135
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Literature, Linguistics & Criticism

Split topicalization as remnant movement: the case of Jordanian Arabic

ORCID Icon
Article: 2333599 | Received 30 Jan 2024, Accepted 18 Mar 2024, Published online: 08 Apr 2024

References

  • Al Khalaf, E. (2019). Floating quantifiers are autonomous phrases: A movement analysis. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.848
  • Al Khalaf, E. (2022a). Furthest conjunct agreement in Jordanian Arabic: Evidence for multiple (non)simultaneous Agree. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 40, 345–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-021-09515-0
  • Al Khalaf, E. (2022b). Constituency and left-sharing in coordination. English Language and Linguistics, 26(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674321000162
  • Al Khalaf, E. (2024). Semantic scope ambiguity in gapping and non-constituent coordination: A generative analysis. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2322231
  • Al Khalaf, E., & Mashaqba, B. (2023). Semantic scope in Q-float constructions: An experimental investigation. Lingua, 282(2023), 103457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103457
  • Al Khalaf, E., Mashaqba, B., & Aldiqs, R. (2024). The syntax of non-canonical coordination in Jordanian Arabic: An experimental investigation. Open Linguistics, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2024-0001
  • Al-Shawashreh, E., Jarrah, M., & Al Khalaf, E. (2024). Variation in verbal negation in Jordanian Arabic: A corpus-based analysis. Lingua, 297, 103644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103644
  • Belletti, A. (2004). Aspects of the low IP area. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The structure of CP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol. 2, pp. 16–51). Oxford University Press.
  • Bruening, B. (2010). Double object constructions disguised as prepositional datives. Linguistic Inquiry, 41(2), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.287
  • Bruening, B., & Al Khalaf, E. (2020). Category mismatches in coordination revisited. Linguistic Inquiry, 51(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00336
  • Cerrone, P., & Oda, H. (2019). Reinterpreting ne-cliticization as split-topicalization. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 25(1), 51–59. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol25/iss1/7
  • Chomsky, N. (2004). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In A. Belletti (Ed.), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structure (Vol. 3, pp. 104–131). Oxford University Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
  • Fanselow, G. (1988). Ufspaltung von NPn und das problem der ‘freien’ wortstellung. Linguistische Berichte, 114, 91–113.
  • Fanselow, G. (1993). The return of the base generators. Groninger Arbeiten Zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 36, 1–74.
  • Fanselow, G., & Ćavar, D. (2002). Distributed deletion. In A. Alexiadou (Ed.), Theoretical approaches (pp. 65–109). John Benjamins.
  • Gengel, K. (2013). Pseudogapping and ellipsis. Oxford University Press.
  • Jayaseelan, K. A. (2001). IP-internal topic and focus phrases. Studia Linguistica, 55(1), 39–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00074
  • Kahnemuyipour, A., & Shabani, M. (2018). Split noun phrase topicalization in Eshkevarat Gilaki. The Linguistic Review, 35(4), 625–646. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2018-2003
  • Kahnemuyipour, A., & Shabani, M. (2022). Corrigendum to: Split noun phrase topicalization in Eshkevarat Gilaki. The Linguistic Review, 39(2), 333–333. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2022-2089
  • Lau, J. H., Clark, A., & Lappin, S. (2017). Grammaticality, acceptability, and probability: A probabilistic view of linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Science, 41(5), 1202–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12414
  • Marty, P., Chemla, E., & Sprouse, J. (2020). The effect of three basic task features on the sensitivity of acceptability judgment tasks. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 72. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.980
  • Mashaqba, B., Al Khalaf, E., Huneety, A., & Abu Sa’aleek, H. (2023). Subject-verb agreement inflection in Arabic-speaking individuals with Down syndrome. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2023.2221373
  • Müller, G. (1998). Incomplete category fronting: A derivational approach to remnant movement in German. Kluwer.
  • Ott, D. (2012). Local instability: Split topicalization and quantifier float in German. de Gruyter.
  • Ott, D. (2015). Symmetric merge and local instability: Evidence from split topics. Syntax, 18(2), 157–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12027
  • Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar (pp. 281–337). Kluwer.
  • Rizzi, L. (2004). Locality and left periphery. In A. Belletti (Ed.), The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, structures and beyond (pp. 223–251). Oxford University Press.
  • Rizzi, L., & Bocci, G. (2017). Left periphery of the clause: Primarily illustrated for Italian. In M. Everaert & H. C. Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax, second edition. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom104
  • Soltan, U. (2006). Standard Arabic subject-verb agreement asymmetry revisited in an agree-based minimalist syntax. In C. Boeckx (Ed.), Agreement systems (pp. 239–265). John Benjamins.
  • Sprouse, J., & Almeida, D. (2017). Design sensitivity and statistical power in acceptability judgment experiments. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.236
  • van Hoof, H. (2006). Split topicalization. In M. Everaert & H. C. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax (pp. 408–462). Blackwell.
  • van Riemsdijk, H. (1989). Movement and regeneration. In P. Beninc a (Ed.), Dialect variation and the theory of grammar. Foris.
  • Zanuttini, R. (1997). Negation and clausal structure: A comparative study of Romance languages. Oxford University Press.
  • Zanuttini, R. (2001). Sentential negation. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 511–535). Blackwell.