334
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
History

Untangling threat perception in international relations: an empirical analysis of threats posed by China and their implications for security discourse

, &
Article: 2335766 | Received 26 Jun 2023, Accepted 23 Mar 2024, Published online: 12 May 2024

References

  • Bagci, S. C., Piyale, Z. E., & Ebcim, E. (2018). Imagined contact in high conflict settings: The role of ethnic group identification and the perspective of minority group members. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12485
  • Booth, K. (2007). The theory of world security. Cambridge University Press.
  • Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge University Press.
  • Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2011). Evolution of international security studies (Y. Xiaofeng, Trans.). Zhejiang University Press. [in Chinese]
  • Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • Chang-Ching, T. (2019). Confrontation or dialogue: Challenges and opportunities for the future AI’s development. Review of Global Politics, 66, 32.
  • Chatterjee, S. (2003). Neo-realism, neo-liberalism, and security. International Studies, 40(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088170304000202
  • Chen, M. (2009). International security theory: Power, sovereignty, and threat. Wunan Press. [in Chinese]
  • Collins, A. (2016a). Contemporary security studies (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Collins, A. (Ed.) (2016b). Contemporary security studies (G. Wanglai & W. Rong, Trans.). World Knowledge Press. [in Chinese]
  • Da-Hua, M. (1998). A review of the security studies debate. Issues and Studies, 37(8), 20–22. [in Chinese]
  • Da-Hua, M. (2002). A constructivist approach to security studies: A comparative study of the Copenhagen school and the critical security studies school. Fu Hsing Kang Academic Journal, 74, 303–323. [in Chinese]
  • Da-Hua, M. (2003). Constructivist theory of international relations and security studies. Shi-Ying Press. [in Chinese]
  • Da-Hua, M. (2006). Bridge-building project within constructivist theory of international relations - dialogue and synthesis of epistemology. Fu Hsing Kang Academic Journal, 87, 221–249.
  • Dannreuther, R. (2013). International security: The contemporary agenda (2nd ed.). Polity.
  • Ding-Guo, Y. (2004). Culture, identity, and national security. The Prospect Foundation, 5(1), 140–141. [in Chinese]
  • Garcia-Retamero, R., Müller, S. M., & Rousseau, D. L. (2012). The impact of value similarity and power on the perception of threat: Value similarity, power, and threat. Political Psychology, 33(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00869.x
  • Goldstein, J. S. (1992). A conflict-cooperation scale for WEIS events data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002792036002007
  • Guilford, J. P. (1965). The minimal phi coefficient and the maximal phi. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 25(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446502500101
  • Heywood, A. (2018). Concepts in politics and international relations (Y. Lin, S. Su, & Z. S. Key, Trans.). Wunan Press. [in Chinese]
  • Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.) (2013). The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Kolodziej, E. A. (2018). Security and international relations (Y. Lin, Trans.). World Knowledge Press. [in Chinese]
  • Liptak, K. (2021). Biden’s first formal national security strategy identifies China as America’s most consequential geopolitical challenge. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/10/12/politics/national-security-strategy-joe-biden/index.html.
  • Lo, C. Y. P. (2015). HIV/AIDS in China and India: Governing health security. Palgrave Macmillan Press.
  • Lobell, S. (2017). Structural realism/offensive and defensive realism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.304.
  • Lu, S M. (2023). The Chinese Communist Party suddenly announced military exercises around the Taiwan Strait, and the Democratic Progressive Party choked: The Chinese Communist Party has become the biggest threat to democratic Taiwan. SETN News. https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E4%B8%AD%E5%85%B1%E7%AA%81%E5%AE%A3%E5%B8%83%E5%9C%A8%E5%8F%B0%E6%B5%B7%E5%91%A8%E9%82%8A%E8%BB%8D%E6%BC%94-%E6%B0%91%E9%80%B2%E9%BB%A8%E5%97%86-%E4%B8%AD%E5%85%B1%E5%B7%B2%E6%88%90%E7%82%BA%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%BB%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E7%9A%84%E6%9C%80%E5%A4%A7%E5%A8%81%E8%84%85-084508706.html (accessed May 8, 2022). [in Chinese]
  • Matonytė, I., & Morkevičius, V. (2013). Threat perception and European identity building: The case of elites in Belgium, Germany, Lithuania and Poland. Perceptions of the European union in new member states (pp. 53–71). Routledge.
  • Morgenthau, H. J., & Thompson, K. W. (1985). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. Knopf.
  • Rosato, S. (2015). The inscrutable intentions of great powers. International Security, 39(3), 48–88. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00190
  • Rousseau, D. L., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2007). Identity, power, and threat perception: A cross-national experimental study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(5), 744–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002707304813
  • Salmon, T. C., & Imber, M. F. (2000). Issues in international relations. Routledge Press.
  • Schuurman, B., & Eijkman, Q. (2015). Indicators of terrorist intent and capability: Tools for threat assessment. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 8(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2015.1040426
  • Slantchev, B. L. (2011). Military threats: The costs of coercion and the price of peace. Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, S. (2005). The contested concept of security: Critical security studies in world politics. Lynne Rienner.
  • Stein, J. G. (2013). Threat perception in international relations. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. p. 364–394. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.013.0012
  • Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation. (2021). Taiwan public opinion under the cross-strait military crisis. https://www.tpof.org/%e5%9c%96%e8%a1%a8%e5%88%86%e6%9e%90/%e5%85%a9%e5%b2%b8%e8%bb%8d%e4%ba%8b%e5%8d%b1%e6%a9%9f%e4%b8%8b%e7%9a%84%e5%8f%b0%e7%81%a3%e6%b0%91%e6%84%8f%ef%bc%882021%e5%b9%b411%e6%9c% 882%e6% 97%a5%ef%bc%89/ (accessed March 18, 2022). [in Chinese]
  • The Economist. (2021, May 20). The most dangerous place on Earth. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2021/05/01/the-most-dangerous-place-on-earth
  • Trachtenberg, M. (2003). The question of realism. Security Studies, 13(1), 156–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410490493877
  • Ullman, Richard H. (1983). Redefining Security. International Security, 129–153.
  • Walker, R. (1997). Critical security studies: Concepts and cases. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Random House.
  • Wang, A. H. E., Yeh, Y. Y., Wu, C. K. S., & Chen, F. Y. (2023). Why does Taiwan identity decline? Journal of Asian and African Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096231168068
  • Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764
  • Wendt, A. E. (1987). The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International Organization, 41(3), 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002751X
  • Zakaria, F. (1998). From wealth to power: The unusual origins of America’s world role. Princeton University Press.