Audit opinion research: overview and research agenda

References

• Abad, D., Sánchez-Ballesta, J. P., & Yagüe, J. (2017). Audit opinions and information asymmetry in the stock market. Accounting & Finance, 57(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadi, K., Purba, D. M., & Fauzia, Q. (2019). The impact of liquidity ratio, leverage ratio, company size and audit quality on going concern audit opinion. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 6(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.25105/jat.v6i1.4871
   Google Scholar
• Abbas, A., & Mahsen Abdulrahman, M. (2023). About scholarly works in the field of islamic economic law: A visualization of related topics. Milkiyah: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 2(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.46870/milkiyah.v2i1.267
   Google Scholar
• Abdian, S., Shahri, M. H., & Khadivar, A. (2023). A bibliometric analysis of research on big data and its potential to value creation and capture. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 16(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJMS.2021.319211.674442
   Google Scholar
• Alatawi, I. A., Ntim, C. G., Zras, A., & Elmagrhi, M. H. (2023). CSR, financial and non-financial performance in the tourism sector: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, 102734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhossini, M. A., Ntim, C. G., & Zalata, A. M. (2021). Corporate board committees and corporate outcomes: An international systematic literature review and agenda for future research. The International Journal of Accounting, 56(01), 2150001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406021500013
   Google Scholar
• Aulianto, D. R., Yusup, P., & Setianti, Y. (2019). Pemanfaatan aplikasi “publish or perish” sebagai alat analisis sitasi pada jurnal kajian komunikasi universitas padjadjaran. Seminar Nasional MACOM III "Communication and Information Beyound Boundaries, July, 873–880.
   Google Scholar
• Averio, T. (2021). The analysis of influencing factors on the going concern audit opinion – a study in manufacturing firms in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-09-2020-0078
   Google Scholar
• Baatwah, S. R. (2016). Audit tenure and financial reporting in oman: Does rotation affect the quality? Risk Governance and Control: Financial Markets and Institutions, 6(3), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.22495/rcgv6i3c1art2
   Google Scholar
• Brunelli, S., Carlino, C., Castellano, R., & Giosi, A. (2021). Going concern modifications and related disclosures in the Italian stock market: Do regulatory improvements help investors in capturing financial distress? Journal of Management and Governance, 25(2), 433–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09537-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahyono, D. (2014). Effect of prior audit opinion, audit quality, and factors of its audit opinion going concern. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(24), 2222–2847.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T. T. Y., Zhang, F. F., & Zhou, G. S. (2017). Secrecy culture and audit opinion: Some international evidence. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 28(3), 274–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, V., Liu, Q., Muehlmann, B., & Baldwin, A. A. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of accounting information systems journals and their emerging technologies contributions. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 32, 24–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2018.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, C. M. (2019). Legitimacy theory: Despite its enduring popularity and contribution, time is right for a necessary makeover. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 2307–2329. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3638
   Google Scholar
• Defond, M. L., & Lennox, C. S. (2017). Do PCAOB inspections improve the quality of internal control audits? Journal of Accounting Research, 55(3), 591–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defond, M. L., Lim, C. Y., & Zang, Y. (2016). Conservatism and auditor-client contracting. The Accounting Review, 91(1), 69–98. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianto, E. C., & R., Putri, A. P. (2021). Effect of audit tenure, financial condition, audit quality, and leverage on going concern audit opinions in the hospitality, restaurant, and tourism sector listed on the indonesia stock exchange in 2017-2019. International Journal of Research and Review, 8(11), 171–174. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20211123
   Google Scholar
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, C. T., Leece, R. D., Vermeer, B. Y., & Vermeer, T. E. (2020). The information value of qualified and adverse audit reports: Evidence from the municipal sector. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 39(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Febriansyah, A., & Oktaviana, R. R. (2022). The effect of due professional care and audit evidence on the appropriateness of giving an audit opinion. Proceeding of International Conference on Business, Economics, Social Sciences, and Humanities, 5, 732–739. https://doi.org/10.34010/icobest.v3i.207
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, R. (2015). Writing narrative style literature reviews. Medical Writing, 24(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder theory. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118785317.weom020179
   Google Scholar
• Gallizo, J. L., & Saladrigues, R. (2016). An analysis of determinants of going concern audit opinion: Evidence from Spain stock exchange. Intangible Capital, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill de Albornoz Noguer, B., & Rusanescu, S. (2018). Foreign ownership and the auditor’s opinion: An analysis in private subsidiaries. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3116125
   Google Scholar
• Gul, F. A., Lim, C. Y., Wang, K., & Xu, Y. (2019). Stock price contagion effects of low-quality audits at the individual audit partner level. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(2), 151–178. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, A. (2013). A meta-analysis of the determinants of modified audit opinion decisions. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(3), 184–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901311304349
   Google Scholar
• Haidar, A. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of publication paper themes for hajj services over the period of COVID-19 pandemic. Milkiyah Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, 2(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.46870/milkiyah.v2i2.440
   Google Scholar
• Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2016). Do (Fe)male auditors impair audit quality? Evidence from going-concern opinions. European Accounting Review, 25(1), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2014.921445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z., Chen, D., & Tang, J. (2021). Do goodwill impairments affect audit opinions? Evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 14(2), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2021.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendri, N., Dewi, F. G., & Nurdiono, N. (2020). Bibliometric study concerning accrual accounting in the public sector of reputable international journals. Solid State. http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/31393
   Google Scholar
• Hidayat, A. H. (2022). Impact of pandemic financial crisis to the going concern audit opinion factors. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(5), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.95.11973
   Google Scholar
• Hu, F., Stewart, J., & Tan, W. (2017). CEO’s political connections, institutions and audit opinions. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(3), 283–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-04-2016-0047
   Google Scholar
• Imen, F., & Anis, J. (2021). The moderating role of audit quality on the relationship between auditor reporting and earnings management: empirical evidence from Tunisia. EuroMed Journal of Business, 16(4), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-03-2020-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jannah, I., & Widuri, R. (2022). Bibliometric analysis on auditor performance. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 6(3), 1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v6i3.2494
   Google Scholar
• Juniarti, N. A., Fany, N. A., & Devie, N. A. (2022). The effect of audit committee on audit opinion through earnings management as mediation variable. Afro-Asian J. of Finance and Accounting, 12(6), 790–803. https://doi.org/10.1504/AAJFA.2022.127915
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: New Age International (P) Ltd., Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Kral, R. (2016). Ensuring a high quality audit : Who is responsible ? Five ideas for audit committees to maximize value from the external audit process. EDPACS, 53(6), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2016.1180101
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., Marrone, M., Liu, Q., & Pandey, N. (2020). Twenty years of the International Journal of Accounting Information Systems: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 39, 100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2020.100488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loretha, O. (2022). Analysis of the effect of liquidity, profitability, solvency and audit quality on going concern audit opinions on automotive and component companies listed on the indonesia stock exchange. International Journal of Applied Finance and Business Studies, 9(4), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.35335/ijafibs.v9i4.40
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., Ntim, C. G., Zhang, Q., & Li, P. (2022). Board of directors’ attributes and corporate outcomes: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffei, M., Fiondella, C., Zagaria, C., & Zampella, A. (2020). A multiple discriminant analysis of the auditor’s going concern opinion: the case of audit opinions in Italy. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(6), 1179–1208. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2019-0514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malau, W. C., Ohalehi, P., Badr, E. S., & Yekini, K. (2019). Fraud interpretation and disclaimer audit opinion: Evidence from the Solomon Islands public sector (SIPS). Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(2), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-04-2018-1867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, M. C. P., & Meca, E. G. (2014). Institutional directors and the quality of information : The role of directors appointed by banks. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(4), 347–363.
   Google Scholar
• Minutti-Meza, M. (2021). The art of conversation: The expanded audit report. Accounting and Business Research, 51(5), 548–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2021.1932264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moalla, H., & Baili, R. (2019). Credit ratings and audit opinion: Evidence from Tunisia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 9(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2018-0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhtar, M., Payamta, P., Sutaryo, S., & Amidjaya, P. G. (2020). Government accrual-based accounting standards implementation in Indonesia: The role of local government internal audit. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D: Faculty of Economics and Administration, 28(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.46585/sp28031107
   Google Scholar
• Newton, N. J., Persellin, J. S., Wang, D., & Wilkins, M. S. (2016). Internal control opinion shopping and audit market competition. The Accounting Review, 91(2), 603–623. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T. H., Malagila, J. K., & Ntim, C. G. (2020). Women on corporate boards and corporate financial and non-financial performance: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, X. H., & Trinh, H. T. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and the non-linear effect on audit opinion for energy firms in Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1757841. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1757841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ningsih, S. (2016). The antecedents of non-unqualified opinions of local governments financial statements: A study on counties and cities in east java province. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 1(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-2016-01-01-B003
   Google Scholar
• Nursito, & Astuti, P. W. I. (2017). Effect of fee audit, expertise, knowledge accounting, auditing and professional skeptis auditors to the provision of audit opinion by public accountings. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 117(15), 859–871.
   Google Scholar
• Pamungkas, B., Ibtida, R., & Avrian, C. (2018). Factors influencing audit opinion of the Indonesian municipal governments’ financial statements. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1540256. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1540256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pizzi, S., Venturelli, A., Variale, M., & Macario, G. P. (2021). Assessing the impacts of digital transformation on internal auditing: A bibliometric analysis. Technology in Society, 67(August), 101738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101738
   Google Scholar
• Prayanthi, I. (2017). The altman model and auditor’s opinion about going concern of the companies. Science Journal of Business and Management, 5(5), 189. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjbm.20170505.12
   Google Scholar
• Read, W. J. (2015). Auditor fees and going-concern reporting decisions on bankrupt companies: Additional evidence. Current Issues in Auditing, 9(1), A13–A27. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-51109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secinaro, S., Dal Mas, F., Brescia, V., & Calandra, D. (2021). Blockchain in the accounting, auditing and accountability fields: A bibliometric and coding analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 168–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2020-4987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakhatreh, M. Z., Alsmadi, S. A., & Alkhataybeh, A. (2020). The effect of audit fees on disclosure quality in Jordan. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), 1771076. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1771076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherliani, D. (2021). Mapping riset auditing dengan analisis bibliometric. ETNIK: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Teknik, 1(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.54543/etnik.v1i3.32
   Google Scholar
• Shraddha, S. D. B., Vinod, C., Seethalaksmi, I., Archana, P., Nishikant, J., Swati., & D., Koshti. (2013). Research Methodology, 145. Himalaya Publishing House: India.
   Google Scholar
• Sidiq, M. (2019). Panduan analisis bibliometrik sederhana. Researchgate, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15688.37125
   Google Scholar
• Simamora, R. A., & Hendarjatno, H. (2019). The effects of audit client tenure, audit lag, opinion shopping, liquidity ratio, and leverage to the going concern audit opinion. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-05-2019-0038
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultanoglu, B., Mugan, C. S., Sekerdag, U., & Oran, A. (2018). The auditor’s opinion modifications around domestic and global financial crises. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(4), 622–639. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2017-0199
   Google Scholar
• Svanberg, J., & Öhman, P. (2014). Lost revenues associated with going concern modified opinions in the Swedish audit market. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 15(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-11-2012-0077
   Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triani, N. N. A., Satyawan, M. D., & Yanthi, M. D. (2017). Determining the effectiveness of going concern audit opinion by ISA 570. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 2(2), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-2017-02-02-B004
   Google Scholar
• Tsipouridou, M., & Spathis, C. (2014). Audit opinion and earnings management: Evidence from Greece. Accounting Forum, 38(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.21511/IMFI.18(4).2021.12
   Google Scholar
• Van Nunen, K., Li, J., Reniers, G., & Ponnet, K. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research. Safety Science, 108, 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, B., Pan, S. Y., Ke, R. Y., Wang, K., & Wei, Y. M. (2014). An overview of climate change vulnerability: A bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database. Natural Hazards, 74(3), 1649–1666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1260-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, L., & Yang, Z. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of global environmental assessment research in a 20-year period. IAEA International Nuclear Information System, 9255(14), 158–166.
   Google Scholar
• Widiatami, A. K., Tanzil, N. D., Irawadi, C., & Nurkhin, A. (2020). Audit committee’s role in moderating the effect of financial distress towards going concern audit opinion. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(4), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n4p432
   Google Scholar
• Zaher, A. A. (2015). Going-concern opinions, executive tenure and gender. Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(3), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i3p2
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Chen, S., Zhang, P., & Lin, X. (2022). Does the random inspection reduce audit opinion shopping? China Journal of Accounting Studies, 10(4), 528–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2022.2143685
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Haya, D., & Holmb, C. (2016). Non-audit services and auditor independence: Norwegian Evidence. Cogent Business and Management, 3(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203094921-17
   Google Scholar