The course of true loyalists never did run smooth: Critical discourse analysis of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms in Thai school textbooks

References

• Angkapanichkit, J. (2008). Kan Wikhro Khokhwam (discourse analysis) (2nd ed.). Thammasart University.
   Google Scholar
• Askew, M. C. (2010). Legitimacy crisis in Thailand. King Prajadhipok’s Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. (2022). A history of Thailand (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chanchalerm, S. (1952). Sam Kok Chabap Mai (The Three Kingdoms New edition ed.). Dokya.
   Google Scholar
• Chantarawong, S. (1989). The Three Kingdoms, Chao Phraya Phra Klang (Hon) edition: Preliminary observations on the political meaning. Thai Journal of East Asian Studies, 2(2), 13–12.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N.(1995). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dejpawuttikul, T.(2022). From archenemy of the nation to intimate other: Prince Damrong Rajanubhab’s journey through Burma and colonial ecumene. The Journal of Burma Studies, 26(1), 35–67.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Academic Affairs. (1981) . Laksut mathayomsueksa ton plai B.E. 2524 (the upper secondary Education curriculum 1981). Ladprao Teachers’ Council.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Academic Affairs. (1990) . Naew Patibat Nai Kanchattam Phaenkanchatkanrianru Samrap Laksut Prathomsueksa lae mathayomsueksa Chabap prapprung B.E. 2533 (guidelines for the preparation of learning plans for the primary and secondary Education curriculum, revised 1990). Ladprao Teachers’ Council.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Academic Affairs. (2002) . Laksut Kansueksa Khan Phuenthan (basic Education curriculum 2001). Ladprao Teachers’ Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dilokwanit, M. (1984). Unique Thai in the Three Kingdoms, literary style. Thammasat Journal, 13(2), 124–133.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The Critical study of language. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Honhuai (pseud.). (1952). Sam Kok Chabap Nai Honhuai (the Three Kingdoms’ Honhuai edition). Dokya.
   Google Scholar
• Khajavi, Y., Rasti, A., & Chaemsaithong, K. (2020). A discourse analytic investigation into politicians’ use of rhetorical and persuasive strategies: The case of US election speeches. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1740051. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311983.2020.1740051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lertchoosakul, K. (2019). The dynamics of change: The decline and revival of the Anti-Thaksin Movement. Journal of Social Sciences, 49(1), 7–33. http://www.library.polsci.chula.ac.th/dl/7a8446e87ac3febbdabedf3d18b76ec3
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matni, M. (2022). “Good child discourses” in Thai and Malaysian textbooks. Rajabhat Rambhai Barni Research Journal, 15(3), 34–45. http://www.org.rbru.ac.th/~researchs/JournalResearch/2564(no.3)_journal-rbru.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCargo, D. (2009). Thai politics as reality TV. The Journal of Asian Studies, 68(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911809000072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mydans, S. (2019, May 26). Prem Tinsulanonda, former Thai Premier and adviser to King, dies at 98. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/26/obituaries/prem-tinsulanonda-dead.html
   Google Scholar
• Nigatu, B. A., & Admassu, M. T. (2023). Critical discourse analysis of the second inaugural speech of Ethiopia’s Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed. Cogent Arts & Humanities. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311983.2023.2172805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nostitz, N. (2012). Red vs yellow: 1: Thailand’s crisis of identity. White Lotus.
   Google Scholar
• OBEC. (2019). Wannakhadi Wichak Chan Mathayomsueksa Pi Thi 6 (Thai literature appreciation Mathayom 6) (12th ed.). OTEPC Trade Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Council of State. (2003). Praratchabanyat Krasuang Sueksathikan B.E. 2546 (The Ministry of Education Administration Act 2003). https://www.moe.go.th/backend/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%9A.-%E0%B8%A8%E0%B8%98.-2546-%E0%B8%89%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%9E%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%97.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Panyanontachai, N. (2007). Inside the Three Kingdoms. Dokya.
   Google Scholar
• Pathmanand, U. (2008). A different coup d’etat? Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472330701651994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramoj, K. (1987). Sam Kok Chabap Naithun Ton Jo Cho Nayok Talotkan (the Three Kingdoms capitalist edition: Cao Cao, forever Prime Minister). Dokya.
   Google Scholar
• Raithuanlom, K. (2023, July 14). The Three Kingdoms episode 9, the Three Kingdoms and Thai politics (final part). ThaiNGO. https://www.thaingo.org/content/detail/5853
   Google Scholar
• Rajanubhab, D. (1928). Tamnan Rueang Sam Kok (legend of the Three Kingdoms). Prachan Printing House.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. J. (1996). Tycoons and Warlords: Modern Thai social formations and Chinese historical Romance. In A. Reid (Ed.), Sojourners and settlers histories of Southeast Asia and the Chinese (pp. 115–147). Versa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartraproong, K. (1998). Rajadhiraja Sam Kok Lae Saihan Lokkathat Chonchannam Thai (Rajadhiraja Sam Kok and Saihan: World views of the Thai elite). The Thailand Research Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Sikkhakoson, T. (2006). Romance of the Three Kingdoms: From China’s great work of literature to its counterpart in Thailand. Chinese Studies Journal, 1(1), 117–135.
   Google Scholar
• Tansakul, S. (2015). The Production of “The Romance of Three Kingdoms” in Thai society, 1937-2007 [ Master’s thesis]. Thammasart University. https://digital.library.tu.ac.th/tu_dc/frontend/Info/item/dc:91756
   Google Scholar
• Tongdaeng, T. (2022). Research on “Romance of the Three Kingdoms” in the Thai Academic Database during the period of 1966-2018. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Suratthani Rajabhat University, 14(2), 28–49. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhsc/article/view/260523
   Google Scholar
• Winichakul, T. (2006). Nationalism and Radical Intelligentsia in Thailand. Third World Quarterly, 29(3), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590801931520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winichakul, T. (2016). Thailand’s hyper-royalism: Its past success and present predicament. Yusof Ishak Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Workpoint News. (2018, 6 May). When you fail, the best strategy is “escaping.” when you want to win an election, “sucking” is the best strategy. Workpointtoday. https://workpointtoday.com/%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%A1%E0%B8%B7%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%AD%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A5%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B3-%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%94/
   Google Scholar
• Ya-Khop. (pseud.). (1977). Sam Kok Chabap Wanipok (The Three Kingdoms beggar edition). Dokya.
   Google Scholar
• Yuttapongtada, M. (2012). An assumption on words [tua] and [ton]. Damrong Journal, 11(2), 237–256. http://www.damrong-journal.su.ac.th/upload/pdf/4_11.pdf
   Google Scholar