Towards an understanding of global ‘private ordering’ in ICANN: text mining 23 years of Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) Decisions

References

• Above.com. n.d. “Above.Com Domain Investment Platform.” Above.com. https://www.above.com/.
   Google Scholar
• ACDR. n.d. “ACDR Cases.” ACDR. http://acdr.aipmas.org/page.aspx?page_key = ACDR%20Cases.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Yochai. 2000. “An Unhurried View of Private Ordering in Information Transactions.” Vanderbilt Law Review 53 (6): 2063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, Ryan. 2023. “How Massive The NFL Really Is, In 4 Charts.” FiveThirtyEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-massive-the-nfl-really-is-in-4-charts/.
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, Jan, and Bart Kerremans. 2012. “Domestic Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Multilevel Venue Shopping in Four EU Member States.” Governance 25 (2): 263–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01551.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, Joe, and Clare Lain. 2020. “Desecuritising Cybersecurity: Towards a Societal Approach.” Journal of Cyber Policy 5 (3): 449–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2020.1856903.
   Google Scholar
• CIIDRC. n.d. “Decisions.” CIIDRC. https://ciidrc.org/domain-name-disputes/ciidrc-decisions/.
   Google Scholar
• Cogburn, Derrick L. 2016. “Why Govern Cyberspace and Social Media.” In Why Govern? Rethinking Demand and Progress in Global Governance, edited by Amitav Acharya, 252–271. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cogburn, Derrick L. 2017. Transnational Advocacy Networks in the Information Society: Partners or Pawns? New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Computer Security Resource Center. n.d. “Phishing – Glossary.” NIST. https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/phishing.
   Google Scholar
• Contreras, Jorge L. 2017. “From Private Ordering to Public Law: The Legal Frameworks Governing Standards-Essential Patents.” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 30:211. https://ssrn.com/abstract = 2907472.
   Google Scholar
• Cowhey, Peter F. 1990. “The International Telecommunications Regime: The Political Roots of Regimes for High Technology.” International Organization 44 (2): 169–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300035244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, Deb, and Justin Sherman. 2018. “Gaps in United States Federal Government IoT Security and Privacy Policies.” Journal of Cyber Policy 3 (2): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2018.1514061.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, Melvin Aron. 1976. “Private Ordering Through Negotiation: Dispute-Settlement and Rulemaking.” Harvard Law Review 89 (4): 637–681. https://doi.org/10.2307/1340217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Electronic Commerce Europe, European ISP Association, Information Technology Association of America, International Chamber of Commerce, International Council of Registrars, International Trademark Association, Internet Society, Policy Oversight Committee, World Information Technology and Services Alliance, and American Intellectual Property Law Association. 1999. “DNSO Letter.” ICANN. https://archive.icann.org/en/dnso/dnso-letter1.html.
   Google Scholar
• Elkin-Koren, Niva. 2005. “What Contracts Cannot Do: The Limits of Private Ordering in Facilitating a Creative Commons.” Fordham Law Review 74 (2): 375–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, Chad D. 2004. “Wasting Time in Cyberspace: The UDRP’s Inefficient Approach Toward Arbitrating Internet Domain Name Disputes.” University of Baltimore Law Review 34 (2): 161.
   Google Scholar
• Falco, Gregory, Alicia Noriega, and Lawrence Susskind. 2019. “Cyber Negotiation: A Cyber Risk Management Approach to Defend Urban Critical Infrastructure from Cyberattacks.” Journal of Cyber Policy 4 (1): 90–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2019.1586969.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, Diego, and Sydney Kokjohn. 2017. “Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) – What It Is and When to Use It.” JD Supra. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/uniform-domain-name-dispute-resolution-87733/.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Google. n.d. “GitHub – Google/Cld3.” GitHub. https://github.com/google/cld3.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Jeanette. 2016. “Multi-Stakeholderism in Internet Governance: Putting a Fiction into Practice.” Journal of Cyber Policy 1 (1): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2016.1158303.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Lucas. 2021. “Fake Websites Used in COVID-19 Themed Phishing Attacks, Impersonating Brands Like Pfizer and BioNTech.” Unit 42 (Blog). https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/covid-19-themed-phishing-attacks/.
   Google Scholar
• ICANN. 1999. “ICANN Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution.” ICANN. https://archive.icann.org/en/udrp/udrp-policy-24oct99.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ICANN. 2000. “Management of Internet Names and Addresses.” ICANN. https://www.icann.org/resources/unthemed-pages/white-paper-2012-02-25-en.
   Google Scholar
• ICANN. 2012. “List of Approved Dispute Resolution Service Providers.” ICANN. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/providers-6d-2012-02-25-en.
   Google Scholar
• ICANN. 2015. “Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the ‘Rules’) – ICANN.” ICANN. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/udrp-rules-2015-03-11-en.
   Google Scholar
• ICANN. 2022. “Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Status Report.” ICANN. https://itp.cdn.icann.org/en/files/consensus-policy/udrp-policy-status-report-03-03-2022-03-03-2022-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ICANN. n.d. “The IANA Stewardship Transition: What You Need to Know.” ICANN. https://www.icann.org/iana-transition-fact-sheet.
   Google Scholar
• Insurance Information Institute. 2023. “Facts + Statistics: Insurance Company Rankings.” Insurance Information Institute. https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-insurance-company-rankings.
   Google Scholar
• Internet Society. 2022. “IANA Transition – Internet Society.” Internet Society. https://www.internetsociety.org/iana-transition/#:~:text = The%20IANA%20stewardship%20transition%20completed,forth%20nearly%2020%20years%20ago.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, Doug. 2017. “When a Domain Name Dispute Is ‘Plan B’.” GigaLaw. https://giga.law/blog/2017/8/2/domain-name-dispute-plan-b.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, Doug. 2020. “UDRP Case Study: Telstra v. Nuclear Marshmallows and the Passive Holding Doctrine.” GigaLaw. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v = m6g9hACIoNY.
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, Doug. 2022. “What Happens After a UDRP Decision?” GigaLaw. https://giga.law/blog/2022/7/28/after-udrp.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Avery. 1996. “Taking Private Ordering Seriously.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144 (5): 1745–1763. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, Patrick D. 2002. “Emerging Patterns in Arbitration Under the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 17 (1): 181–204.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O, and Joseph S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Hans. 2002. “ICANN and Internet Governance: Leveraging Technical Coordination to Realize Global Public Policy.” The Information Society 18 (3): 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290074959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Hans. 2004. “Private Governance for Global Communications: Technology, Contracts, and the Internet.” In The Emergent Global Information Policy Regime, edited by Sandra Braman. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230377684_9.
   Google Scholar
• Komaitis, Konstantinos. 2005. “Pandora’s Box Is Finally Opened: The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Process and Arbitration.” International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 19 (1): 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860500051697.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, Stephen D. 1982. “International Regimes [Principles, Norms, Rules and Decision-Making Procedures Around Which Actor Expectations Converge in a Given Issue-Area].” International Organization 36 (2): 185–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuerbis, Brenden, and Milton Mueller. 2017. “Internet Routing Registries, Data Governance, and Security.” Journal of Cyber Policy 2 (1): 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2017.1295092.
   Google Scholar
• Kulikova, Alexandra. 2021. “Cyber Norms: Technical Extensions and Technological Challenges.” Journal of Cyber Policy 6 (3): 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2021.2020316.
   Google Scholar
• Kur, Annette. 1998. “The Domain Name Versus Trade Mark Dilemma.” Internet Archive. https://web.archive.org/web/20060425164811/http://www.intellecprop.mpg.de/Online-Publikationen/Kur-DomainNamevsTrademarkDilemma.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Lazanski, Dominique. 2019. “Governance in International Technical Standards-Making: A Tripartite Model.” Journal of Cyber Policy 4 (3): 362–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2019.1696851.
   Google Scholar
• Loutocký, Pavel. 2015. “Are We Getting Good Decisions by Top-Level Domain Name Dispute Resolution Providers?” Masaryk University Journal of Law and Technology 9 (1): 111–128. https://doi.org/10.5817/MUJLT2015-1-7.
   Google Scholar
• Lovells, Hogan. 2017. “Complainant’s Case Fails to Stick in UDRP Decision.” World Trademark Review. https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/article/complainants-case-fails-stick-in-udrp-decision.
   Google Scholar
• Macey, Jonathan R. 1997. “Public and Private Ordering and the Production of Legitimate and Illegitimate Legal Rules.” Cornell Law Review 82 (5): 1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Microsoft. n.d. “What Is Typosquatting?” Microsoft. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/what-is-typosquatting-54a18872-8459-4d47-b3e3-d84d9a362eb0.
   Google Scholar
• Milhaupt, Curtis J., and Mark D. West. 2000. “The Dark Side of Private Ordering: An Institutional and Empirical Analysis of Organized Crime.” The University of Chicago Law Review 67 (1): 41–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1600326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, Harriet. 2021. “The Vital Role of International Law in the Framework for Responsible State Behaviour in Cyberspace.” Journal of Cyber Policy 6 (3): 394–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2020.1832550.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, Milton. 1999. “ICANN and Internet Governance: Sorting Through the Debris of ‘Self-Regulation’.” Info 1 (6): 497–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636699910801223.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, Milton. 2001. “Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of ICANN’s Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy.” The Information Society 17 (3): 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240119769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAIC. 2023. “NAIC Releases 2022 Market Share Data.” NAIC. https://content.naic.org/article/naic-releases-2022-market-share-data.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama, Bryan James. 2022. “Information vs the Cyberspace Domain.” Journal of Cyber Policy 7 (2): 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2022.2083976.
   Google Scholar
• National Arbitration Forum. 2016. “Claim Number. FA1606001677457: The Toronto-Dominion Bank v. Carlo Mormina.” National Arbitration Forum. https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/1677457.htm.
   Google Scholar
• National Arbitration Forum. 2022a. “Claim Number. FA2208002009134: Theseus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Neil Schaye / Theseus Pharmaceutical.” National Arbitration Forum. https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/2009134.htm.
   Google Scholar
• National Arbitration Forum. 2022b. “Claim Number. FA2202001984731: Damijan Tuscana/Medellin Living, LLC v. Brad Hinkelman.” National Arbitration Forum. https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/1984731.htm.
   Google Scholar
• National Arbitration Forum. 2022c. “Claim Number. FA2208002009715: Bloomberg L.P. v. Privacy Service Provided by Withheld for Privacy Ehf.” National Arbitration Forum. https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/2009715D.htm.
   Google Scholar
• National Arbitration Forum. 2022d. “Claim Number. FA2208002007801: United Services Automobile Association v. Harris Claims Service.” National Arbitration Forum. https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/2007801.htm.
   Google Scholar
• National Arbitration Forum. 2022e. “Claim Number. FA2304002040469: Come and See Foundation, Inc. v. Nanci Nette.” National Arbitration Forum. https://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/2040469.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, Ben. 2012. “Constitutional Internationalization of ICANN’s UDRP.” Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 29 (1): 137.
   Google Scholar
• NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration). 1998. “Statement of Policy on the Management of Internet Names and Addresses.” National Telecommunications and Information Administration. https://www.ntia.gov/federal-register-notice/statement-policy-management-internet-names-and-addresses.
   Google Scholar
• NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration). 2016. “Fact Sheet: The IANA Stewardship Transition Explained.” National Telecommunications and Information Administration. https://www.ntia.gov/other-publication/fact-sheet-iana-stewardship-transition-explained.
   Google Scholar
• Ooms, Jeroen. 2023. “Google’s Compact Language Detector 3 [R Package Cld3 Version 1.5.0].” CRAN R Project. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/cld3/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pralle, Sarah B. 2003. “Venue Shopping, Political Strategy, and Policy Change: The Internationalization of Canadian Forest Advocacy.” Journal of Public Policy 23 (3): 233–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X03003118.
   Google Scholar
• Publications Office of the European Union. 2018. “Comparative Case Study on Alternative Resolution Systems for Domain Name Disputes.” Publications Office of the EU. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/246c97e0-300f-11e9-8d04-01aa75ed71a1.
   Google Scholar
• Publications Office of the European Union. 2021. “Domain Names – Discussion Paper.” Publications Office of the EU. https://euipo.europa.eu/tunnel-web/secure/webdav/guest/document_library/observatory/documents/reports/2021_Discussion_Paper_on_Domain_Names/2021_Discussion_Paper_on_Domain_Names_FullR_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Radin, Margaret Jane, and R. Polk Wagner. 1998. “The Myth of Private Ordering: Rediscovering Legal Realism in Cyberspace.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 73 (4): 1295.
   Google Scholar
• Richman, Barak D. 2004. “Firms, Courts, and Reputation Mechanisms: Towards a Positive Theory of Private Ordering.” Columbia Law Review 104 (8): 2328–2368. https://doi.org/10.2307/4099361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahel, Jean-Jacques. 2016. “Multi-Stakeholder Governance: A Necessity and a Challenge for Global Governance in the Twenty-First Century.” Journal of Cyber Policy 1 (2): 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2016.1241812.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, Jeffrey M., and Linda B. Samuels. 2003. “Internet Domain Names: The Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy.” American Business Law Journal 40 (4): 885–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.2003.tb00312.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saptiochne, Joshua, and James M. Smith. 2012. “Venue Shopping and the Politics of Urban Development: Lessons from Chicago and Seattle.” Urban Affairs Review 48 (1): 86–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087411420373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarcz, Steven L. 2002. “Private Ordering.” Northwestern University Law Review 97 (1): 319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Geoff. 2023. “What Is Domain Parking and How Can It Make You Money?” GoDaddy Blog. https://www.godaddy.com/garage/what-is-domain-parking/.
   Google Scholar
• Sevier, Charter. 2017. “Topic Modeling/LDA Tutorial.” RPubs. https://rpubs.com/wsevier/LDA.
   Google Scholar
• Sharrock, Lisa M. 2001. “The Future of Domain Name Dispute Resolution: Crafting Practical International Legal Solutions from Within the UDRP Framework.” Duke Law Journal 51 (2): 817–849. https://doi.org/10.2307/1373211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silge, Julia. 2018. “Training, Evaluating, and Interpreting Topic Models.” Juliasilege.com (Data Science Blog). https://juliasilge.com/blog/evaluating-stm/.
   Google Scholar
• Sorkin, David E. 2002. “Judicial Review of ICANN Domain Name Dispute Decisions.” Santa Clara Computer and High-Technology Law Journal 18 (1): 35.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, Colby B. 2001. “Master of the Domain : A History of Domain Name Litigation and the Emergence of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy.” Santa Clara Computer and High-Technology Law Journal 17 (2): 315.
   Google Scholar
• Strickling, Lawrence E., and Jonah Force Hill. 2017. “Multi-Stakeholder Internet Governance: Successes and Opportunities.” Journal of Cyber Policy 2 (3): 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2017.1404619.
   Google Scholar
• UDRP. 1999. “Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy.” UDRP. https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-2012-02-25-en.
   Google Scholar
• VeriSign Inc. 2022. “Verisign Archived Domain Name Industry Brief (DNIB) Reports.” VeriSign Inc. https://www.verisign.com/assets/domain-name-report-infographic-Q22022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, Jonathan. 2000. “ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy.” Duke Law Journal 50 (1): 187–260. https://doi.org/10.2307/1373114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, Oliver E. 2002. “The Lens of Contract: Private Ordering.” The American Economic Review 92 (2): 438–443. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320191769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WIPO. 1999. “WIPO Internet Domain Name Process: Final Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process.” WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/processes/process1/report/finalreport.html.
   Google Scholar
• WIPO. 2017. “WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition, (‘WIPO Jurisprudential Overview 3.0’).” WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/overview3.0/index.html#item1a.
   Google Scholar
• WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. 2006. “Case No. D2006-0523: Gaylord Entertainment Company v. Nevis Domains LLC.” WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2006/d2006-0523.html.
   Google Scholar
• WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. 2010. “Case No. D2009-1661: Inter-Continental Hotels Corporation, Six Continents Hotels, Inc. v. Daniel Kirchhof.” WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-1661.html.
   Google Scholar
• WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. 2021. “Case No. D2021-0886: Reboxed Limited v. Adesoji Adeyemi.” WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case = D2021-0886.
   Google Scholar
• WIPO. n.d.(a). “First WIPO Internet Domain Name Process: Archive.” WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/processes/process1/report/annex/annex01.html.
   Google Scholar
• WIPO. n.d.(b). “First WIPO Internet Domain Name Process: Archive.” WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/processes/process1/report/annex/annex02.html.
   Google Scholar
• Woodard, Elizabeth C. 2009. “The UDRP, ADR, and Arbitration: Using Proven Solutions to Address Perceived Problems with the UDRP.” Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 19 (4): 1169.
   Google Scholar
• World Trademark Review. 2021. “UDRP First Element: One Letter Difference, but Not Confusingly Similar.” World Trademark Review. https://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/article/udrp-first-element-one-letter-difference-not-confusingly-similar.
   Google Scholar
• Zalnieriute, Monika. 2020. “Beyond the Governance Gap in International Domain Name Law: Bringing the UDRP in Line with Internationally Recognized Human Rights.” Stanford Journal of International Law 56 (1): 79–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar