A probabilistic semantics for modal QAD in standard Arabic

References

• Ababneh, T., Saleh, R., & Abushihab, I. (2017). Perspectives on Arabic Semantics. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 7(7), 58–20. www.ijhssnet.com/journal/index/3898
   Google Scholar
• Abu Helal, A. (2023). The semantics of modal QAD in standard Arabic. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 15(1), 27–65. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.15.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahloul, M. (2008). Structure and Function of the Arabic verb. Routlege Arabic Linguistics series. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203945568
   Google Scholar
• Barcan, R. (1946). A functional calculus of first order based on strict implication’. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/2269159
   Google Scholar
• Barcan, R. (1947). The identity of individuals in a strict functional calculus of second order. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12(1), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.2307/2267171
   Google Scholar
• Belnap, N. (1991). Backwards and forwards in the modal logic of agency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 51(4), 777–807. https://doi.org/10.2307/2108182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackburn, P., & Bos, J. (2005). Representation and Inference for Natural Language: A First Course in Computational Semantics. CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Carnap, R. (1946). Modalities and quantification. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 11(2), 33–64. https://doi.org/10.2307/2268610
   Google Scholar
• Condoravdi, C. (2002). Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past. In D. Beaver, S. Kaufmann, B. C, & L. Casillas (Eds.), The Construction of Meaning (pp. 59–88). CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Fassi, F. (2012). Key Features and Parameters in Arabic Grammar. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fukara, I. (2022). The effect of non-seven readings on linguistic guidance in Mughni AlLabib by Ibn Hisham Al-Ansari (D.761 AH). Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan for Human and Social Studies, 3(2), 101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hockett, C. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203(3), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0960-88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C. (2007). Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C., & McNally, L. (2005). Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language, 81(2), 345–381. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer, A. (1977). What ‘must’ and ‘can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353453
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, A. (1981). The notional category of modality. In H. J. Eikmeyer & H. Rieser (Eds.), Words, worlds, and contexts. New approaches in word semantics (pp. 38–74). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, A. (1991). Modality. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research( (pp. 639–650). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110126969.7.639
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, A. (2012). Modals and conditionals: New and revised perspectives. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234684.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kripke, S. (1963). Semantical analysis of modal logic i. normal propositional calculi. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 9(5–6), 67–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/malq.19630090502
   Google Scholar
• Lassiter, D. (2010). Gradable epistemic modals, probability, and scale structure. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT), 20, 20. https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v20i0.2557
   Google Scholar
• Lassiter, D. (2014). Epistemic comparison, models of uncertainty, and the disjunction puzzle. Journal of Semantics, 32(4), 649–684. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffu008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassiter, D. (2017). Graded Modality: Qualitative and quantitative perspectives. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (1968). Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic. Journal of Philosophy, 65(5), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.2307/2024555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partee, B. (1973). Some structure analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy, 70(18), 601–609. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025024
   Google Scholar
• Peter, K. (2012). Positive and conditional semantics. Proceedings of the sinn und bedeutung, 16(2), 363–376.
   Google Scholar
• Portner, P. (2009). Modality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlenker, P. (2006). Ontological symmetry in language: A brief manifesto. Mind and Language, 21(4), 504–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00288.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomason, R. (1984). Combinations of tense and modality. In D. M. Gabbay & F. Guenthner. Eds., Handbook of philosophical logic: Extensions of classical logic, Vol. IIpp. 136–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6259-0_3.
   Google Scholar
• von Stechow, A. (2010). Tenses in compositional semantics. In W. Klein (Ed.), The Expression of time in language (pp. 129–166). de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199031.129
   Google Scholar
• Yalcin, S. (2007). Epistemic modals. Mind, 116(464), 983–1026. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin, S. (2010). Probability operators. Philosophy Compass, 5(11), 916–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00360.x
   Google Scholar
• Zyoud, M., & Zyoud, H. (2022). The pronoun reference and its effect on textual coherence in Surat AlRahman. Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan Journal for Human and Social Studies, 3(2), 1–28.
   Google Scholar