285
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Food Science & Technology

Psycho-social factors influencing the adoption of sustainable intensification practices by smallholder rice farmers in Northern Ghana

ORCID Icon, &
Article: 2345434 | Received 18 Jan 2023, Accepted 16 Apr 2024, Published online: 04 May 2024

References

  • Abushanab, E., & Pearson, J. M. (2007). Internet banking in Jordan: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) perspective. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287260710817700
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour: Attitudes. In Intentions and perceived behavioral control. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
  • Ali, F., Nair, P. K., & Hussain, K. (2016). An assessment of students’ acceptance and usage of computer supported collaborative classrooms in hospitality and tourism schools. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 18, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2016.03.002
  • Alwahaishi, S., & Snásel, V. (2013). Consumers’ acceptance and use of information and communications technology: A UTAUT and flow based theoretical model. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 8(2), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242013000200005
  • Barnes, A. P., Soto, I., Eory, V., Beck, B., Balafoutis, A., Sánchez, B., Vangeyte, J., Fountas, S., van der Wal, T., & Gómez-Barbero, M. (2019). Exploring the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: A cross regional study of EU farmers. Land Use Policy, 80, 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.004
  • Bervell, B., & Umar, I. N. (2017). Validation of the UTAUT model: Re-considering non-linear relationships of exogenous variables in higher education technology acceptance research. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6471–6490.
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189017003004
  • Borges, J. A. R., Foletto, L., & Xavier, V. T. (2015). An interdisciplinary framework to study farmers decisions on adoption of innovation: Insights from expected utility theory and theory of planned behavior. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(29), 2814–2825.
  • Borges, J. A. R., Lansink, A., & Emvalomatis, G. (2019). Adoption of innovation in agriculture: A critical review of economic and psychological models. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2019.096705
  • Brown, B., Nuberg, I., & Llewellyn, R. (2017). Negative evaluation of conservation agriculture: Perspectives from African smallholder farmers. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 15(4), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1336051
  • Brown, S.A., & Venkatesh, V. (2005) Model of adoption of technology in the household: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. Management Information System Quarterly, 29 (3), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148690
  • Çelik, H. (2008). What determines Turkish customers’ acceptance of internet banking? International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(5), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320810894406
  • Chao, C. M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
  • Chouinard, H., Paterson, T., Wandschneider, P., & Ohler, A. (2008). Will farmers trade profits for stewardship? Heterogeneous motivations for farm practice selection. Land Economics, 84(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.84.1.66
  • Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2005). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • de Sena Abrahão, R. D. S., Moriguchi, S. N., & Andrade, D. F. (2016). Intention of adoption of mobile payment: An analysis in the light of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.003
  • Dessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & van Bavel, R. (2019). Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: A policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 417–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019
  • Digvijah, S. N., Birthal, P. S., Kumar, A., & Tripathi, G. (2020). Farmers’ social networks and adoption of modern crop varieties in India. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1918. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133684
  • Doss, C. R. (2006). Analysing technology adoption using microstudies: Limitations, challenges and opportunities for improvement. Agricultural Economics, 34(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0864.2006.00119.x
  • Duck-Boung, K., Kwang-Jin, C., Yang-Kyu, L., & Min-Uk, J. (2020). A study on the effects of changes in smart farm introduction conditions on willingness to accept agriculture - application of extended UTAUT model. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture, 28(2), 119–138. Doi: 10.11625/KJOA.2020.28.2.119
  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
  • El Bilali, H. L., Hassen, T. B., Bottalico, F., Berjan, S., & Capone, R. (2021). Acceptance and adoption of technologies in agriculture. AGROFOR, 6(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.7251/AGRENG2101135E
  • Engotoit, E., Kituyi, G. M., & Moya, M. B. (2016). Influence of performance expectancy on commercial farmers’ intention to use mobile-based communication technologies for agricultural market information dissemination in Uganda. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 18(4), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-06-2016-0037
  • Eweoya, I., Senanu, R., Okuboyejo, S. R., Odetunmibi, O. A., & Odusote, B. O. (2021). An empirical investigation of acceptance, adoption and the use of E-agriculture in Nigeria. Heliyon, 7(7), e07588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07588
  • Foguesatto, C. R., Borges, J. A. R., & Machado, J. A. D. (2019). Farmers’ typologies regarding environmental values and climate change: Evidence from southern Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232(2019), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.275
  • Fountas, S., Carli, G., Sørensen, C. G., Tsiropoulos, Z., Cavalaris, C., Vatsanidou, A., Liakos, B., Canavari, M., Wiebensohn, J., & Tisserye, B. (2015). Farm management information systems: Current situation and future perspectives. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 115, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.05.011
  • Fox, G., Mooney, J., Rosati, P., & Lynn, T. (2021). AgriTech innovators: A study of initial adoption and continued use of a mobile digital platform by family-operated farming enterprises. Agriculture, 11(12), 1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11121283
  • Garnett, T., & Godfray, C. (2012). Sustainable intensification in agriculture. Navigating a course through competing food system priorities. Food Climate Research Network and the Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, University of Oxford, 51.
  • Glover, D., Sumberg, J., & Andersson, J. A. (2016). The adoption problem; Or why we still understand so little about technological change in African agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture, 45(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.5367/oa.2016.0235
  • Glover, D., Sumberg, J., Ton, G., Andersson, J., & Badstue, L. (2019). Rethinking technological change in smallholder agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture, 48(3), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019864978
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Jaradat, M. I. R. M., & Al-Mashaqba, A. M. (2014). Understanding the adoption and usage of mobile payment services by using TAM3. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 16(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2014.063768
  • Jin, Y., Lin, Q., & Mao, S. (2022). Tanzanian farmers’ intention to adopt improved maize technology: Analyzing influencing factors using SEM and fsQCA methods. Agriculture, 12(12), 1991. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12121991
  • Jones-Garcia, E., & Krishna, V. V. (2021). Farmer adoption of sustainable intensification technologies in the maise systems of the Global South: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable. Development, 41(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00658-9
  • Kaplan, K. J. (1972). On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. Psychological Bulletin, 77(5), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032590
  • Lee, J. H., & Song, C. H. (2013). Effect of trust and perceived risk on user acceptance of a new technology service. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 41(4), 587–597. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2013.41.4.587
  • Liu, H. B., & Luo, X. J. (2018). Understanding farmers’ perceptions and behaviors towards farmland quality change in Northeast China: A structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 10(9), 3345. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093345
  • Loos, J., Abson, D. J., Chappell, M. J., Hanspach, J., Mikulcak, F., Tichit, M., & Fischer, J. (2014). Putting meaning back into “sustainable intensification”. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(6), 356–361. https://doi.org/10.1890/130157
  • Lotte, W., Katrien, D., & Ken, G. E. (2015). Adoptability of sustainable intensification technologies in dryland smallholder farming systems of West Africa. Research Report No. 64. Patancheru 502 324. International Crops Research Institute for the SemiArid Tropics, 84 pp.
  • Lwoga, E. T., & Lwoga, N. B. (2017). User acceptance of mobile payment: The effects of user- centric security, system characteristics and gender. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 81(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00595.x
  • Majidi, S., & Raymond, J. K. (2022). Psychosocial responses to telehealth for diabetes care. In David C. Klonoff, David Kerr, Elissa R. Weitzman (Eds.), Diabetes digital health and telehealth (pp. 159–169). Elsevier.
  • Marsh, H. W. (2007). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport and exercise psychology. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (pp. 774–798). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118270011.ch35
  • Michels, M., Bonke, V., & Mußhoff, O. (2019). Understanding the adoption of crop protection smartphone apps: An application of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. (No. 1905). Diskussionsbeitrag.
  • Mills, J., Gaskell, P., Ingram, J., Dwyer, J., Reed, M., & Short, C. (2017). Engaging farmers in environmental management through a better understanding of behaviour. Agriculture and Human Values, 34(2), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9705-4
  • Momani, A. M. (2020). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A new approach in technology acceptance. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 12(3), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD.2020070105
  • Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Investigating students’ behavioural intention to adopt and use mobile learning in higher education in East Africa. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 10(3), 4–20.
  • Mulugu, L., Birungi, F., Kyazze, P., Kibwika, E., Kikulwe, A., Omondi, B., & Ajambo, S. (2020). Unravelling technology-acceptancefactors influencing farmer use of banana tissue culture planting materials in Central Uganda. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(4), 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2019.1634900
  • O’Shea, R., O’Donoghue, C., Ryan, M., & Breen, J. (2018, August 30–31). Understanding farmers: From adoption to attitudes [Paper presentation]. 166th EAAE Seminar Sustainability in the Agri-Food Sector, Galway Galway, Ireland. National University of Ireland.
  • Okumus, B., Ali, F., Bilgihan, A., & Ozturk, A. B. (2018). Psychological factors influencing customers’ acceptance of smartphone diet apps when ordering food at restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 72, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.01.001
  • Omar, Q., Yap, C. E., Ho, P. L., & Keling, W. (2022). Predictors of behavioral intention to adopt e-AgriFinance app among the farmers in Sarawak, Malaysia. British Food Journal, 124(1), 239–254. https://www.emerald.com/insight/0007-070X.htm https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2021-0449
  • Onaolapo, S., & Oyewole, O. (2018). Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and facilitating conditions as factors influencing smart phones use for mobile learning by postgraduate students of the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 14, 95–115. https://doi.org/10.28945/4085
  • Pardamean, B., & Susanto, M. (2012). Assessing user acceptance toward blog technology using the UTAUT model. International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1(6), 203–216.
  • Piedmont, R. L. (2014). Inter-item correlations. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (Vol. 1, pp. 3303–3304). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1493
  • Ren, Z., & Zhong, K. (2022). Driving mechanism of subjective cognition on farmers’ adoption behavior of straw returning technology: Evidence from rice and wheat producing provinces in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 922889. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.922889
  • Rosário, J., Madureira, L., Marques, C., & Silva, R. (2022). Understanding farmers’ adoption of sustainable agriculture innovations: A systematic literature review. Agronomy, 12(11), 2879. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112879
  • Schukat, S., & Heise, H. (2021). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intentions and actual use of smart products among German farmers. Sustainability, 13(12), 6666. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126666
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Shafinah, K., Sahari, N., Sulaiman, R., Yusoff, M. S. M., & Ikram, M. M. (2013). Determinants of user behavioral intention (BI) on mobile services: A preliminary view. Procedia Technology, 11, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.171
  • Shanmugam, V., & Marsh, J. E. (2016). Application of structural equation modeling to the social sciences: A brief guide for researchers. Mesure et Évaluation en Éducation, 37(3), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.7202/1036329ar
  • Stein, C. M., Morris, N. J., & Nock, N. L. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), 850, 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-555-8_27
  • Struik, P. C., & Kuyper, T. W. (2017). Sustainable intensification in agriculture: the richer shade of green. A review. Agronony for Sustainable Development, 37(39), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0445-7
  • Taiwo, A. A., & Downe, L. G. (2013). The theory of user acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A meta-analytic review of empirical findings. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 49(1), 48–58.
  • Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144
  • Teo, T. (2009). The impact of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on pre-service teachers’ attitude toward computer use: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 40(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.40.1.d
  • Thomas, T. D., Singh, L., & Gaffar, K. (2013). The utility of the UTAUT model in explaining mobile learning adoption in higher education in Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 9(3), 71–85.
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., & Davis, F.D. (2003), User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Venkatesh,V., Brown, S.A., Maruping, L.M., & Bala, H.(2008). Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quarterly, 32 (3), 483–502. Doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25148853 https://doi.org/10.2307/25148853
  • Violato, C., & Hecker, K. G. (2007). How to use structural equation modeling in medical education research: A brief guide. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 19(4), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401330701542685
  • Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Al-Sobhi, F., Shareef, M. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2013). Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.05.001
  • Whetten, D. A. (2009). An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organisations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2008.00132.x
  • Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014-0088
  • Yabi, A. J., & Omolehin, A. R. A. (2009). Structural equation modelling of socio-economic determinants of modern technology adoption for sustainable natural resources management in Adja and Nagot Areas of Benin Republic. Journal of Humanities, Social Science and Creative Arts, 4(1), 65–81.
  • Yamano, T., Rajendran, S., & Malabayuabas, M. L. (2013, April 8–10). Psychological constructs toward agricultural technology adoption: Evidence from Eastern India [Paper presentation]. 87th Annual Conference, Coventry, UK. Warwick University.
  • Zeweld, W., Huylenbroeck, G. V., Tesfay, G., & Speelman, S. (2017). Smallholder farmers’ behavioural intentions towards sustainable agricultural practices. Journal of Environmental Management, 187(2017), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.014
  • Zeweld, W., Huylenbroeck, G. V., Tesfay, G., Azadi, H., & Speelman, S. (2018). Impacts of socio-psychological factors on actual adoption of sustainable land management practices in dryland and water stressed areas. Sustainability, 10(9), 2963. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10092963