Mind the Gap(s)? Evidence and UK Policymaking on Human Trafficking and Modern Slavery

References

• Asquith, W., Kiconco, A., & Balch, A. (2022). A review of promising practices in the engagement of people with lived experience to address modern slavery and human trafficking. University of Liverpool and MS- PEC.
   Google Scholar
• Balch, A. (2021). ‘Consultation on the modern slavery PEC’s research priorities’ modern slavery and human rights policy and evidence centre. Bingham Centre, British Institute for International Comparative Law.
   Google Scholar
• Balch, A., & Geddes, A. (2011). Opportunity from crisis? Organisational responses to human trafficking in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 13(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00437.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, R., & Turnbull, N. (2019). From human trafficking to modern slavery: The development of anti-trafficking policy in the UK. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 25(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-018-9375-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, K., & Landman, T. (2020). Combatting human trafficking since Palermo: What do we know about what works? Journal of Human Trafficking, 6(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2020.1690097
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2021). The politics of policy analysis. Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Chuang, J.(2014). Exploitation creep and the unmaking of human trafficking law. The American Journal of International Law, 108(4), 609–649. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.4.0609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CPA. (2018). ‘Reducing modern slavery’, house of commons, committee of public accounts, thirty-sixth report of session 2017–19. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmpubacc/886/886.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eden, L., & Wagstaff, M. F. (2021). Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 gender equality. Journal of International Business Policy, 4(1), 28–57. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-020-00054-w
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., & Russell, J. (2009). Evidence-Based Policymaking: A Critique. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52(2), 304–318. Project MUSE. https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.0.0085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadorn, S., Sager, F., Mavrot, C., Malandrino, A., & Ege, J. (2022). Evidence-based policymaking in times of acute crisis: Comparing the use of scientific knowledge in Germany, Switzerland, and Italy. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 63(2), 359–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00382-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HOAI. (2020). Sovereign borders: International asylum comparisons report (section 1: Drivers and impact on asylum migration journeys)’. Migration and Border Analysis September 2020, Home Office Analysis and Insight. https://freemovement.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Annex-A-Sovereign-Borders-International-Asylum-Comparisons-Report-Section-1-Drivers-and-impact-on-asylum-migration-journeys.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Humpherson, E. (2022). ’Ed Humpherson to Jennifer Rubin: Use of National referral mechanism statistics’ letter published 8 December 2022 from the director general for regulation at the office For statistics regulation https://osr.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/correspondence/ed-humpherson-to-jennifer-rubin-use-of-national-referral-mechanism-statistics/
   Google Scholar
• IASC. (2022). ‘Independent anti-slavery commissioner, annual report 2021-2022’, presented to parliament pursuant to section 42 (10) (b) of the modern slavery Act 2015, April 2022. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1070482/E02718100_Un-num_Act_Independent_Anti-Slavery_Commission_Web_Accessible.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ICAI. (2020). ‘The UK’s approach to tackling modern slavery through the aid programme’, report published by the Independent Commission for aid Impact (ICAI), 14th October, https://icai.independent.gov.uk/review/the-uks-approach-to-tackling-modern-slavery-through-the-aid-programme
   Google Scholar
• Loff, B., & Sanghera, J. (2004). Distortions and difficulties in data for trafficking. Lancet, 363(9408), 566. Health Research Premium collection. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15548-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, W. F.(2014). Explaining the under-performance of the anti-human-trafficking campaign: Experience from the United States and europe. Crime, Law, & Social Change, 61, 125–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MS-PEC. (2021). ‘Strategic delivery plan’ modern slavery and human rights policy and evidence centre. Bingham Centre, British Institute for International Comparative Law (BIICL). https://modernslaverypec.org/assets/downloads/Modern-Slavery-PEC-Strategy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism, Cambridge. University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell Davidson, J. (2015). Modern slavery: The margins of freedom. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2022). Evidence, schmevidence: The abuse of the word “evidence” in policy discourse about education. Educational Review, 75(7), 1297–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2028735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. (2000). ’Protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons especially women and children, supplementing the United Nations convention against transnational organized crime’ United Nations General Assembly resolution 55/25. 15 November 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2020). Are universities left-wing bastions? The political orientation of professors, professionals, and managers in Europe. The British Journal of Sociology, 71(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, R. (2008). Government crime policy and moral contamination. Criminal Justice Matters, 72(1), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09627250802058565
   Google Scholar