A study into the use of video probes in the kitchen: Everyday kitchen practices transforming the middle-class interiors in Turkey

References

• Baysal, A. (1993). Evaluation of changes in Turkish food culture in terms of nutrition and health “research on Turkish cuisine culture”. Turkish Folk Culture Research Foundation, 12, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), The handbook of research methods in psychology (pp. 57–91). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Çakıroglu, P., & Yalçın, S. (2004). The impact of globalization on food consumption (Küreselleşmenin Gıda Tüketimine Etkisi). Standard, 43(510), 41–19.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. (2018). Doing ethnography (2nd ed.). Sage Publications: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526441874
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1998). The practice of everyday life: Living and cooking, 2. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demirkan, H., & Kutlusoy, S. (1998). Housing conditions and activities of the middle-income Turkish household. Housing Science, 22(1), 125–136. Retrieved 13 August, 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/11693/25371
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7221.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Groth, C., & Mäkelä, M. (2016). The knowing body in material exploration. Studies in Material Thinking, 14(2), 1–21. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303924213_The_Knowing_Body_in_Material_Exploration
   Google Scholar
• Güler, S. (2010). Türk mutfak kültürü ve yeme içme alışkanlıkları. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 26(1), 24–30. https://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423876631.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hagströmer, D., (2022). A kitchen for the modern woman, nasjonalmuseet. (Retrieved June 10, 2023). https://www.nasjonalmuseet.no/en/stories/explore-the-collection/a-kitchen-for-the-modern-woman/
   Google Scholar
• Halıcı, N. (1983). Mediterranean region meals (Akdeniz Bölgesi yemekleri). Konya Tourism Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ignatow, G. (2007). Theories of embodied knowledge: New directions for cultural and cognitive sociology? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37(2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2007.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, T., & Littman, J. (2005). The ten faces of innovation. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. MA Harvard University Pre.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 103–131). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, A. Lloyd, A., & Talja, S. (Ed.). (2010).Lessons from the workplace: Understanding information literacy as practice. Practising Information Literacy (pp. 29–50). Centre for Information Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, V., Leder Mackley, K., Pink, S., Escobar-Tello, C., Wilson, G. T., & Bhamra, T. (2015). Situating digital interventions: Mixed methods for HCI research in the home. Interacting with Computers, 27(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwu034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, K. (2009). Key concepts in ethnography. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Orentas, G., (2023). 6 Popular Types of Kitchen layouts, Forbes. (Retrieved June 12, 2023). https://www.forbes.com/home-improvement/kitchen/types-of-kitchen-layouts/
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2004). Home truths: Gender, domestic objects and everyday life. Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2007). Walking with video. Visual Studies, 22(3), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657142
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2012). Situating everyday life: Practices and places. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250679
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. (2017). Making home. Ethnography and design. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Mackley, KL, Morosanu, R, Mitchell V, Bhamra, T. (2017). Making homes: Ethnography and design. (home). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen, S. B., & Thøgersen, U. (2011). Embodied design thinking: A phenomenological perspective. CoDesign, 7(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.563313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. (2002). Towards a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, J. (1996). Engaging science: How to understand its practice philosophically. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organisation of normality. Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Watson, M., Hand, M., & Ingram, J. (2007). The design of everyday life. Berg. Publishers. Stenhouse. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474293679
   Google Scholar
• Sürücüoğlu, M., & Özçelik, A. (2008). Türk mutfak ve beslenme kültürünün tarihsel gelişimi. Icanas, September 10-15 (pp. 1289–1310). Retrieved 13 August, 2023. https://www.ayk.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/SÜRÜCÜOĞLU-Metin-Saip-ÖZÇELİK-Ayşe-Özfer-TÜRK-MUTFAK-VE-BESLENME-KÜLTÜRÜNÜN-TARİHSEL-GELİŞİMİ.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, D. (2009). The mindful kitchen, the embodied cook: Tools, technology and knowledge transmission on a Greek island. Material Culture Review, 70, 63–68. https://journals.lib.unb.ca/index.php/MCR/article/download/18165/19560/23382
   Google Scholar
• Tan, L., & Chow, K. K. N. (2018). An embodied approach to designing meaningful experiences with ambient media. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2020013
   Google Scholar
• TUIK. (2021). Gender Statistics 2021. TUIK (Turk Statistical Institute). Retrieved October 11, 2022, from https://www.tuik.gov.tr/media/announcements/toplumsal_cinsiyet_istatistikleri_2021.pdf
   Google Scholar