CEO psychological biases, firm performance and alternative mechanisms in transition economies: Evidence from Malaysia

References

• Abernethy, M. A., Kuang, Y. F., & Qin, B. (2019). The relation between strategy, CEO selection, and firm performance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadjian, C. L., & Robbins, G. E. (2005). A clash of capitalisms: Foreign shareholders and corporate restructuring in 1990s Japan. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Farooque, O., Dunstan, K., Karim, W., Van Zijl, T., & Karim, A. W. (2007). Ownership structure and corporate performance: Evidence from Bangladesh “Forensic Accounting Teaching and Research“ special issue of Pacific accounting review view project. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 14(2), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2007.9720792
   Google Scholar
• Alam, A., Uddin, M., Yazdifar, H., Shafique, S., & Lartey, T. (2020). R&D investment, firm performance and moderating role of system and safeguard: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Business Research, 106, 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., & Honoré, B. (2001). Panel data models: some recent developments. Handbook of Econometrics, (5, 3229–3296. Elsevier. [ Mismatch
   Google Scholar
• Asad, S., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2020). Differentiating leader hubris and narcissism on the basis of power. Leadership, 16(1), 39–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019885763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, J., Hwan Joo, J., & Park, C. W. (2020). Differential performance impacts of outsider and insider interim CEO successions. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 29(6), 1439–1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2020.1828106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballinger, G. A., & Rockmann, K. W. (2010). Chutes versus ladders: Anchoring events and a punctuated-equilibrium perspective on social exchange relationships. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010a). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, R., Herstein, R., Silbiger, A., & Barnes, B. R. (2017). Developing international business relationships in a Russian context. Management International Review, 57(3), 441–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-016-0295-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogart, L. M., Benotsch, E. G., & Pavlovic Pavlovic, J. D. (2010). Feeling superior but threatened: The relation of narcissism to social comparison. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26(1), 35–44. Taylor & Francis https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2601_4
   Google Scholar
• Braun, S. (2017). Leader narcissism and outcomes in organizations: A review at multiple levels of analysis and implications for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 773. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, N. M., & Conroy, J. P. (2013). Executive hubris: The case of a bank CEO. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(2), 172–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571311303701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., & Werner, S. (2008). Real options, international entry mode choice and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 936–960. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00753.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunzel, J. (2021). Overconfidence and narcissism among the upper echelons: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 71(3), 585–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00194-6
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. (1998). Analyzing foreign market entry strategies: Extending the internalization approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3), 539–561. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahan, S. F., Chen, C., & Chen, L. (2017). Social norms and CSR performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(3), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2899-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahan, S. F., De Villiers, C., Jeter, D. C., Naiker, V., Staden, C. J. V., & Van Staden, C. J. (2015). European accounting review are CSR disclosures value relevant? Cross-country evidence are CSR disclosures value relevant? Cross-country evidence. European Accounting Review, 25(3), 579–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1064009
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, S. J., Madhok, A., & Tao, W. (2006). Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: The effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1058–1077. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro, P., Tascón Fernández, T., Amor-Tapia, B., & De Miguel, A. (2016). Target leverage and speed of adjustment along the life cycle of European listed firms. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(3), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S. J., & Hong, J. (2000). Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: Intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2010a). Executive personality, capability cues, and risk-taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2010(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2010.54484461
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 202–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211427534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, A., & Pollock, T. G. (2017). Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 703–725. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Ni, X., & Tong, J. Y. (2016). Gender diversity in the boardroom and risk management: A case of R&D investment. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 599–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2528-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. Y., & Young, M. N. (2010). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal-principal perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9150-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., & Rui, O. M. (2009). Exploring the effects of China’s two-tier board system and ownership structure on firm performance and earnings informativeness. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 16(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2009.9720831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cragun, O. R., Olsen, K. J., & Wright, P. M. (2020). Making CEO narcissism research great: A review and meta-analysis of CEO narcissism. Journal of Management, 46(6), 908–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319892678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossland, C., & Chen, G. (2013). Executive accountability around the world: Sources of cross-national variation in firm performance-CEO dismissal sensitivity. Strategic Organization, 11(1), 78–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012460946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, T., & Knott, A. M. (2018). Outside CEOs and innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2095–2119. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshmukh, S., Goel, A. M., & Howe, K. M. (2013). CEO overconfidence and dividend policy. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22(3), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2013.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhang, J. (2007). Private vs state ownership and earnings management: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00556.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., Singh, H., & Hesterly, W. S. (2018). The relational view revisited: A dynamic perspective on value creation and value capture. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3140–3162. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2018). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: The role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatotchev, I., Jackson, G., & Nakajima, C. (2013). Corporate governance and national institutions: A review and emerging research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4), 965–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9293-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4), 501–534. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florackis, C., & Ozkan, A. (2009a). Managerial incentives and corporate leverage: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Accounting & Finance, 49(3), 531–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florackis, C., & Ozkan, A. (2009b). The impact of managerial entrenchment on agency costs: An empirical investigation using UK panel data. European Financial Management, 15(3), 497–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00418.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, S. W., & Sputtek, R. (2011). Rediscovering the individual in strategy: Methodological challenges, strategies, and prospects. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 6, 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-8387(2011)0000006004
   Google Scholar
• Gaio, C., & Pinto, I. (2018). The role of state ownership on earnings quality: evidence across public and private European firms. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-07-2016-0067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., & Han, K. S. (2020). Managerial overconfidence, CSR and firm value. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 29(6), 1600–1618. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2020.1830558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerstner, W.-C., Koenig, A., Enders, A., & Hambrick, D. C. (2011). CEO narcissism and incumbent response to technological discontinuities. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2011(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2011.65869634
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, P. C. (2005). The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 777–798. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.18378878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grøgaard, B., Rygh, A., & Benito, G. R. (2019). Bringing corporate governance into internalization theory: State ownership and foreign entry strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(8), 1310–1337. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00237-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., & Nickerson, J. A. (2008). Interorganizational trust, governance choice, and exchange performance. Organization Science, 19(5), 688–708. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, C., Seybert, N., & Wang, S. (2018). Narcissism is a bad sign: CEO signature size, investment, and performance. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(1), 234–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-017-9427-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., Finkelstein, S., & Mooney, A. C. (2005). Executive job demands: New insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 472–491. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.17293355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hass, L. H., Tarsalewska, M., & Zhan, F. (2016). Equity incentives and corporate fraud in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(4), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2774-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, C., Guo, Q., & Rigby, D. (2017). What sustains larger firms? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing industries. The Annals of Regional Science, 58(2), 275–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller, N. J., & Hambrick, D. C. (2005). Conceptualizing executive hubris: The role of (hyper-)core self-evaluations in strategic decision-making. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, T. C., Abeysekera, I., & Ma, S. (2017). The effect of board diversity on earnings quality: An empirical study of listed firms in Vietnam. Australian Accounting Review, 27(2), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. K., Lee, J. H., & Roh, T. (2022). The effects of CEO narcissism on corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(6), 1926–1940. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, B., Li, Z., & Minor, D. (2016). Corporate governance and executive compensation for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(1), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2962-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskisson, R. E., Cannella, A. A., Tihanyi, L., & Faraci, R. (2004). Asset restructuring and business group affiliation in French civil law countries. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 525–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, M., Ding, A., & Zhang, H. (2022). Foreign ownership and earnings management. International Review of Economics & Finance, 80, 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.02.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, W.-T., Chen, H.-L., & Ho, M. H.-C. (2020). CEO tenure and R&D investment: Founders vs. agents and the role of independent directors. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(10), 1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1757637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, S., Lin, S.-W., Chen, W.-P., & Huang, J.-W. (2021). CEO duality, information costs, and firm performance. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 55, 101011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2019.101011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarboui, S. (2016). Managerial psychology and transport firms efficiency: a stochastic frontier analysis. Review of Managerial Science, 10(2), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0149-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouber, H. (2022). Women leaders and corporate social performance: do critical mass, CEO managerial ability and corporate governance matter? Management Decision, 60(5), 1185–1217. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2020-0953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jun Park, H. (2014). The critical assessment of heterogeneous outcome of CEO hubris. Retrieved from http://s-space.snu.ac.kr/handle/10371/119346
   Google Scholar
• Kao, M.-F., Hodgkinson, L., & Jaafar, A. (2019). Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2018-0144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keister, L. A. (2009). Organizational research on market transition: A sociological approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(4), 719–742. October) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9113-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 45–74. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3094254, https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:1<45::AID-SMJ147>3.3.CO;2-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H.-S. (2019). Effects of CEO miscalibration on compensation and hedging. Finance Research Letters, 30, 216–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiviet, J. F., & Kripfganz, S. (2021). Instrument approval by the Sargan test and its consequences for coefficient estimation. Economics Letters, 205, 109935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, C.-Y., Pan, H., Kuo, L.-C., & Ko, Y.-C. (2020). The association between non-executive compensation and firm performance. Taylor & Francis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 29(2), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2020.1726777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouaib, A., Bouzouitina, A., & Jarboui, A. (2022). CEO behavior and sustainability performance: The moderating role of corporate governance. Property Management, 40(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/PM-01-2021-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, P. S. (2022). The double-edged sword of CEO narcissism: A meta-analysis of innovation and firm performance implications. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(6), 749–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, R., Semadeni, M., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2014). CEO duality: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40(1), 256–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2006). When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 894–917. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.22798171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanis, R., Richardson, G., & Taylor, G. (2017). Board of director gender and corporate tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(3), 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2815-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latif, K. (2018). Interactions between corporate governance, earnings quality attributes and value of firm: Empirical analysis from non-financial sector of Pakistan. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. International Islamic University. 1–197.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. M., Hwang, B. H., & Chen, H. (2017). Are founder CEOs more overconfident than professional CEOs? Evidence from S&P 1500 companies. Strategic Management Journal, 38(3), 751–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F., Li, T., & Minor, D. (2016). CEO power, corporate social responsibility, and firm value: a test of agency theory. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 12(5), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-05-2015-0116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., & Lu, Y. (2012). CEO dismissal, institutional development, and environmental dynamism. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4), 1007–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9224-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, F., Lin, S.-W., & Fang, W.-C. (2022). Impact of CEO narcissism and hubris on corporate sustainability and firm performance. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 59, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., & Tang, Y. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48036912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Yang, J. (2019). Effects of CEO duality and tenure on innovation. Journal of Strategy and Management, 12(4), 536–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-04-2019-0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J. W., & Ma, X. (2008). The contingent value of local partners’ business group affiliations. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.31767261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Y. (2008). Structuring interorganizational cooperation: The role of economic integration in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X., Chung, C. N., & Sobczak, M. (2009). How do corporate governance model differences affect foreign direct investment in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3), 444–467. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., Yao, X., & Xi, Y. (2006). Business group affiliation and firm performance in a transition economy: A focus on ownership voids. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(4), 467–483. December) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-006-9011-6
   Google Scholar
• Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005a). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661–2700. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00813.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005b). Does overconfidence affect corporate investment? CEO overconfidence measures revisited. European Financial Management, 11(5), 649–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-7798.2005.00302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-García, I., Basco, R., & Gómez-Ansón, S. (2021). Dancing with giants: Contextualizing state and family ownership effects on firm performance in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(4), 100373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misangyi, V. F., & Acharya, A. G. (2014). Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1681–1705. December 1)https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. S., Cropanzano, R. S., & Quisenberry, D. M. (2012). Social exchange theory, exchange resources, and interpersonal relationships: A modest resolution of theoretical difficulties. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4175-5_6
   Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, S., & Herrmann, P. (2010). CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1050–1073. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr, M. A., & Ntim, C. G. (2018). Corporate governance mechanisms and accounting conservatism: evidence from Egypt. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(3), 386–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2017-0108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nekhili, M., Chakroun, H., & Chtioui, T. (2018). Women’s leadership and firm performance: Family versus nonfamily firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(2), 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3340-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, V. B. (2021). The difference in the FDI inflows–Income inequality relationship between developed and developing countries. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 30(8), 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2021.1925331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nureen, N., Liu, D., Irfan, M., Malik, M., & Awan, U. (2023). Nexuses among green supply chain management, green human capital, managerial environmental knowledge, and firm performance: evidence from a developing country. Sustainability, 15(6), 5597. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeng, H., Enos, B. K., & Yensu, J. (2021). Working capital management, working capital policy, and firm performance in Ghana: empirical evidence using a dynamic system GMM. African Journal of Business and Economic Research, 16(1), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.31920/1750-4562/2021/v16n1a11
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.-H., Kim, C., Chang, Y. K., Lee, D.-H., & Sung, Y.-D. (2018). CEO hubris and firm performance: Exploring the moderating roles of CEO power and board vigilance. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4), 919–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2997-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. (1996). The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. The Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 492–528. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9605060220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. J., Galvin, B. M., & Lange, D. (2012). CEO servant leadership: Exploring executive characteristics and firm performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(3), 565–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01253.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrenko, O. V., Aime, F., Ridge, J., & Hill, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppo, L., Zhou, K. Z., & Zenger, T. R. (2008). Examining the conditional limits of relational governance: Specialized assets, performance ambiguity, and long-standing ties. Journal of Management Studies, 45(7), 1195–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Diversity, Gender, Strategy and Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reina, C. S., Zhang, Z., & Peterson, S. J. (2014). CEO grandiose narcissism and firm performance: The role of organizational identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 958–971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkranz, C., & Wulf, T. (2019). Behavioral integration as a relational governance mechanism in family firms—The moderating role of family involvement in management. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(3), 801–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovelli, P., Massis, A. D., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2023). Are narcissistic CEOs good or bad for family firm innovation? Human Relations, 76(5), 776–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221076834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She, Z., Li, Q., London, M., Yang, B., & Yang, B. (2019). Effects of CEO narcissism on decision-making comprehensiveness and speed. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 35(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-01-2019-0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, W., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Will succession planning increase shareholder wealth? Evidence from investor reactions to relay CEO successions. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, L. M., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M., Chen, X. P., & Tetrick, L. E. (2009). Social exchange in work settings: Content, process, and mixed models. Management and Organization Review, 5(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2009.00158.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., Tabassum, N., Darwish, T. K., & Batsakis, G. (2018). Corporate Governance and Tobin’s Q as a Measure of Organizational Performance. British Journal of Management, 29(1), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, R., Groß, M., & Xin, K. R. (2019). Will Self-Love Take a Fall? Effects of Top Executives’ Positive Self-Regard on Firm Innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syofya, H. (2022). Modeling Analysis of Economic Growth in Asia with a Dynamic Panel Approach Generalized Method of Moment (GMM). IJEBD (International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development), 5(4), 716–725. https://doi.org/10.29138/ijebd.v5i4.1900
   Google Scholar
• Tai, Y.-H. (2020). The relation between the corporate governance evaluation and abnormal returns: the role of company financial performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 30(4), 1086–1103. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2020.1828952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., Hom, H., Hong Kong, K., Qian, C., Chen, G., & Shen, R. (2015). How CEO Hubris Affects Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 36(9), 1338–1357. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, T. L. P., & Liu, H. (2012). Love of Money and Unethical Behavior Intention: Does an Authentic Supervisor’s Personal Integrity and Character (ASPIRE) Make a Difference? Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1040-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., Mack, D. Z., & Chen, G. (2018). The differential effects of CEO narcissism and hubris on corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 39(5), 1370–1387. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Essen, M., Otten, J., & Carberry, E. J. (2015). Assessing managerial power theory: A metaanalytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation. Journal of Management, 41(1), 164–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinh, N. T. (2020). Impact of overconfident CEO on dividend policy: evidence in enterprises listed on hose of Vietnam. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 26(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wibbens, P. D., & Siggelkow, N. (2020). Introducing LIVA to measure long-term firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 41(5), 867–890. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibbens, P. D. (2018).). ScholarlyCommons Exploring The Multi-Trillion Dollar Question: How Resource Dynamics Shape Long-Term Profit Patterns Recommended Citation Wibbens, Phebo Derk, “Exploring The Multi-Trillion Dollar Question: How Resource Dynamics Shape Long-Term Profit Patterns.“ Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations
   Google Scholar
• Yiu, D. W., Wan, W. P., & Xu, Y. (2019). Alternative Governance and Corporate Financial Fraud in Transition Economies: Evidence From China. Journal of Management, 45(7), 2685–2720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318764296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal-principal perspective: Review paper. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 196–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00752.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousaf, U. B., Ullah, I., Wang, M., Junyan, L., & Rehman, A. U. (2022). Does board capital increase firm performance in the Chinese tourism industry? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(4), 653–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-04-2021-0165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, M. (2023). CEO duality and firm performance: A systematic review and research agenda. European Management Review, 20(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, H., Nordberg, D., & Homberg, F. (2019). The dark and bright sides of hubris: Conceptual implications for leadership and governance research. Leadership, 15(6), 647–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715019848198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Ren, S., Chen, X., Li, D., & Yin, D. (2020). CEO hubris and firm pollution: State and market contingencies in a transitional economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3987-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, Q., & Sun, Y. (2020). The more the better? Relational governance in platforms and the role of appropriability mechanisms. Journal of Business Research, 108, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar