Strategic lexicalization in courtroom discourse: A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis

References

• Abdi, R., & Basarati, A. (2016). A critical analysis of the representation of Yemen crisis in ideologically-loaded newspaper headlines. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 37–27. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2016-1603-03
   Google Scholar
• Aijmer, K. (1997). I think-an English modal particle. In T. Swan & O. Westvik (Eds.), Modality in Germanic languages. Historical and comparative perspectives (pp. 1–47). Berlin: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889932.1
   Google Scholar
• Aijmer, K. (2009). Seem and evidentiality. Functions of Language, 16, 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.1.05aij
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933996
   Google Scholar
• Baker, P., & Levon, E. (2015). Picking the right cherries? A comparison of corpus-based and qualitative analyses of news articles about masculinity. Discourse & Communication, 9(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481314568542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbaresi, L. (2009). “Obviously” and “certainly”: Two different functions in argumentative discourse. Folia Linguistica, 21(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1987.21.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, K. (2010). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. Harlow: Longman Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, H. (2020). Swedish modal particles as markers of engagement: Evidence from distribution and frequency. Folia Linguistica, 54(2), 469–496. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2020-2047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, K. V. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bibok, K. (2004). Word meaning and lexical pragmatics. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 51(3–4), 265–308. https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.51.2004.3-4.3
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, M. (2018). The discourse functions of certainly and its Spanish counterparts in journalistic opinion discourse. Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 520–549. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.16026.per
   Google Scholar
• Blunter, R. (1998). Lexical pragmatics. Journal of Semantics, 15(2), 115–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/15.2.115
   Google Scholar
• Boris, V. T. (2012). Lexical borrowings: Linguistic and didactics aspects. Journal of Siberian Federal University: Humanities & Social Sciences, 7(5), 944–950. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/15.2.115
   Google Scholar
• Bray, C. (2022). Cooperation and demotion: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of Aboriginal people(s) in Australian print news. Discourse & Communication, 16(5), 504–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221099193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brochhagen, T., Franke, M., & van Rooij, R. (2018). Coevolution of lexical meaning and pragmatic use. Cognitive Science, 42, 2757–2789. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burleson, B. (2010). The nature of interpersonal communication: A message-centered approach. In C. R. Berger, M. A. Roloff, & D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen (Eds.), The handbook of communication science (2nd ed, pp. 145–163). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412982818.n9
   Google Scholar
• Carston, R. (2015). Contextual adjustment of meaning. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of semantics (pp. 195–210). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., & Machin, D. (2022). The law and critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2102520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, S. (2002). Corpus linguistic approaches for discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190502000041
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M. (1994). On the use of corpora in the analysis of forensic texts. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, 1(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v1i1.27
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2007). An introduction to forensic linguistics. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969717
   Google Scholar
• Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (Eds.), (2017). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, K. (2010). Courtroom discourse. In A. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Historical pragmatics (pp. 621–650). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214284.7.621
   Google Scholar
• Eades, D. (2000). I don’t think it’s an answer to the question: Silencing aboriginal witness in court. Language in Language, 29(2), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500002013
   Google Scholar
• Eltahir, M., Al-Qatawneh, S., & Alsalhi, S. (2019). E-Textbooks and their application levels, from the perspective of faculty members at Ajman University, U.A.E. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(13), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i13.9489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power (2nd ed.). London and New York: Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction: Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (Vol. 2, pp. 258–284). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Farinde, O. R. (2009). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to the study of language and the law. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.
   Google Scholar
• Fetzer, A. (2008). ‘And I think that is a very straight forward way of dealing with it.’: The communicative function of cognitive verbs in political discourse. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 27(4), 384–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X08322481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. (1996). On critical linguistics. In C. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 15–31). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gillings, M., Mautner, G., & Baker, P. (2023). Corpus-assisted discourse studies (Elements in Corpus Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009168144
   Google Scholar
• Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2021). Corpus linguistics in legal discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 34(5), 1515–1540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09860-8
   Google Scholar
• Green, C. M. (1996). Pragmatics and natural language understanding (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Guillén-Nieto, V., & Stein, D. (2021). Introduction: Theory and practice in forensic linguistics. In V. V. Guillén-Nieto & D. Stein (Eds.), Language as evidence: Doing forensic linguistics (pp. 123–176). London: Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4
   Google Scholar
• Guillén-Nieto, V., Vargas-Sierra, C., Pardiño-Juan, M., Martínez-Barco, P., & Suárez-Cueto, A. (2008). Exploring state-of-the-art software for forensic authorship identification. International Journal of English Studies, 8(1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. (2017). Lexical pragmatics, explicature and ad hoc concepts. In I. Depraetere & R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line. Logic, argumentation & reasoning (pp. 85–100). Switzerland: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32247-6_6
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s setter. Journal of Business Communication, 35(2), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369803500203
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. London & New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenböck, G. (2009). Initial I think: Main or comment clause? Discourse and Interaction, 2(1), 49–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kolaiti, P., & Wilson, D. (2014). Corpus analysis and lexical pragmatics: An overview, International Review of Pragmatics, 6(2), 211–239. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00602002
   Google Scholar
• Koźbiał, D. (2020). The language of EU and polish judges. Investigating textual fit through corpus methods. Bern: Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b17734
   Google Scholar
• Krieger, D. (2003). Corpus linguistics: What it is and how it can be applied to teaching. The Internet TESL Journal, 3, 123–141.
   Google Scholar
• Langelan, M. (1993). Back off! How to confront and stop sexual harassment and harassers. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Li, F. (2017). Critical discourse analysis of Sino-US climate change news report: A corpus-based analysis. Journal of News Research, 8(12), 59–61.
   Google Scholar
• Li, K., & Zhang, Q. (2022). A corpus-based study of representation of Islam and Muslims in American media: Critical discourse analysis approach. International Communication Gazette, 84(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048520987440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Małolepszy, M., & Głuchowski, M. (2021). Argumentation and legal interpretation in the criminal decisions of the polish supreme court and the German federal court of justice: A comparative view. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 35(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09843-9
   Google Scholar
• Marchi, A., & Taylor, C. (2009). If on a winter’s night two researchers…: A challenge to assumptions of soundness of interpretation. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines (CADDAD), 3(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., & Ronald Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497650
   Google Scholar
• Partington, A. (2004). Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast: Linguistic insights. Studies in Language and Communication, 9(C), 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Partington, A., Alison, D., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse. Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55
   Google Scholar
• Potts, A., & Kjær, L. (2016). Constructing achievement in the international criminal tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY): A corpus-based critical discourse analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 29(3), 525–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-015-9440-y
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Pearson Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Recanati, F. (2010). Pragmatic enrichment. In D. Fara & G. Russell (Eds.), Routledge companion to philosophy of language (pp. 67–78). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reddington, J., Murtagh, F., & Douglas, C. (2013). Computational properties of fiction writing and collaborative work. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intelligent Data Analysis (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41398-8-32
   Google Scholar
• Richard, I. (2018). Is legal lexis a characteristic of legal language? Lexis, 11, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.1173
   Google Scholar
• Schaffner, C. (2004). Political discourse analysis from the point of view of translation studies. Journal of Language and Politics, 3(1), 117–150. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.1.09sch
   Google Scholar
• Scheibman, J. (2000). ‘I dunno’: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of ‘don’t’ in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00032-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (2010). Pragmatic functions and lexical categories. Linguistics, 48(3), 717–777. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2010.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solan, L. (2020). Corpus linguistics as a method of legal interpretation: Some progress, some questions. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique, 33(2), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09707-8
   Google Scholar
• Solan, L., & Gales, T. (2017). Corpus linguistics as a tool in legal interpretation. Brigham Young University Law Review, 6, 1311–1358.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell, G. (2018). Computer-assisted language learning: Diversity in research and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, M. (1997). Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis. In A. Wray & A. Ryan (Eds.), Evolving model of language (pp. 100–115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Stygall, G. (2012). Discourse in the US courtroom. In P. Tiersma & L. Solan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 369–380). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0027
   Google Scholar
• Supardi, S. (2016). Language power in courtroom: The use of persuasive features in opening statements. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i1.2663
   Google Scholar
• Tiersma, M. P. (1999). Legal language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tognini, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Upton, T., & Cohen, A. (2009). An approach to corpus-based discourse analysis: The move analysis as example. Discourse Studies, 11(5), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445609341006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bogaert, J. (2006). I guess, I suppose and I believe as pragmatic markers: Grammaticalization and functions. Belgian Essays on Language and Literature, 4, 129–149.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Discourse, power and access. In C. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 84–104). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107775404
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, F., Hamann, H., & Gauer, I. (2018). Computer-assisted legal linguistics: Corpus analysis as a new tool for legal studies. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(4), 1340–1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G. (2018). A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of news reporting on China’s air pollution in the official Chinese English-language press. Discourse & Communication, 12(6), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481318771431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, G., & Wodak, R. (Eds). (2003). Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288423
   Google Scholar
• Widdowson, H. (2004). Text, context, pretext: Critical issues in critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470758427
   Google Scholar
• Widdowson, H. (2007). Discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiechmann, D., & Fuhs, S. (2006). Concordancing software. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1515/CLLT.2006.006
   Google Scholar
• Williams, C., & Tessuto, G. (Eds.). (2013). Language in the negotiation of justice: Contexts, issues and applications. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H., Lu, H., & Hu, J. (2021). A corpus-based critical discourse analysis of news reports on the COVID-19 pandemic in China and the UK. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(2), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n2p36
   Google Scholar
• Zejnilović, L., Samardžić, V., & Knežević, Ž. (2023). Pragmatic aspects of judicial discourse: Zooming in on a nuanced language use. Folia Linguistica Et Litteraria (Journal of Language and Literary Studies), 42(42), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.31902/fll.42.2022.17
   Google Scholar