Psychological empowerment as moderator of the relationship between core self-evaluation and proactive work behaviour

References

• Abdulrab, M., Zumrah, A. R., Almaamari, Q., & Al-Tahitah, A. (2017). Transformational leadership and psychological empowerment in Malaysian public universities: A review paper. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(24), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Akhtar, M. S., & Ali, H. (2023). Innovative work behaviour: An association of leadership styles, job autonomy, and employee proactive behaviour. Journal of Social Sciences Review, 3(1), 190–211. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i1.128
   Google Scholar
• Akosile, A. L., & Ekemen, M. A. (2022). The impact of core self-evaluations on job satisfaction and turnover intention among higher education academic staff: Mediating roles of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 12(7), 236. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12070236
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alikaj, A., Ning, W., & Wu, B. (2020). Proactive personality and creative behaviour: Examining the role of thriving at work and high-involvement HR practices. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(5), 857–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09704-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Makhadmah, I. M., Al-Najdawi, B. M., & Al-Muala, I. M. (2020). Impact of psychological empowerment on the performance of employees in the four-and five-star hotel sector in the Dead Sea-Jordan tourist area. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 30(2 supplement), 896–904. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.302spl16-520
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M. (2017). The Sage encyclopedia of communication research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, C. (2021). The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atinc, G., Simmering, M. J., & Kroll, M. J. (2012). Control variable use and reporting in macro and micro-management research. Organizational Research Methods, 15(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110397773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydogmus, C., Ergeneli, A., & Camgoz, S. M. (2015). The role of psychological empowerment on the relationship between personality and job satisfaction. Pressacademia, 2(3), 251–251. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2015312979
   Google Scholar
• Aziz, S., & Jackson, C. J. (2001). A comparison between three and five-factor models of Pakistani personality data. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1311–1319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00223-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranski, E., Gray, J., Morse, P., & Dunlop, W. (2020). From desire to development? A multi-sample, idiographic examination of volitional personality change. Journal of Research in Personality, 85, 103910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, T. E., Atinc, G., Breaugh, J. A., Carlson, K. D., Edwards, J. R., & Spector, P. E. (2016). Statistical control in correlational studies: 10 essential recommendations for organisational researchers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J., & Ziegele, M. (2020). The effects of personality traits and situational factors on the deliberativeness and civility of user comments on news websites. International Journal of Communication, 14, 3924–3945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco, V., Berchicci, M., Quinzi, F., Perri, R. L., Spinelli, D., & Di Russo, F. (2020). Females are more proactive, males are more reactive: Neural basis of the gender-related speed/accuracy trade-off in visuo-motor tasks. Brain Structure & Function, 225(1), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-019-01998-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonyarit, I. (2023). Linking self-leadership to proactive work behaviour: A network analysis. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2163563. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2163563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, W., Lysova, E. I., Khapova, S. N., & Bossink, B. A. (2018). The effects of servant leadership, meaningful work and job autonomy on innovative work behaviour in Chinese high-tech firms: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1767. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, W. Y., Hsu, C. T., & Yu, P. Y. (2019). Confidence is the plant of slow growth: A moderated mediation model for predicting voice behaviour among power distance orientation and team-based self-esteem in Taiwanese nurses. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12, 609–617. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S209931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Liu, F., & Wen, Y. (2023). The influence of college students’ core self-evaluation on job search outcomes: Chain mediating effect of career exploration and career adaptability. Current Psychology, 42(18), 15696–15707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02923-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.-T., Cheng, Z.-H., Wang, H.-Q., & Li, D. (2020). Does leader narcissism hinder employees taking charge? An affective events theory perspective. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.9377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Jiang, W., Zhang, G., & Chu, F. (2019). Spiritual leadership on proactive workplace behaviour: The role of organisational identification and psychological safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1206. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-J., Wang, M.-J., & Lee, S.-H. (2018). Meaningful matters, transformational leadership and voice behaviours: The mediating effect of employee perceived meaningful work. Personnel Review, 47(3), 694–708. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2017-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T., Li, F., & Leung, K. (2016). When does supervisor support encourage innovative behaviour? Opposite moderating effects of general self-efficacy and internal locus of control. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 123–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choeni, P., Babalola, S. S., & Nwanzu, C. L. (2023). The effect of leader’s emotional intelligence and role-breadth self-efficacy on proactive behaviour at work. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 18(1), 63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019). Organisational behaviour: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (6th ed.). Florida: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, J. M. (2023). Analysing survey data in marketing research: A guide for academics and postgraduate students. Journal of Strategic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2023.2176533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristofaro, M., Giardino, P. L., & Leoni, L. (2020). The influence of core self-evaluations on group decision-making processes: A laboratory experiment. Administrative Sciences, 10(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10020029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawwas, A., & Shafig, A.-H. (2018). The impact of locus of control on innovativeness. Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7(5), 1721–1733.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, E. T. Higgins, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (vol. 2, chap. 49, pp 458–476). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Effong, U., & Akpan, G. A. (2020). Proactive work behaviour among bank employees in Anambra State, Nigeria: An examination of abusive supervision, organisational justice, and core self-evaluation. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research, 11(2), 1090–1102.
   Google Scholar
• Eibl, B., Lang, F. R., & Niessen, C. (2020). Employee voice at work: The role of employees’ gender, self-efficacy beliefs, and leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(4), 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1733979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elidemir, S. N., Ozturen, A., & Bayighomog, S. W. (2020). Innovative behaviours, employee creativity, and sustainable competitive advantage: A moderated mediation. Sustainability, 12(8), 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eto, K., & Watanabe, N. (2014). Impact of core self-evaluations on in-role and extra-role performance: Voice and self-evaluation maintenance. Japanese Journal of Administrative Science, 27(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.5651/jaas.27.97
   Google Scholar
• Fajrianthi, K. W. (2019). The effects of time pressure and situational constraints on the proactive work behaviour through psychological empowerment as a mediator. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 85(1), 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1855/rjoas.2019-01.63
   Google Scholar
• Farčić, N., Barać, I., Plužarić, J., Ilakovac, V., Pačarić, S., Gvozdanović, Z., & Lovrić, R. (2020). Personality traits of core self-evaluation as predictors on clinical decision-making in nursing profession. PLoS One, 15(5), e0233435. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. B. (2021). The Sage encyclopedia of research design. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Geuens, N., Verheyen, H., Vlerick, P., Van Bogaert, P., & Franck, E. (2020). Exploring the influence of core-self evaluations, situational factors, and coping on nurse burnout: A cross-sectional survey study. PLoS One, 15(4), e0230883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. W., Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2020). Organisational behaviour: Managing people and organisations (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Grohman, M., Ivcevic, Z., Silvia, P., & Kaufman, S. (2017). The role of passion and persistence in creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(4), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancer, M. (2005). Dimensions of the Turkish version of the psychological empowerment scale. Psychological Reports, 97(2), 645–650. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.97.2.645-650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, Q., Shi, Y., & Yang, W. (2019). How leader-member exchange affects knowledge sharing behaviour: Understanding the effects of commitment and employee characteristics. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Homberg, F., Vogel, R., & Weiherl, J. (2019). Public service motivation and continuous organisational change: Taking charge behaviour at police services. Public Administration, 97(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, S., & Nair, S. K. (2020). Exploring the moderating role of core self-evaluation in the relationship between demands and work-family enrichment. Journal of Indian Business Research, 12(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-08-2017-0125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha, N., Potnuru, R. K. G., Sareen, P., & Shaju, S. (2019). Employee voice, engagement and organisational effectiveness: A mediated model. European Journal of Training and Development, 43(7/8), 699–718. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2018-0097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 303–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00152.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawasaki, S. (2019). Effects of psychological need satisfaction on proactive work behaviours. Minnesota State University. https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/903
   Google Scholar
• Keith, T. Z. (2019). Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modelling (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Khusanova, R., Choi, S. B., & Kang, S.-W. (2019). Sustainable workplace: The moderating role of office design on the relationship between psychological empowerment and organisational citizenship behaviour in Uzbekistan. Sustainability, 11(24), 7024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kustanto, H., Hamidah, A. E., Mumpuni, J. H. S., & Gunawan, D. R. (2020). The moderation role of psychological empowerment on innovative work behaviour. Systematic Review in Pharmacy, 11(8), 254–264.
   Google Scholar
• Lemon, K., Allen, E. B., Carver, J. C., & Bradshaw, G. L. (2007). An empirical study of the effects of Gestalt principles on diagram understandability. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (pp. 156–165).
   Google Scholar
• Lisbona, A., Palaci, F., Salanova, M., & Frese, M. (2018). The effects of work engagement and self-efficacy on personal initiative and performance. Psicothema, 30(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Lin, S., Liu, J., & Zhang, J. (2019). Influence factors of college students’ creativity: The effect of self-esteem and motivation. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 8(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pbs.20190802.13
   Google Scholar
• Luiten, A., Hox, J., & De Leeuw, E. (2020). Survey non-response trends and fieldwork effort in the 21st century: Results of an international study across countries and surveys. Journal of Official Statistics, 36(3), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2020-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., Qian, Z., & Zhong, L. (2022). Influence of core self-evaluations on work engagement: The mediating role of informal field-based learning and the moderating role of work design. Sustainability, 14(9), 5319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhijaa, S., & Akbarb, W. (2019). Linking rewards and creative performance: Mediating role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and moderating role of rewards attractiveness International Journal of Innovation. Creativity and Change, 8(12), 36–51.
   Google Scholar
• Manichev, S., Lepehin, N., & Ilyina, O. (2022). The Russian version of “core self-evaluation scale”: Psychometric testing and prospects of using. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology, 12(3), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu16.2022.304
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Córcoles, M., & Zhu, X. (2020). Leading proactivity in innovative startups: A moderated mediation model. Sustainability, 12(23), 9878. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, B. W., Guay, R. P., Colbert, A. E., & Stewart, G. L. (2019). Proactive personality and proactive behaviour: Perspectives on person-situation interactions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. E., Hall-Simmonds, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2020). Are measures of character and personality distinct? Evidence from observed-score and true-score analyses. Assessment, 27(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117738047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i–xx. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01
   Google Scholar
• Messmann, G. (2023). Fostering proactive behaviour: The role of work-related reflection, psychological empowerment, and participative safety for innovative behaviour and job crafting. International Journal of Training and Development, 27(1), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mielniczuk, E., & Laguna, M. (2020). Positive affect mediates the relationship between self-efficacy and innovative behaviour in entrepreneurs. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(2), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjana, P. B., Ana, A., & Marjana, M.-S. (2018). Examining determinants of entrepreneurial intentions in Slovenia: Applying the theory of planned behaviour and an innovative cognitive style. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 1453–1471. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1478321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monestier, C., & Bell, A. M. (2020). Personality traits change after an opportunity to mate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1926), 20192936. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves, P., & Champion, S. (2015). Core self-evaluations and workplace deviance: The role of resources and self-regulation. European Management Journal, 33(5), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, K., Nguyen, P., Do, T., Trinh, A., & Truong, V. (2020). Proactive personality, value congruence, perceived organisational support, and problem prevention behaviour: A reciprocal moderated mediation model. Management Science Letters, 10(16), 4045–4054. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.7.004
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, B. B., & Raswant, A. (2018). The selection, use, and reporting of control variables in international business research: A review and recommendations. Journal of World Business, 53(6), 958–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurjaman, K., Marta, M. S., Eliyana, A., Kurniasari, D., & Kurniasari, D. (2019). Proactive work behaviour and innovative work behaviour: Moderating effect of job characteristics. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.7663
   Google Scholar
• Nwanzu, C. L., Babalola, S. S., & Osazevbaru, H. O. (2023). Effect of public service motivation and psychological empowerment on individual work performance of public sector employees. African Journal of Business and Economic Research, 18(2), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.31920/1750-4562/2023/v18n2a6
   Google Scholar
• Ogihara, Y. (2020). The pattern of age differences in self-esteem is similar between males and females in Japan: Gender differences in developmental trajectories of self-esteem from childhood to old age. Cogent Psychology, 7(1), 1756147. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2020.1756147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, M. C. B., Hoefsmit, N., Van Ruysseveldt, J., & van Dam, K. (2019). Exploring proactive behaviours of employees in the prevention of burnout. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), 3849. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviours. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peariasamy, S. D., Omar, Z., Basri, R., & Alias, S. N. (2020). Magnitude of role-breadth self-efficacy in teacher proactive work behaviour. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(7), 446–459. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v10-i7/7434
   Google Scholar
• Prabowo, R., Mustika, M. D., & Sjabadhyni, B. (2018). How a leader transforms employees’ psychological empowerment into innovative work behaviour. Psychological Research on Urban Society, 1(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v1i2.32
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, S., & Jena, L. K. (2019). Does meaningful work explain the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour? Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 44(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090919832434
   Google Scholar
• Purba, D. E., & Paundra, J. (2018). Core self-evaluations and innovative behaviour among micro-entrepreneurs: The mediating effect of proactive personality. Psychological Research on Urban Society, 1(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v1i1.30
   Google Scholar
• Rasyid, F. A., & Marta, M. S. (2020). Impact of organisational politics on proactive behaviour of government employees: The moderating role of self-efficacy. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(1), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.33
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organisational behaviour (18th ed.). Pearson Educations.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B., Luo, J., Briley, D., Chow, P., Su, R., & Hill, P. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2020). How to prevent, detect and control common method variance in electronic commerce research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762020000200101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Palomino, P., Linuesa-Langreo, J., & Elche, D. (2021). Team-level servant leadership and team performance: The mediating roles of organisational citizenship behaviour and internal social capital. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(S2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12390
   Google Scholar
• Scholtz, S. E. (2021). Sacrifice is a step beyond convenience: A review of convenience sampling in psychological research in Africa. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 47(0), a1837. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1837
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, P. K., & Misra, R. K. (2017). Core self-evaluations scale: An empirical attestation among software professionals. Procedia Computer Science, 122, 79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.344
   Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (2019). Do not cross me: Optimising the use of cross-sectional designs. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-018-09613-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spritzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. https://doi.org/10.5465/256865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spychala, A., & Sonnentag, S. (2011). The dark and the bright sides of proactive work behaviour and situational constraints: Longitudinal relationships with task conflicts. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 20(5), 654–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.487646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutanti, M., & Sandroto, C. W. (2021). Core self-evaluation and job satisfaction: Mediating role of career commitment. Review of Management and Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.37715/rme.v5i2.1647
   Google Scholar
• Takaishi, K., Sekiguchi, K., Kono, H., & Suzuki, S. (2019). Interactive effects of work autonomy and proactive personality on innovative behaviour. Asian Business Research, 4(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.20849/abr.v4i1.548
   Google Scholar
• Töre, E., & Yolal, M. (2017). The effects of knowledge sharing, internal locus of control and self-efficacy on innovative work behaviour. Revista Turismo and Desenvolvimento, 2(27/28), 391–393.
   Google Scholar
• Ul Haq, M. A., Ahmed, M. A., & Khalid, S. (2019). Empowering leadership and proactive behaviour: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of leader-follower distance. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.34091/AJSS.12.1.05
   Google Scholar
• Um-e-Rubbab, and S. M. M. R. Naqvi. (2020). Employee voice behaviour as a critical factor for organisational sustainability in the telecommunications industry. PLoS One, 15(9), e0238451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uner, S., & Turan, S. (2010). The construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Spreitzer’s psychological empowerment scale. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-117
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vu, H. M. (2020). Employee empowerment and empowering leadership: A literature review. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 2(7), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v2i7.1653
   Google Scholar
• Wadkj, W., & Mos, M. (2021). Relationship between employee productivity and firm’s profitability from shareholders’ and firm’s perspectives: A comparative study. Sri Lanka Journal of Business Studies and Finance, 1(1), 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Gao, M., & Panaccio, A. (2021). A self-determination approach to understanding individual values as an interaction condition on employees’ innovative work behaviour in the high-tech industry. The Journal of Creative Behaviour, 55(1), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterwall, B. (2019). Linking proactive personality and proactive behaviour: The mediating effect of regulatory focus. Journal of Organisational Psychology, 19(1), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.33423/jop.v19i1.1095
   Google Scholar
• Wei, X., Hisrich, R. D., & Peng, X. (2020). Chinese employees’ psychological empowerment and voice behaviour: Organisational justice as a moderator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(6), e8792. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.8792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winton, B. G., & Sabol, M. A. (2022). A multi-group analysis of convenience samples: Free, cheap, friendly, and fancy sources. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25(6), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1961187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S.-C., Chen, Y.-C., & Zhuang, W.-L. (2023). The effect of workplace friendship on hotel employees’ intention to leave: Moderating role of psychological contract violation. Sustainability, 15(12), 9438. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildiz, B., Uzun, S., & Semih Coskun, S. (2017). Drivers of innovative behaviours: The moderator roles of perceived organisational support and psychological empowerment. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3335714
   Google Scholar
• York, R. (2018). Control variables and causal inference: A question of balance. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(6), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1468730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, H., Zhao, J. L., & Zhao, X. Y. (2020). Inclusive leadership and taking charge behaviour: Roles of psychological safety and thriving at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 62. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Song, L. J., Wang, Y., & Liu, G. (2018). How authentic leadership influences employee proactivity: The sequential mediating effects of psychological empowerment and core self-evaluations and the moderating role of employee political skill. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-018-0026-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuraik, A., Kelly, L., & Dyck, L. R. (2020). Individual innovative work behaviour: Effects of personality, team leadership and climate in the US context. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(05), 2050078. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500784
   Google Scholar
• Zuraik, A., Kelly, L., & Perkins, V. (2020). Gender differences in innovation: The role of ambidextrous leadership of the team leads. Management Decision, 58(7), 1475–1495. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2019-0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar