The syntax of negative imperatives in Yemeni Arabic: A phase approach

References

• Aboh, E. (2004). The morphosyntax of complement-head sequences: Clause structure and word order patterns in Kwa. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adger, D. (2007). Three domains of finiteness: A minimalist perspective. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations (pp. 23–26). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2010). Imperatives and commands. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alcázar, A., & Saltarelli, M. (2014). The syntax of imperatives. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E.(1998). Parameterizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 16, 491–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aloni, M. (2007). Free choice, modals, and imperatives. Natural Language Semantics, 15(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9010-2
   Google Scholar
• Aoun, J. E., Choueiri, L., & Benmamoun, E. (2010). The syntax of Arabic. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A. 2004. Bipartite negation and the fine structure of the negative Phrase. Unpublished PhD Dissertation: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Belletti, A. (1990). Generalized verb movement. Rosenberg & Sellier.
   Google Scholar
• Benincà, P. (2001). The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In G. Cinque & G. Salvi (Eds.), Current studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi (pp. 39–64). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Benmamoun, E. (1997). Licensing of negative polarity items in Moroccan Arabic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005727101758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benmamoun, E. (2000). The feature structure of functional categories: A comparative study of Arabic dialects. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, H. (2006). Agreement, pro and imperatives. In P. Ackema, P. Brandt, M. Schoorlemmer, & F. Weerman (Eds.), Arguments and agreement (pp. 101–123). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beukema, F., & Coopmans, P. (1989). A government-binding perspective on the imperative in English. Journal of Linguistics, 25(2), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670001416X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, V., & Frascarelli, R. (2010). Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, (2), 43–88.
   Google Scholar
• Chatar-Moumni, N. (2013). Cycle de la négation en arabe marocain. Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales, 9(1), 1. 219–238. https://doi.org/10.7202/1024043ar
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures 3. (Adriana Belletti, Ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024389052993655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133–16). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Clercq, K. (2018). Syncretisms and the morphosyntax of negation. In L. Baunaz, K. D. Clercq, L. Haegeman, & E. Lander (Eds.), Exploring Nanosyntax (pp. 180–204). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, B. T. (1969). Vocatives and third-person imperatives in English. Papers in Linguistics, 1(3), 570–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351816909389130
   Google Scholar
• Erteschik-Shir, N. (2007). Information structure: The syntax–discourse interface. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frascarelli, M. (2007). Subjects, topics and the interpretation of referential pro: An interface approach to the linking of (null) pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25(4), 691–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9025-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frascarelli, M., & Jimènez-Fernàndez, A. (2021). How much room for discourse in imperative? the lens of interface on English, Italian and Spanish. Studia Linguistica, 75(3), 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemeijer, T. (2009). Aspects of discontinuous negation in Santome. In N. Cyffer, E. Ebermann, & G. Ziegelmeyer (Eds.), Negation patterns in West African languages and beyond (pp. 139–165). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Han, C.-H. (1998). The syntax and semantics of imperatives and related constructions. [PhD Dissertation]. University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Han, C.-H. (2001). Force, negation and imperatives. The Linguistic Review, 18(4), 289–325. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2001.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. (2013). Be Nice! How simple imperatives simplify imperative logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 43(5), 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-013-9304-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M.-B. M. (2014). The grammaticalization of negative indefinites: The case of the temporal/aspectual n-words plus and mais in Medieval French. In M.-B.-M. Hansen & J. Visconti (Eds.), The diachrony of negation (pp. 185–212). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Isac, D. (2015). The morphosyntax of imperatives. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. (2003). Syntax and semantics of imperative subjects. Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 31(1), 150–164. https://septentrio.uit.no/index.php/nordlyd/article/view/23/22
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, M. (2012). Interpreting imperatives. Studies in linguistics and philosophy. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Koeneman, O., & Zeijlstra, H. (2014). The rich agreement hypothesis rehabilitated. Linguistic Inquiry, 45(4), 571–615. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratzer, A. (2009). Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(2), 187–237. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krifka, M. (2001). Quantifying into question acts. Natural Language Semantics, 9(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017903702063
   Google Scholar
• Lafkioui, M. (2013). Reinventing negation patterns in Moroccan Arabic. In M. Lafkioui (Ed.), African Arabic: Approaches to dialectology (pp. 51–93). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, K. (1996). On the formal and functional relationship between topics and vocatives: Evidence from French. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language (pp. 267–288). CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, C. (2010). Negative-š in Palestinian (and cairene) Arabic: Present and possible past. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics, 2(1), 165–201. https://doi.org/10.1163/187666310X12688137960623
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, C. (2015). On Wilmsen on the development of postverbal negation in dialectal Arabic. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics Vol, 17, 77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Matushansky, O. (2006). Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(1), 69–109. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, G. G.-S. (2001). Grammatical and discourse properties of the imperative Subject in English. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Neeleman, A., & Szendrői, K. (2007). Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(4), 671–714. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesetsky, D., & Esther, T. (2007). The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian, & K. W. Wendy (Eds.), Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation (pp. 262–294). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Platzack, C., & Rosengren, I. (1998). On the subject of imperatives: A minimalist account of the imperative clause. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 1(3), 177–224. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009747522177
   Google Scholar
• Poletto, C. (2008). On negative doubling. Quaderni di lavoro ASIT, (8), 57–84. https://cecilia-poletto.de/phocadownloadpap/userupload/Fernando/Papers/2008_On_negative_doubling.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, UG and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(3), 365–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portner, P. (2007). Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics, 15(4), 351–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9022-y
   Google Scholar
• Radford, A. (2009). Analyzing English sentences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi, L. (2006). On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In L.-L.-S. Cheng & N. Corver (Eds.), Wh-movement: Moving on (pp. 97–133). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlett, P. (2014). French imperatives, negative ne, and non-subject clitics. Journal of French Language Studies, 24(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269513000367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp, L. (2003). The syntax of imperatives in English and Germanic: Word order variation in the minimalist framework. Palgrave McMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Shormani, M. (2014). Clitic construct state in semitic: A minimalist N-to-Spec approach. Al-Qalam Journal, (3), 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Shormani, M. (2015). Is Standard Arabic a VSO language? evidence from syntax and semantics. Al-Qalam Journal, 3, 1–49. https://doi.org/10.35695/1946-000-003-012
   Google Scholar
• Shormani, M. (2017a). Imperatives: Where syntax meet with discourse. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Shormani, M. (2017b). SVO, (silent) topics and the interpretation of referential pro: A discourse-syntax interface approach. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 291, 131–188. https://doi.org/10.26346/1120-2726-112.
   Google Scholar
• Shormani, M. (2019). Vocatives in Yemeni (ibbi) Arabic: Functions, types and approach. Journal of semitic studies 64(1), 221–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/jss/fgy049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shormani, M. (2021). Imperatives in Yemeni Arabic: Syntax, discourse and interface. International Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 7(1), 19–50.
   Google Scholar
• Shormani, M. (2023). Cypriot Arabic: Language contact and linguistic deviations from mainstream Arabic norms. International Journal of Linguistics Studies, 3(2), 34–55. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijls.2023.3.2.5
   Google Scholar
• Shormani, M., Qarabesh, M., & Stanley, P. (2018). Vocatives: Correlating the syntax and discourse at the interface. Cogent Arts & Humanities, Taylor & Francis, 5(1), 1. 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1469388
   Google Scholar
• Sibawayhi, A. B. O. (1938). Al-Kitaab ( 796). Buulaaq.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne, J. P. (1966). English imperative sentences. Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002222670000133X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilleson, P. 2019. On bipartite negation. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Unive4rsity of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• van der Wurff, W. (2007). Imperative clauses in generative grammar: Studies in honour of Frits Beukema. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Waltereit, R. (2002). Imperatives, interruption in conversation, and the rise of discourse markers: A study of Italian guarda. Linguistics, 40(5), 987–1010. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2002.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltschko, M. (2021). The grammar of interactional language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, W. (1898). A grammar of the Arabic language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zanuttini, R. 1991. Syntactic properties of sentential negation: a comparative study of Romance languages. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Zanuttini, R. (1996). On the relevance of tense for sentential negation. In A. Belletti & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Parameters and functional heads: Essays in comparative syntax (pp. 181–207). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zanuttini, R. (1997). Negation and clausal structure. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zanuttini, R. (2008). Encoding the addressee in the syntax: Evidence from English imperative subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 26(1), 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9029-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanuttini, R., Pak, M., & Portner, P. (2012). A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30(4), 1231–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-012-9176-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeijlstra, H. (2007). Negation in natural language: On the form and meaning of negative elements. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(5), 5. 498–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00027.x
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. 1990. The status of imperatives in theories of grammar. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar