Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews Advancing the Practice of School Psychology: The Imperative of Bringing Science to Practice

REFERENCES

• Abu Khalaf, N., Woolweaver, A. B., Marmolejos, R. R., Little, G. A., Burnett, K., & Espelage, D. L. (2023). The impact of Islamophobia on Muslim students: A systematic review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 52(2), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2075710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R. M., & Reynolds, M. R. (2020). Intelligence and adaptive behavior: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 49(2), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1717374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alperin, A., Reddy, L. A., Glover, T. A., Bronstein, B., Wiggs, N. B., & Dudek, C. M. (2023). School-based interventions for middle school students with disruptive behaviors: A systematic review of components and methodology. School Psychology Review, 52(2), 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1883996
   Google Scholar
• APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63(9), 839–851. https://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/jars.pdf
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, R., Hall, B. J., Doyle, J., & Waters, E. (2011). Cochrane Update. ‘Scoping the scope’ of a cochrane review. Journal of Public Health, 33(1), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (2020). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-02
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K., Cacioppo, J. T., Kaplan, R. M., Krosnick, J. A., & Olds, J. L. (2015). Social, Behavioral, and Economic sciences perspectives on robust and reliable science. Report of the subcommittee on replicability in Science Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences. National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/sbe/AC_Materials/SBE_Robust_and_Reliable_Research_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brann, K. L., Daniels, B., Chafouleas, S. M., & DiOrio, C. A. (2022). Usability of social, emotional, and behavioral assessments in schools: A systematic review from 2009 to 2019. School Psychology Review, 51(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1836518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Open Science. (2022). Open Science Framework (OSF). https://www.cos.io/
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, I., Hedges, L. V., & Cooper, H. (2002). A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 25(1), 12–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278702025001003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. J., Slemp, J., Reddy, L. A., Alperin, A., Lui, A., Austin, A., & Cedar, T. (2023). Characteristics and uses of SRL microanalysis across diverse contexts, tasks, and populations: A systematic review. School Psychology Review, 52(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1862627
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane. (2020, January 3). Evidence synthesis - What is it and why do we need it? Retrieved January 22, 2023, from https://www.cochrane.org/news/evidence-synthesis-what-it-and-why-do-we-need-it
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, K., Burns, M. K., Oyen, K., DeMarchena, S., & McCollom, E. M. (2022). Addressing chronic absenteeism in schools: A meta-analysis of evidence-based interventions. School Psychology Review, 51(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1789436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eklund, K., Kilpatrick, K. D., Kilgus, S. P., & Haider, A. (2018). A systematic review of state-level social–emotional learning standards: Implications for practice and research. School Psychology Review, 47(3), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017.0116.V47-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evidence for Policy and Practice Information (EPPI). (2019). History of systematic reviews. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Resources/EvidenceInformedPolicyandPractice/HistoryofSystematicReviews/tabid/68/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Grapin, S. L., Collier-Meek, M. A., January, S.-A. A., Yang, C., & Portillo, N. L. (2023). Reconceptualizing mentorship for the 21st century: A systematic mapping of research in school psychology. School Psychology Review, 52(2), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1910861
   Google Scholar
• Jimerson, S. R. (2001). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30(3), 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2001.12086124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavale, K. A. (1988). Using meta-analysis to answer the question: What are the important, manipulable influences on school learning? School Psychology Review, 17(4), 644–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1988.12085382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil, H., Ameen, D., & Zarnegar, A. (2022). Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: A scoping review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 144, 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King, H. C., Bloomfield, B. S., Wu, S., & Fischer, A. J. (2022). A systematic review of school teleconsultation: Implications for research and practice. School Psychology Review, 51(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1894478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinucci, A., Grové, C., & Allen, K.-A. (2023). A scoping review and analysis of mental health literacy interventions for children and youth. School Psychology Review, 52(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.2018918
   Google Scholar
• Methley, A. M., Campbell, S., Chew-Graham, C., McNally, R., & Cheraghi-Sohi, S. (2014). PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: A comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 579. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0579-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of School Psychologists. (2020). Model for comprehensive and integrated school psychological services: The NASP practice model. National Association of School Psychologists. https://www.nasponline.org/standards-and-certification/nasp-practice-model
   Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … McKenzie, J. E. (2020). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372: n160–36. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, K. (1904). Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. British Medical Journal, 2(2288), 1243–1246. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.2288.1243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2012.12087375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanin, J. R., Pigott, T. D., Espelage, D. L., & Grotpeter, J. K. (2019). Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large‐evidence systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(3), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. A., Akinyede, O., Dutta, T., Sawin, V. I., Li, T., Spencer, M. R., Turkelson, C. M., & Weston, C. (2013). Framework for determining research gaps during systematic review: Evaluation methods research report. Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice Center: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK126708/?report=reader#!po=12.5000
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society. (2018, September 19). Evidence synthesis for policy. https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/evidence-synthesis/
   Google Scholar
• Schnorrbusch, C., Fabiano, G. A., Aloe, A. M., & Toro Rodriguez, R. C. (2020). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and relative age: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 49(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1717368
   Google Scholar
• Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conduc­ting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and ­meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, T. D., & Doucouliagos, H. (2014). Meta-regression ­approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., & Malone, S. (1992). Social skills and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of the literature. School Psychology Review, 21(3), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1992.12085627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik, G. M., Dila, K. A. S., Mohamed, M. Y. F., Tam, D. N. H., Kien, N. D., Ahmed, A. M., & Huy, N. T. (2019). A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Tropical Medicine and Health, 47(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-019-0165-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ten Bokkel, I. M., Roorda, D. L., Maes, M., Verschueren, K., & Colpin, H. (2023). The role of affective teacher–student relationships in bullying and peer victimization: A multilevel meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 52(2), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2029218
   Google Scholar
• Torgal, C., Espelage, D. L., Polanin, J. R., Ingram, K. M., Robinson, L. E., El Sheikh, A. J., & Valido, A. (2023). A meta-analysis of school-based cyberbullying prevention programs’ impact on cyber-bystander behavior. School Psychology Review, 52(2), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1913037
   Google Scholar
• van Aert, R. C. M., Wicherts, J. M., & van Assen. M. A. (2019). Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 14(4), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215052
   Google Scholar
• Van Camp, A. M., Wehby, J. H., Martin, B. L. N., Wright, J. R., & Sutherland, K. S. (2020). Increasing opportunities to respond to intensify academic and behavioral interventions: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 49(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1717369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarreal, V., Castro-Villarreal, F., Peterson, L. S., Bear, M., Cortes, D. M., & Escobedo, T. (2023). Meta-analysis of proportions of students screened and identified in mental health multiple-gate screening research. School Psychology Review, 52(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2022.2106155
   Google Scholar
• Welch, V., Petticrew, M., Petkovic, J., Moher, D., Waters, E., White, H., & Tugwell, P. (2015). Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): Explanation and elaboration. International Journal for Equity in Health, 14, 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0219-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakszeski, B., & Rutherford, L. (2021). Mind the gap: A systematic review of research on restorative practices in schools. School Psychology Review, 50(2–3), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1852056
   Google Scholar