Exploring the cross-linguistic functioning of the Principles of WH-Movements: The case of Pakistani ESL learners

References

• Aldwayan, S. N. (2008). The acquisition and processing of Wh-movement by Najdi learners of English. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas] https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/bitstream/handle/1808/4431/Aldwayan_ku_0099D_10053_DATA_1.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. (2019). Second language acquisition beyond borders? The Douglas Fir Group searches for transdisciplinary identity. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 113–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayoun, D. (2005). Parameter setting in language acquisition. A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz, A., Saleem, T., Maqsood, B., & Ameen, Z. (2020). Grammatical and syntactical functions of auxiliaries in English and Urdu. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 9(35), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2020.35.11.3
   Google Scholar
• Bley-Vroman, R. (1990). The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bley-Vroman, R. W., Felix, S. W., & Loup, G. L. (1988). The accessibility of universal grammar in adult language learning. Second Language Research, 4(1), Retrieve from. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43104370?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
   Google Scholar
• Boeckx, C. (2006). Linguistic minimalism: origin, concepts, methods, and aims. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burton-Roberts, N. (2011). Analyzing sentence: An introduction to English syntax (3rd ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Carnie, A. (2013). Syntax: A Generative Introduction (3rd ed.) ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L. L., & Corver, N. (2006). Lines of inquiry into wh-movement. Wh-Movement: Moving On, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7197.003.0004
   Google Scholar
• Choi, M. H. (2009). The acquisition of Wh-in-Situ construction in second language acquisition (doctoral dissertation). [Doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, US].
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2005). Three Factors in Language Design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2006). Language and mind. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H., & Hong, U. (1995). Agreement and null subjects in German L2 development: New evidence from reaction-time experiments. Second Language Research, 11(1), 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658395011001
   Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H., & Peter, M. (1986). The availability of universal grammar to adult and child learners: A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research, 2, 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658386002002
   Google Scholar
• Collins, C. (2022). The complexity of trees, universal grammar and economy conditions. Biolinguistics, 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5964/bioling.9573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, V. (1989). Universal grammar theory and the language classroom. System, 17(2), 169–181. http://www.viviancook.uk/Writings/Papers/System89.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cook, V. J., & Newson, M. (2007a). Chomsky’s universal grammar: An introduction. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, V., & Newson, M. (2007b). Chomsky’s universal grammar (3rd ed). Wiley-Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Cowper, E., & Hall, D. C. (2022). Morphosemantic features in universal grammar: What we can learn from Marshallese pronouns and demonstratives. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 67(3), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2022.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, S., Ni, W., & Conway, L. (1994). Learning, parsing, and modularity. Perspectives on Sentence Processing, 443, 467.
   Google Scholar
• Diessel, H., Merrison, A. J., & Bloomer, A. (2020). Learning versus growth. In P., Griffiths, A.J., Merrison, & A., Bloomer (Eds.). Language in Use (pp. 313–322). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Edelstein, E. (2020). English syntax: A minimalist account of structure and variation. Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2021). A short history of SLA: Where have we come from and where are we going? Language Teaching, 54(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enjavinezhad, M., & Paramasivam, S. (2014). Interlanguage syntax of L2 Persian speakers: The case of resumptive pronouns in English relative clauses. International Journal of Education and Research, 2, 10. http://www.ijern.com/journal/2014/October-2014/23.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. D., Flynn, S., & Martohardjono, G. (1996). Second language acquisition: Theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(19), 677–758. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/700B260891E6E716B3CA4C84930CCE55/S0140525X00043545a.pdf/transfer_in_l2_grammars.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Finer, D., & Broselow, E. (1986). Second language acquisition of reflexive binding. North Eastern Linguistic Society, 16, 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839100700102
   Google Scholar
• Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course L. Topics in applied psycholinguistics, 67.
   Google Scholar
• Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to government and binding theory (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Han, W. (2020). Universal Grammar and the Initial State of Second Language Learning: Evidence of Chinese Multidialectal Children’s Acquisition of English at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Hasebe, M. (2014). The acquisition of Wh-movement operation in English by Japanese EFL learners. [Doctoral dissertation, Yokohama National University, Kanagawa]. https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:4EaUwbdR6_8J:https://ynu.repo.nii.ac.jp/%3Faction%3Drepository_action_common_download%26item_id%3D4945%26item_no%3D1%26attribute_id%3D20%26file_no%3D1+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&client=firefox-b-ab
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, A. (2010). Parameters in Minimalist Theory: The Case of Scandavian. Theoretical Linguistics. http://filcat.uab.cat/clt/activitats/Holmberg_2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J.C. -T. (1982). Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. [ Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15215
   Google Scholar
• Hyams, N. (2013). A reanalysis of null subjects in child language. In Theoretical issues in language acquisition (pp. 259–278). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maqsood, B., Saleem, T., Aziz, A., & Azam, S. (2019). Grammatical constraints on the borrowing of nouns and verbs in urdu and English. SAGE Open, 9(2), 2158244019853469. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019853469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, D. (1998). Second language acquisition of English reflexives: Is there hope beyond transfer. In: Andy Stringfellow, Dalia Cahana-Amitay, Elizabeth Hughes and Andrea Zukowski (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development: 453–464. Somerville, Massachusetts: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muftah, M. Y. A., & Eng, W. B. (2011). English verb placement parameter in the interlanguage of L1 Arabic speakers. The Linguistic Journal, 5, 1. https://www.linguistics-journal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/June-2011-my.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, K., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). The Effect of First Language Transfer on Second Language Acquisition and Learning: From Contrastive Analysis to Contemporary Neuroimaging. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221081894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentza, A. (2012). Second language acquisition of complex structures: The case of English restrictive relative clause. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(7), 1330–1340. http://www.academypublication.com/issues/past/tpls/vol02/07/02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Radford, A. (2004). English Syntax: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, A. (2009). An Introduction to English Sentence Structure. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, A., Atkinson, M., Britain, D., Clahsen, H., & Spencer, A. (2009). Linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on Variables. (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, S. (2006). The accessibility of universal grammar in the acquisition of structure-dependency in Persian learners of English. [Master dissertation, Islamic Azad University of Bandar Abbas, Iran]. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED493519
   Google Scholar
• Saito, M., & An, D. H. (2014). A comparative syntax of ellipsis in Japanese and Korean. Japanese Syntax in Comparative Perspective, 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945207.003.0005
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, J. (1989). A new look at an old classic. Interlanguage studies bulletin (Utrecht), 5(1), 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Schacter, J. (1988). Second language acquisition and its relationship to universal grammar. Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.3.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape, N. (2006). The acquisition of English determiner phrase by Japanese and Spanish learners of English. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex]. http://www.nealsnape.com/thesis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sportiche, D., Koopman, H., & Stabler, E. (2014). An introduction to syntactic analysis and theory. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Strozer, J. (1992). Non-native language acquisition from a principles and parameters perspective. Current studies in Spanish linguistics (pp. 71–113). Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subsai, G. (2015). Universal grammar and its effects on L1 and L2 acquisition. International Journal of Arts and Commerce, 4(9), http://www.ijac.org.uk/images/frontImages/gallery/Vol._4_No._9/4._29-42.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Taci, J., & Saraci, M. (2022). Accusative case assignment to the verbal internal argument in the Albanian language and the corresponding case assigning model. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS2.1899
   Google Scholar
• Tayyabi, G. (2012). The availability of universal grammar to second language learners: A case of Wh-movement. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(3), http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n3p34
   Google Scholar
• Tsimpli, I. M., & Dimitrakopoulou, M. (2007). The interpretability hypothesis: Evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 23(2), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583070765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, E., Fuji, C., Kabuto, Y., & Murasugi, K. (2008). Experimental evidence for the parameter resetting hypothesis: The second language acquisition of English reflexive-binding by Japanese speakers. Nanzan Linguistics, 3(2), 263–282. http://www.ic.nanzan-u.ac.jp/LINGUISTICS/publication/pdf/NLSI3_2-14-watanabe_et_al.pdf
   Google Scholar
• White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, A. (1993). The S-parameters: A minimalist approach to syntax. [Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles]. http://linguistics.ucla.edu/general/dissertations/Wu.1993.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H. (2006). On overt and covert Wh-and relative movement in Hindi and Punjabi. Current Studies in Linguistics Sseries, 42, 135.
   Google Scholar