R&D intensity and firm performance of SME firms in Thailand: the moderating role of firm size

References

• Ahmed, K., & Jinan, M. (2011). The association between research and development expenditure and firm performance: Testing a life cycle hypothesis. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 7(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2011.042771
   Google Scholar
• Aliasghar, O., Sadeghi, A., & Rose, E. L. (2023). Process innovation in small- and medium-sized enterprises: The critical roles of external knowledge sourcing and absorptive capacity. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(4), 1583–1610. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1844491
   Google Scholar
• Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E., & Cardinal, L. B. (2010). A longitudinal study of the impact of R&D, patents, and product innovation on firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(5), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00747.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm Reources ad Sustained Competitive Advantege. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos, R., Carree, M., & Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy, 33(10), 1477–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, J. B., Green, R. C., & Naik, V. (2004). Valuation and return dynamics of new ventures. Review of Financial Studies, 17(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremser, W. G., & Barsky, N. P. (2004). Utilizing the balanced scorecard for R&D performance measurement. R&D Management, 34(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. E. (1972). New definitions for industrial R&D. Research Management, 15(5), 55–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00345334.1972.11756146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callimaci, A., & Landry, S. (2004). Market valuation of research and development spending under Canadian GAAP. Canadian Accounting Perspective, 3(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1506/V5LY-4CNE-3J0Q-00HN
   Google Scholar
• Cazavan-Jeny, A., & Jeanjean, T. (2006). The negative impact of R&D capitalization: A value relevance approach. European Accounting Review, 15(1), 37–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180500510384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamber, D., Jennings, R., & Thompson, R. B. (2002). Excess returns to R&D intensive firm. Review of Accounting Studies, 7(2/3), 133–158. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020217817156
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T. C., Guo, D. Q., Chen, H. M., & Wei, T. T. (2019). Effects of R&D intensity on firm performance in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 2377–2392. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1642776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Ibhagui, O. W. (2019). R&D-firm performance nexus: New evidence from NASDAQ listed firms. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 50(January), 101009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.101009
   Google Scholar
• Diéguez-Soto, J., Manzaneque, M., González-García, V., & Galache-Laza, T. (2019). A study of the moderating influence of R&D intensity on the family management-firm performance relationship: Evidence from Spanish private manufacturing firms. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 22(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2018.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duqi, A., Mirti, R., & Torluccio, G. (2011). An analysis of the R&D effect on stock returns for European listed firms. European Journal of Scientific Research, 58(4), 482–496.
   Google Scholar
• Ekpol, S. (2007). Relationship between firm life cycle, firm size, research and development expenditure and stock returns [Master thesis of accounting program]. Chulalongkorn University.
   Google Scholar
• Ferdaous, J., & Mizanur Rahman, M. (2017). The effects of research and development expenditure on firm performance: An examination of pharmaceuticals industry in Bangladesh. Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.20522/apjbr.2017.1.2.37
   Google Scholar
• Franzen, L., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2009). The value relevance of R&D across profit and loss firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Wu, J., & Hafsi, T. (2017). The inverted U-shaped relationship between corporate philanthropy and spending on research and development: A case of complementarity and competition moderated by firm size and visibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaffar, A., & Khan, W. A. (2014). Impact of research and development on firm performance. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 4(1), 357. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v4i1.6087
   Google Scholar
• Gharbi, S., Sahut, J. M., & Teulon, F. (2014). R&D investment and high-tech forms’ stock return volatility. Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 88(2), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Guan, F., Tienan, W., & Tang, L. (2022). Organizational resilience under COVID-19: The role of digital technology in R&D investment and performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2022-0220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, B., Wang, J., & Wei, S. X. (2018). R&D spending, strategic position and firm performance. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-018-0037-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., & Babin, B. J. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., & Lerner, J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (1st ed., Vol. 1, Issue 1C). Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)01014-2
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., Lotti, Æ F., & Mairesse, Æ J, O, O. Á. (2009). Innovation and productivity in SMEs : Empirical evidence for Italy. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9184-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, L. A., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2002). A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry. Technovation, 22(4), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00016-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, B. H., & Manry, D. (2004). The value-relevance of R&D and advertising expenditures: Evidence from Korea. The International Journal of Accounting, 39(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2004.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Insee, K., & Suttipun, M. (2023). Determinants of R&D Investment of Private companies in Thailand. The 61st Kasetsart University Annual Conference (pp. 71–79). Bangkok: Kasetsart University. https://annualconference.ku.ac.th/61/eproc/E-ProceedingKUConf61-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, C., John, K., & Larsen, D. (2019, October 23–26). R&D Investment Intensity and Jump Volatility of Stock Price. The FMA Annual Meeting at 2019. New Orleans, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, W. S., Park, K., Lee, S. H., & Kim, H. (2018). R & D investments and firm value: Evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkalyuenyong, P. (2018). Strategies in building corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Rajapruk University, 4(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, W. N. (1971). Research and development in industrial growth. Journal of Political Economy, 79(2), 232–256. https://doi.org/10.1086/259741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev, B., Sougiannis, T., & Sarath, B. (2005). R&D reporting biases and their consequences. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 977–1026. https://doi.org/10.1506/7XMH-QQ74-L6GG-CJRX
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, Z., & Greenfield, P. F. (2000). The synergy of corporate r & d and competitive strategies: An exploratory study in Australian high-technology companies Journal of High Technology Management Research, 11(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00025-0
   Google Scholar
• Limanlı, Ö. (2015). Determinants of R & D investment decision in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 759–767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.471
   Google Scholar
• Lome, O., Heggeseth, A. G., & Moen, Ø. (2016). The effect of R&D on performance: Do R&D-intensive firms handle a financial crisis better? The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 27(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2016.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y. M., & Wang, C. M. (2011). Effect of R&D investment on performance of Chinese listed companies-take manufacturing and IT industry as an example. Science and Technology Management Research, 5(5), 122–127.
   Google Scholar
• Manomansatham, W. (2015). The relationship between company characteristics and R&D disclosure: A case of listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Master Independent Study of Accountancy Program, Thammasat University.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, V. (2007). The determinants of R&D expenditure of firms: Evidence from a cross-section of Indian firms. Economic Papers, 26(3), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.2007.tb00433.x
   Google Scholar
• Mozafari, S. (2017). The impact of R&D expenditure volatility on stock return of the listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Specialty Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2), 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mulugeta, T. (2021). Impacts of R & D expenditures on firms’ innovation and financial performance : A panel data evidence from Ethiopian firms. Res. Sq. 2021, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1106769/v1
   Google Scholar
• Nord, L. (2011). R&D investment link to profitability: A pharmaceutical industry evaluation. Undergraduate Economic Review, 8(1), 25–57.
   Google Scholar
• Office of SMEs Promotion (OSMEP). (2018). SMEs Promotion Scheme Number 4 (2560-2564 B.C.) www.sme.go.th/th/download.php?modulekey=12
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2017). Enhancing the contributions of SMEs in a global and digitalized economy. www.oecd.org/mcm/documentsC-MIN-2018-EN-pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Penman, S., & Zhang, H. X. (2002). Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 237–264. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravšelj, D., & Aristovnik, A. (2020). The impact of R and D expenditures on corporate performance: Evidence from Slovenian and world R&D companies. Sustainability, 12(5), 1943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, M., & Zantout, Z. (2008). Stock price and systematic risk effect of discontinuation of corporate R&D programs. Journal of Empirical Finance, 16(4), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2009.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangnapawan, P. (2007). Research and development disclosures of listed companies in Agriculture and food industry in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Master Independent Study of Accountancy Program, Chiang Mai University.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, C. (2012). R&D and firm performance: Evidence from the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 17(2), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2012.668094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, C. (2003). On the trade-off between the future benefits and riskiness of R&D: A bondholders’ perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(2), 227–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(03)00020-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, N., Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. (2009). R&D, value chain location and firm performance in the global electronics industry. Industry & Innovation, 16(3), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710902923867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siripong, W., Phramhan, N., Pimpakarn, P., Panyaying, R., Saengsri, S., Malawaichan, I., & Suttipun, M. (2019). The relationship between research and development disclosure and financial performance of listed companies in the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). MUT Journal of Business Administration, 16(2), 173–190.
   Google Scholar
• Suttipun, M., & Arwae, A. (2020). The influence of sufficiency economy philosophy practice on SMEs’ performance in Thailand. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 8(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2020.080210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thailand Financial Reporting Standards (TFRS). (2017). Intangible asset. Federation of accounting professions under the royal patronage of his majesty the king.
   Google Scholar
• The Ministry of Industry. (2019). Definition of SMEs in Thailand. www.industry.go.th
   Google Scholar
• The Office of National Higher Education Science Research and Innovation Policy Council. (2019). Annual Report 2019. https://anti-corruption.nxpo.or.th/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/AR-สอวช-Final-Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Titi, A. (2014). The effect of R&D expenditures on stock returns, price, and volatility. Master Degree Project in Finance. University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Veskaisri, K., Chan, P., & Pollard, D. (2007). Relationship Between Strategic Planning and SME Success: Empirical Evidence from Thailand California State University-Fullerton, California, USA. Asia and Pacific DSI, September. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. I., Manley, S. C., Aaron, J. R., & Daniel, F. (2018). The relationship between a comprehensive strategic approach and small business performance. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 21(2), 193–215.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C., & Wei, K. C. J. (1998). Cooperative R&D and the value of the firm. Review of Industrial Organization, 13(4), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007761717501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Jin, Z. (2016). Research on the Impact of R&D Investment on Firm Performance in China’s Internet of Things Industry. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 4(March), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.12720/joams.4.2.112-116
   Google Scholar