Advanced search
Publication Cover
Cogent Arts & Humanities Volume 10, 2023 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,476
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
LINGUISTICS

On English translation variation of similar plural nouns in the Holy Quran

Mohd Nour Al Salem2 Department of English Language and Literature, The University of Jordan, Amman, JordanView further author information
,
Sharif Alghazo1 Department of Foreign Languages, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, The United Arab Emirates;2 Department of English Language and Literature, The University of Jordan, Amman, JordanCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Imran Alrashdan2 Department of English Language and Literature, The University of Jordan, Amman, JordanView further author information
,
Nimer Abusalim2 Department of English Language and Literature, The University of Jordan, Amman, JordanView further author information
&
Mohammad Rayyan3 Department of European Languages, The University of Jordan, Amman, JordanORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-7845View further author information
ORCID Icon
Article: 2196136 | Received 16 Sep 2022, Accepted 23 Mar 2023, Published online: 29 Mar 2023

References

  • Abdelaal, N. M. (2019). Faithfulness in the translation of the Holy Quran: Revisiting the Skopos theory. SAGE Open, 9(3), 2158244019873013.
  • Abdelaal, N. M., & Md Rashid, S. (2016). Grammar-related semantic losses in the translation of the Holy Quran, with special reference to Surah Al A’araf (The Heights). SAGE Open, 6(3), 2158244016661750.
  • Abdul-Raof, H. (2001). Qur’an translation: Discourse, texture and exegesis. Routledge.
  • Abu-Chacra, F. (2018). Arabic: An essential grammar. Routledge.
  • Al-Hilali, M, & Khan, M. M. (1983). Translation of the meanings of the Noble Qur’an in the English language. Madinah, King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Qur’an.
  • Ali, A. (1999). The meaning of the Holy Qur’an (10th edn ed.). Amana Publications.
  • Al-Jabari, A. R. Y. (2008). Reasons for the possible incomprehensibility of some verses of three translations of the meaning of the Holy Quran into English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Salford,
  • Al-Salem, R. S. (2008). Translation of metonymy in the holy qur’an: a comparative, analytical study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. King Saud University, KSA.
  • Alsharou, S. (2016). Contextual Emphasis in the Holy Quran and its translation into English. Unpublished MA Thesis, American University of Sharjah, UAE.
  • Arberry, A. (1955). The Quran interpreted. Allen & Unwin.
  • Jarrah, M. A., Alghazo, S. M., & Al Salem, M. N. (2019). Discourse functions of the wh-word ʃu: In Jordanian Arabic. Lingue e Linguaggio, 28(2), 291–17.
  • Jarrah, M., Alghazo, S. M., & Bader, Y. (2021). Two types of concession: Evidence from discourse markers. SAGE Open, 11(3), 1–13.
  • Khalaf, I., & Yusoff, Z. M. (2012). The Qur’an: Limits of translatability. QURANICA-International Journal of Quranic Research, 2(1), 73–85.
  • Pickthall, M. M. (1930). The meaning of the glorious Koran. Hyderabad Government Press.
  • Ratcliffe, R. (2006). Analogy. Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, 1, 74–82.
  • Salim, J. (2013). A contrastive study of English-Arabic noun morphology. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(3), Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org.
  • Sawaie, M. (2014). Fundamentals of Arabic grammar. Routledge.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.