656
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Management

Ambidextrous leadership and academic staff innovative behavior at Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia: the mediating role of workplace happiness

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2307564 | Received 10 Aug 2023, Accepted 16 Jan 2024, Published online: 12 Feb 2024

References

  • Ahlers, M., & Wilms, M. (2017). Ambidextrous leadership in innovation: A multiple case study of innovation leaders on the alignment of opening and closing leader behaviors.
  • Akıncı, G., Alpkan, L., Yıldız, B., & Karacay, G. (2022). The link between ambidextrous leadership and innovative work behavior in a military organization: The moderating role of climate for innovation. Sustainability, 14(22), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215315
  • Albano, J. F.Jr. (2009). Developing a measure and an understanding of the individual experience of happiness at work. Saybrook University.
  • Al-Hawari, M. A., Bani-Melhem, S., & Shamsudin, F. M. (2019). Determinants of frontline employee service innovative behavior: The moderating role of co-worker socializing and service climate. Management Research Review, 42(9), 1076–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-07-2018-0266
  • Al-Husseini, S., El Beltagi, I., & Moizer, J. (2021). Transformational leadership and innovation: The mediating role of knowledge sharing amongst higher education faculty. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 24(5), 670–693. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2019.1588381
  • Al-Kurdi, O. F., El-Haddadeh, R., & Eldabi, T. (2020). The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.018
  • Al-Shami, S. A., Al Mamun, A., Rashid, N., & Cheong, C. B. (2023). Happiness at workplace on innovative work behaviour and organisation citizenship behaviour through moderating effect of innovative behaviour. Heliyon, 9(5), e15614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15614
  • Bani-Melhem, S., Zeffane, R., & Albaity, M. (2018). Determinants of employees’ innovative behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(3), 1601–1620. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2017-0079
  • Bellet, C. S., De Neve, J.-E., & Ward, G. (2020). Does employee happiness have an impact on productivity? Management Science, 1655. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4766
  • Berraies, S. (2023). Mediating effects of employees’ eudaimonic and hedonic well-being between distributed leadership and ambidextrous innovation: Does employees’ age matter? European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(5), 1271–1292. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2021-0568
  • Budur, T., Demirer, H., & Rashid, C. A. (2023). The effects of knowledge sharing on innovative behaviours of academicians; mediating effect of innovative organization culture and quality of work life. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. Ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2022-0257
  • Casteel, A., & Bridier, N. L. (2021). Describing populations and samples in doctoral student research. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 16(1), 339–362. https://doi.org/10.28945/4766
  • Choi, S. B., Kim, K., & Kang, S.-W. (2017). Effects of transformational and shared leadership styles on employees’ perception of team effectiveness. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(3), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.5805
  • Civelek, M. E. (2018). Essentials of structural equation modeling. Lulu.com. https://doi.org/10.13014/K2SJ1HR5
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602
  • Daniela, L., Visvizi, A., Gutiérrez-Braojos, C., & Lytras, M. D. (2018). Sustainable higher education and technology-enhanced learning (TEL). Sustainability, 10(11), 3883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113883
  • Davidavičienė, V. (2018). Research methodology: An introduction. In Modernizing the academic teaching and research environment: Methodologies and cases in business research (pp. 1–23). Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74173-4_1
  • Debre Berhan University (2022). Annual report.
  • Duwe, J. (2021). Ambidextrous leadership: How leaders unlock innovation through ambidexterity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64032-6
  • Elrehail, H., Emeagwali, O. L., Alsaad, A., & Alzghoul, A. (2018). The impact of transformational and authentic leadership on innovation in higher education: The contingent role of knowledge sharing. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.09.018
  • El-Sholkamy, M., & Fischbach, T. (2019). The knowledge and human development authority: Innovation in human resource management and people’s happiness. In Future governments (pp. 251–270). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-757620190000007014
  • Etikariena, A. (2018). The effect of psychological capital as a mediator variable on the relationship between work happiness and innovative work behavior. Diversity in Unity: Perspectives from Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 23, 379–386.
  • Farzana, S., & Charoensukmongkol, P. (2023). Using approach-inhibition theory of power to explain how participative decision-making enhances innovative work behavior of high power distance-oriented employees. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 10(4), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-10-2022-0304
  • Faulks, B., Song, Y., Waiganjo, M., Obrenovic, B., & Godinic, D. (2021). Impact of empowering leadership, innovative work, and organizational learning readiness on sustainable economic performance: An empirical study of companies in Russia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(22), 12465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212465
  • Fitzgerald, H. E., Karen, B., Sonka, S. T., Furco, A., & Swanson, L. (2020). The centrality of engagement in higher education. In Building the field of higher education engagement (pp. 201–219). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003443353-12
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Fuad, D. R. S. M., Musa, K., & Hashim, Z. (2022). Innovation culture in education: A systematic review of the literature. Management in Education, 36(3), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620959760
  • Gerlach, F., Hundeling, M., & Rosing, K. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership and innovation performance: A longitudinal study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(3), 383–398. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2019-0321
  • Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis.
  • Hair, J. F.Jr., Babin, B. J., & Krey, N. (2017). Covariance-based structural equation modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and recommendations. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281777
  • Hair, J. F.Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., Ray, S. (2021). An introduction to structural equation modeling. In Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (pp. 1–29). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7_1
  • Ijigu, A. W., Alemu, A. E., & Kuhil, A. M. (2022). Fostering employee ambidexterity: The role of high-performance work system and ambidextrous leadership. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan, 15(3), 313-329. https://doi.org/10.20473/jmtt.v15i3.38687
  • Jain, S. (2023). Ambidextrous leadership, social capital, creative behaviour and well-being: A mediation-moderation model. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. Ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-02-2023-3652
  • Jia, R., Hu, W., & Li, S. (2022). Ambidextrous leadership and organizational innovation: The importance of knowledge search and strategic flexibility. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(3), 781–801. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2020-0544
  • Jiang, L., Pan, Z., Luo, Y., Guo, Z., & Kou, D. (2023). More flexible and more innovative: The impact of flexible work arrangements on the innovation behavior of knowledge employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1053242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1053242
  • Jiang, Y., Asante, D., Zhang, J., & Ampaw, E. M. (2023). The influence of ambidextrous leadership on the employee innovative behavior: An empirical study based on Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Current Psychology, 42(11), 9452–9465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02233-1
  • Joo, B.-K., & Lee, I. (2017). Workplace happiness: Work engagement, career satisfaction, and subjective well-being. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 5(2), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-04-2015-0011
  • Kafetzopoulos, D. (2022). Ambidextrous leadership: A narrative literature review for theory development and directions for future research. Baltic Journal of Management, 17(2), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2021-0001
  • Khan, S. M., & Abbas, J. (2022). Mindfulness and happiness and their impact on employee creative performance: Mediating role of creative process engagement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101027
  • Kleebbua, C., & Lindratanasirikul, K. (2021). Learning climate for enhancing innovative behavior in Thai higher education. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 16(1), 45–57.
  • Klonek, F. E., Volery, T., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Managing the paradox: Individual ambidexterity, paradoxical leadership and multitasking in entrepreneurs across firm life cycle stages. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 39(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242620943371
  • Koroglu, Ş., & Ozmen, O. (2022). The mediating effect of work engagement on innovative work behavior and the role of psychological well-being in the job demands-resources (JD-R) model. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(1), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-09-2020-0326
  • Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology. New Age.
  • Kung, C.-W., Uen, J. F., & Lin, S.-C. (2020). Ambidextrous leadership and employee innovation in public museums. Chinese Management Studies, 14(4), 995–1014. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-05-2018-0523
  • Kwon, K., & Kim, T. (2020). An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: Revisiting the JD-R model. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100704
  • Ling, Y., Hammond, M., & Wei, L.-Q. (2020). Ethical leadership and ambidexterity in young firms: Examining the CEO-TMT Interface. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2020(1), 17314. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.17314abstract
  • Liu, Y., Wang, W., & Chen, D. (2019). Linking ambidextrous organizational culture to innovative behavior: A moderated mediation model of psychological empowerment and transformational leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02192
  • Ma, J., Zhou, X., Chen, R., & Dong, X. (2019). Does ambidextrous leadership motivate work crafting? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.06.025
  • Mathew, V. S. (2023). Happiness a driver for innovation at the workplace. In Understanding happiness: An explorative view (pp. 335–344). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3493-5_15
  • Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2017). Organizational culture and radical innovation: Does innovative behavior mediate this relationship? Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(4), 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12236
  • Nazir, S., Qun, W., Hui, L., & Shafi, A. (2018). Influence of social exchange relationships on affective commitment and innovative behavior: Role of perceived organizational support. Sustainability, 10(12), 4418. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124418
  • Oluwafemi, T. B., Mitchelmore, S., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2020). Leading innovation: Empirical evidence for ambidextrous leadership from UK high-tech SMEs. Journal of Business Research, 119, 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.035
  • Özdil, S. Ö., & Kutlu, Ö. (2019). Investigation of the mediator variable effect using BK, Sobel and Bootstrap methods (mathematical literacy case). International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(2), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.189.3
  • Pandey, R., & Verma, M. R. (2008). Samples allocation in different strata for impact evaluation of developmental programme. Revista de Matematica e Estatistica, 26(4), 103–112.
  • Qi, L., Liu, B., Wei, X., & Hu, Y. (2019). Impact of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior: Perceived organizational support as a mediator. PLOS One, 14(2), e0212091. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212091
  • Qi, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). A talent cultivation model for improving the innovation ability of college students in scientific research. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(18), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i18.16745
  • Rosdaniati, R., & Muafi, M. (2021). The influence of workplace happiness and innovative work behavior on job satisfaction mediated by work engagement. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(7), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i7.1457
  • Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014
  • Ruiz, P., Ruiz, C., & Martínez, R. (2011). The cascading effect of top management’s ethical leadership: Supervisors or other lower-hierarchical level individuals? African Journal of Business Management, 5(12), 4755.
  • Shafi, M., Zoya, Lei, Z., Song, X., Sarker, M. N. I. (2020). The effects of transformational leadership on employee creativity: Moderating role of intrinsic motivation. Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(3), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.12.002
  • Usman, M., Ghani, U., Islam, Z. U., Gul, H., & Mahmood, K. (2022). Ambidextrous leadership and innovative work behaviors: Workplace thriving as a mediator. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1), e2321. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2321
  • Vuong, B. N., Tushar, H., & Hossain, S. F. A. (2023). The effect of social support on job performance through organizational commitment and innovative work behavior: Does innovative climate matter? Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 15(5), 832–854. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-06-2021-0256
  • Wang, S., Eva, N., Newman, A., & Zhou, H. (2021). A double-edged sword: The effects of ambidextrous leadership on follower innovative behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(4), 1305–1326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-020-09714-0
  • Wang, Z., Gao, M., & Panaccio, A. (2021). A self-determination approach to understanding individual values as an interaction condition on employees’ innovative work behavior in the high-tech industry. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(1), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.444
  • Zabiegalski, E., & Marquardt, M. J. (2022). Action learning and the ambidextrous organization. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 14(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-11-2021-0062
  • Zacher, H., Robinson, A. J., & Rosing, K. (2016). Ambidextrous leadership and employees’ self-reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 24–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.66
  • Zainal, M. A., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2019). Factors influencing teachers’ innovative behaviour: A systematic review. Creative Education, 10(12), 2869–2886. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012213
  • Zhao, F., Hu, W., Ahmed, F., & Huang, H. (2023). Impact of ambidextrous human resource practices on employee innovation performance: The roles of inclusive leadership and psychological safety. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(5), 1444–1470. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2021-0226