Vietnamese fictive motion constructions: a construction grammar approach

References

• Afrashi, A., & Rahmani, A. (2014). Fictive motion in Persian: A cognitive approach to coextension paths. Journal of Language and Western Iranian Dialects, 2(6), 1–28. https://lsi-linguistics.ihcs.ac.ir/article_1759.html?lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Banaruee, H., Khoshsima, H., Zare-Behtash, E., & Yarahmadzehi, N. (2019). Reasons behind using metaphor: A cognitive perspective on metaphoric language. NeuroQuantology, 17(3), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2019.17.03.2001
   Google Scholar
• Biên, D. H. (2016a). Câu có vị từ chuyển tác trong tiếng Việt: Cấu trúc – Ngữ nghĩa – Cú pháp. NXB Đại học Quốc gia.
   Google Scholar
• Biên, D. H. (2016b). Mô hình hệ thống ý niệm trong hệ hình Ngôn ngữ học Tri nhận. In D. H. Trong Biên (Ed.), Ngữ văn và Văn hóa học: Một chặng đường (pp. 466-493). Nhà xuất bản Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
   Google Scholar
• Biên, D. H. (2017a). Ngôn ngữ và sự tri nhận vận động (Qua một số mô hình lập thức vận động trong Ngôn ngữ học Tri nhận). In D. H. Trong Biên (Ed.), Ngữ văn và văn hóa học: Những điểm nhìn (pp. tr. 477–512). Nhà xuất bản Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
   Google Scholar
• Biên, D. H. (2017b). Ngôn ngữ học Tri nhận: Từ lập trường chung đến các luận thuyết cơ bản. Tạp Chí Khoa Học Đại Học Đà Lạt, 7(4), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.37569/DalatUniversity.7.4.348(2017
   Google Scholar
• Biên, D. H. (2021a). Fictive motion: Some models in cognitive linguistics. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 8(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.2003979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biên, D. H. (2021b). Construal and its representative forms in cognitive linguistics. Dalat University Journal of Science, 11(3), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.37569/DalatUniversity.11.3.697(2021)
   Google Scholar
• Blomberg, J. (2014). Motion in language and experience: Actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. [ Doctoral dissertation], Lund University. https://portal.research.lu.se/en/publications/motion-in-language-and-experience-actual-and-non-actual-motion-in
   Google Scholar
• Blomberg, J. (2015). The expression of non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(4), 657–696. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomberg, J., & Zlatev, J. (2014). Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-013-9299-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauchard, A. (2018). Spatial expression in Caac: An Oceanic language spoken in the North of New Caledonia. De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, M. (1978). Coverbs and case in Vietnamese. The Australian National University .
   Google Scholar
• Dân, N. Đ. (1996). Sự chuyển nghĩa của những từ trỏ quan hệ và chuyển động trong không gian. In Lôgích và tiếng Việt (pp.327-349). Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, V. (2007). A glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fagard, B., Zlatev, J., Kopecka, A., Cerruti, M., & Blomberg, J. (2013). The expression of motion events: A quantitative study of six typologically varied languages. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 39(1), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v39i1.3893
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore et al., (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case for let alone. Language, 64(3); 501–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/414531
   Google Scholar
• Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction (Vol. 1). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalizations in language. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Han, M. T. T. (2011). Verbs of motion and their lexicalization patterns in English and Vietnamese - A perspective from cognitive semantics. Nghiên cứu nước ngoài, 27(2), 107–114. https://js.vnu.edu.vn/FS/article/view/1470/1434
   Google Scholar
• Hạo, C. X. (1998). Tiếng Việt: Mấy vấn đề ngữ âm, ngữ pháp, ngữ nghĩa. Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục.
   Google Scholar
• Huumo, T. (1999). Path settings, subjective motion, and the finnish partitive subject. In S. J. J. Hwang & A. R. Lommel (Eds.), LACUS forum XXV (Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States) (pp. 363–374). https://www.academia.edu/16649792/Path_settings_subjective_motion_and_the_Finnish_partitive_subject
   Google Scholar
• Huumo, T. (2005). How fictive dynamicity motivates aspect marking: The riddle of the Finnish quasiresultative construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(1), 113–144. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2004). Language typologies in our language use: The case of Basque motion events in adult oral narratives. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(3), 317–349. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2004.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatin-Zadeh, O., Marmolejo-Ramos, F., & Trenholm, S. (2022). The role of motion-based metaphors in enhancing mathematical thought: A perspective from embodiment theories of cognition. Journal of Cognitive Enhancement, 6(4), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-022-00247-6
   Google Scholar
• Ký, T. V. (1883). Grammaire de la langue annamite. Saigon. https://petruskyaus.net/grammaire-de-la-langue-annamite-p-truong-vinh-ky/
   Google Scholar
• Lai, N. (1977). Một vài đặc điểm của nhóm từ chỉ hướng được dùng ở dạng động từ trong tiếng Việt hiện đại. Ngôn ngữ, 3, 8–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, N. (1989). Ghi nhận thêm về bản chất nhóm từ chỉ hướng vận động trong tiếng Việt hiện đại. Ngôn ngữ, (1–2).
   Google Scholar
• Lai, N. (1990). Nhóm từ chỉ hướng vận động trong tiếng Việt. Tủ sách Trường Đại học Tổng hợp Hà Nội. https://books.google.com.vn/books/about/Nh%C3%B3m_t%E1%BB%AB_ch%E1%BB%89_h%C6%B0%E1%BB%9Bng_v%E1%BA%ADn_%C4%91%E1%BB%99ng.html?id=v_9AHAAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
   Google Scholar
• Lai, N. (1994). Về mối quan hệ giữa phạm trù ngữ nghĩa và ngữ pháp trong tiếng Việt (qua cứ liệu cụ thể của nhóm từ chỉ hướng vận động). In Lưu Vân Lăng (chủ biên) (1994) (pp. 211–232). Những vấn đề ngữ pháp tiếng Việt. Nhà xuất bản Khoa học Xã hội.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1985). Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 109–150). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1990). Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 5–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1999). Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29(2), 77–104. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/9723
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American sign language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, S. (2016). Fictive motion in Chinese. University of Auckland Research Repository, Research Space.
   Google Scholar
• Matlock, T. (2004a). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32(8), 1389–1400. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlock, T. (2004b). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden & K.-E. Panther (Eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation (pp. 221–248). De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, Y. (1996a). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), 183–226. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1996.7.2.183
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, Y. (1996b). How abstract is subjective motion? A comparison of coverage path expressions and access path expressions. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 359–373). CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Medill, K. (2021). Is this directive He inappropriate? The directive He and fictive motion in Biblical Hebrew. Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages, 47(2), 37–55. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-semlang_v47_n2_a3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, R. K., & Singh, N. (2010). Online fictive motion understanding: An eye-movement study with Hindi. Metaphor and Symbol, 25(3), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2010.489393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. L., & Jolley, J. M. (2010). Research design explained. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Naidu, V., Zlatev, J., Duggirala, V., van De Weijer, J., Devylder, S., & Blomberg, J. (2018). Holistic spatial semantics and post-Talmian motion event typology: A case study of Thai and Telugu. Cognitive Semiotics, 11(2), 20182002. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2018-2002
   Google Scholar
• Pace, C. (2009). The typology of motion verbs in Northern Vietnamese. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics, 1. Rice University. https://hdl.handle.net/1911/21857
   Google Scholar
• Rojo, A., & Valenzuela, J. (2003). Fictive motion in English and Spanish. International Journal of English Studies, 3(2), 123–150. https://www.academia.edu/34369170/Fictive_Motion_in_English_and_Spanish
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical constructions (pp. 195–219). Claredon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stosic, D., Fagard, B., Sarda, L., & Colin, C. (2015). Does the road go up the mountain? Fictive motion between linguistic conventions and cognitive motivations. Cognitive Processing, 16(Suppl 1), 221–225. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01458753/file/2015_Stosic-etal-Does-the-road.pdf
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stosic, D., & Sarda, L. (2009). The many ways to be located in French and Serbian: The role of fictive motion in the expression of static location. In M. B. Vukanovic & L. G. Grmuša (Eds.), Space and time in language and literature (pp. 39–60). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, K. (2000). Expressions of emanation fictive motion events in Thai. [ Doctoral dissertation], Chulalongkorn University. http://labo.kuis.ac.jp/private/kiyoko/Takahashi2001PhD.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (Vol. 3, pp. 36–149). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and “ception. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 211–276). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2000a). Toward a cognitive semantics: Conceptual structuring systems (Vol. 1). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2000b). Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology and process in concept structuring (Vol. 2). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (2017). Past, present, and future of motion research. In I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (Ed.), Motion and space across languages: Theory and applications (pp. 1–12). Human Cognitive Processing.
   Google Scholar
• Taremaa, P. (2013). Fictive and actual motion in Estonian: Encoding space. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 26, 151–183. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286600784_Fictive_and_actual_motion_in_Estonian_Encoding_space
   Google Scholar
• Thản, N. K. (1977). Động từ trong tiếng Việt. Nhà xuất bản Khoa học Xã hội.
   Google Scholar
• Toan, L. N. (2019a). A cognitive study of lexical expressions denoting motion in English and Vietnamese. [ Doctoral dissertation in English Linguistics], The University of Da Nang, Da Nang. https://www.elib.vn/doc/2020/20200910/a-cognitive-study-of-lexical-expressions-denoting-motion-in-english-and-vietnamese313.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Toan, L. N. (2019b). Lexical expressions of path motion in Vietnamese: A perspective from Cognitive Linguistics. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 1(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v1i1.25
   Google Scholar
• Wahlang, M., & Koshy, A. (2018). Descriptions of co-extension paths in Khasi. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 11(2), 42–66. http://hdl.handle.net/10524/52426
   Google Scholar
• Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., Devylder, S., Naidu, V., & van De Weijer, J. (2021). Motion event descriptions in Swedish, French, Thai and Telugu: A study in post-Talmian motion event typology. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 53(1), 58–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2020.1865692
   Google Scholar
• Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P. (2004). A third way of travel: The place of Thai in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative, Vol. 2: Typological & contextual perspectives (pp. 159–190). Erlbaum. https://scholar.google.com.vn/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=vi&user=CJ3-uqUAAAAJ&citation_for_view=CJ3-uqUAAAAJ:k_IJM867U9cC
   Google Scholar