A pathway to engagement: the mediating role of self-efficacy between interpersonal relationships and academic engagement

References

• Awang-Hashim, R., Kaur, A., & Noman, M. (2015). The interplay of socio-psychological factors on school engagement among early adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 45(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.10.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
   Google Scholar
• Bassi, M., Steca, P., Fave, A. D., & Caprara, G. V. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-006-9069-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bong, M., Cho, C., Ahn, H. S., & Kim, H. J. (2012). Comparison of self-beliefs for predicting student motivation and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(5), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2011.627401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. L. J. Berry (Ed.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137–164). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson, S., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Collie, R. J., Martin, A. J., Papworth, B., & Ginns, P. (2016). Students’ interpersonal relationships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, W., & Williams, C. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self‐efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903353302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guay, F., Boivin, M., & Hodges, E. V. (1999). Predicting change in academic achievement: A model of peer experiences and self-system processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., & Babin, B. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. N., & Chen, Q. (2011). Reciprocal effects of student–teacher and student–peer relatedness: Effects on academic self efficacy. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, S-f., Wong, B. P., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2012). Understanding student engagement with a contextual model. In A. L. R. S. L. Christenson, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 403–419). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs instudent engagement and learning intheclassroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308223
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self-description questionnaire II: Manual. Publication Unit, Faculty of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J. (2014). Interpersonal relationships and students’ academic and non-academic development: What outcomes peers, parents, and teachers do and do not impact. In P. d. B. D. Zandvliet., T. Mainhard, & J. Tartwijk (Eds.), Interpersonal relationships in education: From theory to practice (pp. 9–24). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 327–365. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. J., Yu, K., & Hau, K.-T. (2014). Motivation and engagement in the ‘Asian Century’: A comparison of Chinese students in Australia, Hong Kong, and Mainland China. Educational Psychology, 34(4), 417–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.814199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L. (1997). Child and adolescent development for educators. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K. E., & Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Niemi, H., & Multisilta, J. (2016). Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1074610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In A. L. R. S. L. Christenson & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H.-R. (2019). A teacher-focused intervention to enhance students’ classroom engagement. In J. Fredricks, S. Christenson, & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of student engagement interventions (pp. 87–102). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. (1985). Self‐efficacy and classroom learning. Psychology in the Schools, 22(2), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(198504)22:2<208::AID-PITS2310220215>3.0.CO;2-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D., & Miller, S. D. (2002). Self-efficacy and adolescents’ motivation. In F. P. T. urdan (Ed.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 29–52). Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioural and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sökmen, Y. (2021). The role of self-efficacy in the relationship between the learning environment and student engagement. Educational Studies, 47(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2019.1665986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sungur, S., & Kahraman, N. (2011). The contribution of motivational beliefs to students’ metacognitive strategy use. Education and Science, 36(160), 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Uçar, F. M., & Sungur, S. (2017). The role of perceived classroom goal structures, self-efficacy, and engagement in student science achievement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1278684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandvliet, D., Den Brok, P., & Mainhard, T. (2014). Interpersonal relationships in education: From theory to practice. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zhen, R., Liu, R.-D., Ding, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., & Xu, L. (2017). The mediating roles of academic self-efficacy and academic emotions in the relation between basic psychological needs satisfaction and learning engagement among Chinese adolescent students. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar