Map out the legitimacy of source, story actors, and types of frames on the choice of development issues in faith media

References

• Abbink, J. (2011). Religion in public spaces: Emerging Muslim–Christian polemics in Ethiopia. African Affairs, 110(439), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adr002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. (2010). Combating climate change through quality education. Brookings Global Economy and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Annan, K. (2005). Secretary-General of the United Nations quotes on religious leaders and the millennium development goals [Online]. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in a semantic and lexical organization (pp. 21–74). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Beltrán, L. R. (2004). Communication for development in Latin America: A forty-year appraisal. Development Communicators and Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., ed. (2001). Le réenchantement du monde. Bayard.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, D., & Adams, D. (1990). Information subsidy and agenda-building in local television news. Journalism Quarterly, 67(4), 723–731. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909006700426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, P. (2016). Sensing religion, observing religion, reconstructing religion: Contingency and pluralization in post-Westphalian context. Social Compass, 63(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768616628794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, L., & Keller, P. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behaviour. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(2), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379503200206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyskal, J., & Blyskal, M. (1985). PR: How the public relations industry writes the news. Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Bratosin, S. (2015). La Foi et le Langage: Paradigmes de Sens pour les Médias. In S. Bratosin (Ed.), Médias, Spiritualité et Laïcité: Regards Croisés Franco-Roumains (pp. 9–30). Iarsic.
   Google Scholar
• Bratosin, S. (2016). La Médialisation du Religieux dans la Théorie du Post Néo-protestantisme. Social Compass, 63(3), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768616652335
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058877
   Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multi paradigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52, 870–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dacheux, E. (1999). Communication: a blind spot of interculturality. ARIC Bulletin, 31, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404041413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edy, J. A., & Meirick, P. C. (2007). Wanted, dead or alive: Media frames, frame adoption, and support for the war in Afghanistan. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etana, A. (2014). The characteristics of development paradigms: Modernization, dependency, & multiplicity. Development Paradigms/Discourse.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart & M. M. Braungart (Eds.), Research in political sociology (Vol. 3, pp. 137–177). JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. (1992). Social construction and moral action. In D. N. Robinson (Ed.), Social discourse and moral judgment (pp. 9–27). Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Gumucio Dagron, A. (2001). Making waves: Stories of participatory communication for social change. The Rockefeller Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Igartua, J., & Humanes, M. L. (2004). Teoría e investigación en comunicación social. Síntesis.
   Google Scholar
• Kinder, D. R. (2007). Curmudgeonly advice. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, R. (1998). Consumer knowledge structures: Networks and frames. In Advances in consumer research (Vol. 25, pp. 334–340). Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Lehikoinen, T. (2003). Religious media theory: Understanding mediated faith and Christian application of modern media. University of Jyvaskyla: Jyvaskyla University Printing Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379002700310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. (2006). Estableciendo la agenda. El impacto de los medios en la opinión pública y en el conocimiento. Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J., Pan, Z., & Rucinski, D. (1994). Levels of analysis in public opinion research. In T. L. Glaser & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 55–88). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Mefalopolus, P. (2008). Development communication sourcebook: broadening the boundaries of communication. World Bank. Retrieved from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/
   Google Scholar
• Melkote, S. R. (1991). Communication for development in the third world: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Melkote, S. R., & Steeves, H. L. (2001). Communication for development in the third world: Theory and practice for empowerment. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muñiz, C. (2007). News frames and immigration: from content analysis to the study of media effects [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Salamanca.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2014). Sacré versus Sécularisation. Religion et Politique dans le Monde. Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., & McLeod, J. M. (1991). Multilevel analysis in mass communication research. Communication Research, 18(2), 140–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365091018002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickel, G. (2012). Religiosity and bonding to the church in East Germany in Eastern European comparison: Is East Germany still following a special path? In G. Pickel & K. Sammet (Eds.), Transformations of religiosity. Religion and religiosity in Eastern Europe 1989–2010 (pp. 135–154). VS-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.3.380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1999). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365097024005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D. Jr. (2001). A bridging model for media research. In S. Reese, O. Gandy, & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7–31). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rhee, J. W. (2007). Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1997.tb02715.x
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Díaz, R., & Mena Montes, N. (2008). Opinión pública y frames: la crisis de los cayucos. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 63(63), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-63-2008-772-341-347
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C. (1991). Primetime activism. South End.
   Google Scholar
• Sahgai, N., & Smith, G. (2009). Pew Research Center’s forum on religion & public life.
   Google Scholar
• Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social research. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2–3), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda-setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schifirnet, C. (2013). Orthodoxy, church, state, and national identity in the context of tendential modernity. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies, 12(34), 173–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European Politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, M. (2009). Climate change and the media: Media coverage of climate change in non-industrialized countries (pp. 145–157). Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1996). Message framing and persuasion: A message processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296223004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1987). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In R. M. Hogarth & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Rational choice: The contrast between economics and psychology (pp. 67–94). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57, 60–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, E., & Seifert, M. (1992). Variability in the framing of risk issues. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1992.tb01948.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilanilam, J. V. (2005). Mass communication in India: A sociological perspective. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wallack, L., Dorfman, L., Jernigan, D., & Themba, M. (1993). Media advocacy and public health. Power for prevention. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda-setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (2009). The theory of social and economic organization. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Willaime, J.-P. (2006). La Sécularisation: Une Exception Européenne? Retour sur un-Concept et sa Discussion en Sociologie des Religions. Revue Française de Sociologie, 47(4), 755–783. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfs.474.0755
   Google Scholar
• Xiaoge, X. (2009). Measuring and mapping development journalism (pp. 1–22). International Communication Association.
   Google Scholar