Özkan, T. (2023). Automation preferences by traffic climate and driver skills in two samples from countries with different levels of traffic safety. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2677(2), 1701–1712. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221109593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk, İ., Wallén Warner, H., & Özkan, T. (2022). Traffic climate scale: Comparing samples from Turkey and Sweden. IATSS Research, 46(1), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2021.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 27, 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penmetsa, P., Adanu, E. K., Wood, D., Wang, T., & Jones, S. L. (2019). Perceptions and expectations of autonomous vehicles–a snapshot of vulnerable road user opinion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 143, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, W., Sun, H., & Ge, Y. (2021a). The effects of trait anxiety and the big five personality traits on self-driving car acceptance. Transportation, 48(5), 2663–2679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10143-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu, W., Xu, J., & Ge, Y. (2021b). The effect of acceptability and personality on the intention to use automated vehicles among Chinese samples. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6632185
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Strayer, D. L., Yu, Z., Biondi, F., & Cooper, J. M. (2018). Cognitive underpinnings of beliefs and confidence in beliefs about fully automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuß, M., Wintersberger, P., & Riener, A. (2021a). Let’s share a ride into the future: A qualitative study comparing hypothetical implementation scenarios of automated vehicles [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan (pp. 1–11). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445609
   Google Scholar
• Schuß, M., Wintersberger, P., & Riener, A. (2021b). security issues in shared automated mobility systems: A feminist HCI perspective. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(8), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5080043
   Google Scholar
• Sener, I. N., Zmud, J., & Williams, T. (2019). Measures of baseline intent to use automated vehicles: A case study of Texas cities. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skjeret, F., Bjorvatn, A., Innamaa, S., Lehtonen, E., Malin, F., Nordhoff, S., & Louw, T. (2023). Willingness to pay for conditional automated driving among segments of potential buyers in Europe. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2023, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8953109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurlock, C. A., Sears, J., Wong-Parodi, G., Walker, V., Jin, L., Taylor, M., Duval, A., Gopal, A., & Todd, A. (2019). Describing the users: Understanding adoption of and interest in shared, electrified, and automated transportation in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 71, 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (vol. 6, pp. 497–516). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Thurner, T., Fursov, K., & Nefedova, A. (2022). Early adopters of new transportation technologies: Attitudes of Russia’s population towards car sharing, the electric car and autonomous driving. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 155, 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Selm, M., & Jankowski, N. W. (2006). Conducting online surveys. Quality and Quantity, 40(3), 435–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 47(3), 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749408401131
   Google Scholar
• Vishwanath, A. (2005). Impact of personality on technology adoption: An empirical model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8), 803–811. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadud, Z., MacKenzie, D., & Leiby, P. (2016). Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 86, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallén Warner, H., Björklund, G., & Andersson, J. (2021). Using a three-stage model of change to understand people’s use of bicycle, public transport, and car. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 82, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallén Warner, H., Özkan, T., Lajunen, T., & Tzamalouka, G. (2011). Cross-cultural comparison of drivers’ tendency to commit different aberrant driving behaviours. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(5), 390–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Li, Z., Wang, Y., & Wyatt, D. A. (2022). How do age and gender influence the acceptance of automated vehicles?–Revealing the hidden mediating effects from the built environment and personal factors. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 165, 376–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigl, K., Eisele, D., & Riener, A. (2022). Estimated years until the acceptance and adoption of automated vehicles and the willingness to pay for them in Germany: Focus on age and gender. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 11(2), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Weigl, K., Schartmüller, C., Riener, A., & Steinhauser, M. (2021). Development of the questionnaire on the acceptance of automated driving (QAAD): Data-driven models for Level 3 and Level 5 automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 83, 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2018). Global status report on road safety 2018. https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2018/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Zeng, J., Zhu, H., & Zhu, H. (2020). Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 112, 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar