Hedging practices in soft science research articles: A corpus-based analysis of Indonesian authors

References

• Abdollahzadeh, E. (2019). A cross-cultural study of hedging in discussion sections by junior and senior academic writers: Un estudio transcultural. Ibérica, 38, 177–14. https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/97
   Google Scholar
• Alghazo, S., Al Salem, M. N., & Alrashdan, I. (2021). Stance and engagement in English and Arabic research article abstracts. System, 103, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almakrob, A. Y. (2020). Native versus Nonnative English writers’ use of hedging in linguistics dissertations. Asian EFL Journal, 27(4.4), 360–381. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/monthly-editions-new/2020-monthly-editions/volume-27-issue-4-4-october-2020/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Asfina, R., Kadarisman, A. E., & Astuti, U. P. (2018). Hedges used by Indonesian ELT students in written and spoken discourses. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 650. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9815
   Google Scholar
• Babaii, E., Atai, M. R., & Mohammadi, V. (2015). Stance in English research articles: Two disciplines of the same science. Teaching English Language, 9(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2015.53730
   Google Scholar
• Brezina, V., McEnery, T., & Wattam, S. (2015). Collocations in context: A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 139–173. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.01bre
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). An intercultural analysis of the use of hedging by Chinese and Anglophone academic English writers. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, P. (1997). Hedging in academic writing: Some theoretical problems. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)00007-0
   Google Scholar
• Demir, C. (2018). Hedging and academic writing: An analysis of lexical hedges. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(4), 74–92. http://www.jlls.org/index.php/jlls/article/view/812
   Google Scholar
• Fajri, M. S. A., Kirana, A. W., & Putri, C. I. K. (2020). Lexical bundles of L1 and L2 English professional scholars: A contrastive corpus-driven study on applied linguistics research articles. Journal of Language and Education, 6(4), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.10719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrokhi, F., & Emami, S. (2008). Hedges and boosters in academic writing: Native vs. non-native research articles in applied linguistics and engineering. The Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 1(2), 62–98. https://journals.iau.ir/article_524171.html
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In Kaltenböck, G., Mihatsch, W., & Schneider, S. (Eds.), New approaches to hedging (pp. 15–34). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253247_003
   Google Scholar
• Gomaa, Y. (2019). A corpus-based pragmatic analysis of hedging in linguistics master theses abstracts written by Saudi students. هرمس, 8(1), 9–81. https://doi.org/10.21608/HERMS.2019.66028
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAF textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90004-3
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (1996). Talking to the academy: Forms of hedging in science research articles. Written Communication, 13(2), 251–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088396013002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2016). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, S. H. (2020). Hedging in spoken conversations by Norwegian learners of English. Nordic Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.46364/njmlm.v8i2.751
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1973). Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(4), 458–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262952
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Wong, S. M. (2005). Raising awareness of hedging in Chinese business letters: Linguistic symbol. In F.-B.-C. In & M. Gotti (Eds.), Asian business discourse(s) (Vol. 29, pp. 271–290). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Loi, C. K., & Lim, J. M.-H. (2019). Hedging in the discussion sections of English and Malay educational research articles. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 19(1), 36–61. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1901-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu, C., Zhang, L. J., Ehrich, J., & Hong, H. (2015). The use of metadiscourse for knowledge construction in Chinese and English research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orta, I. V. (2010). A contrastive analysis of the use of modal verbs in the expression of epistemic stance in business management research articles in English and Spanish. Ibérica, 19, 77–95. http://www.revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/355
   Google Scholar
• Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(94)90013-2
   Google Scholar
• Sanjaya, I. N. S. (2015). Revisiting the effects of sociocultural context and disciplines on the use of hedges in research articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.838
   Google Scholar
• Sanjaya, I. N. S., Sitawati, A. A. R., & Suciani, N. K. (2015). Comparing hedges used by English and Indonesian scholars in published research articles: A corpus-based study. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 26(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i2/209-227
   Google Scholar
• Shafqat, A., Memon, R. A., & Khan, T. A. (2022). Do Pakistani English writers hedge more in linguistics research than native English writers? Journal of Humanities, Social and Management Sciences (JHSMS), 3(1), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.47264/idea.jhsms/3.1.17
   Google Scholar
• Smirnova, E., & Strinyuk, S. (2020). Hedges in Russian EAP writing: A corpus-based study of research papers in management. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 9(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2020-2033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takimoto, M. (2015). A corpus-based analysis of hedges and boosters in English academic articles. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 95–105. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.836
   Google Scholar
• Thabet, R. A. (2018). A cross-cultural corpus study of the use of hedging markers and dogmatism in postgraduate writing of native and non-native speakers of English. In K. Shaalan, A. E. Hassanien, & F. Tolba (Eds.), Intelligent natural language processing: Trends and applications (pp. 677–710). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67056-0_32
   Google Scholar
• Thuy, T. N. T. (2018). A corpus-based study on cross-cultural Divergence in the use of hedges in academic research articles written by Vietnamese and native English-Speaking authors. Social Sciences, 7(4), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7040070
   Google Scholar
• Tran, T. Q., & Tang, T. B. (2022). Hedging in the results and discussion section of English applied linguistics research articles by Vietnamese and foreign writers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(1), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1301.14
   Google Scholar
• Varttala, T. (1999). Remarks on the communicative functions of hedging in Popular scientific and specialist research articles on medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00007-6
   Google Scholar
• Vold, E. T. (2006). Epistemic modality markers in research articles: A cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2006.00106.x
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. (2022). Hedging in academic writing: Cross-disciplinary comparisons in the Michigan corpus of Upper-level Student papers (MICUSP). JALTCALL Publications, PCP2021(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTSIG.CALL.PCP2021-09
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S.-P., & Tatiana, K. (2016). Corpus research on hedges in linguistics and EFL journal papers. International Journal of Education, 9(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v9i1.3717
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. (2001). International scientific English: The language of research scientists around the world. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Research perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 71–83). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yagız, O., & Demir, C. (2014). Hedging strategies in academic discourse: A comparative analysis of Turkish writers and native writers of English. Procedia - Social & Behavioral Sciences, 158, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.085
   Google Scholar