542
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Development Economics | Research Article

A roadmap to a green economy in South Africa: modelling technological innovation and energy consumption in the novel dynamic ARDL simulations framework

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2295191 | Received 26 Jun 2022, Accepted 11 Dec 2023, Published online: 05 Feb 2024

References

  • Abid, A., Mehmood, U., Tariq, S., & Haq, Z. U. (2022). The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: Evidence from the G8 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(8), 11654–11662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x
  • Abdouli, M., & Hammami, S. (2017). Investigating the causality links between environmental quality, foreign direct investment and economic growth in MENA countries. International Business Review, 26(2), 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.07.004
  • Adebayo, T. S., Awosusi, A. A., Kirikkaleli, D., Akinsola, G. D., & Mwamba, M. N. (2021). Can CO2 emissions and energy consumption determine the economic performance of South Korea? A time series analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(29), 38969–38984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13498-1
  • Adebayo, T. S., Oladipupo, S. D., Adeshola, I., & Rjoub, H. (2022). Wavelet analysis of impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on CO2 emissions: Evidence from Portugal. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(16), 23887–23904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17708-8
  • Adeel-Farooq, R. M., Riaz, M. F., & Ali, T. (2021). Improving the environment begins at home: Revisiting the links between FDI and environment. Energy, 215, 119150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119150
  • African Development Bank Group. (2019). South Africa economic outlook. https://www.afdb.org/en/countries/southern-africa/south-africa/south-africa-econ omic-outlook.
  • Ahmad, M., & Raza, M. Y. (2020). Role of public-private partnerships investment in energy and technological innovations in driving climate change: Evidence from Brazil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24), 30638–30648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09307-w
  • Ahmad, M., & Wu, Y. (2022). Combined role of green productivity growth, economic globalization, and eco-innovation in achieving ecological sustainability for OECD economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 302, 113980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113980
  • Alharthi, M., Dogan, E., & Taskin, D. (2021). Analysis of CO2 emissions and energy consumption by sources in MENA countries: Evidence from quantile regressions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(29), 38901–38908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13356-0
  • Ali, M., Irfan, M., Ozturk, I., & Rauf, A. (2022). Modeling public acceptance of renewable energy deployment: A pathway towards green revolution. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2159849
  • Ali, S., Yan, Q., Dilanchiev, A., Irfan, M., & Fahad, S. (2022). Modeling the economic viability and performance of solar home systems: A roadmap towards clean energy for environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 30612–30631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24387-6
  • Ali, S., Yan, Q., Razzaq, A., Khan, I., & Irfan, M. (2022). Modeling factors of biogas technology adoption: A roadmap towards environmental sustainability and green revolution. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 30(5), 11838–11860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22894-0
  • Ali, S., Yusop, Z., Kaliappan, S. R., & Chin, L. (2020). Dynamic common correlated effects of trade openness, FDI, and institutional performance on environmental quality: Evidence from OIC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(11), 11671–11682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07768-7
  • Altinoz, B., Vasbieva, D., & Kalugina, O. (2021). The effect of information and communication technologies and total factor productivity on CO2 emissions in top 10 emerging market economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45), 63784–63793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11630-1
  • Álvarez-Herránz, A., Balsalobre, D., Cantos, J. M., & Shahbaz, M. (2017). Energy innovations-GHG emissions nexus: Fresh empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy Policy, 101, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.11.030
  • Anser, M. K., Khan, M. A., Nassani, A. A., Aldakhil, A. M., Hinh Voo, X., & Zaman, K. (2021). Relationship of environment with technological innovation, carbon pricing, renewable energy, and global food production. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 30(8), 807–842. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1787000
  • Anwar, A., Chaudhary, A. R., Malik, S., & Bassim, M. (2021). Modelling the macroeconomic determinants of carbon dioxide emissions in the G-7 countries: The roles of technological innovation and institutional quality improvement. Global Business Review, 097215092110393. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509211039392
  • Arshad, Z., Robaina, M., & Botelho, A. (2020). The role of ICT in energy consumption and environment: An empirical investigation of Asian economies with cluster analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(26), 32913–32932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09229-7
  • Ashraf, Y., & Ali, F. (2022). How innovative organization culture affects firm performance in the wake of enterprise resource planning? evidence from energy-and non-energy-sector firms in Pakistan. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.991319
  • Asif, M. H., Zhongfu, T., Ahmad, B., Irfan, M., Razzaq, A., & Ameer, W. (2023c). Influencing factors of consumers’ buying intention of solar energy: A structural equation modeling approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(11), 30017–30032. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24286-w
  • Asif, M. H., Zhongfu, T., Dilanchiev, A., Irfan, M., Eyvazov, E., & Ahmad, B. (2023a). Determining the influencing factors of consumers’ attitude toward renewable energy adoption in developing countries: A roadmap toward environmental sustainability and green energy technologies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(16), 47861–47872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25662-w
  • Asif, M. H., Zhongfu, T., Irfan, M., & Işık, C. (2023b). Do environmental knowledge and green trust matter for purchase intention of eco-friendly home appliances? An application of extended theory of planned behavior. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(13), 37762–37774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24899-1
  • Aslan, A., Altinoz, B., & Özsolak, B. (2021). The nexus between economic growth, tourism development, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions in Mediterranean countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(3), 3243–3252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10667-6
  • Asongu, S. A. (2018). ICT, openness and CO 2 emissions in Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(10), 9351–9359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1239-4
  • Atsu, F., Adams, S., & Adjei, J. (2021). ICT, energy consumption, financial development, and environmental degradation in South Africa. Heliyon, 7(7), e07328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07328
  • Aydin, M., & Turan, Y. E. (2020). The influence of financial openness, trade openness, and energy intensity on ecological footprint: Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(34), 43233–43245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10238-9
  • Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., & Khan, D. (2021). Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2615
  • Baye, R. S., Olper, A., Ahenkan, A., Musah-Surugu, I. J., Anuga, S. W., & Darkwah, S. (2021). Renewable energy consumption in Africa: Evidence from a bias corrected dynamic panel. The Science of the Total Environment, 766, 142583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142583
  • Bibi, F., & Jamil, M. (2021). Testing environment Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in different regions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 13581–13594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11516-2
  • Breitung, J., & Candelon, B. (2006). Testing for short-and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach. Journal of Econometrics, 132(2), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.004
  • Cherniwchan, J. (2012). Economic growth, industrialization, and the environment. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(4), 442–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.04.004
  • Chhabra, M., Giri, A. K., & Kumar, A. (2022). Do technological innovations and trade openness reduce CO2 emissions? Evidence from selected middle-income countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(43), 65723–65738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20434-4
  • Cole, M. A. (2004). Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: Examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.09.007
  • Cole, M. A., & Elliott, R. J. (2003). Determining the trade–environment composition effect: The role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00021-4
  • Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2013). Trade and the environment. Princeton University Press.
  • Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., & Salman, M. (2019). The effects of economic growth and innovation on CO 2 emissions in different regions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15), 15028–15038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04891-y
  • Dauda, L., Long, X., Mensah, C. N., Salman, M., Boamah, K. B., Ampon-Wireko, S., & Dogbe, C. S. K. (2021). Innovation, trade openness and CO2 emissions in selected countries in Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125143
  • Demir, C., Cergibozan, R., & Ari, A. (2020). Environmental dimension of innovation: Time series evidence from Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(3), 2497–2516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-00305-0
  • Destek, M. A., & Manga, M. (2021). Technological innovation, financialization, and ecological footprint: Evidence from BEM economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(17), 21991–22001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11845-2
  • Dinda, S. (2018). Production technology and carbon emission: Long-run relation with short-run dynamics. Journal of Applied Economics, 21(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2018.1526871
  • Ding, Q., Khattak, S. I., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Towards sustainable production and consumption: Assessing the impact of energy productivity and eco-innovation on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions (CCO2) in G-7 nations. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.004
  • Doğanlar, M., Mike, F., Kızılkaya, O., & Karlılar, S. (2021). Testing the long-run effects of economic growth, financial development and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Turkey: New evidence from RALS cointegration test. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(25), 32554–32563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12661-y
  • Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2010). Energy Statistics for Countries.
  • Erdogan, S. (2021). Dynamic nexus between technological innovation and buildings Sector’s carbon emission in BRICS countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112780
  • Faheem, M., Hussain, S., ArsalanTanveer, Safdar, N., & Anwer, M. A. (2022). Does foreign direct investment asymmetrically affect the mitigation of environmental degradation in Malaysia? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 7393–7405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16231-0
  • Faisal, F., Tursoy, T., Pervaiz, R., Azizullah. (2020). Does ICT lessen CO2 emissions for fast-emerging economies? An application of the heterogeneous panel estimations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(10), 10778–10789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07582-w
  • Fine, B., & Rustomjee, Z. (1996). The political economy of South Africa: From Minerals-energy complex to industrialisation. Hurst.
  • Godil, D. I., Sharif, A., Agha, H., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). The dynamic nonlinear influence of ICT, financial development, and institutional quality on CO2 emission in Pakistan: New insights from QARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(19), 24190–24200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08619-1
  • Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Ali, S., Shahzad, U., & Cui, L. (2021). Exploring the role of green innovation and investment in energy for environmental quality: An empirical appraisal from provincial data of China. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112779
  • Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443
  • Habiba, U. M. M. E., Xinbang, C., & Anwar, A. (2022). Do green technology innovations, financial development, and renewable energy use help to curb carbon emissions? Renewable Energy, 193, 1082–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.05.084
  • Hao, L. N., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Ali, W. (2021). Green growth and low carbon emission in G7 countries: How critical the network of environmental taxes, renewable energy and human capital is? Science of the Total Environment, 752, 141853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141853
  • Haseeb, A., Xia, E., Saud, S., Ahmad, A., & Khurshid, H. (2019). Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? An empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(9), 8594–8608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04296-x
  • He, A., Xue, Q., Zhao, R., & Wang, D. (2021). Renewable energy technological innovation, market forces, and carbon emission efficiency. The Science of the Total Environment, 796, 148908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148908
  • Hongxing, Y., Abban, O. J., Boadi, A. D., & Ankomah-Asare, E. T. (2021). Exploring the relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, urbanization, trade, and CO2 emissions: A PMG-ARDL panel data analysis on regional classification along 81 BRI economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(46), 66366–66388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15660-1
  • Hossain, M. S. (2011). Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy, 39(11), 6991–6999.
  • Hu, M., Chen, S., Wang, Y., Xia, B., Wang, S., & Huang, G. (2021). Identifying the key sectors for regional energy, water and carbon footprints from production-, consumption-and network-based perspectives. The Science of the Total Environment, 764, 142821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142821
  • Ibrahiem, D. M. (2020). Do technological innovations and financial development improve environmental quality in Egypt? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(10), 10869–10881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07585-7
  • Ibrahim, M., & Vo, X. V. (2021). Exploring the relationships among innovation, financial sector development and environmental pollution in selected industrialized countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 284, 112057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112057
  • Ibrahim, R. L., & Ajide, K. B. (2021a). Nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption, trade openness, and environmental quality in G-7 countries: The conditional role of technological progress. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(33), 45212–45229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13926-2
  • Ibrahim, R. L., & Ajide, K. B. (2021b). Disaggregated environmental impacts of non-renewable energy and trade openness in selected G-20 countries: The conditioning role of technological innovation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(47), 67496–67510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15322-2
  • Ibrahim, R. L., & Ajide, K. B. (2021c). Trade facilitation and environmental quality: Empirical evidence from some selected African countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(1), 1282–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01497-8
  • International Energy Agency. (2020). Global energy review 2020: The impacts of the COVID—19 crisis on global energy demand and CO2 emissions.
  • IPCC. (2018). Summary for policymakers. Global warming of 1.5 °C. IPCC, Geneva
  • Iqbal, N., Abbasi, K. R., Shinwari, R., Guangcai, W., Ahmad, M., & Tang, K. (2021). Does exports diversification and environmental innovation achieve carbon neutrality target of OECD economies? Journal of Environmental Management, 291, 112648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112648
  • Irfan, M., Elavarasan, R. M., Hao, Y., Feng, M., & Sailan, D. (2021a). An assessment of consumers’ willingness to utilize solar energy in China: End-users’ perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 126008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126008
  • Irfan, M., Hao, Y., Ikram, M., Wu, H., Akram, R., & Rauf, A. (2021b). Assessment of the public acceptance and utilization of renewable energy in Pakistan. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.031
  • Irfan, M., Razzaq, A., Sharif, A., & Yang, X. (2022b). Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121882
  • Irfan, M., Razzaq, A., Suksatan, W., Sharif, A., Elavarasan, R. M., Yang, C., Hao, Y., & Rauf, A. (2022a). Asymmetric impact of temperature on COVID-19 spread in India: Evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach. Journal of Thermal Biology, 104, 103101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.103101
  • Irfan, M., Zhao, Z. Y., Li, H., & Rehman, A. (2020). The influence of consumers’ intention factors on willingness to pay for renewable energy: A structural equation modeling approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(17), 21747–21761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08592-9
  • Irfan, M., Zhao, Z. Y., Rehman, A., Ozturk, I., & Li, H. (2021c). Consumers’ intention-based influence factors of renewable energy adoption in Pakistan: A structural equation modeling approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(1), 432–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10504-w
  • Isik, C., Ongan, S., Ozdemir, D., Ahmad, M., Irfan, M., Alvarado, R., & Ongan, A. (2021). The increases and decreases of the environment Kuznets curve (EKC) for 8 OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(22), 28535–28543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12637-y
  • Islam, M. M., Irfan, M., Shahbaz, M., & Vo, X. V. (2022). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in Bangladesh: The relative influencing profiles of economic factors, urbanization, physical infrastructure and institutional quality. Renewable Energy. 184, 1130–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.020
  • Jordan, S., & Philips, A. Q. (2018). Cointegration testing and dynamic simulations of autoregressive distributed lag models. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 18(4), 902–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1801800409
  • Khalid, W., & Jalil, A. (2019). An econometric analysis of inter-fuel substitution in energy sector of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(17), 17021–17031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05014-3
  • Khalid, W., & Ozdeser, H. (2021). Estimation of substitution possibilities between hydroelectricity and classical factor inputs for Pakistan’s economy. Forman Journal of Economic Studies, 17(02), 69–101. https://doi.org/10.32368/FJES.20211712
  • Khalid, W., Özdeşer, H., & Jalil, A. (2021). An empirical analysis of inter-factor and inter-fuel substitution in the energy sector of Pakistan. Renewable Energy. 177, 953–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.163
  • Khan, A., Muhammad, F., Chenggang, Y., Hussain, J., Bano, S., & Khan, M. A. (2020). The impression of technological innovations and natural resources in energy-growth-environment nexus: A new look into BRICS economies. Science of the Total Environment, 727, 138265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138265
  • Khan, I., Han, L., BiBi, R., & Khan, H. (2022b). The role of technological innovations and renewable energy consumption in reducing environmental degradation: Evidence from the belt and road initiative countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(48), 73085–73099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21006-2
  • Khan, I., Hou, F., & Le, H. P. (2021c). The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. The Science of the Total Environment, 754, 142222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142222
  • Khan, I., Lei, H., Shah, A. A., Khan, I., Baz, K., Koondhar, M. A., & Hatab, A. A. (2022a). Environmental quality and the asymmetrical nonlinear consequences of energy consumption, trade openness and economic development: Prospects for environmental management and carbon neutrality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(10), 14654–14664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16612-5
  • Khan, M., & Ozturk, I. (2021). Examining the direct and indirect effects of financial development on CO2 emissions for 88 developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112812
  • Khattak, S. I., Ahmad, M., Khan, Z. U., & Khan, A. (2020). Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: New evidence from the BRICS economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(12), 13866–13881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07876-4
  • Kripfganz, S., & Schneider, D. C. (2018). ARDL: Estimating autoregressive distributed lag and equilibrium correction models. Retrieved July 12, 2019, from Stata: www.stata.com/meeting/uk18/slides/uk18_Kripfganz.pdf
  • Kuang, H., Akmal, Z., & Li, F. (2022). Measuring the effects of green technology innovations and renewable energy investment for reducing carbon emissions in China. Renewable Energy, 197, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.091
  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P., & Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1–3), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
  • Li, Y., Zhang, C., Li, S., & Usman, A. (2022). Energy efficiency and green innovation and its asymmetric impact on CO2 emission in China: A new perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(31), 47810–47817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19161-7
  • Lin, B., Omoju, O. E., & Okonkwo, J. U. (2015). Impact of industrialisation on CO2 emissions in Nigeria. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.164
  • Lin, B., & Ma, R. (2022). Green technology innovations, urban innovation environment and CO2 emission reduction in China: Fresh evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121434
  • Ling, C. H., Ahmed, K., Muhamad, R. B., & Shahbaz, M. (2015). Decomposing the trade-environment nexus for Malaysia: What do the technique, scale, composition, and comparative advantage effect indicate? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(24), 20131–20142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5217-9
  • López, R. (1994). The environment as a factor of production: The effects of economic growth and trade liberalization. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1032
  • MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6<601::AID-JAE417>3.0.CO;2-T
  • Mensah, C. N., Long, X., Boamah, K. B., Bediako, I. A., Dauda, L., & Salman, M. (2018). The effect of innovation on CO2 emissions of OCED countries from 1990 to 2014. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(29), 29678–29698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2968-0
  • Minlah, M. K., & Zhang, X. (2021). Testing for the existence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for CO 2 emissions in Ghana: Evidence from the bootstrap rolling window Granger causality test. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(2), 2119–2131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10600-x
  • Mohanty, S., & Sethi, N. (2022). The energy consumption-environmental quality nexus in BRICS countries: The role of outward foreign direct investment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(13), 19714–19730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17180-4
  • Muhammad, B., Khan, M. K., Khan, M. I., & Khan, S. (2021). Impact of foreign direct investment, natural resources, renewable energy consumption, and economic growth on environmental degradation: Evidence from BRICS, developing, developed and global countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(17), 21789–21798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12084-1
  • Muhammad, F., Khan, A., Razzaq, N., & Karim, R. (2021). Influence of tourism, governance, and foreign direct investment on energy consumption and CO 2 emissions: A panel analysis of Muslim countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(1), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10502-y
  • Murshed, M. (2021). LPG consumption and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in South Asia: A time-series ARDL analysis with multiple structural breaks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(7), 8337–8372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10701-7
  • Narayan, P. K., Narayan, S., & Popp, S. (2010). A note on the long-run elasticities from the energy consumption–GDP relationship. Applied Energy, 87(3), 1054–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.08.037
  • Ngepah, N., & Udeagha, M. C. (2018). African regional trade agreements and intra-African trade. Journal of Economic Integration, 33(1), 1176–1199. https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2018.33.1.1176
  • Ngepah, N., & Udeagha, M. C. (2019). Supplementary trade benefits of multi-memberships in African regional trade agreements. Journal of African Business, 20(4), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2019.1584719
  • Obobisa, E. S., Chen, H., & Mensah, I. A. (2022). The impact of green technological innovation and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in African countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121670
  • Pan, X., Wang, Y., Shen, Z., & Song, M. (2022). Technological progress on embodied carbon emissions in G7 countries’ exports: A structural decomposition analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 372, 133800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133800
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
  • Ponce, P., & Khan, S. A. R. (2021). A causal link between renewable energy, energy efficiency, property rights, and CO2 emissions in developed countries: A road map for environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(28), 37804–37817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12465-0
  • Rafique, M. Z., Li, Y., Larik, A. R., & Monaheng, M. P. (2020). The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO2 emissions: Evidence from the BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(19), 23899–23913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08715-2
  • Rafique, M. Z., Schneider, N., Shahzad, U., & Song, M. (2022). High‐tech industries, financial expansion, and low‐carbon energy deployment along the belt and road initiative. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1779–1795. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2347
  • Rahman, M. M., Alam, K., & Velayutham, E. (2022). Reduction of CO2 emissions: The role of renewable energy, technological innovation and export quality. Energy Reports, 8, 2793–2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.200
  • Santra, S. (2017). The effect of technological innovation on production-based energy and CO2 emission productivity: Evidence from BRICS countries. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 9(5), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2017.1308069
  • Shafiei, S., & Salim, R. A. (2014). Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Energy Policy, 66, 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064
  • Shahbaz, M., Sbia, R., Hamdi, H., & Ozturk, I. (2014b). Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecological Indicators, 45, 622–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.05.022
  • Shan, S., Genç, S. Y., Kamran, H. W., & Dinca, G. (2021). Role of green technology innovation and renewable energy in carbon neutrality: A sustainable investigation from Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 294, 113004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113004
  • Sharif, A., Saqib, N., Dong, K., & Khan, S. A. R. (2022). Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO2 emissions in the G7 countries: The moderating role of social globalisation. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1934–1946. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2360
  • Squalli, J., & Wilson, K. (2011). (2011). A new measure of trade openness. The World Economy, 34(10), 1745–1770. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01404.x
  • Statistics South Africa. (2019). Economic growth. http://www.statssa.gov.za/? page_id=735&id=1.
  • Sun, Y., Li, M., Zhang, M., Khan, H. S. U. D., Li, J., Li, Z., Sun, H., Zhu, Y., & Anaba, O. A. (2021). A study on China’s economic growth, green energy technology, and carbon emissions based on the Kuznets curve (EKC). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(6), 7200–7211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11019-0
  • Tang, C., Xue, Y., Wu, H., Irfan, M., & Hao, Y. (2022). How does telecommunications infrastructure affect eco-efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Technology in Society, 69, 101963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101963
  • Taylor, M. S. (2004). Unbundling the pollution haven hypothesis. Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(2).
  • Tian, X., Chang, M., Shi, F., & Tanikawa, H. (2014). How does industrial structure change impact carbon dioxide emissions? A comparative analysis focusing on nine provincial regions in China. Environmental Science & Policy, 37, 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.001
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2021). Estimating the trade-environmental quality relationship in SADC with a dynamic heterogeneous panel model. African Review of Economics and Finance, 13(1), 113–165.
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023a). Exploring the moderating role of financial development in environmental Kuznets curve for South Africa: Fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-022-00396-9
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023b). On the asymmetric effects of trade openness on CO2 emissions in SADC with a nonlinear ARDL approach. Discover Sustainability, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-022-00117-3
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023c). Revisiting the nexus between fiscal decentralization and CO2 emissions in South Africa: Fresh policy insights. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00453-x
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023d). Can fiscal decentralization be the route to the race to zero emissions in South Africa? Fresh policy insights from novel dynamic autoregressive distributed lag simulations approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(16), 46446–46474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25306-z
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023e). The role of financial development in climate change mitigation: Fresh policy insights from South Africa. Biophysical Economics and Sustainability, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-023-00110-y
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2023f). The role of fiscal decentralization in limiting CO2 emissions in South Africa. Biophysical Economics and Sustainability, 8(3), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-023-00112-w
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2022a). Investigating the moderating role of economic policy uncertainty in environmental Kuznets curve for South Africa: Evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(51), 77199–77237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21107-y
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023a). Green finance, fintech, and environmental sustainability: Fresh policy insights from the BRICS nations. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(6), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2023.2183526
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023b). Achieving regional sustainability and carbon neutrality target in BRICS economies: Understanding the importance of fiscal decentralization, export diversification and environmental innovation. Sustainable Development, 31(4), 2620–2635. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2535
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023c). Achieving green environment in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa economies: Do composite risk index, green innovation, and environmental policy stringency matter? Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3468–3489. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2597
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023d). Striving for the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in BRICS economies: The role of green finance, fintech, and natural resource rent. Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3657–3672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2618
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023e). Environmental sustainability in South Africa: Understanding the criticality of economic policy uncertainty, fiscal decentralization, and green innovation. Sustainable Development, 31(3), 1638–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2473
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2019). Revisiting trade and environment nexus in South Africa: Fresh evidence from new measure. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(28), 29283–29306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05944-y
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2020). Trade liberalization and the geography of industries in South Africa: Fresh evidence from a new measure. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 24(3), 354–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2019.1695652
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2021a). The asymmetric effect of trade openness on economic growth in South Africa: A nonlinear ARDL approach. Economic Change and Restructuring, 54(2), 491–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09285-6
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2022a). Does trade openness mitigate the environmental degradation in South Africa? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(13), 19352–19377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17193-z
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2022b). Dynamic ARDL simulations effects of fiscal decentralization, green technological innovation, trade openness, and institutional quality on environmental sustainability: Evidence from South Africa. Sustainability, 14(16), 10268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610268
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2022c). Disaggregating the environmental effects of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in South Africa: Fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Economic Change and Restructuring, 55(3), 1767–1814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-021-09368-y
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2022d). The asymmetric effect of technological innovation on CO2 emissions in South Africa: New evidence from the QARDL approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 985719. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.985719
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023a). Can public–private partnership investment in energy (PPPI) mitigate CO2 emissions in South Africa? Fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1044605. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1044605
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023b). Striving towards environmental sustainability in the BRICS economies: The combined influence of fiscal decentralization and environmental innovation. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2123411
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023c). Striving towards carbon neutrality target in BRICS economies: Assessing the implications of composite risk index, green innovation, and environmental policy stringency. Sustainable Environment, 9(1), 2210950. https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2023.2210950
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023d). Towards climate action and UN sustainable development goals in BRICS economies: Do export diversification, fiscal decentralisation and environmental innovation matter? International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 15(1), 172–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2023.2222264
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023e). The role of technological innovation in fostering environmental quality in South Africa: Fresh evidence from the novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment, (2), 107–155. https://doi.org/10.3280/EFE2022-002006
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023f). Achieving decarbonization goals in BRICS economies: Revisiting the joint role of composite risk index, green innovation, and environmental policy stringency. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2234230. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2234230
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023g). The drivers of environmental sustainability in BRICS economies: Do green finance and fintech matter? World Development Sustainability, 3(1), 100096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2023.100096
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023h). The role of tourism development in improving environmental quality in South Africa: Insights from novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. African Review of Economics and Finance, 1–24. https://african-review.com/online-first-details.php?id=69
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. N. (2021b). A step towards environmental mitigation in South Africa: Does trade liberalisation really matter? Fresh evidence from a novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Research Square, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-419113/v1
  • Udemba, E. N. (2022). Implication of energy expansion via the interaction of coal, industrialization, and agriculture towards climate goal: Dual sustainability analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(17), 25605–25622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17537-9
  • United Nations Climate Change. (2021). COP26 reaches consensus on key actions to address climate change. https://unfccc.int/news/cop26- reach es- consensus- on- key- actions- to- address- climate- change.
  • Usman, M., & Hammar, N. (2021). Dynamic relationship between technological innovations, financial development, renewable energy, and ecological footprint: Fresh insights based on the STIRPAT model for Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(12), 15519–15536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11640-z
  • Van Tran, N. (2020). The environmental effects of trade openness in developing countries: Conflict or cooperation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 27(16), 19783–19797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08352-9
  • Van Zyl, A. (2011). Innovation in South Africa: The role of the technological innovation agency. South African Journal of Science, 107(1–2), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i1/2.594
  • Villanthenkodath, M. A., & Mahalik, M. K. (2022). Technological innovation and environmental quality nexus in India: Does inward remittance matter? Journal of Public Affairs, 22(1), e2291. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2291
  • Vitenu-Sackey, P. A., & Acheampong, T. (2022). Impact of economic policy uncertainty, energy intensity, technological innovation and R&D on CO2 emissions: Evidence from a panel of 18 developed economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(58), 87426–87445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21729-2
  • Wagner, G. (2010). Energy content of world trade. Energy Policy, 38(12), 7710–7721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.022
  • Wang, Z., Gao, L., Wei, Z., Majeed, A., & Alam, I. (2022). How FDI and technology innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in high-tech industries: Evidence from province-level data of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(3), 4641–4653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15946-4
  • World Bank. (2021). World development indicators. http://www.world bank.org
  • Yang, B., Jahanger, A., & Ali, M. (2021b). Remittance inflows affect the ecological footprint in BICS countries: Do technological innovation and financial development matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(18), 23482–23500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12400-3
  • Yang, C., Hao, Y., & Irfan, M. (2021a). Energy consumption structural adjustment and carbon neutrality in the post-COVID-19 era. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 442–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.06.017
  • Zameer, H., Yasmeen, H., Zafar, M. W., Waheed, A., & Sinha, A. (2020). Analyzing the association between innovation, economic growth, and environment: Divulging the importance of FDI and trade openness in India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(23), 29539–29553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09112-5
  • Zheng, L., Abbasi, K. R., Salem, S., Irfan, M., Alvarado, R., & Lv, K. (2022). How technological innovation and institutional quality affect sectoral energy consumption in Pakistan? Fresh policy insights from novel econometric approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121900