Accessibility hierarchy and acquisition of English relative clauses by Urdu EFL learners

References

• Albikri, R., & Jarrah, M. (2022). Acquisition of Arabic and English relative clauses by L2 English and Arabic learners. Dirasat, Human and Social Sciences, 49(5), 534–22. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v49i5.2776
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, B. (2007). The acquisition of relative clauses in relation to language typology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(2), 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2005). A New look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 81(4), 882–906. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2005.0169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckman, F. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27, 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1977.tb00124.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2009). Grammatical processing of spoken language in child and adult language learners. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 38(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9104-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S. (1979). Language transfer and universal grammatical relations. Language Transfer, 29(2), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1979.tb01073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (2010). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
   Google Scholar
• Goodluck, H., & Tavakolian, S. L. (1982). Competence and processing in children’s grammar of relative clauses. Cognition, 11, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(82)90002-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R., & Chan, C. (1997). The partial accessibility of universal grammar in second language acquisition: The failed functional features hypothesis. Second Language Research, 13(3), 187–226. https://doi.org/10.1191/026765897671476153
   Google Scholar
• Hayat, A. (2016). The acquisition of English restrictive relative clauses by Arab adult EFL learners. Advances in Language & Literary Studies, 7(1), 33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Izumi, S. (2003). Processing difficulty in comprehension and production of relative clauses by learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 53(2), 285–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, K. S., & Kim, H. (2007). Development of relativization in Korean as a Foreign language: The noun Phrase Accessibility hierarchy in head-internal and head-external relative clauses. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, Y. (2014). Typological universals of relative clauses. Presented at the East Asian Linguistics Seminar (EALS), Kuching, Malaysia, 14, 443–452. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B. (1977). Noun Phrase Accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koçak, A. (2020). Turkish tertiary level EFL learners’ recognition of relative clauses. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 1637–1655. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.850976
   Google Scholar
• Kuno, S. (1974). The position of relative clauses and conjunctions. Linguistic Inquiry, 5(1), 117–136.
   Google Scholar
• Maani, A. A. (2019). The acquisition of English relative clauses by University students of English in Jordan the Jordanian Association for Educational Sciences. Jordanian Education Journal, 4(1), 2019. https://doi.org/10.46515/2060-004-001-015
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, R. (2015). The Accessibility hierarchy of relativization in second language acquisition. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 2899. http://eprints.ibu.edu.ba/2899/
   Google Scholar
• Noor, H. H. (1994). Some implications of the role of the mother tongue in second language acquisition. Linguistica Communication, 6(1&2), 97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Ozeki, H., & Shirai, Y. (2007). Does the noun phrase accessibility hierarchy predict the difficulty order in the acquisition of Japanese relative clauses? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(2), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263107070106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavesi, M. (1986). Markedness, discoursal models, and relative clause formation in a formal and informal context. Studies in Second Lan guage Acquisition, 8, 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100005829
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, A. (1974). The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(3), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80064-2
   Google Scholar
• Tsimpli, I. (1997). Resumptive strategies and second language acquisition: A minimalist account. In Proceedings of the BUCLD 21 (pp. 639–655). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. (2003). On the nature of interlanguage representation: Universal grammar in the second language. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 19–42). Cambridge.
   Google Scholar