Legal technology acceptance in Vietnam’s courts

References

• Abramovsky, L., & Griffith, R. (2006). Outsourcing and offshoring of business services: How important is ICT? Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(2–3), 1–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40005125 https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2006.4.2-3.594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarie, B., Niblett, A., & Yoon, A. H. (2018). How artificial intelligence will affect the practice of law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68(supplement 1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2017-0052
   Google Scholar
• Alda, E., Bennett, R., Marion, N., Morabito, M., & Baxter, S. (2020). Antecedents of perceived fairness in criminal courts: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 44(3), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2019.1615521
   Google Scholar
• Almaiah, M., Al-Otaibi, S., Lutfi, A., Almomani, O., Awajan, A., Alsaaidah, A., Alrawad, M., & Awad, A. (2022). Employing the TAM model to investigate the readiness of M-learning system usage using SEM technique. Electronics, 11(8), 1259. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11081259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammenwerth, E. (2019). Technology acceptance models in health informatics: TAM and UTAUT. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 263, 64–71. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI190111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballell, T. R. (2019). Legal challenges of artificial intelligence: Modelling the disruptive features of emerging technologies and assessing their possible legal impact. Uniform Law Review, 24(2), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/ulr/unz018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., Ryan, A. M., & Wiechmann, D. (2004). Justice expectations and applicant perceptions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(1–2), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, J., Roper, S., & Love, J. H. (2020). Innovation in legal services: The practices that influence ideation and codification activities. Journal of Business Research, 109, 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, K., Hirabayashi, M., Langevin, C., Munozcano, B. R., Sekizawa, K., & Zhu, J. (2020). The future of AI in the Brazilian judicial system (pp. 1–20). Retrieved from https://itsrio.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/SIPA-Capstone-The-Future-of-AI-in-the-Brazilian-Judicial-System-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, C., Gherhes, C., & Vorley, T. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the legal sector: Pressures and challenges of transformation. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 13(1), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsz026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, T. H., & Nguyen, V. P. (2022). The impact of artificial intelligence and digital economy on Vietnam’s legal system. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 9(8), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09927-0
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. S. (2020). Procedural fairness can guide court leaders. Court Review, 56(2), 76–78.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. S., & Leben, S. (2020). Procedural fairness in a pandemic: It’s still critical to public trust. Drake Law Review, 68(4), 685–706.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In V. Esposito Vinzi, W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares. Springer handbooks of computational statistics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciftci, O., Berezina, K., & Kang, M. (2021). Effect of personal innovativeness on technology adoption in hospitality and tourism: Meta-analysis. In J. L. Stienmetz, W. Wörndl, & C. Koo (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2021 (pp. 162–174). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Clothier, R. A., Greer, D. A., Greer, D. G., & Mehta, A. M. (2015). Risk perception and the public acceptance of drones. Risk Analysis, 35(6), 1167–1183. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, G. S., & Moons, K. G. M. (2019). Reporting of artificial intelligence prediction models. Lancet, 393(10181), 1577–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30037-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrales, M., Fenwick, M., & Haapio, H. (2019). Legal tech, smart contracts and blockchain. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6086-2
   Google Scholar
• Da Xu, L. D., He, W., & Li, S. (2014). Internet of things in industries: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 10(4), 2233–2243. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2300753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearing, J. W., & Cox, J. G. (2018). Diffusion of innovations theory, principles, and practice. Health Affairs, 37(2), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeks, A. (2019). The judicial demand for explainable artificial intelligence. Columbia Law Review, 119(7), 1829–1850. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/26810851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirsehan, T., & Can, C. (2020). Examination of trust and sustainability concerns in autonomous vehicle adoption. Technology in Society, 63, 101361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, C. (2021). How do lawyers engineer and develop legaltech projects? A story of opportunities, platforms, creative rationalities, and strategies. Law, Technology and Humans, 3(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.v3i1.1558
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, B., Peng, M.-H., & Sun, S.-L. (2018). Modeling the adoption of personal health record (PHR) among individual: The effect of health-care technology self-efficacy and gender concern. The Libyan Journal of Medicine, 13(1), 1500349. https://doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2018.1500349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejdys, J. (2018). Building technology trust in ICT application at a university. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(5), 980–997. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-07-2017-0234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, C., & Grgić-Hlača, N. (2021). Machine advice with a warning about machine limitations: Experimentally testing the solution mandated by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Journal of Legal Analysis, 13(1), 284–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/laab001
   Google Scholar
• Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, G. C., Su, X., Lin, Z., He, Y., Luo, N., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Determinants of technology acceptance: Two model-based meta-analytic reviews. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020952400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Cha, J. (1994). Partial least squares. In R. P. Bagozzi (Ed.), Advanced methods of marketing research (pp. 52–78). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, K. (2016). Algorithmic injustice: How the Wisconsin Supreme Court failed to protect due process rights in State v. Loomis. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 18, 75–106.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, J., & Mishra, M. (2022). Fintech in the time of COVID − 19: Technological adoption during crises. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 50, 100945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2021.100945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisser, S. (1975). The predictive sample reuse method with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70(350), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/2285815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasinghe, A., Hamid, J. A., Khatibi, A., & Azam, S. M. F. (2019). The adequacy of UTAUT-3 in interpreting academician’s adoption to e-learning in higher education environments. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 17(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2019-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F.Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). Data, measurement, and causal inferences in machine learning: Opportunities and challenges for marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 29(1), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2020.1860683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdollah, R., & Baghaei, P. (2016). Partial least squares structural equation modeling with R. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 21(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hameed, I., Mubarik, M. S., Khan, K., & Waris, I. (2022). Can your smartphone make you a tourist? Mine does: Understanding the consumer’s adoption mechanism for mobile payment system. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4904686
   Google Scholar
• Hanham, J., Lee, C. B., & Teo, T. (2021). The influence of technology acceptance, academic self-efficacy, and gender on academic achievement through online tutoring. Computers & Education, 172, 104252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartung, M., Bues, M. M., & Halbleib, G. (2018). Legal tech: A practitioner’s guide. CH Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Hartung, M., Bues, M.-M., & Halbleib, G. (2017). Legal tech. Beck/Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Hasani, I., Chroqui, R., Okar, C., Talea, M., & Ouiddad, A. (2017). Literature review: All about IDT and TAM. Berrechid, Morocco: National School of applied sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikhsan, K. (2020). Technology acceptance model, social influence and perceived risk in using mobile applications: Empirical evidence in online transportation in Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen, 11(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.15294/jdm.v11i2.23309
   Google Scholar
• Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam (2020). Viet Nam’s intellectual property strategy until 2030: Driving force for development of intellectual property assets. Retrieved from https://www.most.gov.vn/en/news/753/viet-nam's-intellectual-property-strategy-until-2030–driving-force-for-development-of-intellectual-property-assets.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Jalil, A., & Sheriff, S. M. (2020). Legal tech in legal service: Challenging the traditional legal landscape in Malaysia. IIUM Law Journal, 28(S1), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v28i(S1).586
   Google Scholar
• Janoski-Haehlen, E. (2019). Robots, blockchain, ESI, oh my!: Why law schools are (or should be) teaching legal technology. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 38(3), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2019.1656456
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, H. M., Sung, H. J., & Kim, H. Y. (2020). Customers’ acceptance intention of self-service technology of restaurant industry: Expanding UTAUT with perceived risk and innovativeness. Service Business, 14(4), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-020-00425-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K., & Rich, K. (2021). Who is included in human perceptions of AI?: Trust and perceived fairness around healthcare AI and cultural mistrust. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445570
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. K., Jain, A., Cha, H. J. I. N., Ojha, S., & Kusbit, D. (2019). Procedural justice in algorithmic fairness: Leveraging transparency and outcome control for fair algorithmic mediation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Legg, M. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic, the courts and online hearings: Maintaining open justice, procedural fairness and impartiality. Federal Law Review, 49(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X21993139
   Google Scholar
• Liu, K., & Tao, D. (2022). The roles of trust, personalization, loss of privacy, and anthropomorphism in public acceptance of smart healthcare services. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C. S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2005.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhlenbach, F., & Sayn, I. (2019). Artificial intelligence and law: What do people really want?: Example of a French Multidisciplinary Working Group. In 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law ICAIL (pp. 1–19).
   Google Scholar
• Namahoot, K. S., & Rattanawiboonsom, V. (2022). Integration of TAM model of consumers’ intention to adopt cryptocurrency platform in Thailand: The mediating role of attitude and perceived risk. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9642998
   Google Scholar
• Ortega Egea, J. M., & Román González, M. V. (2011). Explaining physicians’ acceptance of EHCR systems: An extension of TAM with trust and risk factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osoba, O., & Welser, W. (2017). An intelligence in our image: The risks of bias and errors in artificial intelligence. Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, A. L., Fotheringham, D., & Bitner, M. J. (2019). Customer acceptance of AI in service encounters: Understanding antecedents and consequences. In P. Paul (Ed.), Handbook of service science (Vol. 2, pp. 77–103). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Patil, P., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Raghavan, V. (2020). Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petkevičiūtė-Barysienė, D. (2016). The factors of the judgment of judicial behavior fairness in civil justice [Summary of Ph.D. Dissertation]. Vilnius University.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. (2010). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, F. (2021). Rage against the machine? Incorporating legal tech into legal education. The Law Teacher, 55(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2020.1805927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şahin, F., Doğan, E., Okur, M. R., & Şahin, Y. L. (2022). Emotional outcomes of e-learning adoption during compulsory online education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7827–7849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10930-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón-Manzano, E. (2021). Legaltech and lawtech: Global perspectives, challenges, and opportunities. Laws, 10(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws10020024
   Google Scholar
• Sandefur, R. L. (2019). Legal tech for nonlawyers: Report of the survey of US legal technologies. Retrieved from https://iaals.du.edu/sites/default/files/documents/publications/abf_us_digital_legal_tech_for_nonlawyers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. E. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2
   Google Scholar
• Silva, J. E., Scherf, E. D. L., & Silva, M. V. V. (2018). In tech we trust? Some general remarks on law in the technological era from a third world perspective. Revista Opinião Jurídica, 17(25), 107. https://doi.org/10.12662/2447-6641oj.v17i25.p107-123.2019
   Google Scholar
• Sindermann, C., Riedl, R., & Montag, C. (2020). Investigating the relationship between personality and technology acceptance with a focus on the smartphone from a gender perspective: Results of an exploratory survey study. Future Internet, 12(7), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12070110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitar-Tăut, D. (2021). Mobile learning acceptance in social distancing during the COVID-19 outbreak: The mediation effect of hedonic motivation. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3(3), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sitar-Tăut, D.-A., & Mican, D. (2021). Mobile learning acceptance and use in higher education during social distancing circumstances: An expansion and customization of UTAUT2. Online Information Review, 45(5), 1000–1019. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2021-0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validation and multinomial prediction. Biometrika, 61(3), 509–515. https://doi.org/10.2307/2334733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez, C. A. (2020). Disruptive legal technology, COVID-19, and resilience in the profession. South Carolina Law Review, 72(2), 393–444. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/License
   Google Scholar
• Subawa, N. S., Dewi, N. K. A., & Gama, A. W. O. (2021). Differences of gender perception in adopting cashless transaction using technology acceptance model. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 617–624. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no2.0617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
   Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, S., Yang, W., Le Grange, J. M. L., Wang, P., Huang, W., & Ye, Z. (2019). Smart healthcare: Making medical care more intelligent. Global Health Journal, 3(3), 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glohj.2019.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Tian, Y., Chan, T. J., Suki, N. M., & Kasim, M. A. (2023). Moderating role of perceived trust and perceived service quality on consumers’ use behavior of Alipay e-wallet system: The perspectives of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5276406
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, P., & Tiwari, S. K. (2020). Integration of technology acceptance model with perceived risk, perceived trust and perceived cost: Customer’s adoption of m-banking. International Journal on Emerging Technologies, 11(2), 447–452.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, T.-H., Lin, W.-Y., Chang, Y.-S., Chang, P.-C., & Lee, M.-Y. (2020). Technology anxiety and resistance to change behavioral study of a wearable cardiac warming system using an extended TAM for older adults. PLOS One, 15(1), e0227270. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung, F.-C., Chang, S.-C., & Chou, C.-M. (2008). An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(5), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2012). Adoption and impacts of interorganizational business process standards: Role of partnering synergy. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1131–1157. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vimalkumar, M., Sharma, S. K., Singh, J. B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). ‘Okay google, what about my privacy?’: User’s privacy perceptions and acceptance of voice based digital assistants. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Transparent, explainable, and accountable AI for robotics. Science Robotics, 2(6), 6080. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aan6080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Xu, Z., & Zeng, X. J. (2018). Linguistic terms with weakened hedges: A model for qualitative decision making under uncertainty. Information Sciences, 433–434, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.12.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Zhao, S., Zhang, W., & Evans, R. (2021). Why people adopt smart transportation services: An integrated model of TAM, trust and perceived risk. Transportation Planning and Technology, 44(6), 629–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2021.1943132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff, A., Fox, S. E., Rousso-Schindler, S., & Warshaw, J. (2018, April). A qualitative exploration of perceptions of algorithmic fairness. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 207–226). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174230
   Google Scholar
• Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., Tan, X., & Zheng, H. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. International Journal of Information Management, 31(6), 572–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, C. W. (2019). The influence of perceived risk and trust in adoption of FinTech services in Indonesia. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13(1), 1039. https://doi.org/10.21512/commit.v13i1.5708
   Google Scholar
• Xiang, A. (2021). Reconciling legal and technical approaches to algorithmic bias. Tennessee Law Review, 88(3), 1–75. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3650635
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, F., & Ke, J. (2021). Pricing, management and decision-making of financial markets with artificial intelligence: Introduction to the issue. Financial Innovation, 7(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00302-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, N., & Wang, K. J. (2021). Adopting robot lawyer? The extending artificial intelligence robot lawyer technology acceptance model for legal industry by an exploratory study. Journal of Management & Organization, 27(5), 867–885. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2018.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., & Wang, H. (2017). On the syntax and semantics of virtual linguistic terms for information fusion in decision making. Information Fusion, 34, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2016.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X., & Huang, Y. (2019). Restaurant information cues, diners’ expectations, and need for cognition: Experimental studies of online-to-offline mobile food ordering. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K. C., & Shih, P. H. (2020). Cognitive age in technology acceptance: At what age are people ready to adopt and continuously use fashionable products? Telematics and Informatics, 51, 101400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Wei, G., & Chen, X. (2022). SF-GRA method based on cumulative prospect theory for multiple attribute group decision making and its application to emergency supplies supplier selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 110, 104679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar