725
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Development Economics

Trade determinants and opportunities for Indian rice: a dynamic panel gravity model perspective

, , &
Article: 2312367 | Received 24 Oct 2023, Accepted 25 Jan 2024, Published online: 01 Mar 2024

References

  • Adhikari, A., Sekhon, M. K., & Kaur, M. (2016). Export of rice from India: Performance and determinants. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 29(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2016.00026.4
  • Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. (2021). Ministry of agriculture and farmers welfare, department of agriculture, cooperation & farmers welfare. Government of India.
  • Alka, S., & Harpreet, K. (2023). India’s trade potential with China: A gravity model approach. European Chemical Bulletin, 12(10), 1339–1358.
  • Amjad, M., Sami, U., Yasmin, T., & Aslam, M. (2021). Impact of China-Pakistan Regional Trade Agreement on Pakistan’s Exports: An Analysis Using Gravity Trade Model. Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, 31(1), 99–112. https://www.aerc.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Paper-939-AMJAD-MASOOD-V-1.pdf
  • Anderson, J. E., & Wincoop, E. (2004). Trade costs. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(3), 691–751. https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051042177649
  • Anh Lan Thi, N., Le Pham, T., & Xuyen, V. K. T. (2022). Determinants of the world’s rice trade: The role of trade costs. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(5), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no5.0313
  • Anh Thu, L., Fang, S., & Kessani, S. S. (2019). Factors influencing Vietnam’s handicraft export with the gravity model. Journal of Economics and Development, 21(2), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-08-2019-0021
  • Arnon, A., & Weinblatt, J. (1998). Linder’s hypothesis revisited: income similarity effects for low income countries. Applied Economics Letters, 5(10), 607–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/135048598354267
  • Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005
  • Baldwin, R., & Taglioni, D. (2006). Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations. CEPR. In Discussion papers. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 12516. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12516.
  • Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P. H., & Kesina, M. (2018). Generalized spatial autocorrelation in a panel-probit model with an application to exporting in China. Empirical Economics, 55(1), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1409-0
  • Boerema, A., Peeters, A., Swolfs, S., Vandevenne, F., Jacobs, S., Staes, J., & Meire, P. (2016). Soybean trade: balancing environmental and socio-economic impacts of an intercontinental market. PloS One, 11(5), e0155222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155222
  • Braha, K., Qineti, A., Cupák, A., & Lazorčáková, E. (2017). Determinants of Albanian agricultural export: The gravity model approach. AGRIS on-Line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 9(665-2017-1574), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.262457
  • Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
  • Bui, T. H. H., & Chen, Q. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing rice export in Vietnam based on gravity model. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(3), 830–844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0279-y
  • Carrère, C. (2006). Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review, 50(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2004.06.001
  • Castillo, J. S., Villanueva, E. C., & García‐Cortijo, M. C. (2016). The international wine trade and its new export dynamics (1988–2012): A gravity model approach. Agribusiness, 32(4), 466–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21463
  • Chaney, T. (2008). Distorted gravity: The intensive and extensive margins of international trade. American Economic Review, 98(4), 1707–1721. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.4.1707
  • Chaney, T. (2018). The gravity equation in international trade: An explanation. Journal of Political Economy, 126(1), 150–177. https://doi.org/10.1086/694292
  • Choi, C. (2002). Linder hypothesis revisited. Applied Economics Letters, 9(9), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850110111234
  • Chow, P., Kellman, M., & Shachmurove, Y. (1999). A test of the Linder hypothesis in pacific newly industrialized countries trade. Applied Economics, 31(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/000368499324408
  • Cosslett, T. L., & Cosslett, P. D. (2018). Sustainable development of rice and water resources in Mainland Southeast Asia and Mekong River Basin. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5613-0
  • Dal Bianco, A., Boatto, V. L., Caracciolo, F., & Santeramo, F. G. (2016). Tariffs and non-tariff frictions in the world wine trade. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 43(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbv008
  • Dascal, D., Mattas, K., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2002). An analysis of EU wine trade: A gravity model approach. International Advances in Economic Research, 8(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295344
  • Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2010). Aggregation versus Heterogeneity in cross-country growth empirics. CSAE working paper series 2010-32, Centre for the study of African economies. University of Oxford. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:adc43db1-daab-434a-9aea-ac149861d6a9
  • Fan, Z., Zhang, R., Liu, X., & Pan, L. (2016). China’s outward FDI efficiency along the Belt and Road: An application of stochastic frontier gravity model. China Agricultural Economic Review, 8(3), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/CAER-11-2015-0158
  • Filippini, C., & Molini, V. (2003). The determinants of East Asian trade flows: A gravity equation approach. Journal of Asian Economics, 14(5), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2003.10.001
  • Gashi, P., Hisarciklilar, M., & Pugh, G. (2016). Kosovo–EU trade relations: A dynamic panel poisson approach. Applied Economics, 49(27), 2642–2654. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1245836
  • Ghazalian, P. L., Tamini, L. D., Larue, B., & Gervais, J. P. (2012). A gravity model to account for vertical linkages between markets with an application to the cattle/beef sector. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 21(4), 579–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2010.505297
  • Gupta, S., & Kumar, N. (2020). Time varying dynamics of globalization effect in India. Portuguese Economic Journal, 22(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-020-00190-4
  • Haq, Z. U., Meilke, K., & Cranfield, J. (2013). Selection bias in a gravity model of agrifood trade. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 40(2), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbs028
  • Hasiner, E., & Yu, X. (2019). When institutions matter: A gravity model for Chinese meat imports. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(1), 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-11-2016-0290
  • Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352
  • Huot, N., & Kakinaka, M. (2007). Trade structure and trade flows in Cambodia: A gravity model. Asean Economic Bulletin, 24(3), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1353/ase.2008.0008/10.1355/ae24-3b
  • Hwang, C. W., & Lim, S. S. (2017). Effect of non-tariff measures on international tea trades. Journal of Korea Trade, 21(4), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKT-05-2017-0054
  • Igue, N. N., & Ogunleye, T. S. (2014). Impact of real exchange rate on trade balance in Nigeria. African Development Review, 26(2), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12086
  • Irshad, M. S., & Xin, Q. (2017). The gravity behind South Korea’s international trade: A panel data approach. The Myanmar Journal, 4(2), 76–89. http://www.komyra.com/doc/submission.php
  • Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., & Arshad, H. (2018a). Competitiveness of Pakistani rice in international market and export potential with global world: A panel gravity approach. Cogent Economics & Finance, 6(1), 1486690. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2018.1486690
  • Irshad, M. S., Xin, Q., Shahriar, S., & Arshad, H. (2018b). A panel data analysis of China’s trade pattern with OPEC members: Gravity model approach. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 8(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2018.81.103.116
  • Jemal, Abafita, & Tekilu, Tadesse. (2021). Determinants of global coffee trade: Do RTAs matter? Gravity model analysis. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1892925. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1892925
  • Jordaan, A. C., & Eita, J. H. (2012). Determinants of South Africa’s exports of leather products. Agrekon, 51(2), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.2012.695137
  • Kahouli, B. (2016). Regional integration agreements, trade flows and economic crisis: A static and dynamic gravity model. International Economic Journal, 30(4), 450–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2016.1204338
  • Khalid, M. W., Kayani, A. S., Alotaibi, J. M., Muddassir, M., Alotaibi, B. A., & Kassem, H. (2020). Regional trade and food security challenges: The case of SAARC countries. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská Ekonomika), 66(7), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.17221/3/2020-AGRICECON
  • Kumar, M. (2019). India’s rice export: What is in it for farmers? Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, 8(1–2), 136–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277976019851930
  • Lee, J. W., & Pyun, J. H. (2018). North Korea’s economic integration and growth potential. Asian Economic Journal, 32(3), 301–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/asej.12157
  • Lee, M., & Tcha, M. (2005). Pass-through elasticity, substitution and market share: The case for sheep meat exports. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 14(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638190500093380
  • Li, L., Sun, Z., & Long, X. (2019). An empirical analysis of night-time light data based on the gravity model. Applied Economics, 51(8), 797–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1523612
  • Lien, D., & Lo, M. (2017). Economic impacts of cultural institutes. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 64, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2017.02.002
  • Linder, S. B. (1961). An essay on trade and transformation (pp. 82–109). Almqvist & Wiksell. https://ex.hhs.se/dissertations/221624-FULLTEXT01.pdf
  • Liu, A., Lu, C., & Wang, Z. (2020). The roles of cultural and institutional distance in international trade: Evidence from China’s trade with the Belt and Road countries. China Economic Review, 61, 101234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.10.001
  • Marti, L., Puertas, R., & García, L. (2014). Relevance of trade facilitation in emerging countries’ exports. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 23(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2012.698639
  • Martin, W., & Pham, C. S. (2020). Estimating the gravity model when zero trade flows are frequent and economically determined. Applied Economics, 52(26), 2766–2779. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2019.1687838
  • Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Felicitas, N. L. D., & Horsewood, N. (2009). Are regional trading agreements beneficial? Static and dynamic panel gravity models. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 20(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2008.10.001
  • Martínez-Zarzoso, I., & Johannsen, F. (2017). The gravity of arms. Defence and Peace Economics, 30(1), 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2017.1324722
  • Matyas, L. (Ed.). (2017). The econometrics of multi-dimensional panels: Theory and applications. Series Vol. 50. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60783-2
  • McPherson, M. A., Redfearn, M. R., & Tieslau, M. A. (2000). A re-examination of the Linder hypothesis: A random-effects Tobit approach. International Economic Journal, 14(3), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168730000000032
  • Milner, C., & Mcgowan, D. (2013). Trade costs and trade composition. Economic Inquiry, 51(3), 1886–1902. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00496.x
  • Moscone, F., & Tosetti, E. (2009). “GMM estimation of spatial panels,” MPRA Paper 16327. University Library of Munich. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/16327
  • Moustafa Ismaiel, A. I., Zhou, D., Shawky Eladawy, R., El-Rasoul, A. A. E. Y. A., Tawfik Yousef Alkhateeb, T., Ali Ahmed Abdullah, T., & Mahmood, H. (2023). Determinants and potential of trade using the gravity model approach: Empirical evidence of Egyptian Rice Crop. Complexity, 2023, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4791707
  • Narayan, S., & Nguyen, T. T. (2016). Does the trade gravity model depend on trading partners? Some evidence from Vietnam and her 54 trading partners. International Review of Economics & Finance, 41, 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2015.08.010
  • Nasrullah, M., Chang, L., Khan, K., Rizwanullah, M., Zulfiqar, F., & Ishfaq, M. (2020). Determinants of forest product group trade by gravity model approach: A case study of China. Forest Policy and Economics, 113, 102117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102117
  • Natale, F., Borrello, A., & Motova, A. (2015). Analysis of the determinants of international seafood trade using a gravity model. Marine Policy, 60, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.05.016
  • Nazir, M. A., Shahriar, S., Kea, S., Abdullahi, A. M., Zhang, Q., & Huo, X. (2021). Nigeria’s cocoa exports: a gravity model approach. Ciência Rural, 51(11), e20201043. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20201043
  • Nguyen, B. X. (2010). The determinants of Vietnamese export flows: Static and dynamic panel gravity approaches. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(4), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v2n4p122
  • Nguyen, D. D. (2022). Determinants of Vietnam’s rice and coffee exports: Using stochastic frontier gravity model. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 29(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-05-2020-0054
  • Nguyen, H. T. M., Do, H., Kay, A., & Kompas, T. (2020). Rice policy in a transitional economy: Balancing the social and political objectives. Food Security, 12(3), 549–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-01005-x
  • Nikolche, Jankulovski, & Usama, Ehsan Khan. (2022). Asian Rice Exports and the European Demand: An Application of the Modified Panel Gravity Model. Journal of Agricultural Science, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v14n8p18
  • Nugroho, A. D., Bhagat, P. R., Magda, R., & Lakner, Z. (2021). The impacts of economic globalization on agricultural value added in developing countries. PloS One, 16(11), e0260043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260043
  • Olivero, M. P., & Yotov, Y. V. (2012). Dynamic gravity: Endogenous country size and asset accumulation. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D'économique, 45(1), 64–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2011.01687.x
  • Paudel, R. C., & Cooray, A. (2018). Export performance of developing countries: Does landlockedness matter? Review of Development Economics, 22(3), e36–e62. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12389
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240). http://repec.iza.org/dp1240.pdf
  • Popova, L., & Rasoulinezhad, E. (2016). Have sanctions modified Iran’s trade policy? An evidence of Asianization and De-Europeanization through the gravity model. Economies, 4(4), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies4040024
  • Poyhonen, P. (1963). A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90, 93–100. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40436776
  • Rafael, E. De Hoyos, & Vasilis, Sarafidis. (2006). Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. The Stata Journal, 6(4), 482–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0600600403
  • Rahman, R., Shahriar, S., & Kea, S. (2019). Determinants of exports: A gravity model analysis of the Bangladeshi textile and clothing industries. FIIB Business Review, 8(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319714519872643
  • Rasoulinezhad, E. (2017). China’s foreign trade policy with OPEC member countries. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 10(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCEFTS-09-2016-0027
  • Rasoulinezhad, E., & Kang, G. S. (2016). A panel data analysis of South Korea’s trade with OPEC member countries: The gravity model approach. Iranian Economic Review, 20(2), 203–224. https://ier.ut.ac.ir/article_58799_cdd6d2fcb5efb7932f0ce589c2a4f4f5.pdf
  • Rasoulinezhad, E., & Popova, L. (2017). An estimation of the impact of economic sanctions and oil price shocks on Iran-Russian trade: Evidence from a gravity-VEC approach. Iranian Economic Review, 21(3), 469–497. https://ier.ut.ac.ir/article_62926.
  • Rasoulinezhad, E., & Wei, W. (2017). China’s trade with OPEC member countries: A panel-gravity model approach. The Chinese Economy, 50(5), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10599231.2022.2065565
  • Rose, A. K., & Van Wincoop, E. (2001). National money as a barrier to international trade: The real case for currency union. American Economic Review, 91(2), 386–390. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.386
  • Santos Silva, J. M. C., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641–658. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641
  • Santos Silva, J. M. C., & Tenreyro, S. (2011). Further simulation evidence on the performance of the poisson pseudo-maximum likelihood estimator. Economics Letters, 112(2), 220–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.008
  • Saxena, R., Raman, M. S., Srivastava, S. K., Khan, A., & Kumar, R. (2023). Does India need a different rice ecosystem to harness the export advantages and manage the virtual water exports? Current Science, 124(4), 407–414. https://www.i-scholar.in/index.php/CURS/article/view/220935
  • Schierhorn, F., Meyfroidt, P., Kastner, T., Kuemmerle, T., Prishchepov, A. V., & Müller, D. (2016). The dynamics of beef trade between Brazil and Russia and their environmental implications. Global Food Security, 11, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.08.001
  • Semykina, A., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2013). Estimation of dynamic panel data models with sample selection. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 28(1), 47–61. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:japmet:v:28:y:2013:i:1:p:47-61 https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1266
  • Shahriar, S., Qian, L., & Kea, S. (2018). China’s economic integration with the Greater Mekong sub-region: An empirical analysis by a panel dynamic gravity model. Economics Discussion Paper, 44, 1–45. http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2018-44/file
  • Shaiara, H., & Shanjida, Y. (2015). Does the gravity model explain Bangladesh’s Direction of Trade? A panel data approach. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF), 6(3), 01–14. https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-06320114
  • Shepherd, B. (2019). Mega-regional trade agreements and Asia: An application of structural gravity to goods, services, and value chains. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 51, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2018.10.004
  • Soeng, R., & Cuyvers, L. (2018). Domestic institutions and export performance: Evidence for Cambodia. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 27(4), 389–408. https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/91af78/146048_2019_04_14.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2017.1386230
  • Sokvibol, Kea, Hua, Li, Saleh, Shahriar, Nazir, Muhammad Abdullahi, Samnang, Phoak, & Tharo, Touch. (2019). Factors Influencing Cambodian Rice Exports: An Application of the Dynamic Panel Gravity Model Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 1–22. 10.1080/1540496X.2019.1673724
  • Sreevidhya, K. S., & Elango, L. (2019). Temporal variation in export and import of virtual water through popular crop and livestock products by India. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 8, 468–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.01.002
  • Suman, J., Shekhawat, P. S., Kharkwal, S., & Verma, D. K. (2022). Growth instability and comparative advantage in export of Indian Rice. International Journal of Social Sciences, 11(4), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.46852/2249-6637.04.2022.3
  • Tamini, L. D., Doyon, M., & Simon, R. (2016). Analyzing trade liberalization effects in the egg sector using a dynamic gravity model. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne D'agroeconomie, 64(2), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12084
  • Thorbecke, W. (2015). China–US trade: A global outlier. Journal of Asian Economics, 40, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2015.09.001
  • Thuong, N. T. T. (2018). The effect of sanitary and phytosanitary measures on Vietnam’s rice exports. EconomiA, 19(2), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2017.12.001
  • Tinbergen, J. (1963). Shaping the world economy. The International Executive, 5(1), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.5060050113
  • Wang, J. (2016). Analysis of the factors influencing Japan’s soybean import trade: Based on gravity model. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 06(02), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2016.62011
  • Wei, G. X., Huang, J. K., & Jun, Y. (2012). Honey safety standards and its impacts on China’s honey export. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 11(4), 684–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60056-2
  • Xiong, B., & Chen, S. (2014). Estimating gravity equation models in the presence of sample selection and heteroscedasticity. Applied Economics, 46(24), 2993–3003. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.920481
  • Yadav, P. (2021). Globalization and India’s international trade: Does distance still matter? GeoJournal, 86(4), 1927–1941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10152-0
  • Zhou, L., Li, L., & Lei, L. (2019). Avian influenza, non-tariff measures and the poultry exports of China. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 63(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.12285