Interior design social compact possibilities in tandem with industry realities in South Africa

References

• Abbott, A. (1983). Professional ethics. American Journal of Sociology, 88(5), 855–48. https://doi.org/10.1086/227762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics South Africa. & Africa, S. S. 2014. Poverty trends in South Africa: An examination of absolute poverty between 2006 and 2011. Statistics South Africa. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-10-06/Report-03-10-06March2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The African Institute of the Interior Design Professions. (2020). Membership categories. http://www.iidprofessions.org.za/join-the-iid/membership-categories/
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, D. (2017). Visual mapping as a powerful tool for social design. KCETLink Media Group. https://www.kcet.org/shows/artbound/visual-mapping-as-a-powerful-tool-for-social-design
   Google Scholar
• Allan, K., & Heese, K. (2011). Understanding why service delivery protests take place and who is to blame. municipaliq. http://municipaliq.co.za/publications/articles/sunday_indep.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. G., Honey, P. L., & Dudek, M. T. (2007). Interior design’s social compact: The missing aspect of our quest for professional legitimacy. In P. Evans & J. C. Turpin, Eds. Interior Design educators council 44th annual international conference: Design and social justice. IDEC. p. 91–98. https://www.idec.org/files/2007IDECProceedings.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. G., Honey, P. L., & Dudek, M. T. (2023). Interior design’s social compact: Key to the quest for professional status. Journal of Interior Design(), v–xii. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2007.tb00313.x
   Google Scholar
• Animating Democracy. (2016). What is social change? Animating-Democracy. http://animatingdemocracy.org/place-start/what-social-change
   Google Scholar
• Augustin, D. S. (2014). Designing for Collaboration and Collaborating for Design. Journal of Interior Design, 39(1), ix–xviii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustin, S. (2014). Designing for Collaboration and Collaborating for Design. Journal of Interior Design, 39(2), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., & Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation ‘came to be’: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941600009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, C. A., & Alpern, T. (2006). A guide to qualitative field research. 2nd ed. J. Westby, Ed. Pine Forge Press Publications. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=EoxmBAAAQBAJ
   Google Scholar
• Balamatsias, G. (2018). 8 popular social innovation definitions. Social Innovation Academy. https://www.socialinnovationacademy.eu/8-popular-social-innovation-definitions/
   Google Scholar
• Barkan, S. E. (2012). Social Problems: Continuity and Change. FlatWorld.
   Google Scholar
• Belis, H., Pombo, F., & Heynen, H. (2014). Interior architecture in Flanders: Gendered perceptions and professional realities. Architectoni, 4, 13–20. http://ccaasmag.org/arch-issues/arch-online4/Pombo_gender.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boehm, S., & Kopec, D. (2016). Interior design as a post-disaster team partner. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 7(3), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-10-2014-0075
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd) ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Breen, B. (2007). Design for the other 90%. Fast Company. https://www.fastcompany.com/678764/design-other-90
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. 30–35. http://ssir.org/articles/entry/design_thinking_for_social_innovation
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (2001). Human dignity and human rights: Thoughts on the principles of human-centered design. Design Issues, 17(3), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caulier-Grice, J., Davies, A., Patrick, R., & Norman, W. (2012). www.youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/TEPSIE.D1.1.Report.DefiningSocialInnovation.Part-1-defining-social-innovation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., Na, J. H., Walters, A., Lam, B., Boult, J., Jordan, P. W., & Green, S. (2018). Design for social value: Using design to improve the impact of CSR. Journal of Design Research, 16(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2018.092818
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge Falmer Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Contract. (2020). Does interior design have a gender problem? 26. https://www.contractdesign.com/practice/business/does-interior-design-have-a-gender-problem/
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D., Wing, L., & Dillon, E. (2017). Co-design toolkit. WA Council of Social Service.
   Google Scholar
• Dam, R., & Siang, T. (2018). What is design thinking and why is it so popular. Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/what-is-design-thinking-and-why-is-it-so-popular
   Google Scholar
• Davey, C. L., Wootton, A. B., Boyko, C. T., & Cooper, R. (2005). From sustainability to socially responsible design. In Design synergy 21 group, design for the 21st century programme (pp. 1–12).
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers, P. G. R. (2016). Apocalyptic groups and socially disadvantaged contexts. Acta Theologica, 23(1), 238–262. https://doi.org/10.4314/actat.v23i1S.12
   Google Scholar
• de Vos, A. S., Strydom, H., Fouché, C. B., & Delport, C. S. L. (2015). Research at grass roots: For the social sciences and human service professions (4th) ed.). Van Schaik Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, J., & Partidário, M. (2019). Mind the gap: The potential transformative capacity of social innovation. Sustainability, 11(16), 4465. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docherty, C. (2017). Perspectives on design thinking for social innovation. The Design Journal, 20(6), 719–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1372005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, W., & Brown, A. (2009). Working with qualitative data. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=zdzYwxtXKWQC
   Google Scholar
• Globus, S. (2010). Value of interior design: The interior design value proposition. In C. S. Martin & D. A. Guerin (Eds.), The state of the interior design profession (pp. 4). Fairchild Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B., Laubscher, D., Freschi, F., & Collina, L. 2014. Design for development discourses and neoliberal values: Designer, innovation, community and sustainability. In: Cumulus johannesburg conference, design with the other 90%: Changing the world by design. A. Breytenbach & K. Pope, Eds. Greenside Design Center and University of Johannesburg. 427http://www.cumulusjohannesburg.co.za/files/9014/1810/9492/CumulusJoburgProceedings_Sep14.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, R., Fox, C., Baines, S., & Albertson, K. (2013). Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges? Locating the concept in theory and practice. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(4), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2013.848163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin, D. A., & Martin, C. S. Accreditation, C for ID. The interior design profession’s body of knowledge and its relationship to people’s health safety, and welfare. University of Minnesota College of Design; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hankinson, M. (2012). Factors that Impact on the Implementation of Sustainable Interior Design in KwaZulu-Natal [ Doctoral dissertation, University of Johannesburg (South Africa)]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/18219057.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harber, R., & Waxman, L. (2014). Interior design by expediency. In D. Smith, M. Lommerse, & P. Metcalfe (Eds.), Perspectives on social sustainability and interior architecture (pp. 87–92). Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345
   Google Scholar
• Havenhand, L. K. (2004). A view from the margin: Interior design. Design Issues, 20(4), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/0747936042312002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, CA. (2014). The social innovation revolution. Retrieved November 8, 2022, from http://commonwise.com/thesocialinnovationrevolution
   Google Scholar
• Heller, S., & Vienne, V. 2003. Citizen designer: Perspectives on design responsibility. Allworth Press. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=kviju2KshJQC
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, C., Handke, C., & Hitters, E. (2019). Analyzing talk and text II: Thematic analysis. In H. van den Bulck, M. Puppis, K. Donders, & L. van Audenhove (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of methods for media policy research (pp. 385–401). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16065-4
   Google Scholar
• Interior Design Education Council. 2011. The interior design body of knowledge. https://www.idec.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageID=3307
   Google Scholar
• Julier, G. (2013). From design culture to design activism. Design and Culture, 5(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470813X13638640370814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, Z., & Königk, R. (2019). A thin veneer: Interior design’s social compact. In S. C. Gray, C. T. Toffa, & A. Soudien (Eds.), Standing Items: Critical pedagogies in South African art, design and architecture (pp. 46–65). University of Johannesburg, Jacana Media.
   Google Scholar
• Königk, R. (2015). Interior Design's 100%: Engaging the Cultural Capital of the 'Other'. In A. Breytenbach & K. Pope (Eds.), Proceedings of Cumulus Johannesburg Conference, Design with the Other 90%: Changing the World by Design (pp. 81–86). Midrand, South Africa: Design Education Forum of Southern Africa. Retrieved from http://www.cumulusjohannesburg.co.za/files/9014/1810/9492/CumulusJoburgProceedings_Sep14.pdf (Accessed 26 April).
   Google Scholar
• Lasky, J. (2013). Design and social impact: A cross-sectoral agenda for design education, research and practice. The Smithsonian’s Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Lasky, J., & Nasadowski, B. (2015). Design and social impact: A cross-sectoral agenda for design education, research, and practice. Design and Culture, 7(1), 133–135. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470715X14153615623880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed). Merrill Prentice Hall. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=udhGPgAACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Lees-Maffei, G. (2008). Introduction: Professionalization as a focus in interior design history. Journal of Design History, 21(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epn007
   Google Scholar
• Lekhanya, L. M. (2019). The support structures for strengthening social innovation in South Africa. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(4). https://www.abacademies.org/articles/the-support-structures-for-strengthening-social-innovation-in-south-africa-8735.html
   Google Scholar
• Loseke, D. 2017. Thinking About Social Problems: An Introduction to Constructionist Perspectives (2nd) ed. Routledge. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=Ih8xDwAAQBAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, P. (2015). Community-Building through Interior Design Education. In J. A. A. Thompson & N. Blossom (Eds.), The Handbook of Interior Design (pp. 141–152). Routledge. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=hjMxBgAAQBAJ
   Google Scholar
• Luciell, V. R., & Saheed Bayat, M. (2019). The determination of social needs as drivers of social innovation. Management Studies Economic Systems, 4(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.12816/0053649
   Google Scholar
• Magnini, V. P. (2006). Photo-elicitation as a tool to alleviate international marketing mistakes. Journal of Global Competitiveness, 14(2), 75–83. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=sso&db=bth&AN=24488561&site=eds-live&scope=site
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. The All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 9(3). https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs: An introduction to design for social innovation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Presshttps://books.google.co.za/books?id=BzfpBgAAQBAJ
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E., & Coad, R. (2015). Design for Social Innovation. In: Design, when everybody designs. (An introduction to design for social innovation). The MIT Press. 55–74http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt17kk7sv.8
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd) ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. S., & Guerin, D. A. (2010). The state of the interior design profession. Fairchild Books. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=rdC6PwAACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, C., & Hill, C. (2011). Gay until proven straight: Exploring perceptions of male interior designers from male practitioner and student perspectives. Journal of Interior Design, 36(3), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2011.01060.x
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, D. G., Jr. (2007). Design that solves problems for the world’s poor. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/29/science/29cheap.html?_r=2&ref=science&oref=login&oref=slogin
   Google Scholar
• Melles, G., de Vere, I., & Misic, V. (2011). Socially responsible design: Thinking beyond the triple bottom line to socially responsive and sustainable product design. CoDesign, 7(3/4), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, D. M. (2012). A factor analysis of the health, safety, and welfare in the built environment toward interior design as perceived by building industry professionals (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee).
   Google Scholar
• Moody, D. M., & Petty, G. (2012). A factor analysis of the health, safety, and welfare in the built environment toward interior design as perceived by building industry professionals. https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=2483&context=utk_graddiss
   Google Scholar
• Moody, D. M., Petty, G., & Giglio, W. (2015). Interior design state regulation: The undermining power of perceptions. Journal of Family Consumer Sciences, 107(2), 49–55. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/interior-design-state-regulation-undermining/docview/1708016659/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Morelli, N. (2007). Social innovation and new industrial contexts: Can designers “industrialize” socially responsible solutions? Design Issues, 23(4), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2007.23.4.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Said Business School University Of Oxford-Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.
   Google Scholar
• Ndovela, X. (2021). Social innovation: Understanding selected Durban-based interior designers’ perceptions of socially responsible interior design. Durban University of Technology. https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/3585
   Google Scholar
• Ndovela, X., Olalere, F. E., & Reynolds, M. C. (2022). Design for social innovation: A value creation for intensifying interior design’s social compact. The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 16(2), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-162X/CGP/v16i02/53-75
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd) ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Pable, J. (2009). Interior design identity in the crossfire: A call for renewed balance in subjective and objective ways of knowing. Journal of Interior Design, v–xx. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2008.01015.x
   Google Scholar
• Pable, J., & Waxman, L. (2014). The importance of interior design professionals’ engagement in policy development to effect change for underprivileged individuals. In D. Smith, M. Lommerse, & P. Metcalfe (Eds.), Perspectives on social sustainability and interior architecture (pp. 79–85). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Papanek, V. J. (1985). Design for the real world: Human ecology and social change. Academy Chicago. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=VN1HwAEACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Perolini, P. S. (2011). Interior spaces and the layers of meaning. Design Principles & Practice: An International Journal, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v05i06/38247
   Google Scholar
• Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation
   Google Scholar
• Poldma, T. (2009). Taking up space: Exploring the design process. Fairchild Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pol, E., & Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(6), 878–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Ramirez, M. 2011. Designing with a social conscience: An emerging area in industrial design education and practice. In: DS 68-5: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 11), Impacting Society through Engineering Design, Vol. 5: Design for X/Design to X, Lyngby/ Copenhagen,Denmark, 15.-19.08. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rawsthorn, A. (2011). An early champion of good sense. The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/16/arts/16iht-design16.html
   Google Scholar
• Rwomire, A. (2001). The nature of social problems. In A. Rwomire (Ed.), Social problems in Africa: New visions (pp. 3–5). Praeger Publishers. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=jf2kJNT9qgkC&source=gbs_navlinks_s
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd) ed. SAGE Publicationshttps://books.google.co.za/books?id=V3tTG4jvgFkC
   Google Scholar
• Saloojee, A., & Saloojee, N. (2011). From social exclusion to social inclusion: Theory and practice over two continents. African Journal of Public Affairs, 4(2). https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/57703
   Google Scholar
• Shields, P. M., & Hassan, T. (2006). Intermediate theory: The missing link in successful student scholarship. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 12(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2006.12001438
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (2011). The environmental sustainability of paper. Graduate Studies Journal of Organizational Dynamics, 1(1). https://repository.upenn.edu/gsjod/vol1/iss1/4
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. (2014). Interiors can address social justice: Fact or fiction? In D. Smith, M. Lommerse, & P. Metcalfe (Eds.), Perspectives on social sustainability and interior architecture: Life from the inside (pp. 55–77). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D., Beeck, S., Lommerse, M., & Metcalfe, P. (2014). An introduction to social susutainability and interior architecture. In D. Smith, M. Lommerse, & P. Metcalfe, Eds. Perspectives on social sustainability and interior architecture: Life from the inside, (2nd) ed. Springer. p. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-39-2_4
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D., Lommerse, M., & Metcalfe, P. (2014). Perspectives on social sustainability and interior architecture: Life from the inside (2nd) ed. Springerhttps://books.google.co.za/books?id=kpDEBAAAQBAJ
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, W. M. (2005). Work and integrity: The crisis and promise of professionalism in America (2nd) ed. Jossey-Basshttps://books.google.co.za/books?id=3QMlAQAAIAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Theodorson, A. G. (1979). A modern dictionary of sociology. Barnes & Noble. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=ZWfSxQEACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• van Auken, P. M., Frisvoll, S. J., & Stewart, S. I. (2010). Visualising community: Using participant-driven photo-elicitation for research and application. Local Environment, 15(4), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549831003677670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasin, S. M., Gamidullaeva, L. A., & Rostovskaya, T. K. (2017). The challenge of social innovation: Approaches and key mechanisms of development. European Research Studies Journal, 20(2B), 25–45. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxy2017i2bp25-45.html
   Google Scholar
• Veiga, I., & Almendra, R. 2014. Social design principles and practices. In: Paper presented at the design research society conference 2014. Umea University, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, C. G. (2007). Designing for the” other 90 percent”. The Futurist, 41(3), 34. http://www2.dominicos.org/kit_upload/File/diseno.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, B., Sullivan, P. J., & Palermo, G. (2000). Ethics and the practice of architecture. John Wiley & Sonshttps://books.google.co.za/books?id=_lxwAbQlMXIC
   Google Scholar
• White, A. C. (2009). What’s in a Name? Interior Design and/or Interior Architecture: The Discussion Continues. Journal of Interior Design, 35(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1668.2009.01023.x
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, N. (1993). Design for society. Reaktion Books.http://site.ebrary.com/lib/durbanut/docDetail.action?docID=10430639
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? The American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1086/223790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, J., Jefferies, E., Tan, L., & Brown, T. 2013. Design transitions: Inspiring stories. Global viewpoints. How design is changing. Laurence King Publishing. https://books.google.co.za/books?id=y579lAEACAAJ
   Google Scholar
• Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning. W W Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R. (2017). Social innovation as a collaborative concept. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(4), 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1348935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar