876
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General & Applied Economics

Assessing the effect of INSTC on India’s trade with Eurasia: an application of gravity model

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Article: 2313899 | Received 26 Jun 2023, Accepted 30 Jan 2024, Published online: 15 Feb 2024

References

  • Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.
  • Anderson, J. E., & Van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214
  • Azmi, S. N., & Akhtar, S. (2022). Interactions of services export, financial development and growth: evidence from India. Quality & Quantity, 57(5), 4709–4724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01566-8
  • Azmi, S. N., Khan, T., Azmi, W., & Azhar, N. (2023). A panel cointegration analysis of linkages between international trade and tourism: case of India and South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries. Quality & Quantity, 57, 5157–5176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01602-7
  • Beck, K. (2020). What drives international trade? Robust analysis for the European Union. Journal of International Studies, 13(3), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-3/5
  • Bergstrand, J. H. (1989). The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.2307/1928061
  • Deardorff, A. (1998). Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In The regionalization of the world economy (pp. 7–32). University of Chicago Press.
  • Divsallar, A. (2022). Shifting threats and strategic adjustment in Iran’s foreign policy: The case of Strait of Hormuz. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 49(5), 873–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2021.1874873
  • Evenett, S., J, &., & Keller, W. (2002). On theories explaining the success of the gravity equation. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 28128131628131610.1086/338746
  • Feenstra, R. C. (2015). Advanced international trade: theory and evidence. Princeton university press.
  • Feenstra, R. C., Markusen, J. R., & Rose, A. K. (2001). Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D'économique, 34(2), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/0008-4085.00082
  • Frankel, J. A., Stein, E., & Wei, S.-J. (1997). Regional trading blocs in the world economic system. Peterson Institute.
  • Gogna, S. (2019). Assessing India’s Engagements in the INSTC and Analysing its Implications on India’s Commercial and Strategic Interests. Strategic Analysis, 43(1), 1–12. 10.1080/09700161.2019.1573747
  • Grajewski, N. (2022). An illusory entente: The myth of a Russia-China-Iran “axis. Asian Affairs, 53(1), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2022.2029076
  • Guo, R. (2007). Linguistic and religious influences on foreign trade: Evidence from East Asia. Asian Economic Journal, 21(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8381.2007.00248.x
  • Hassan Khayat, S. (2019). A gravity model analysis for trade between the GCC and developed countries. Cogent Economics & Finance, 7(1), 1703440. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1703440
  • Huang, R., Nie, T., Zhu, Y., & Du, S. (2020). Forecasting trade potential between China and the five Central Asian countries: Under the background of belt and road initiative. Computational Economics, 55(4), 1233–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-019-09886-y
  • Huwaidin, M. B. (2022). China and India’s soft rivalry in the Gulf region. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 18(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19480881.2022.2054505
  • Jagdambe, S., & Kannan, E. (2020). Effects of ASEAN-India free trade agreement on agricultural trade: The gravity model approach. World Development Perspectives, 19, 100212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2020.100212
  • Jing, S., Zhihui, L., Jinhua, C., & Zhiyao, S. (2020). China’s renewable energy trade potential in the “Belt-and-Road” countries: A gravity model analysis. Renewable Energy, 161, 1025–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.134
  • Kabir, M., & Salim, R. (2016). Is trade in electrical and electronic products sensitive to IPR protection? Evidence from China’s exports. Applied Economics, 48(21), 1991–2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2015.1111990
  • Kabir, M., Salim, R., & Al-Mawali, N. (2017). The gravity model and trade flows: Recent developments in econometric modeling and empirical evidence. Economic Analysis and Policy, 56, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.08.005
  • Kavalski, E. (2019). The Puzzle of India’s Relations with “Central Eurasia. Asian Security, 15(3), 304–322. 10.1080/14799855.2018.1463990
  • Khan, Z., Khan, K. H., & Koch, H. (2023). Aggregating an economic model and GIS to explore trade potentials of India-Caspian countries and a way forward for INSTC. Research in Globalization, 7, 100154 10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100154
  • Khan, Kashif Hasan, Koch, Halil, Emerging Central Asia: Managing Great Power Relations, 1, BLUE DOME PRESS, United States, 2021
  • Khan, K. H., & Omidi, Ali (2023). China-India counterbalancing measures through international corridors and ports: The focus on Chabahar And Gwadar Ports. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 9(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2392171k
  • Kohl, T. (2014). Do we really know that trade agreements increase trade?. Review of World Economics, 150(3), 443–469. 10.1007/s10290-014-0188-3
  • Kuszewska, Agnieszka, Khan, Kashif Hasan, The Strategy of (Re) Connectivity: Revisiting India's Multifaceted Relations with Central Asia, The Significance of India's (Re) Connectivity Strategy in Central Asia: An Introduction, Khan, Kashif Hasan, KW Publishers, New Delhi, 2020, xiv, xxii, 1
  • Lewer, J. J., & Van den Berg, H. (2007). Religion and international trade: does the sharing of a religious culture facilitate the formation of trade networks? The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 66(4), 765–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.2007.00539.x
  • Lohani, K. K. (2020). Trade flow of India with BRICS countries: A gravity model approach. Global Business Review, 0(0) . https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920927684
  • Lypko, N. (2022). The gravity model of trade: The case of Central and Eastern Europe. LeXonomica, 14(2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.18690/lexonomica.14.2.187-212.2022
  • Meena, A. (2020). The Trade Game: Engaging with Central Asia. Asian Affairs, 51(3), 709–711. 10.1080/03068374.2020.1814530
  • Mohapatra, N. K. (2022). Geopolitics of ‘Imaginary Greater Eurasia’ and Russia’s dilemma of Asia-Pacific vs Indo-Pacific strategy: an analysis from India’s strategic perspective. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 18(2), 173–199. 10.1080/19480881.2022.2135075
  • Nathoo, R., Salim, R., Ancharaz, V., & Kabir, M. (2021). Does aid for trade diversify sub-Saharan Africa’s exports at the intensive and extensive margins? Applied Economics, 53(55), 6412–6425. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1940084
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2021). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Empirical Economics, 60(1), 13–50. 10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
  • Purushothaman, U., & Unnikrishnan, N. (2019). A tale of many roads: India’s approach to connectivity projects in Eurasia. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, 75(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928418821488
  • Shepotylo, O. (2009). Gravity with zeros: estimating trade potential of CIS countries. Kyiv School of Economics Discussion Papers. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1347997
  • Sohn, C.-H. (2005). DOES THE GRAVITY MODEL EXPLAIN SOUTH KOREA'S TRADE FLOWS?*. The Japanese Economic Review, 56(4), 417–430. 10.1111/j.1468-5876.2005.00338.x
  • Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy, The Twentieth Century Fund, New York.
  • Tochkov, K. (2018). Trade potential and trade integration of the Russian Far East: A regional perspective. Spatial Economics, 4, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.14530/se.2018.4.021-038
  • Nations, U. (2019). World Economic Situation and Prospects 2019. United Nations.