Resumption optionality in direct object relative clauses in modern standard Arabic

References

• Åfarli, T. (1994). A promotion analysis of restrictive relative clauses. The Linguistic Review, 11(2), 81–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1994.11.2.81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhobaishy, A. (2018). The Syntax of Relativization in Arabic: A Cartographic Minimalist Account. PhD Dissertation, EFL University,
   Google Scholar
• Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., & Choueiri, L. (Eds.). (2010). The Syntax of Arabic. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511691775
   Google Scholar
• Aoun, J., Choueiri, L., & Hornstein, N. (2001). Resumption, movement, and derivational economy. Linguistic Inquiry, 32(3), 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901750372504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoun, J., & Li, A. (2003). Essays on the Representation and Derivation of Nature of Grammar: The Diversity of Wh-Constructions. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatt, R. (2002). The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification. Natural Language Semantics, 10(1), 43–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015536226396
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, V. (1999). Consequences of antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, V. (2000a). The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, V. (2000b). Some issues in the Syntax of Relative Determiners. In A. Alexiadou, Ed., The Syntax of Relative Clauses (pp. 53–81). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/la.32.02bia
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, V. (2002a). Headed relatives in generative Syntax - Part 1. Glot International, 6(7), 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, V. (2002b). Headed relatives in generative syntax - Part 2. Glot International, 6(8), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, V. (2004). Resumptive relatives and LF chains. In Cartography of syntactic structures. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The structure of CP and IP (Vol. 2, pp. 76–114). Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brame, M. (1968). A new analysis of the relative clause: Evidence of an Interpretive Theory. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding (7th ed.). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110884166
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1982). Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1992). A minimalist program for linguistic Theory. In MIT Occsional Papers in Linguistics. MIT Press Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.003.0003
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist Inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin (Ed.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax, in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–156). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fassi-Fehri, A. (1993). Issues in the Syntax of Arabic Clauses and Words. Springer Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Fassi-Fehri, A. (1996). Distributing Features and Affixes in Arabic Subject Verb Agreement. In J. Lecarme, J. Lowenstamm, & U. Shlonsky (Eds.), Research in Afroasiatic Grammar (pp. 79–100). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.202.05feh
   Google Scholar
• Galal, M. (2005). A Minimalist Approach To The Relative Clauses In Modern Standard Arabic. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Harizanov, B., & Gribanova, V. (2019). Whither head movement?. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 37(2), 461–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornstein, N., Nunes, J., & Grohmann, K. (2005). Understanding Minimalism (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840678
   Google Scholar
• Kayne, R. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), 63–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, J. (2005). Resumption. In M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax (Vol. IV, pp. 94–117). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, D., & Cowart, W. (1999). Experimental evidence for a minimalist account of English resumptive pronouns. Cognition, 70(2), B15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00006-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, G. (1999). Elemente der optimalitätstheoretischen Syntax ( [To be published by Stauffenburg,Tübingen). Universität Stuttgart. ( Manuscript).
   Google Scholar
• Ozeki, H., & Shirai, Y. (2007). Does the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses?Studies in Second Language Acquisition292169196. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070106
   Google Scholar
• Radford, A. (2009). English Syntax an Introduction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841675
   Google Scholar
• Rohrbacher, B. (1994) The Germanic languages and the full paradigm: A theory of V to I raising, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Rouveret, A. (2011). Some issues in the theory of resumption: A perspective on early and recent research. In A. Rouveret (Ed.), Resumptive pronouns at the interfaces (pp. 1–62). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, P. (1973). Focus and relativization. Language, 49(1), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/412101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlonsky, U. (1992). Resumptive pronouns as last resort. Linguistic Inquiry, 23(3), 443–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shlonsky, U. (1997). Clause Structure and Word Order in Hebrew and Arabic. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sichel, I. (2014). Resumptive Pronouns and Competition. Linguistic Inquiry, 45(4), 655–693. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. (2000). Wh-movement and the theory of feature-checking. Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Vergnaud, J. R. (1974). French Relative Clauses. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. (1999). A minimalist theory of human sentence processing. In S. Epstein & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Working Minimalism (pp. 20–88). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behaviour and the Principles of Least Effort. Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar