Semantic scope ambiguity in gapping and non-constituent coordination: a generative analysis

References

• Abels, K. (2003). [Successive-cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding] [PhD thesis]. University of Connecticut. http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000049
   Google Scholar
• Al Khalaf, E. (2015). [Coordination and linear order] [PhD thesis]. University of Delaware.
   Google Scholar
• Al Khalaf, E. (2017). NPI licensing in JA: An argument for downward entailment and syntax- semantics interface. Topics in Linguistics, 18(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/topling-2017-0008
   Google Scholar
• Al Khalaf, E. (2018). Remarks on the syntax and the semantics of so-called comitative coordination. Linguistic Research, 35, 253–273. https://doi.org/10.17250/khisli.35.2.201806.253
   Google Scholar
• Al Khalaf, E. (2019). Floating quantifiers are autonomous phrases: A movement analysis. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Khalaf, E. (2022). Furthest conjunct agreement in Jordanian Arabic: Evidence for multiple (non)simultaneous Agree. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 40, 345–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-021-09515-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Khalaf, E. (2022). Constituency and left-sharing in coordination. English Language and Linguistics, 26(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674321000162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Khalaf, E., & Mashaqba, B. (2023). Semantic scope in Q-float constructions: An experimental investigation. Lingua, 282(2023), 103457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103457
   Google Scholar
• Beavers, J., & Sag, I. A. (2004). Coordinate ellipsis and apparent non-constituent coordination. In S. Müller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on HPSG (pp. 48–69). CSLI Publications. https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2004.3
   Google Scholar
• Bruening, B. (2014). Precede-and-command revisited. Language, 90(2), 342–388. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruening, B. (2015). Non-constituent coordination: Prosody, not movement. In S. Arunachalam, U. Horesh, E. Kaiser, I. Ross, T. Sanchez, & A. Williams (Eds.), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 21:1 Proceedings of the 38th Annual Penn Linguistics Conference (pp. Article 5). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol22/iss1/5
   Google Scholar
• Bruening, B., & Al Khalaf, E. (2018). Argument-adjunct asymmetry in reconstruction for binding condition C. Journal of Linguistics, 55(2), 247–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226718000324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruening, B., & Al Khalaf, E. (2020). Category mismatches in coordination revisited. Linguistic Inquiry, Pages, 51(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves, R. (2012). Conjunction, cumulation and respectively readings. Journal of Linguistics, 48(2), 297–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaves, R. (2014). On the disunity of right-node raising phenomena: Extraposition, ellipsis, and deletion. Language, 90(4), 834–886. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2014.0081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, C. (1988). Conjunction adverbs.
   Google Scholar
• Dowty, D. (1988). Type raising, functional composition, and non-constituent conjunction. In R. T. Oehrle, E. Bach, & D. Wheeler (Eds.), Categorial grammars and natural language structures (pp. 153–197). Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Haegeman, L. (2000). Inversion, non-adjacent inversion, and adjuncts in CP. Transactions of the Philological Society, 98(1), 121–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.00060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. (2004). In search of the English middle field. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts Amherst. https://people.umass.edu/kbj/homepage/ Content/middle_field.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. (2009). Gapping is not (VP-) ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 40(2), 289–328. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota, Y., & Levine, R. (2015). Against ellipsis: arguments for the direct licensing of ‘non- canonical’ coordinations. Linguistics and Philosophy, 38(6), 521–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9179-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota, Y., & Levine, R. (2016). Gapping as hypothetical reasoning. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 34(1), 107–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9298-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, B. (2012). A dilemma with accounts of right node raising. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(1), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1162/LING_a_00078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCawley, J. (1993). Gapping with shared operators. In D. Peterson (Ed.), Berkeley linguistics society (pp. 245–253). University of California. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v19i1.1507
   Google Scholar
• Oehrle, R. (1987). Boolean properties in the analysis of gapping. In G. Huck & A. Ojeda (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Discontinuous constituency (pp. 203–240). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T., & Groß, T. (2017). Left node blocking. Journal of Linguistics, 53(3), 641–688. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226717000111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. (1996). [Order and structure] [PhD thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Distributed by MIT working papers in linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. (2003). Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(1), 37–90. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438903763255922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, D., Frazier, M., & Yoshida, M. (2017). A two-source hypothesis for gapping. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 35(4), 1123–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9359-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Sailor, C., & Thoms, G. (2013). On the non-existence of non-constituent coordination and non-constituent ellipsis. In R. Santana-LaBarge (Ed.), Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 361–370). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, M. (1984). Gapping and interpretation. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 523–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, M. (1987). Compositionality, case, and the scope of auxiliaries. Linguistics and Philosophy, 10(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00603392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, N. (2010). Coordination in syntax. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar